Gravity (The C-R theory view)

We basically agreed with Einstein's original thoughts on gravity. Where we differed is that we did not attempt to reconcile gravity to other forces, using hypothetical particles called gravitons.

We could state that gravity is what appears to be the "force" attracting larger massive objects together. The C-R theory predicts that gravity is actually a side-effect, caused by the deactivation of real-time.

By the C-R theory, gravity results from the squeezing, bending, or warping of the real-time activity of any packet, or quanta of matter-energy, causing the energy expressed as real-time activity to decrease. All objects will seek their minimum energy level. In the case of masses, their absolute minimum energy level could only occur at a NO REAL TIME situation. This situation can only occur inside the Schwarzschild radius in the Neutral-Zone of a Black-Hole. (The Schwarzschild radius starts where the escape velocity reaches the speed of light. Anything trapped between the inner and outer Schwarzschild radii, {in the Neutral-Zone}, is suspected to be impervious, and unaffected by any and all time.)

The appearance of the "force" of gravity occurs whenever any mass successfully bends, warps or pushes another mass into or towards a less time active state. In a direct exchange for the energy loss expressed in active time, the mass gains an exactly equivalent amount of kinetic energy (speed). The kinetic energy can be exchanged for heat or light energy by friction or intra-molecular collisions.

The speed of light, squared, times the mass, times the change in real-time1. (as measured by a distant observer) will yield the portion of the total energy released.

Since the energy is released in proportion to whatever the mass of the object times the E=mc2 times the proportional time loss, one can see that the amount of kinetic energy gained, is not dependent on the mass. The amount of curvature, or bending of time (which can be figured by the amount of time lost per unit of time) will be the only influence on the rate of acceleration, and on the kinetic energy which the mass can acquire.

One of the biggest differences between this description of gravity, and the conventional description of gravity is that the C-R theory clearly does away with the possibility of the collapse of any mass into a singularity. Since the mass can only continue to be subject to the gravitational curvature or gravitational collapse while some real-time exists to de-activate; once the real time has decreased to zero, no further acceleration, or collapse is possible.

This simple explanation for the elimination of the gravitational "singularity" represents a possible triumph for the C-R theory, hopefully equalling the triumph of the Quantum Mechanical theory over Classical Physics.

The quantum theory proposed that there was a minimum energy orbital for an electron. At that orbit, the electron could not radiate away or surrender any further amount of energy. The problem encountered by the classical theory was the false assumption which postulated that the constantly moving electron would continually lose or radiate away2 all of it's energy until the electron collapsed entirely into the proton.

In a similar manner, the C-R theory forecasts that the minimum gravitational energy for any particle must occur when no active real-time remains. Note from our quantum based analogy that the hydrogen atom still possessed energy at the temperature of absolute zero. The hydrogen atom was forbidden from radiating that remaining energy away since either expanding or collapsing the electron's orbital added energy to the atom.

At absolute zero real-time the de-activated particle (hydrogen will do nicely), will still possess some energy. This atom will be totally uncoupled from the external world, and totally unresponsive to any outside stimulus as long as it remains in a zero-real-time condition. From any interactive standpoint, other than still contributing geometrically to the total gravitational curvature, the particle behaves as if it were neutral. This is why the C-R theory calls the Zone in which this occurs the Neutral-Zone.

Another big difference in the C-R theory vs the classical gravitational theory is in the predicted behavior of a mass in a non-increasing gravitational curvature. One possible example: Consider a well shaft that would be drilled clear through the entire diameter of some asteroid or moon.

Try releasing a ball at the top of this well-shaft. As long as the density of the materials forming the asteroid or moon was fairly constant with depth, the C-R theory would predict that the ball would not fall down into the shaft. The C-R theory predicts that the ball would eventually come to rest wherever the gravitational curvature was the greatest. By the pre-conditions, this could only be at the top of the shaft.

Conventional gravitational theory3. would predict that a ball dropped into such a shaft would eventually come to rest only at the center of the object. At that location, the net gravitational curvature would be zero. However, the active time-domain energy at this point would be greater than at the well-top on the surface, where the gravitational curvature would be the greatest.

Note: Above the surface of any object, both gravitational theories would make essentially the same predictions, unless the gravitational field strength approached or exceeded the amount needed to form a Black-Hole.