Expanding Universe

Conventional theories of the universe point out the red-shift of distant objects as the total proof of the expansion of the universe. The universe is surmised to be expanding in line with the Hubble constant, which states that, as the distance from the earth is doubled, the expansion is doubled also.

The outer edges of the universe, with their enormous red-shifts, are thought to be receding from the earth at speeds up to 95% (or even more) of the speed of light. Unfortunately, the common theories have no explanation for the cause of the expansion. Even more so, they haven't any idea whether the expansion will continue, or accelerate, or slow-down, or stop and reverse.

The C-R theory does not contend with the hypothesis that, if the velocities are truly speeding away at these speeds, that the red-shifts would be correct. What the C-R theory contends with is, there may be another explanation. This explanation may single-handedly account for all of the red-shifts, or it may allow some portion of recession generated red-shifts to add-on in combination.

The C-R theory suggests that gravitational curvature, and the resulting slow-down, may account for most, if not all of the red-shifts encountered. As the curvature becomes more total, and more complete, the matter and energy are progressively time-inactivated. The gravity works essentially by bending the matter into a non-active state.

The time slowdown produced by gravity is an already known, although seldom appreciated phenomenon. On earth, the slowdown from earths gravity is exceedingly small. An atomic clock will detect the differences. For an atomic clock flown at an average of 30,000 feet above the surface of the earth for about 6 hours, the net gain in time was about 53 billionths of a second. (The time difference due to the speed of the airplane had been removed from that figure.)

At the outer edge of the universe, the curvature would be 100% complete if this universe was the inside of a giant active zone. While this is not necessarily the case, the coincidence that almost exactly this curvature is observed (within 5% of total de-activation.) should be taken to be significant.

The C-R theory thus predicts that almost all of the observed red-shift is due to the natural conditions at the edge of the universe, and not necessarily at all due to the rapid recession of the contents of the universe. One of the most unexpected events, if this is true, is what happens to the likelihood for a collapse.

If the matter at the edge of the universe is time-de-activated, it follows that it is already at a lower energy level than matter residing closer to the center of the universe. It follows that, the matter at the outer edge will not only resist collapse into the center, but will actually need an energy input in order to approach the center of the universe. In brief, the gravitational field would tend to attract matter outward, and make it fall "up", in order to bring matter to a lower energy level.

Another consequence of this is: objects at the edge of the universe not only look younger, time wise, but they actually are younger, even now. The rate of time is so much slower out there, than many objects may only now be undergoing the type of reactions we had assumed that all such matter underwent billions of years ago.

The edge of the universe may not just appear to be younger, but may be a real-time (but super-slowed motion) museum quality exhibit showing how the inner universe really was many years ago.

Notice: When conventional theories describe the outer universe, all kinds of weird explanations must be invoked to explain why the red-shifts appear to be so huge. In contrast, the C-R theory explanation for the appearance is a natural occurrence resulting from only one requirement. C-R suggests that our universe is (NOW!!) the active portion inside a universe-sized (C-R type) Black-Hole.