THE INSTITUTE
  FOR  THE
  QUATERNARY
  EVOLUTION IN
  SHAKESPEAREAN
  THOUGHT

Sonnet Commentaries
             MOTTO: Know you not that I must be about my mother's business
  • HOME PAGE

  • The commentaries show how to apply the Sonnet
    philosophy to individual sonnets, and so avoid the
    inadequacies of the traditional paradigm.

    The Institute for the Quaternary Evolution in Shakespearean Thought
    The Quaternary Institute


        Quaternary Institute & Quaternary Imprint

             SONNETS 94-105




    HOME PAGE   +    QUATERNARY INSTITUTE    +   CONDITIONS OF ENGAGEMENT   +   QUATERNARY PROGRAM
    THE SONNET PHILOSOPHY   +   SONNET COMMENTARIES    +   PLAY COMMENTARIES   +   GLOSSARY
    DARWIN, WITTGENSTEIN & DUCHAMP   +   INQUEST 2009    +   JAQUES 2009    +   QUIETUS    +   CONTACT


    The four volume set William Shakespeare's Sonnet Philosophy is now available.



    SONNETS 94-105

          Only the first commentary on each page is currently online


    Sonnet 94

    They that have power to hurt, and will do none,
    That do not do the thing, they most do show,
    Who moving others, are themselves as stone,
    Unmoved, cold, and to temptation slow:
    They rightly do inherit heaven�s graces,
    And husband nature�s riches from expence,
    They are the Lords and owners of their faces,
    Others, but stewards of their excellence:
    The summer�s flower is to the summer sweet,
    Though to it itself, it only live and die,
    But if that flower with base infection meet,
    The basest weed out-braves his dignity:
        For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds,
        Lilies that fester, smell far worse than weeds.

    When Shakespeare wrote a sonnet he based its meaning on the philosophy of the whole set. If a reader is ignorant of the philosophy of the whole set, then difficulties with the meaning of a particular sonnet follow automatically.
          Ironically, sonnet 94 is a sonnet �famous� for the frustration it causes commentators. Because they do not credit Shakespeare with a philosophy, much less a consistent philosophy, they are reduced to calling sonnet 94 elusive or enigmatic. They do not appreciate that Shakespeare�s understanding is based on the natural logic derived systematically from the processes of life. The connectedness and consistency of the whole set is a consequence of Shakespeare�s adherence to natural logic.
          For Shakespeare, the possibility of determining right and wrong derives from natural logic. The dynamic of truth and beauty, to which all of Shakespeare�s Sonnets adhere, recognises that the capacity to do right and wrong is a matter of judgment based on the logical conditions for human existence inherent in Nature. The natural perspective this generates enables Shakespeare to correct inconsistencies in traditional thought.
          Sonnet 94 examines the consequences of inaction that result from unrealistic ideals. A decision to act may involve undesirable effects but these are preferable to the worse consequences of not acting. The Poet challenges those who should act, or have the �power to hurt� (94.1), but do not. He questions their reasons for remaining as �stone, unmoved and cold� and above �temptation� (94.4).
          He notes ironically that, because of their inaction, they can �rightly� claim to �inherit� the inertia of �heaven�s graces� (94.5). In their unwillingness to act they �husband�, or refuse to expend, �nature�s riches� (94.6), such as the potential for increase. Like �Lords� (94.7), they consider themselves above human concerns and see �others� as their �stewards� or servants (94.8). Such a �summer�s flower� (94.9), while �sweet in summer�, if it keeps to itself will merely �live and die� (94.10). It �shows� its weakness when challenged by �base infections� or temptations. It is �out-braved by the basest weeds� (94.12).
          In the couplet, the �sweetest things turn sourest� when their �deeds� are proven to be for show. Such �lilies�, when they �fester, smell far worse than weeds� because weeds, not distracted by self regard, are contented and firmly rooted in day-to-day reality. In the plays, such as Measure for Measure, Shakespeare examines the consequences of over-idealised religious pride and its vulnerability to prejudice and temptation.


    Back to Top

    Roger Peters Copyright © 2001


    Introduction    1-9    10-21    22-33    34-45    46-57    58-69    70-81     82-93    94-105    106-117
    118-129    130-141    142-153    154     Emendations


    HOME PAGE   +    QUATERNARY INSTITUTE    +   CONDITIONS OF ENGAGEMENT   +   QUATERNARY PROGRAM
    THE SONNET PHILOSOPHY   +   SONNET COMMENTARIES    +   PLAY COMMENTARIES   +   GLOSSARY
    DARWIN, WITTGENSTEIN & DUCHAMP   +   INQUEST 2009    +   JAQUES 2009    +   QUIETUS    +   CONTACT

    Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

    1