Night Hawke

 

philosophy

   

insurrection

 

 

   

home

philosophy

god

truth

jesus and religion

good and evil

destiny

evil

why we need a devil

perfection

life

afterlife

oikos and friendship

on soul mates

love

poetry

rules

death penalty

abortion


outside links

Einstein, Heisenberg, and Kippler

the big bang and god

stephen hawking

stephen hawkings universe

string theory

nova - Einstein

skeptics dictionary

joel barker

quotations

more string theory

layman's quantum mechanics

becoming human

uncertainty principal

implications of uncertainty

systems theory

systems view of life

john shelby spong

spong columns archive

discuss philosophy

loss function

genichi taguchi

zen-fritjof capra

yahoo strings

Good, Evil, and Paradigms

The Question:

"If God is good, then He must not be powerful enough to deal with all the evil and injustice in the world since it is still going on. If He is powerful enough to stop wrongdoing then He must be evil since He's not doing anything about it. So which is it? Is He a bad God or a God that's not all-powerful?
"

The Thesis:

The seeming paradox presented by the question is in fact no paradox at all. It is perceived to be paradoxical because of the conflict between an ever-advancing empirical body of knowledge of the physical universe with accompanying descriptive language and the static ancient language and paradigms used to explain the un-explainable and imagined or almost perceptible spiritual universe. The latter remains static due to a fear in fundamentalism (of all religions) of the core tenets of faith being lost to the heretical and experiential. Ironically it will ultimately be the static nature of the faith-language that will cause the demise of faith.

Dr. Joel Barker, about ten years ago, produced videotape that was distributed widely through American industry as a tool for promoting change within organizations. His thesis was and is that we see what we expect to see. Our paradigms or models of reality will filter all data that we perceive so that we can protect our paradigm -- or in other words we will interpret data to agree with the answers we expect. In fact all information that comes into our consciousness passes through this filter of expectations put there through years and years of experience and thought process.

This is why in the scientific world experiments are conducted repeatedly to ensure the data and interpretation of data because it is so easy to see what we expect or what we want. As a demonstration Dr. Barker placed images of regular playing cards on the screen for a fraction of a second. The viewer was then asked to identify the cards seen. Almost anyone could get them all correct even though they were only on screen for 1/30th of a second. Then he ran through the same sequence again... this time showing the card for a longer duration... and when the frame of one particular card came up everyone stumbled. As the images were on screen for longer and longer periods it became clear what the card was that caused the viewers to stumble. At a rapid speed it was interpreted as any other card. At slow speed it was different but took several viewings to figure out why. It was a black heart. Everyone had interpreted it as a spade. The paradigm of the basic shape and color caused the viewer to interpret it as something it was not -- or rather to interpret it as expected data.

As constituents of Western Culture we are heavily influenced by the extremely Cartesian thought that we must remove ourselves from the macroscopic and treat ourselves only as observers if we are to understand the fundamental nature of things. Within that context we tend to comprehend the universe around us through the models of Democritean and Newtonian mechanistic models of the universe, or classical physics, which reduces all phenomena into the motions and interactions of things -- within the confines of Euclidean three-planed, three dimensional geometry.

Within this paradigm things are or are not. They are here or there. It is a rigid determinism even in the face of modern physics -- because we don't think in quantum terms -- we think in the macro. It is a determinism that still clings to a universe -- the belief of most in the western Judeo-Christian-Muslim traditions -- in which God created the matter, the energy, the forces, the fundamental laws of motion and time, and that it has all been running ever since like some big machine.

Due to our 'scientific' experiential paradigm and given our religious mystical traditions of an all powerful God who made it all -- the introduction of evil into the system appears to present a paradox -- if God made it to work a certain way and it doesn't how did it break? In short we could say evil is the singularity in the Newtonian Judeo Christian paradigm of reality. It presents an inconsistency just as daunting as a fading horizon presented to flat earth believers.



poem of the month | home | gas tank | road rage center | poetry archive

waking venus | bidness as usual | fugitive muse gallery | favorite quotes

philosophy | cigar review | hawke bio | FAQ | contact | links

free stuff | exit


"This table has four legs. A table with a broken leg remains a table. But a table from which the four legs have been removed becomes only a flat piece of wood. At what moment did it cease to be a table?"
-- Carlo Suares
 

 

© 2001 Night Hawke all rights reserved

If you steal anything from here I will hunt you down and eat you!

 
           
           
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1