Quasars

Conventional theories are mostly mystified by the objects now known as quasars. The name quasar, was shortened from the original mouthful, quasi-stellar radio objects.

The first quasar was detected by the output of energy in the radio band. This radio energy was later found to be extremely red-shifted light. The spectral patterns from the elements measured suggested that some quasars were red shifted by at least 90%. The quasi part referred to the seemingly star-like nature of the object, even though the frequency of the energy output from the quasars was shifted way-down into the radio band.

Conventional theories ascribe to these quasars the honor of being the brightest objects in the sky. This conclusion was based on the measure of the redshift (up to 90%), and the Hubble constant. The Hubble constant states that the farther some object is from us, the faster it recedes. By virtue of their 70%-90% recessional velocity, the various quasars have been proportionally assigned an age and distance rating anywhere from 1 billion to 10 billion years old, and the same distance away in light years.

If these age and distance calculations are correct, then the relatively dim appearance of these "stars" is even more spectacular, considering the enormous distances involved.

Astronomers and cosmologists startlingly concluded that these little objects, less than one light year in diameter1, outshine all the billions of stars in any nearby galaxy. This conclusion provides the quasar with the reputation of a most inexplicable energy output.

Conventional theories turned to several alternatives.

• One alternative explanation is that the quasar represents a White-Hole; the other end, if you will, of a black hole. What matter and energy goes into a black hole, somewhere; comes out at the quasar, somewhere else.
• Another possibility mentioned is that the quasar represents a recurrence of some of the starting conditions left over from the Big-Bang. Present theories lack the proper understanding to account for these objects. The snag seems to be that the initially predicted smoothness of the Big-Bang leaves matter too energetic, and too smooth to collect and concentrate in such obvious lumps as quasars.
• Some theories suggest that the quasars represent something like a miniature version of the Big-Bang. While not exactly accepting the same reasons that conventional theories would use, the C-R theory suggests that this scenario is probably the closest to reality.

Using the C-R theory to explain away quasars.

One of the nicest benefits accruing from the C-R theory is that: from the nova, to the supernova, to the quasar, to the ultimate: the Big Bang itself; only an increase in the magnitude of the event is required. We might imagine a quasar as an earlier phenomenon, cosmologically, than a supernova. The quasar would shine with a more intense illumination, and with a greater amount of matter and energy released. One could reasonably imagine the young quasars acting as the fountain-like source of the materials for the later stage of cosmological evolution; the building-up of galaxies and star clusters.

The quasars would merely be releasing extra quantities of matter and energy trapped from the original big-bang. These quasars could be viewed as miniature Big-Bangs, occurring later than the original source Big-Bang.

The real-time inactivation properties of the Neutral-Zone can be put to work in no better way than to explain the energy- and ion- rich conditions of pre-creation.

By the C-R theory: matter which has been swallowed by a Black-Hole will be time-inactivated, then held in the portion of the Black-Hole which we call the Neutral-Zone. This matter will consist mainly of protons and neutrons, with some trapped energy, neutrinos, and misc. cosmic "driftwood" unlucky enough to get caught.

A simple disturbance will suffice to trigger the re-activation of the contents of a Neutral-Zone. Once this occurs; matter which has been, in essence, held in a paralyzed position, is once again allowed to experience real-life adventures.

The protons, sensing a bit too much overcrowding for their newly re-awakened sensibilities, mutually push and repel each other from the vicinity of the release-site with all of the electrostatic energy each proton can muster. Some of the lower dwelling denizens of the mass-pile, as well as some of the gravitationally de-energized neutrons may well be content or condemned to spend a considerably longer time squished together. This blob of dense neutrons may well serve as the nucleus of another Black-Hole2.