• Second version of the original site

¡×Why do I think so..?

1. The heading and the prefatory text are in style. It was made clear that this site was for amusement, and by setting the font type as a comical one it added the effect.

2. The introduction explains the purposes of each link clearly and concisely, guiding visitors exactly to what they should do. (This is common in both sites, though.)

3. The composition is better in the sense of being generous about the space. It gives the visitors a comforting feeling. It seems to provide room for taking a breath to the pressed visitors.

4. Background is consistent comparing to the constantly changing background of the original site.

5. Each page has the same number of links in the same order which the original page hasn't.

6. Not only is the graphic matching to the context, it seems to have its own role in its own space of the whole formation. It dosn't stick out, it blends in natually just by structure.

7. At the 'test' section, the list items are lined up neatly, forming a state of composure. It helps read and absorb more easily, simply following the lines. Let's put it this way; each item well classified.

8. The background color of the graphic itself was considered in picking the background color of each page, so the graphic wouldn't seem like it should be somewhere else. Also, the brightness of the graphics were adjusted so that visitors won't have a hard time making out the pictures.

  E-mail me


This is an example of how to insert an image by linking to its URL.

View the source code on this page to see how to do it.

  E-mail me



Assignment 7: Terminology



Assignment 8: Summary



Assignment 9: Search 1



Assignment 11 : Internet Use Survey



Assignment 12 : Favorite Sites



Assignment 13 : English Learning Sites



Assignment 15: Peer Critique