Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Shorts School Road Am Antenna Structures 75

The potential for viewing the antennas from multiple viewpoints in a continuous time sequence
is therefore not expected to result in cumulative impacts.

No cumulative effects are noted with regards to lighting due to this project. Only the single tall
antenna that is a part of both alternatives is required to be lit. However, the FAA has issued a No
Hazard Determination for one of the two communication towers on Devil�s Butte requiring that
red hazard lights be placed on it, although to date that has not happened. With either alternative,
nighttime red lights will be visible from the proposed 349 foot antenna as well as the tower on
Devil�s Butte.

4.2 Land Use and Shorelines

The proposed action would not result in significant direct or indirect land use or shorelines
impacts. The proposed action would remove 4,500 square feet of agricultural land from
production, and be constructed within the FEMA 100-year flood plain. Other direct impacts
would be temporary construction related impacts, such the operation of heavy machinery,
preparation of the site for construction, construction traffic, and noise. These direct impacts can
be mitigated. The proposed action would not increase or add traffic to local roadways.

Indirect impacts are caused by the action but may occur later in time or are farther removed in
distance, but still reasonably foreseeable. Indirect effects may include growth inducing effects
and other effects related to induced changes in the pattern of land use, population density, or
growth rate. The proposed action would not significantly change land use patterns. The site
would only remove 4,500 square feet of agricultural land from production, but allows the rest of
the site to continue to be cultivated. Furthermore, the proposed action would not increase
existing population density for the area, nor would it increase traffic congestion.

The site and surrounding area has historically been used as rural agricultural land, and the
proposed action would not significantly change land use or shorelines patterns. It is conceivable
that sometime in the future the surrounding land could shift from rural agricultural uses to rural
residential. However, the area currently does not have the infrastructure to support residential
development of that nature, nor is it currently zoned for such development. Based on
insignificant land use changes associated with the proposed action, and it�s compatibility with
the goals, policies, regulations and Shoreline Master Program, the project does not have the
potential for cumulative impacts on land use or shorelines.
<<Prev                                                       Home                                                          Next>>

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51

52 53 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71

95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107

Pages 72-94 are photos
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1