THE INSTITUTE
  FOR  THE
  QUATERNARY
  EVOLUTION IN
  SHAKESPEAREAN
  THOUGHT

Sonnet Commentaries
             MOTTO: Know you not that I must be about my mother's business
  • HOME PAGE

  • The commentaries show how to apply the Sonnet
    philosophy to individual sonnets, and so avoid the
    inadequacies of the traditional paradigm.

    The Institute for the Quaternary Evolution in Shakespearean Thought
    The Quaternary Institute


        Quaternary Institute & Quaternary Imprint

             SONNETS 58-69




    HOME PAGE   +    QUATERNARY INSTITUTE    +   CONDITIONS OF ENGAGEMENT   +   QUATERNARY PROGRAM
    THE SONNET PHILOSOPHY   +   SONNET COMMENTARIES    +   PLAY COMMENTARIES   +   GLOSSARY
    DARWIN, WITTGENSTEIN & DUCHAMP   +   INQUEST 2009    +   JAQUES 2009    +   QUIETUS    +   CONTACT


    The four volume set William Shakespeare's Sonnet Philosophy is now available.



    SONNETS 58-69

          Only the first commentary on each page is currently online


    Sonnet 58

    That God forbid, that made me first your slave,
    I should in thought control your times of pleasure,
    Or at your hand th�account of hours to crave,
    Being your vassal bound to stay your leisure.
    Oh let me suffer (being at your beck)
    Th�imprisoned absence of your liberty,
    And patience tame, to sufferance bide each check,
    Without accusing you of injury.
    Be where you list, your charter is so strong,
    That you your self may privilege your time
    To what you will, to you it doth belong,
    Your self to pardon of self-doing crime.
        I am to wait, though waiting so be hell,
        Not blame your pleasure be it ill or well.

    Sonnets 57 and 58 are linked by the common imagery of enslavement to the ideal. While the Mistress sequence presents the logical conditions for beauty and truth, the youth sonnets focus particularly on the traditional confusions over the logic of the ideal. The introduction of the male �God� of religion in sonnet 58 intensifies the arguments of the previous sonnets.
          As noted, sonnet 58 is the first in the set to use the word God. The only other sonnet in the youth sequence to use the word is sonnet 110. In both cases in the 1609 original, the word God has a capital �G�. Most modern editions omit the capitals. The only other use of �God� is in sonnet 154, where �the little Love-God� is the Roman �Cupid� named in sonnet 153.
          The poet Ted Hughes speculates in Shakespeare and the Goddess of Complete Being on the profound effect the religious excesses of the Reformation may have had on Shakespeare. His family and others suffered persecution in the name of God as two sects fought over the absolute right to the ideal. So his use of the word God in sonnet 58 could reflect both logical and personal issues.
          Sonnet 58 identifies �God� as the one who first made the Poet a �slave� to his youth. The paradox is that if the Poet �in thought� (58.2) wants to �control� the youth�s �pleasure�, or make an �account� of the hours the youth �craves�, how can a slave �stay your leisure� (58.4). Being a slave to the mindbased sensation of the singular ideal (God), precludes an argument against unthinking sensuous indulgence.
          The Poet facetiously offers to suffer �imprisoned absence� (58.5) and to exercise �patience� at the �checks� caused by the youth�s �liberty�, without accusing him of �injury� (58.8). If God, as the archetypal male adolescent, makes the Poet a slave, and he suffers the constraint, then he cannot exercise his �thoughts� or the dynamic of truth to accuse the youth of injury.
          Sonnet 57 stated that only a �fool in love� would �think no ill� of such behaviour. So in sonnet 58, the Poet asserts that the God-based �charter� (58.9) the youth uses to sanction his willfulness, encounters the contradiction as to how �your self to pardon of self-doing crime� (58.12).
          The couplet is uncompromising. If the youth expects the Poet �not to blame (his) pleasure be it ill or well�, then the Poet may as well be waiting in �hell�. Because the ideal as the absolute good is unmitigated sensation, it becomes indistinguishable from its evil consequence. Sonnet 58 details the wrong that comes from thinking �no ill� (57.14). Together sonnets 57 and 58 assert that the idealised male God, divorced from the capacity to determine right and wrong, readily becomes its logical opposite, the evil of �hell�.


    Back to Top

    Roger Peters Copyright © 2001


    Introduction    1-9    10-21    22-33    34-45    46-57    58-69    70-81     82-93    94-105    106-117
    118-129    130-141    142-153    154     Emendations


    HOME PAGE   +    QUATERNARY INSTITUTE    +   CONDITIONS OF ENGAGEMENT   +   QUATERNARY PROGRAM
    THE SONNET PHILOSOPHY   +   SONNET COMMENTARIES    +   PLAY COMMENTARIES   +   GLOSSARY
    DARWIN, WITTGENSTEIN & DUCHAMP   +   INQUEST 2009    +   JAQUES 2009    +   QUIETUS    +   CONTACT

    Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

    1