Egypt undermines
Israel
YEDIOT AHARONOT 9/2/99: "Ehud Baraq, prime minister and defense
minister, is drawing Egypt closer and enabling it to play an
important role in promoting the peace process. It appears, however,
that this attitude is not mutual. According to classified reports
that have reached the Foreign Ministry, the Egyptian authorities
are waging a secret war to "undermine" Israel's influence in
Africa.
According to the reports, which came from Israeli representations
in Africa, the Egyptian authorities are trying behind Israel's
back to torpedo Israel's activities in Africa -- namely, its
economic activities and the activities of the Foreign Ministry
Center for International Cooperation, such as the dispatch
of agricultural and medical experts, the establishment of
Israeli agricultural farms, and invitations to delegations
to train in Israel.
The "red lights" were turned on in the Foreign Ministry
in the wake of, among other things, a report that reached
the ministry a few weeks ago to the effect that Egypt was
among the initiators of two anti-Israeli draft resolutions
that were endorsed at the Organization of African Unity conference.
The draft resolutions denounced the Baraq government over
the state of the peace process.
At the same time, Jerusalem received information to the effect
that the Egyptians are trying to pass anti-Israeli draft resolutions
in other African forums. A few days ago, Avraham Toledo, Foreign
Ministry assistant director general for Africa, sent a classified
cable to all Israeli representations in Africa in which he
asked them to gather information and specific examples related
to the Egyptian activities so that Israel can counter these
attempts.
Referring to this issue, high-level political sources said
yesterday: "We are concerned. The picture is clear. The situation
is very strange: On one hand, the Egyptians are being given
an active role in the peace process and are hosting the Baraq-'Arafat-Albright-Mubarak
summit and, on the other, they continue to view Israel as
an enemy."...
Controversial
UN appointment
YEDIOT AHARONOT 9/2/99: "UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has
decided to appoint Norwegian diplomat Terje Larsen as his permanent
representative in the territories. Officials in Jerusalem fear
that the appointment reflects an intention to expand UN involvement
in the peace process and that this step might be interpreted
as bolstering the Palestinian Authority's political standing.
Larsen, who mediated between Israel and the PLO during the
negotiations on the Oslo accord (in 1993) and who was one
of the accord's architects, serves today as the Norwegian
Government's special envoy to the Middle East. Israeli officials
fear that his appointment as the UN secretary general's representative
in the territories will increase UN involvement in the political
process.
In his capacity as the UN representative in the territories,
Chinmaya Gharekhan dealt mainly with UNRWA [UN Relief and
Works Agency] activities in the territories and was not involved
in the political contacts whatsoever. The assumption in Jerusalem
is that the appointment of Larsen, who is a veteran diplomat
with many connections, will change the tatus and character
of the position because Larsen will display greater political
involvement and seek to serve as a mediator in the negotiations.
In light of the above, Israel has notified the UN secretary
general of its objection to increasing the UN involvement
in the peace process. Israeli officials have high regard for
Larsen, and he maintains close, friendly relations with political
elements in Jerusalem, including Ministers Shim'on Peres and
Yosi Beilin.
Senior Foreign Ministry officials, however, said yesterday
that they will not accept the appointment of a person who
has such a high profile and status to a position that so far
has been insignificant. A senior political source explained:
"Israel believes in direct negotiations between the two sides,
and there is no room for active UN intervention."...
Plot against
Yatom
Dubai's AL BAYYAN 9/2/99: "Izz-al-Din al-Qassam Battalions,
the military arm of Hamas [Islamic Resistance Movement], yesterday
warned that it will carry out operations in Israel, shed lots
of blood, and strike at Israeli targets worldwide if the Israeli
authorities harm any of the political or military leaders and
figures.
They also claimed responsibility for the murder of two Israeli
students in the West Bank last Monday. At the same time, Jordanian
opposition parties denounced the crackdown on Hamas leaders
and the closure of Hamas offices in Amman. They considered
it an illegal act of oppression and called on the government
to reconsider those measures, which are detrimental to Jordan's
reputation and image.
Al-Bayan learned that the real reason behind closing Hamas
offices is the exposure of a plot to assassinate Dani Yatom,
the former chief of the Israeli Mosad Service, and the official
currently in charge of the file relating to Jordanian-Israeli
relations. It is to be noted that there was an attempt on
the life of Khalid Mish'al, head of Hamas political bureau,
in September 1997 during Yatom's tenure as Mosad chief. Informed
sources said Jordanian security services learned about the
plot from the Egyptian security services. It is to be noted
that Yatom paid a secret visit to Amman two weeks ago and
apologized for the assassination attempt against Misha'al."
Prospecting
for gas offshore
GLOBES 9/2/99: "An agreement was signed today for the set-up
of a consortium to execute deep-sea gas prospecting offshore
of Israel. The consortium will be headed by British Gas. The
British company will allocate 15.6% of project ownership to
Mashav, 7.2% to Dor Chemicals of the Dankner group and 7.2%
to Petrochemical Industries.
Mashav, British Gas, Petrochemicals and Dor Chemicals are
partners in the consortium bidding in the international tender
for the set-up of the natural gas import infrastructure project.
The gas shaft sinkings planned by the group headed by British
Gas are expected to constitute the most extensive prospecting
ever carried out in Israel for either oil or gas. British
Gas is one of the world's largest gas companies..."
Israel
and Jordan join vs. Hamas
MA'ARIV 9/2/99: "Israel has relayed to Jordan a great deal of
intelligence data on Hamas activities in that country. A senior
security source said yesterday: "The material is essential for
the Jordanians to carry out measures against Hamas members in
Jordan." According to him, the Hamas branch in Jordan activates
Hamas elements worldwide.
It has been learned that since the abortive assassination
attempt against Khalid Mish'al approximately two years ago,
Mish'al has continued to be engaged in terrorist activity.
Many funds were transferred from Jordan to Hamas inside the
Gaza Strip and Judaea and Samaria.
Moreover, clear messages were relayed from the Hamas Political
Bureau in Jordan to Hamas in the territories, including a
message on the resumption of terrorist activities. Based on
reports that have reached Israel, King 'Abdallah is determined
to obliterate the Hamas infrastructure."
India &
Israel software and third world marketing co-op
GLOBES 9/2/99: "A co-operation agreement between the software
houses organisation at the Manufacturers Association and Nasscom,
India's software houses organisation, was signed this evening
at the home of India's ambassador to Israel. The agreement calls
for a joint council to be set up to encourage joint ventures
in the software field, and frameworks for R&D and the marketing
of products and technologies in third countries.
The agreement was signed by 'Amiram Shor, chairman of software
houses organisation at the Manufacturers Association, and
Nasscom chairman Dewang Mehta. Shor estimates that as early
as Y2000, the agreement could result in a bilateral trade
volume of $40-50 million. "The Indian market is developing,
and aspires to reach western levels.
"This is an opportunity for those engaging in communications
and advanced management software and anyone penetrating the
Indian market will succeed," Shor said. According to Shor,
although India is not highly computerised by western standards,
it has become a centre for outsourcing and project programming..."
Wye II
details: Sharm el Sheikh
HA'ARETZ 9/6/99: The following is the timetable set out in the
Sharm el Sheikh Agreement signed last night:
Sep. 10 - The agreement takes effect.
Sep. 10-13 - The first stage of withdrawal, in which 7 percent
of Area C, under Israeli control, becomes Area B, under joint
control; first 200 Palestinian prisoners are freed; joint
committee convenes on prayers at the Tomb of the Patriarchs.
Sep. 13 (the anniversary of the White House signing of the
Oslo accords) - Final status talks begin; all joint committees
as determined by Oslo convene; the committee on the third
withdrawal meets; Palestinian list of police is presented
to Israel.
Oct. 1 - Opening of the southern safe passage route (contingent
on achieving the detailed protocol); Gaza port construction
begins; renewal of Israel-Palestinian-Jordanian-Egyptian talks
on 1967 refugees.
Oct. 5 - Deadline for deciding on location of northern safe
passage point entering West Bank.
Oct. 8 (Palestinian Prisoner Day) - A second group of 150
prisoners is released.
Oct. 15 - Palestinians report on weapons collection; Palestinians
report on arrested terror suspects; review of Palestinian
police lists.
Oct. 30 - Economic committee completes its deliberations;
second stage of Shuhada Street opens to one-way traffic.
Nov. 1 - Partial opening of Hebron wholesale market as a
retail market.
Nov. 15 - The second stage of withdrawal, in which 2 percent
of Area B becomes Area A (full Palestinian control) and another
3 percent of Area C becomes Area B.
Early December - (Ramadan) Israel frees more prisoners,
as has been the tradition for years on the Muslim holiday.
Jan. 20, 2000 - Third and final stage of interim withdrawal,
in which 1 percent of Area C and another 5.1 percent of Area
B become Area A, under full Palestinian control.
Feb. 5, 2000 - Northern safe passage route between Gaza
and West Bank is opened, contingent on an agreed protocol.
Feb. 13, 2000 - Target date for a framework for a final
status agreement.
Sep. 13, 2000 - Target date for an overall agreement."
Golan protest
HA'ARETZ 9/6/99: "Hundreds of Golan Heights residents rallied
at an old Syrian fort on the Heights overlooking Israel late
Sunday night to protest against any Israeli withdrawal from
the territory.
"This is where the Syrians are supposed to come back to
if we give up the Golan Heights," said Avi Zeira, chair of
the Golan settlers council, warning that "if Israel gives
up the Golan, we'll become like the refugees of Kosovo. There
will be a mass deportation of Golan residents and it doesn't
matter if no one will absorb us. The eviction is an impossible
trauma," he claimed.
A heavy police presence was out in force to prevent the
demonstration from turning violent. According to police sources,
the police have readied plans first prepared five years ago
to deal with expected protests as the peace process continues."
Arab reaction
to Wye II
HA'ARETZ 9/6/99: "Within hours of the Sharm el Sheikh ceremony
that sealed the timetable for the Wye accord, Syria criticized
the agreement, Gulf states gave it a lukewarm welcome and Iran
attacked it.
"What was carried out and is still going on is extremely
far from the basis of a real peace," the Syrian government
newspaper Tishrin wrote in an editorial, saying Syria wants
a just and genuine peace and it "definitely rejects being
dragged into the game of agreements and accords by installment."
The editorial added that Syria demands "full Israeli withdrawal
from occupied lands."
Also in Damascus, two radical Palestinian guerrilla groups
that recently opened reconciliation talks with Palestinian
Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat said yesterday that the new
deal would have negative impact on their negotiations.
Maher al-Taher, politburo member and spokesman of the Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), and Ali Badwan,
central committee member and spokesman of the Democratic Front
for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP), said in separate interviews
that their groups strongly opposed the accord. They said the
deal gave more concessions to Israel at the expense of Palestinians...
But in the Gulf, Arab states described the deal signed between
the Palestinians and Israel on Sunday as a step forward in
the Middle East peace process, even while warning that it
fell short of Palestinian and Arab desires.
Qatar, which, along with Oman, are the only Gulf Arab states
to have forged trade relations with Israel, said the signing
was "a positive step on the right track and could pave the
way for negotiations" to settle all issues.
The Qatari News Agency quoted an official source as expressing
hope "that the next phase will witness a real breakthrough
on the Syrian and Lebanese tracks that will lead to a total
Israeli withdrawal from the occupied Golan Heights and southern
Lebanon..."
But some newspapers were skeptical. Qatar's al-Sharq daily
said, "It is true that the Sharm el Sheikh deal had some positive
elements for the Palestinians, but its negative elements are
more than its positive ones."
The United Arab Emirates' English-language The Gulf Today
said, "The Palestinians have gained little from the new deal,
except for the fact that the stalled peace process has been
activated again. That is if Barak holds to his word and does
not go back on them the way his predecessor did ...
For the Palestinians it is another agreement whose validity
is in doubt until it is actually implemented," it added. Saudi
Arabia's al-Bilad said: "The world is witnessing what could
be called an achievement in negotiations, but it is a small
part of (Arabs') legitimate rights. The Israelis have a lot
to do to reactivate the peace process ..."
The UAE's al-Bayan said: "The signing of the agreement is
a step forward and better than nothing, although it came at
the expense of the Palestinians, who had to give concessions
by accepting Israeli conditions and amendments ... following
U.S. and Israeli pressure." The UAE's al-Ittihad said: "Finally,
and after a lot of pressure, the Palestinians and Israelis
reached a solution that pleases the Israelis more than the
Palestinians."
Iran yesterday continued its attacks on the deal, saying
capitulation by Palestinian self-rule authorities to Israel's
demands would not bring peace. "This agreement ... is the
result of yielding to the pressures imposed by the Zionist
regime (Israel) onto the self-rule authorities ... and so
it cannot end the crisis and tension in the region," state
radio quoted foreign ministry spokesman Hamid-Reza Asefi as
saying."