|
 Re:
The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse Part 02.
Reply #20 - Today
at 8:54am
Quote:
Starjade says: Explain how
a law that determines a matter to be true or not could possibly be a
negative law when its outcome is to determine matters of the truth. As
the law established the truth then that can only be positive. And yet
the religious ignorance or bitterness of one can easily make false
accusations and so two or three witnesses are needed to establish the
truth. One may have a view to make accusation but it would be just an
opinion. When it is backed up by another�s view then there is a reason
to do some diligent inquisition.
Quote:
JrnymnX replies: Let me
spell it out for you. A written law cannot determine a matter of truth,
that's a job for judges.
Starjade says: The law of Deuteronomy shows what is needed to prove a
matter true or not. So in my case the law judged me before the diligent
inquisition. I can produce more than the three witnesses that show I am
not guilty of any crime of iniquity or sin. That law is the guide of
those Judges. So, on this matter I must disagree with you even though I
do see the point you were making.
Quote:
JrnymnX replies: They have
to weigh the evidence, as only a living, breathing judge can do. A few
words on a scrap of paper can't determine a matter of truth; they can
only set out guidelines on how the judge should conduct the inquiry.
Starjade says: Ah now I read these words I know you understand my last
statement and what I mean. The accusation must be made and then the
Judges, which were the Jewish congregations, can diligently look at the
evidence. More than Three witnesses all heard me accurately prophesise
two earthquakes and a volcano erupting and those Mexican babies and the
woman who was praying for them I year before that event had even
happened.
So in your own Judgement do you not see how that can establish I am a
Prophet with a provable connection to the living God who can by the law
of Deuteronomy Chapter 19 verse 15 be established as being a prophet
with a provable connection to the living God who also has witnesses that
in 1995 I approached the Jews with a serious view to a world wide Exodus
of every Jew on earth. The law of Deuteronomy already Judges the matter
and there can only be one conclusion as the law already gives that
guideline for the Judges to ponder upon.
Quote:
JrnymnX replies:
Deuteronomy 19:15 is a law that instructs a judge not to convict a
person on the testimony of only one witness. This is why it is a
negative law, it tells a judge not to do something.
Starjade says: That straw gets shorter for you with each breath you
take. The law also says at the mouth of two or three witnesses shall
the matter be established and so it is a positive law with a positive
guideline.
Quote:
JrnymnX replies:
As you said in your last sentence, it is only when it is backed up by
another persons testimony that there is reason for diligent inquisition.
It still remains for the judge to determine matters of truth.
Starjade says: I have already backed my mouth up with those witnesses
in advance. Offering those Judges that diligent inquisition to show to
their Jewish congregations. The law already states what the conclusion
must be. The Deuteronomy law already passed that Judgement and the
other Judges must accept is outcome like it or not.
Quote:
JrnymnX replies: JrnymnX:3
StarJade:0
Starjade says: In your Dreams you have lost all your arguments and I
won all of mine. I am the Lord King of the Apocalyptic Castle and you
JrnymnX have bitten the Dust.
Or as Jesus would say. (tee hee) in John Chapter 8 verse 17: Jesus
said to the Jews. Also in your own law it is written, the witness of two
men is true. 
|