Knight v. DSHS, Administrative Procedure, and Appeal to King County Superior Court, No. 03-2-27325-2 SEA, Appeal to Court of Appeals, No. 54129-3-I
Web Page
See also www.antipeonage.0catch.com
Some practical advice for support contemnors in the State of Washington
A Way to Walk a Mile in a Noncustodial Parent's Moccasins.
This is the Web Page upon which I list the internal links to the briefs in the administrative procedure commenced on March 11, 2003 when the King County Sheriff's Department served me with paperwork that should have been properly served before the illegal license suspension performed in September 2001. They got me! Now will they wish they hadn't? After all, maybe the Salem Court would not want to have a REAL witch on their hands!
Request for Adjudicative Hearing
We had the adjudicative hearing on April 16, 2003, the decision is the Final Order in No. 03-2003-C-1839. Adobe Acrobat pdf file.
So it's off to King County Superior Court in Knight v. State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services, No. 03-2-27325-2 SEA. After getting the case assigned to Judge Richard Jones, I filed the Amended Petition for Judicial Review of Agency Decision, Chapter 34.05 RCW.
Motion for Leave to File Overlong Brief
Exhibit A to Knight Declaration
Reply to DSHS's Memo in Opposition to Motion to Restore License and to File Overlong Brief
Declaration of Roger W. Knight in Support of Petitioner's Reply Brief on Motions
On March 19, 2004 Judge Richard A. Jones heard our oral argument. Much of what I said is summed up in my letter to Mayor Greg Nickels of Seattle. Judge Jones, a younger brother of the musician Quincy Jones, yes THAT Quincy Jones, found that 1) he was barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel by the findings in the two federal cases, Knight v. Mercer Island and Knight v. Serpas. Never mind that these federal courts also found that they had to abstain under Younger abstention doctrine and lacked jurisdiction under Rooker-Feldman. Like the federal courts, Judge Jones decided to have it both ways, after finding that he lacked jurisdiction (collateral estoppel and res judicata are jurisdictional arguments as well as equitable principles) he then found that none of my constitutional and other arguments were valid.
I have appealed, Washington Court of Appeals No. 54129-3-I. In the meantime, I suggest a boycott of Quincy Jones music. Perhaps we can ask Quincy Jones if he paid for at least part of his brother's law school education so he can be a shill for a tyrannical power structure.
And now, my Brief of Appellant citing the new City of Redmond v Moore decision!!!!
If the back button does not take you there, click Home to go to the Index page of this Antipeonage Act Website, click Enemies for the main Enemies page, and click Allies for the Allies page. Or you can use the Antipeonage Act Site Map.
