| Draft Environmental Impact Statement Shorts School Road Am Antenna Structures 60 Viewpoint 17 The visual impacts under Alternative II would be similar to those under the Preferred Alternative from Viewpoint 17 (Figure A.17). However, because in Alternative II the number of antennas would be reduced, the vividness, intactness, and unity ratings would be slightly better than those ratings under the Preferred Alternative. Lighting impacts from the 349-foot antenna would not differ between alternatives. Final Adjusted Visual Quality Rating: 4.0 (down from 5.9) Viewpoint 18 The visual impacts under Alternative II would be similar to those under the Preferred Alternative from Viewpoint 18 (Figure A.18). However, because in Alternative II the number of antennas would be reduced, the vividness, intactness, and unity ratings would be slightly better than those ratings under the Preferred Alternative. Lighting impacts from the 349-foot antenna would not differ between alternatives. Final Adjusted Visual Quality Rating: 5.2 (down from 6.4) Viewpoint 19 The visual impacts under Alternative II would be similar to those under the Preferred Alternative from Viewpoint 19 (Figure A.19). However, because in Alternative II the number of antennas would be reduced, the vividness, intactness, and unity ratings would be slightly better than those ratings under the Preferred Alternative. Lighting impacts from the 349-foot antenna would not differ between alternatives. Final Adjusted Visual Quality Rating: 6.6 (down from 7.0) |