| Appendix A Engineering Report: Site Selection Rationale for New KRKO Facility, Hatfield & Dawson, July 26, 2001 Appendix B Environmental Assessment: KRKO-AM, S-R Broadcasting, Co., Inc., Master Planned Antenna Site, Snohomish, Washington, Excerpt pgs. 11 �17, Site Selection Process, LSI ADAPT, July 28, 2001 Appendix C Snohomish County Council, Snohomish, Washington, Motion 03-130, February 26, 2003 (Decision for the Conditional Use permit and Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit) Appendix D Decision of the Deputy Hearing Examiner, File No. 00-107495, S-R Broadcasting Co., Inc., July 31, 2002 (Decision A) Appendix E Decision of the Deputy Hearing Examiner, File No. 00-107465, S-R broadcasting Co., Inc., July 31, 2002, (Decision B) Appendix F DEIS Distribution List List of Figures Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure A.0 Radio Antenna Project Area Map � Key Viewpoint Locations Figure A.1 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 2 Figure A.2 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 2 Figure A.3 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 3 Figure A.4 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 4 Figure A.5 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 5 Figure A.6 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 6 Figure A.7 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 7 Figure A.8 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 8 Figure A.9 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 9 Figure A.10 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 10 Figure A.11 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 11 Figure A.12 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 12 Figure A.13 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 13 Figure A.14 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 14 Figure A.15 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 15 Figure A.16 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 16 Figure A.17 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 17 Figure A.18 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 18 Figure A.19 Radio Antenna Visual Simulations Viewpoint 19 List of Tables Table 1 Site Selection Criteria Table 2 Voluntary Project Revisions Table A.1 Viewer Sensitivity Table A.2 Representative Viewpoints Considered Table A.3 Sample Visual Quality Assessment Rating Sheet Table A.4 Resource Analysis Summary Matrix Table A.5 Visual Quality Assessment Rating Sheet Table A.6 Kenwanda Viewpoint Locations |