|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| The four volume set William Shakespeare's Sonnet Philosophy is now available. |
Sonnet 118After the unconditional statement about love in sonnet 116 and the challenge to the youth to prove the Poet in error in sonnet 117, sonnets 118 and 119 consider the means by which the Poet�s mature understanding of love avoids the excesses of youthful idealism. He questions the need for false expectations that predictably lead to unavoidable consequences. The Poet does not claim to remove �sickness�. He argues only that what is already bad enough is made worse by feeding the appetite for the excessive �sweetness� of idealised perfection. The Poet accepts that, to remedy the needs of the body, �eager compounds� can increase the appetite and that immunisation can �purge� a �malady unseen� (118.3) before it takes hold. �Even so�, while small portions of like compounds work for bodily needs, the Poet turns to �bitter sauces� to effect a remedy (118.5) when he finds his mind is �full of the near cloying sweetness� or idealised goodness of the youth. The effect of the youth�s cloying �beauty� on the Poet�s mind requires a dose of bitterness to bring it back into balance with the natural logic of truth and beauty. The Poet finds �a kind of meetness� (118.7) or mental balance when he makes his mind �sick� to counteract youth�s �cloying� idealism. The �need� to be �diseased� is the logical remedy to counter the imbalance (118.8). �Thus� the Poet developed a �policy� to �anticipate� (118.9) the �ill� that is consequent on the type of idealised or absolute love associated with the adolescent mind in adults. The �policy� ensures that such love does not grow to �assured faults� or evil consequences (118.10). Mental �illnesses� of the type involving �rank of goodness� can paradoxically be brought to a healthful state by �ill� (118.12). In the couplet, the �lesson� for the Poet as he moves beyond the immature phase of youth (typified by an absolute belief in the ideal), is that more of the same �drug� �poisons� only �him� who once �fell� for the mental �sickness� of impossible love. Many commentators have found sonnet 118 harsh and confusing because they commit the very fault Shakespeare anticipates. When they bring their predispositions for the absolute or the idealised male God to the sonnet, they are confounded by the sense of ill the sonnet in turn generates in them. The sonnet affects them just as the Poet is affected if he accepts unquestioningly youth�s appetite for �cloying sweetness�. The logic of the Sonnets, based in Nature and respectful of the sexual dynamic, presents a �meet� or balanced appreciation of truth and beauty.
118-129 130-141 142-153 154 Emendations |