|
Seek:
Reports from the Edges of America & Beyond
by Denis Johnson. With the essays in this book, Johnson takes
you from war-torn Liberia to gold prospecting in Alaska to
a Christian bike rally. I like this book as much as I liked
his novel Jesus'
Son. Johnson's voice is one that is familiar, luring you
into the situations he coverswhether fiction or non.
Chump
Change by Dan Fante. Fante's (the son of novelist
John Fante of Los Angeles) first book published in the States
is the first part of a trilogy about on-again-off-again drunk
Bruno Dante. It seems like a lightly veiled autobiography
as this book begins with Bruno's father in a coma and not
expected to live. Fighting (well, sort of) his alcoholism
he tries to deal with his screenwriting father's state. The
story is balances brutality and tenderness with skill and
daring.
Mooch
by Dan Fante. The second part of the trilogy picks up ten
months after the death of Bruno's father. He's "cleaned
himself up, straightened out, and is back on the wagon."
With a new job selling computer supplies comes along it seems
he's back in the game until (wait for it) he meets a Mexican
femme fatale and his world once again begins to crumble. This
is actually really good.
The
Michigan Assassin: The Saga of Stanley Ketchel by Nat
Fleischer. A book on boxing great
Staney
Ketchel (1886-1910)(considered by boxing
collectors as one of 15 rare boxing books to possess).
I don't expect anyone to have read it or be able to find it.
Either way, I have a copy and have read it a couple of times
this year and found it enlightening. Fleischer was long-time
editor of The Ring Magazine and knew the Middleweight champ.
His book mixes hearsay with fact and then adds a dash of myth
creating a soupy Frankenstein's monster. It's fun and about
all there is available on Ketchel aside from a mountain of
newspaper clippings (which I also have).
Works
on Paper: The Craft of Biography and Autobiography
by Michael Holroyd. Reknowned historian Holroyd
turns his attention to the art of biographies and autobiographies.
Beginning with a case against biographic writing he moves
on to those who have chosen the life and the lives they've
told. Absolutely fascinating read.
I'm
Gone by Jean
Echenoz. Winner of the 1999 Prix Goncourt. Quite an entertaining
novel, I often wish that I could read the original French
version of novels to see how the translator (Mark Polizzotti
in this case) did. The story finds the narrator Ferrer leaving
his girlfriend and finding himself in a "'man against
nature' tale, heist caper, art world satire, and love story"
all rolled into one.
Blood
Orchid: An Unnatural History of America by Charles
Bowden. I've often agreed with the term 'incandescent'
when used to describe Bowden's writing. As with Blues for
Cannibals, this book is an eye-opening experience of everything
under the Sororan desert sky from narcotrafficantes
to the treatment of the Native Americans. He rants like no
other, with wit and brutal honesty. Be warned though, his
soapbox has a turret and lots of ammunition.
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Welcome to the book section. A
mixture of reviews, beefs and lists. I considered separating
them into topics (non-fiction, fiction, et al) but since that
isn't how I read them I listed them as is. This year has been
a good year for books. I'd been eagerly awaiting new books
by Zadie Smith (Autograph
Man), Chuck Palahniuk (Lullaby),
Dave Eggers (You
Shall Know Our Velocity) and Dan Fante (Spitting
Off Tall Buildings) and now that I've got them all and
have finished reading them I can say that it was worth the
wait (in gold). I was surprised to read that the critics were
unsatisfied with Smith's book, I found the book more controlled
than White
Teeth which in my opinion had a poorly resolved ending.
The critics have been a lot more friendly to Palahniuk whose
book saw a return to the brilliance of his earlier works.
Frankly I was disappointed with his last endeavor, Choke,
which seemed to lack the balance between the 'facts' and story
needed for his style of 'dangerous
writing' to coalesce into a believable story. Suspension
of belief is needed to enjoy any book, especially so for Chuck's,
but a foundation of reality has to be fabricated for his work
to shine and in this Choke failed. The reviews for Eggers
is mixed and extreme; personally I'm enjoying the book even
with the copy-editing mistakes. He is a good writer, there's
no denying it. There are some really strong passages in this
book that I happily reread a couple of times but in general
it's not a masterpiece (and neither was A
Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, no matter who
told you heard otherwise).
Enjoy,
Paul
|
|