Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Shorts School Road Am Antenna Structures 5


1.3 Objectives of the Proposed Action
The objectives of the Proposed Action are:
To construct AM antenna structures in an area that will allow the station to increase its
coverage to include all of Snohomish County, providing coverage in areas that currently
do not receive coverage from other sources or only from an extremely limited number of
sources, and to provide enough signal to allow Snohomish County residents commuting
out of Seattle or Bellevue to scan for the signal on their car radio and pick it up,
particularly in the pre-dawn and post-sunset hours when KRKO must turn its signal to the
northwest.
To locate a transmitting site that is an improvement over the existing site.
To locate a transmitting site away from high-tension power lines, more densely populated
areas, and in an area that is not encumbered by major environmental and technical issues
such as tree clearing, wetlands, historic landmarks, and FAA issues.

1.4 Scoping of Draft EIS
This EIS is limited in scope by the Decision of the Snohomish County Deputy Hearing Examiner
dated July 31, 2002 to aesthetic visual effects of the proposal. The Examiner�s Decision was
rendered following public hearings on an appeal of the Determination of Nonsignificance
(�DNS�) originally issued by PDS for the proposal. The Examiner�s Decision concludes that
�[t]he DNS is erroneous in its conclusion of the absence of probable significant adverse
environmental impacts with respect to adverse aesthetic visual impacts.�5 The Decision found
that the DNS was correct as to other SEPA issues with respect to the proposal. The DNS thus
was vacated in part, and remanded for preparation of this Draft EIS on the single pertinent issue
of the visual effects of the proposal on the area surrounding the project site. On April 5, 2003
Snohomish County Planning and Development Services issued a Determination of Significance
limiting the scope of this EIS to this one issue. Although outside the scope of the Examiner�s
decision, an informational discussion of land use and shorelines is also included with this Draft
EIS.

5 Examiner�s Decision, File No. 00-107495, July 31, 2002, p. 28.
<<Prev                                                       Home                                                         Next>>

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51

52 53 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71

95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107

Pages 72-94 are photos
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1