|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| The four volume set William Shakespeare's Sonnet Philosophy is now available. |
Sonnet 58Sonnets 57 and 58 are linked by the common imagery of enslavement to the ideal. While the Mistress sequence presents the logical conditions for beauty and truth, the youth sonnets focus particularly on the traditional confusions over the logic of the ideal. The introduction of the male �God� of religion in sonnet 58 intensifies the arguments of the previous sonnets. As noted, sonnet 58 is the first in the set to use the word God. The only other sonnet in the youth sequence to use the word is sonnet 110. In both cases in the 1609 original, the word God has a capital �G�. Most modern editions omit the capitals. The only other use of �God� is in sonnet 154, where �the little Love-God� is the Roman �Cupid� named in sonnet 153. The poet Ted Hughes speculates in Shakespeare and the Goddess of Complete Being on the profound effect the religious excesses of the Reformation may have had on Shakespeare. His family and others suffered persecution in the name of God as two sects fought over the absolute right to the ideal. So his use of the word God in sonnet 58 could reflect both logical and personal issues. Sonnet 58 identifies �God� as the one who first made the Poet a �slave� to his youth. The paradox is that if the Poet �in thought� (58.2) wants to �control� the youth�s �pleasure�, or make an �account� of the hours the youth �craves�, how can a slave �stay your leisure� (58.4). Being a slave to the mindbased sensation of the singular ideal (God), precludes an argument against unthinking sensuous indulgence. The Poet facetiously offers to suffer �imprisoned absence� (58.5) and to exercise �patience� at the �checks� caused by the youth�s �liberty�, without accusing him of �injury� (58.8). If God, as the archetypal male adolescent, makes the Poet a slave, and he suffers the constraint, then he cannot exercise his �thoughts� or the dynamic of truth to accuse the youth of injury. Sonnet 57 stated that only a �fool in love� would �think no ill� of such behaviour. So in sonnet 58, the Poet asserts that the God-based �charter� (58.9) the youth uses to sanction his willfulness, encounters the contradiction as to how �your self to pardon of self-doing crime� (58.12). The couplet is uncompromising. If the youth expects the Poet �not to blame (his) pleasure be it ill or well�, then the Poet may as well be waiting in �hell�. Because the ideal as the absolute good is unmitigated sensation, it becomes indistinguishable from its evil consequence. Sonnet 58 details the wrong that comes from thinking �no ill� (57.14). Together sonnets 57 and 58 assert that the idealised male God, divorced from the capacity to determine right and wrong, readily becomes its logical opposite, the evil of �hell�.
118-129 130-141 142-153 154 Emendations |