Chapter 7: The C-R Theory and Recycling

One of the most beautiful, simple, and elegant processes in all of nature is the concept of the hydrological cycle. Because of this, almost all of the water in existence today is the same water which was present at the creation of the earth. Some chemical reactions and hydrolysis of water have occurred, so not 100% of all water molecules are the exact ones which were here at the founding of this planet, but overall, the same water has been here since the beginning. Remarkably, water can undergo seemingly infinite cycles of accumulation, evaporation, condensation, precipitation, flow, accumulation... over a very long period of time.

One of the amazing things in the area of scientific theories is the way that some events or explanations of phenomenon in one area can closely parallel happenings in seemingly unrelated fields. Even so, the simplest and most straightforward explanations are often the best, and nature seems to be addicted to the multiple re-use of good ideas.

Parallels with Nature: A New Slant to Consider

In the C-R theory, we believe that the universe recycles, somewhat in parallel to the way water recycles here on earth. Of course, the C-R theory has the Black-Holes playing a major part in this recycling. While the existence of the hydrological cycle does not prove the C-R theory, it does provide a suitable natural framework for a similar system.

Using conservation of energy as our guide, we have proposed a nature of the C-R type Black-Hole that plays a crucial part in this recycling. We have assumed that the true nature of the Black-Hole is somewhat different than current theories suggest. We believe that, due to the energy-consuming nature of the Black-Hole, and the Schwarzschild-radius "trap" which defines the limit of the Black-Hole, the Black-Hole can only consume- which implies it can only CONCENTRATE, matter-energy. This invalidates the second law of thermodynamics, which states that energy concentrations with time can only decrease. However, this only invalidates the second law for the Neutral-Zone of the Black-Hole, the second law still applies to every other region of the universe. This indicates that all Active-Zones, i.e., non- Black-Hole areas, do still obey the Second law of thermodynamics.

Is Black-Hole Behavior Random: Wanna Bet?...Not a Chance!

We also believe that the Black-Hole fortuitously takes advantage of the (probably not accidental or random) difference in mass between an atomic nucleus and it's associated electrons. The Black-Hole preferentially swallows, and de-activates positive charges; while letting some or all of the negative charges escape unswallowed. This selectiveness of the Black-Hole allows all of the still-free electrons to repulse each other away from the active Black-Hole.

This utilization of a "newly-discovered" use for a Black-Hole has the advantage that while storing up mass and energy, it re-concentrates them to the original Big-Bang quality and levels. Thus, the Black-Hole also stores up - in abundance, the only known force (at non-atomic distances) which can already overcome gravity. This concept is so simple, so refined, and so unique, it almost has to be true.

Even if we imagine that the above conclusions are all wrong, we then have to demonstrate that the logical progression of events which follows from the above scenario either aren't happening, or are unlikely to happen.

We Can't Evade the Charges

A most surprising discovery which almost pops-out from the C-R theory is the extent to which unbalanced electrical charges should be active in the universe. Unless Black-Holes (or some mystery batteries?) are continuously creating local imbalances of electrical charge, the laws of physics favor a quick and ongoing return to local neutrality. Even such reactions as nuclear fusion and nuclear fission should not favor the production and re-distribution of electrical charges on the scale in which they are encountered in the universe.

Present day theories about (non C-R) black holes are even less promising to provide solutions to the abundance of solitary and energetic charged particles. These theories claim that, by tunnelling, the black hole (non-C-R type) equalizes the charges trapped inside to those present on the outside. While this doesn't necessarily hurt our search for other possible ionic producers, the black hole which doesn't produce and separate charges doesn't help matters any.

If you think you have no use for re-use

Recycling implies multiple uses. This means that, unless the Big Bang was a one-time fling in all of eternity, the universe must have recycled1. If the universe has ever recycled at all, then the mass and energy which exist today have very likely been around for multiple times. If a one shot universe is very unlikely throughout all of infinity, low numbers of recycles such as two, three, four, and so on are necessarily also very low probabilities. The implication from this is, the matter-energy contents of the universe have been here infinitely long, and have recycled for a correspondingly large number of cycles.

Creating: A Stir

Back at the start of this current (re)cycle of our universe, we can speculate as to the following:

Some matter and energy would have been left active at the center of the universe, although entropy may have dissipated the contents into a very run-down state of matter.

The Neutral Zone surrounding the inner Active Zone would have held the contents of most of what we now see as our Universe. This combination of matter and energy in the Neutral Zone would have been time-frozen and inactivated. The contents would already be primed to permit some small disturbance to shift the boundaries of the neutral zone a sufficient amount so that activation would occur.

This activation could have been brought about by a tidal tug caused by some gravitational disturbance from the Active Zone located outside of our Universe, or from some disturbance in the active zone inside the universe. There is a possibility that some other unknown cause could have triggered this event. (For instance, a sufficiently loud verbal command or cue, such as "Let there be Light"?)

Detonation First, Big-Bang to Follow

Once any portion of the contents of the Neutral Zone was tugged back into a real-time situation, the lid would be blown off of the Black-Hole. Most of the trapped protons, neutrons, photons, neutrinos and whatever else would start to expand, and repulse each other at an incredible rate. As the density at the Neutral Zone would be locally decreased by the newly-activated matter, the loss of density could be experienced by other nearby matter-energy trapped in the dwindling contents of the Neutral Zone. The relatively high ratio of protons which would be shoving each other out of their way would contribute to the outermost surge-burst of positive charges released with extremely high energy.

Since the contents of the Universe would never have been concentrated into a singularity, the initial starting density and energy of the Universe, using the C-R theory as a guide, would be considerably less intense than that predicted by (or at least, expected by) conventional theories. Even so, the energy levels generated at release time would be orders of magnitude above any energy levels we could achieve in a laboratory setting within the foreseeable future.

Once our Universe was activated, there would be an incredible display of light (and other energy) such as could never be witnessed by mortal man. The intense level of heat, radiation, and energy produced would, at this time, prevent the survival any kind of living creature based on chemical compounds.

Within some amount of time, the energy level would be low enough that chemical bonding would again be possible, and the molecules needed to sustain life would be allowed to exist again.

Inside this newly created universe, there would be an ample amount of freshly recycled matter and energy. These would remain available to build and stock a livable universe for quite a while, at least billions of years.