Chapter 14: The Perils, Pitfalls, Traps, Card-Houses, Obstacles, and Objections faced by the C-R theory before potential Theoryhood

(impossible, improbable, imponderable, incredulous, imprecise, immeasurable, idiotic, iffy, immature, imaginary, ill-conceived, ignorable, immutable, ignoble impaired, imbecilic, implausible, impugned, impudent, incongruous, incoherent, inconsiderate, indecipherable, indefensible, indulgent, inept, infamous, infirm, insufferable, inferior, intransigent, invalid, irksome, irrational, ivied, & I've had enough of this C-R theory. (C-R theory)itis

First admission. The C-R theory is very dependent on the nature of gravity. If gravity does not behave substantially like we have predicted in the C-R theory, our theory will totally collapse. Gravity must be the result from the de-activation of time. Any other cause of gravity, especially gravitons, and most of the benefits derived from the theory also collapse.

Second: If a singularity forms at the center of any black hole, and no C-R type Black-Holes exist, our theory also becomes useless. The C-R theory demands that no Black-Holes can form with a singularity. Every Black-Hole must have an active zone in the middle (just like a tootsie-pop has to have a tootsie-roll center to qualify). If any exception, anywhere, occurs, that will potentially result in the downfall of the C-R theory.

Third: If quantum-mechanical tunnelling occurs from the inside of a Black-Hole, and is a major cause of electrical charge equalization between the inside1 and the outside of a Black-Hole, then the C-R theory has had it. Electrical charges must be infinitely insulated inside a Black-Hole, or there are no potential long term benefits to the C-R theory.

Fourth: The matter inside of the neutral-zone in a Black-Hole must accumulate, time-inactivated while the Black-Hole stores-up matter, energy, and excess positive charges. If this step does not occur, again, there would be no benefit to anyone using the C-R theory.

Fifth: Black-Holes must obey the law of conservation of energy-mass. If this is allowed to be violated, the C-R theory may again possibly collapse, with the very pillar knocked out from under our supporting column.

Sixth: The neutral-zone areas inside of Black-Holes cannot obey the second "law?" of thermodynamics while they are acquiring energy. In short, every Black-Hole MUST violate the second law2 of thermodynamics if they are acquiring energy-mass.

Seventh: Once the entire Black-Hole, or any part thereof is restored back into the real-time world, those parts must then re-obey the second law of thermodynamics.

Eighth: By hypothesis, all of the contents of the Black-Hole must be restorable, or reactivatable, as the C-R theory predicts. All of our conservation of energy and momentum experiments and conclusions rest on the assumption that a before collapse and after collapse mass of equivalent mass and energy are equal in all properties. Even so, there is no suggested pathway or method known to make this so.

Ninth: There must be some external (or internal) influence sufficient to trigger the Black-Hole into re-activation. This trigger will only be valid after ALL of the above conditions have happened, in the approximate order they were presented.

Tenth: Some present theories will undoubtedly disagree, and deny any or every one of the previous conditions. Some will state that the C-R theory is too tenuous. There are too many pillars it rests upon for the C-R theory to have any chance of success. Like Samson in the temple, push out any one pillar, and the entire structure will collapse. Only if all ten pillars remain standing, can the C-R theory possibly succeed.

Success to Spare, or bowling over our competition

In an manner opposite to a winner take all bowling game [with only one player competing], if any pin is knocked down, the game is over. The C-R theory has these 10 obstacles which it must face, and if any of the ten pillars is knocked down, our game is also over.

As the originator, I have a suspicion that the C-R theory is playing with a full deck and a winning hand in the card game of life. If I were someone else, I would take the betting odds against the C-R theory on sheer probability alone. However, when it comes to straightforward and rational explanations of the universe, and ease of agreement with the actual observations, I believe that the C-R theory is holding all of the aces. The C-R theory has made some assumptions, all of which can be mentally compared with existing, known systems and natural processes. Nowhere does the theory require the violating of conservation of energy, or does it require the condition of incalculable infinities.

If the C-R theory has an ace up it's sleeve, it would be the "real-world-fit" to known and observed phenomenon. As of this time, there are no events in the universe which I suspect would cause the invalidation of the theory. There may be many events which don't help or hurt the theory, but there are none known which flat-out contradict any C-R theory prediction.