With the recent capture of Saddam. Matt and Hach got together again to talk
about the "war" in Iraq.
So without further ado...... read.....
Matt: I just read that article you wrote titled
Saddam, Bush & GORE! And I might
have to do the Bush-Hitler parallel chart. The similarities are endless.
Hach: Haha
Matt: Both were men suffering from Napolean Syndrome (Small men attacking
bigger ones to seem tough), both attemt to conker other countries to increase
the military and economy
Hach: Bush wouldn't of had to if it wasn't for a man named Clinton
Matt: The US has a police force that attacks it's citizens, the Nazis were
a police force. Both followed up WEAK presidency. German economy was shit,
while ours grew, but has since turned to shit. Due the Bush
Hach: The police thing, i agree with, but the one who put more cops on the
streets is a again a man named Clinton
Matt: Which to leg to my other point, of conquering other countries to increase
the economy
Hach: Ours turned to shit 'cause of 9/11.
Matt: No necessarily. It turned to shit on 9/11 because of the stock market.
That could happen on anyday. And it recovers.
Hach: And it has
Matt: It hasn't recovered because of a lack of job opportunities our government
provides. You think it's recovered? Interesting... I agree with one point
you make though. Having Gore in the White House during 9/11 would have been
FAR worse. A democrat has no concept of war. The main problem I have with
Bush is this -- I fully support any action he'd like to make towards
Osama/Afghanistan. Always have, I'd fight for that. But he used the situation
of 9/11 to point our attention towards something else he had a vendetta with
Saddam was out of the news, and silent for YEARS until Bush spun 9/11 to
go towards Iraq.
Hach: Well, yeah, but Saddam has been far worst for far longer.. yes, the
80 war was mainly our fault.. b/c of the whole Cold War error. True.
Matt: When they had no weapons, they had no involvement in 9/11 etc...
Hach: As for the Stock Market last week before we caught Saddam it did go
up over 10,000 pts before anyone
Matt: He spun everything to take the hatred we had, and wanted us to go for
Irag
Hach: well, it was like another Vitnam in some sense.. during the Gulf War
we didn't finish the job.
Matt: Which is taking advantage of a situation we shouldn't forget, and a
situation that should NEVEr be taken advantage of. Which is low. And totally
spun my support for him completely around, and caused me to hate him. See,
instead of saying Bush is a drunk, I can actually SUPPORT my case
Hach: Correct... But i don't hate him, yes, he announced war on Iraq, but
we probably, and i'm not sure about this but we had troops in Iraq before
any of this shit happened this year
Matt: Oh, I know that without a doubt. He did that shit without even SEEING
if we supported it. So he used that whole situation to make his actions seem
right. Which almost makes you think that the US MIGHT have known. about 9/11
happening, and LET it happen
Hach: But would you have been pleased if we didn't do anything after 9/11?
Matt: No. But we targetted the wrong people. I don't believe in just attacking
somebody for the sake of doing it. Attack somebody who is a THREAT. Is Osama
was in Afghanistan, turn that fucking place into glass.
Hach: And with Saddam in charge in Iraq, we weren't going to stop fighting
him until he was out of office.. How many years did we fight with the USSR?
Hell, we we're once alias with them.
Matt: Bomb that sand until it no longer resembles sand. We aren't fighting
them now, and nothing ever changed to pull somebody from office.
Hach: well, that's what we did with Iraq... Hell, we did find Saddamn with
750,000 dollars plus, thus leading to the point he had some involvement.
Well, he's out.
Matt: Think about this -- Would you keep all your money invested in a foreign
dollar, especially the Iraqi unit, when your dollar is worth shit? I'm not
making up excuses or anything, but I'm just saying to keep an open mind and
not eat everything the media feeds you. Every single thing they spin the
way they do can be explained in another way.
Hach: Well, that's a question, I really can't answer.. 'Cause hell, no doubt
you would want more money, and hell you would want more respect
Matt: Do you really have more money though if being an Iraqi billionaire
means you have 10,000 American?
Hach: True, it can, but hey, what about respect... His father was a president,
he's got republican backing, and he's wasnt' going to be a legendary president,
if he didn't do this.
Matt: When we look back years from now, he won't be remembered as legendary.
Hach: True, I understand.. but let me compare this to the whole thing going
on in MLB today, with A-Rod... He's willing to give up 30 Million to go to
Boston to win a championship.
Matt: He'll be remembered as somebody who murdered thousands for no reason.
Yes, and how does that relate?
Hach: Spend money to get legendary status
Matt: Scholars don't consider money when deciding who is a legend. True,
thus the reasoning to defend ur "spending billions of dollars". Huh, I never
mentioned spending money?
Hach: How about when you said this? "Which to leg to my other point, of
conquering other countries to increase the economy"
Matt: I didn't say I supported that. I'm just making the parallel
Hach: Alright then... I see
Matt: Bush and Hitler did many similar things. I truly think the American
public will someday look back at George Jr and see how badly he fucked this
country up. And the way people look at this country
Hach: Well, maybe so... but it could definetly be worse... and i think the
reasoning for most of his things that he's had to do, we're beacuse of his
father
Matt: Oh, without a doubt. The only reason he spun the attention to Iraq
is because of his father. I don't think we necessarily got ATTACKED because
of George Senior. But we defintely DID attack because of him
Hach: Maybe so...
Matt: I think so... |
