|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| The four volume set William Shakespeare's Sonnet Philosophy is now available. |
Sonnet 94When Shakespeare wrote a sonnet he based its meaning on the philosophy of the whole set. If a reader is ignorant of the philosophy of the whole set, then difficulties with the meaning of a particular sonnet follow automatically. Ironically, sonnet 94 is a sonnet �famous� for the frustration it causes commentators. Because they do not credit Shakespeare with a philosophy, much less a consistent philosophy, they are reduced to calling sonnet 94 elusive or enigmatic. They do not appreciate that Shakespeare�s understanding is based on the natural logic derived systematically from the processes of life. The connectedness and consistency of the whole set is a consequence of Shakespeare�s adherence to natural logic. For Shakespeare, the possibility of determining right and wrong derives from natural logic. The dynamic of truth and beauty, to which all of Shakespeare�s Sonnets adhere, recognises that the capacity to do right and wrong is a matter of judgment based on the logical conditions for human existence inherent in Nature. The natural perspective this generates enables Shakespeare to correct inconsistencies in traditional thought. Sonnet 94 examines the consequences of inaction that result from unrealistic ideals. A decision to act may involve undesirable effects but these are preferable to the worse consequences of not acting. The Poet challenges those who should act, or have the �power to hurt� (94.1), but do not. He questions their reasons for remaining as �stone, unmoved and cold� and above �temptation� (94.4). He notes ironically that, because of their inaction, they can �rightly� claim to �inherit� the inertia of �heaven�s graces� (94.5). In their unwillingness to act they �husband�, or refuse to expend, �nature�s riches� (94.6), such as the potential for increase. Like �Lords� (94.7), they consider themselves above human concerns and see �others� as their �stewards� or servants (94.8). Such a �summer�s flower� (94.9), while �sweet in summer�, if it keeps to itself will merely �live and die� (94.10). It �shows� its weakness when challenged by �base infections� or temptations. It is �out-braved by the basest weeds� (94.12). In the couplet, the �sweetest things turn sourest� when their �deeds� are proven to be for show. Such �lilies�, when they �fester, smell far worse than weeds� because weeds, not distracted by self regard, are contented and firmly rooted in day-to-day reality. In the plays, such as Measure for Measure, Shakespeare examines the consequences of over-idealised religious pride and its vulnerability to prejudice and temptation.
118-129 130-141 142-153 154 Emendations |