Dialectics of New Vision

 

By Andrei Shkarubo.

 

Content:

 

1.      Nature of dialectics

2.      Three visions of the world

3.      Formation of new stereotypes of vision

4.      Nature of dualism – different levels of consciousness

5.      Objective causes of New Dialectics

6.      Phases and periods of time cycle distinguished by consciousness

7.      Structure of New Dialectics

8.      Signs of the Times – characteristics of four phases of Time cycle

9.      Conclusion.

 

 

1.     Nature of dialectics (its cognitive, epistemological origins).

 

 

Dialectics is a universal methodology based on dualism of thinking (author).

 

The vision of the world is but a projection of the mind’s arrangement and its work.

 

The nature of dialectics, or any other stereotype of thinking, i.e. reception/perception of information and its processing (analysis and synthesis) lies primarily in the mind’s structure and mechanism of its work (for more detail read Spiritual Rape of Russia, parts: The Way We Interact With The World, Structure of Consciousness, Mechanism of Consciousness’ Work).

 

In other words, the way we see, perceive the world around us depends on a) what apparatus, what mechanism we use b) what technical characteristics it possesses

.

Say, a snap-shot taken by a camera allows a closer look at the object of your interest, making possible its analysis.

 

But if you want to determine time-and-space ties of the object under study, i.e. determine how it develops in time and what surrounds it in space, in other words, if you want to achieve synthesis and obtain a comprehensive picture of reality, you’ll see that camera is of little use there.

 

In such cases they use other mechanism: video-camera.

 

If we use the same mechanism, say video-camera, for our perception of reality, in this case our ability to perceive as well as the picture of perceived reality would depend strongly on the speed-frequency of our perception, or on the speed-frequency of video-camera we use.

 

For example, the processes which are beyond ordinary human perception, the speed-frequency of which is much higher or lower than the frequency-speed of perception, such processes, say like opening of a bud or movement of wings of a bumble-bee can be correctly recorded only if a high-speed video-camera is used. If you use ordinary camcorder, you won’t get a dynamic picture but a static one, or a picture of chaos when the image becomes blurred beyond recognition.

 

So, before we start speaking of dialectics as a universal technique of measurement, a universal methodology of analysis, before we start speaking of dialectics’ universal measure, Time, we must stress that every picture of our perception: images, views, notions, including those of Time and Space; stereotypes of thinking, models and theories, including dialectics itself, are Conditional and Relative, being the product of interaction of our mind and reality.

 

All our knowledge, our picture of the world are determined by the way we perceive and process-decipher information.

 

2. Three Visions Of The World.

 

Using the language of physics, the picture of the world we perceive is a kind of interference pattern which emerges as a result of an overlay of waves, frequencies of your consciousness and waves, frequencies of reality.

As in the case of a video-camera cited above, the picture resulting from this overlay will be of three basic patterns: Chaos, Dynamics, Statics.

 

Chaos.

 

The picture of chaos (state of utter incomprehension) emerges when consciousness starts perceiving something absolutely new, which is impossible to compare-measure: either because consciousness has no such stereotypes (they are not formed yet), or it simply cannot find them.

 

Everything in such picture is changing: details, their characteristics, proportions, and so on, creating complete chaos in which nothing can be singled out and recognized because the newly-emerged bears no semblance to the just-disappeared.

 

The state of mind in such situation resembles a person who finds himself unexpectedly and inexplicably abroad, having no knowledge of the country he’s in, or its language, customs, laws, nor even the meaning of objects around him.

 

The person in possession of all his faculties in this situation is nonetheless completely helpless, confused and devastated. Until he’s managed to focus his attention, i.e. to raise the frequency of his own perception, and start singling out and recognize repetitive elements in reality he perceives.

 

Dynamics and Time

 

It’s this singling out of a repetitive, common element which changes perception, transforming the picture of chaos into picture of dynamics.

 

This common element which has its own frequency, period of repetition turns into the first reference point , a universal measure in human perception called Time (the Sun has always been and still is such reference point for a human being).

 

To be more precise, Time is an overlay of two frequencies: the frequency of perceived reality and frequency of perception - resulting in a periodical fraction.

 

Ability to remember, to store and retrieve the common element, to recognize it from the perceived chaos by comparing the stored element with the current one has made it possible to distinguish in Time its past and present aspects.

 

With the emergence of thinking, ability to actively and systematically reflect-reproduce common elements, a notion of future has come into use.

 

Statics and Space

 

Further qualitative growth of the level of consciousness when the speed-frequency of perception-reflection equals the speed-frequency of the perceived process creates a static picture.

 

The relativity of statics is most obvious when, for example, a transport vehicle you ride in, say, a train picks up speed and overtakes another train and they run in the same direction at the same speed for a while. If you spot no stationary object in your sight (other reference point) you’ll have an impression that both trains are motionless, static.

 

Static perception creates the notion of Space, first of all such aspects as form, the inner and outer, the front and the rear.

 

So, passing the periods of 1) complete chaos 2) dynamic confusion, the picture of our perception enters a period of 3) static knowledge.

 

It’s during this period that such patterns-stereotypes emerge as notions, knowledge, methodologies, including dialectics.

 

Being just a stereotype of thinking, dialectics, like any other stereotype, are relative and conditional. It’s not a dogma, but a manual, in other words, its content and function are determined by Time.

 

3. Formation of new stereotypes of vision

 

say, a new theory, including dialectics, invariably implies analysis and restructuring of old stereotypes – conditioned by experience accumulated during the dynamic, active period when consciousness distinguished-remembered the most frequent vital fragments of reality.

 

Building a new stereotype out of time-acquired fragments of old stereotypes (experience, skills, notions and stereotypes of thinking) could be compared to a situation in which a traveler is trying to collect his belongings acquired over a certain period and pack them into one whole but finds it impossible to accomplish using the old method of packing because of the increased number of possessions.

 

So, the first thing one has to do in such cases is to spread things apart and determine which of the baggage items is to be placed with which so they could form the closest natural link.

 

After the mutual position of one item against the other is determined (linear ties), their final packaging, tying up takes place when multi-dimensional ties and structures are defined so that a pile of diverse items could be transformed, or rather compressed, with proportions intact, into one whole, the baggage which is good for transportation, i.e. the one which won’t fall apart on any external impact.

 

During transportation itself, it will become evident that certain objects, items of baggage, broke under impact, or proved useless. After which these items, the elements of the whole, will be thrown out, the baggage will be re-adjusted and tied up again, i.e. it’ll become more compact and homogeneous despite the diversity of its composites. Thus a single whole emerges from a swarm of isolated separate things.

Thus a newly emerged theory is tested and updated by practice.

 

4.     Nature of dualism – different levels of consciousness

 

Following the above-mentioned analogy, one must take the old baggage, the old dialectics, apart and learn where its basic components come from, first and foremost its notion of contradictions-polarities; in other words, why one person can perceive some process or phenomenon, whereas the other cannot, or he can perceive it, but sees it in a completely differing, contradictory way.

 

The cause of those contradictions lies in different levels of consciousness, perception.

 

If the analogy of two trains to be used, reality, or rather its specific layer, could be compared to an express train, while human consciousness, perception – to a commuter train which can catch up with the express, i.e. perceive reality, only for a limited period of time on a specific section of the road.

 

Naturally, these specific sections of the road and periods of time when express and commuter trains can draw level making perception and understanding possible, they all differ for different commuter trains, which means that the perceived picture, understanding, would differ as well.

 

It’s the different levels of inadequacy of human perception which breed all sorts of contradictions.

 

For example, in order to obtain at least some picture of reality, to have at least some idea of it, the mind has to focus, to accelerate its work, to increase the frequency/speed of its perception to equal the frequency/speed of the reality layer under study, in other words, to catch up with that “express” which never stops, but

there are people whose mind is too feeble, too narrow for this, and attempts to draw their attention to certain phenomena, processes would be as futile as taking the blind to a picture gallery.

 

These processes and phenomena simply do not exist for them. These people live in a blissful oblivion of idiots.

 

There are people whose minds can speed up and catch a glimpse of some fragment of reality. But it’s only a glimpse: having instantly drained their energy resources on it, they quickly lose the sight of the express train of reality.

 

For these minds this fragment of reality is always perceived with a certain tinge: either positive or negative – the unbalanced view results from brevity of perception.

 

If the fragment was perceived while consciousness was “catching up” with reality, its picture would be positive;

if , vice versa, the fragment was perceived while consciousness was losing speed and falling behind reality (which creates illusion of moving in opposite directions) its picture would be negative.

 

The brevity of perception allows this type of consciousness only a one-sided view of reality: either black or white.

This type knows no alternative, it’s simply unaware of it. This type knows no contradictions, no doubts or compunctions. Everything is crystal clear for them, they are always right.

 

Unlike the former type of blank consciousness called the type of blessed idiots, this type of incomplete, one-sided consciousness could be called the type of omniscient idiots.

 

The next level of consciousness has a grade higher energy reserve which allows consciousness a more extended contact with reality.

 

Thanks to this energy reserve, consciousness falls behind reality not instantly but gradually (i.e. after the commuter train draws level with the express, it loses speed gradually, and the trains gradually move apart).

 

Which allows consciousness a comprehensive perception of reality consisting of both white, positive, and black, negative, experience. A contradictory experience which lacks awareness of the unity and wholeness of positive and negative.

 

Fragmentary, contradictory nature of such consciousness is manifest in all its judgments and acts, which are marked by doubts and hesitations characteristic of this type of consciousness, called the doubting, thinker idiot, a complete opposite of its predecessor, the omniscient idiot.

 

The next level of consciousness has such a high reserve of energy that it is capable of not simply seeing reality in all its contradictions-polarities, but it’s also capable of seeing, understanding the relative and conditional nature of these contradictions.

 

Which is possible only if this consciousness can accelerate so it can perceive the new layer of reality completely, in other words, if consciousness can acquire a new reference point, a new dimension.

 

For example, the relativity of two trains moving apart becomes obvious if the observer is shifted from the window of a commuter train to the porthole of an airplane, and thereby discovers that the trains actually are still moving in the same direction, but at differing speed.

 

It’s a new reference point which allows consciousness to have a whole and complete view of the proceedings, i.e. to see not just all, but all at once, in other words, to have the grasp, to understand.

 

Such type of consciousness could be called the idiot who’s learned his own folly (in the East they call it Enlightened One).

 

It’s this type of consciousness which possesses truly dialectic approach, i.e. perceives reality not just as struggle of opposites, but as their unity too, being able to see the relativity and conditionality of those opposites.

 

5.     Objective causes of New Dialectics

 

The evolutionary growth of the level of consciousness (its main technical characteristic, frequency, is gradually rising the same way computer processors evolve) triggers similar changes in the mind’s faculties: first of all, its ability to discriminate increases, so does the fullness of perception and its level of integration – which inevitably creates new stereotypes-programs.

 

For example, dialectics as a program can no longer be limited to only those features common to any process or phenomenon which were already outlined in the dialectics of Karl Marx, which are:

 

1)                  presence of contradictions-polarities in a process or phenomenon;

2)                  unity and inter-conditionality of those contradictions;

3)                  struggle of opposites, producing tension between them and rise of quantitative changes;

4)                  a shift of accumulated quantitative changes into qualitative ones.

 

The modern historical period, new level of consciousness (primarily improved ability to discriminate) require a new, a fuller and more integrated, methodology which could both explain and predict; a methodology based on a universal measure, Time and its derivatives, as well as notions of space, energy, matter and information.

 

 

6.      Phases and periods of Time cycle distinguished by consciousness

 

Although notion of Time is only relative and conditional, it’s nonetheless the only factor which determines any process or phenomenon – that’s why the whole theory of new dialectics, or Dialectics of New Vision, will be built on Time and its derivatives, like frequency, period, phase.

 

Using this single, universal measure, one can state that all processes and phenomena (human perception including) are of cyclical, repetitive nature: the end of one cycle triggers the start of the other.

 

This cyclical nature can be illustrated by a circle with a dot in its center which signifies the start and end of a process; opposites-contradictions which determine its development.

 

If one were to estimate by the level of discrimination, one could single out in each cycle, distinguish, two opposite processes: 1) a phase of quantitative, external changes; 2) a phase of their decline, and/or rise of qualitative, internal changes.

 

The first process results in creation of a new form, opposite to the old initial one, i.e. “negation”takes place;

The second process results in a qualitative shift, and return to the old form, but with a new, opposite content, i.e. “negation of negation”, synthesis, takes place, closing thereby the old cycle and creating inner, informational, preconditions for the new one.

 

To illustrate this we divide the circle by a vertical line drawn through its center.

 

Its proper right half – left for us – would signify the process of growth, or materialization; figuratively speaking: conception, birth and development;

its proper left half – right for us – would signify the reverse process of decline, or dematerialization, figuratively speaking: aging, death, and ensuing purgatory (correction of “design” mistakes made during conception).

 

In ancient philosophy this cycle comprising two opposite processes of materialization, growth and dematerialization, decline is symbolized by a monad in which creation is marked by – active, male, red, light – energy of yang; destruction, by passive, female, blue, night energy of ying.

 

Using the language of physics which at the moment gives the most precise description of reality, the process of materialization is characterized by a fall in its frequency, its inner speed, and rise of its amplitude, and correspondingly, the rise of tension in the system – which could be compared with an ocean wave hitting the shore: While it’s losing its speed, it’s growing in size.

 

In terms of its space aspect, its energy-information flow moves downwards-forward-right-outward, in other words, along the right unwinding spiral.

(One should bear in mind that “visible” space characteristics we use are just a reflection of invisible phase-frequency-amplitude characteristics – for more detail of which one can read play Untrodden paths, Act.4).

 

Dematerialization, on the contrary, is marked by a rising frequency, its inner speed, and falling amplitude, accompanied by a corresponding fall of tension in the system, relaxation;

the movement of its energy-information flow goes upwards-backward-left-inward, that is, along the left winding spiral.

 

To illustrate the next level of discretion we divide our circle with a horizontal line drawn through its center. Its upper half signifies the processes invisible to us, its bottom half – the opposite, visible processes.

 

So, materialization process is split into invisible part: from conception to birth, and visible part: from birth to the peak of development;

Appropriately, dematerialization is split into a visible process from aging to death, and invisible – from death to purgatory.

 

The next level of discretion is when our mind distinguishes and separates in the upper invisible part of the cycle the processes which could be perceived only indirectly, abstractly – what we call “information” – and the processes which are perceived directly – what we call “energy”.

 

In the lower part of the cycle the energy becomes visible; in other words, the process acquires direction and other dimensional aspects, and is first perceived as dynamic, then dynamic-static, i.e. when a continuous flow of energy develops a kind of ‘island of safety’, or stability, which we call “matter”.

 

To illustrate this stage of our perception of the time cycle, we enter a square into the circle divided by horizontal and vertical lines. The top of the square is to signify the informational phase of the cycle, the bottom – material phase, its two sides – energy phases.

 

Discrimination in growth-decline of quantitative changes allows one to distinguish in each of those four phases three periods: period of tension-acceleration-growth, period of resonance-peak, and period of relaxation-deceleration-fall.

So, a time cycle has four phases with three periods in each, which could be illustrated by a regular dodecagon, or a polygon with 12 angles and 12 sides, entered in the circle.

 

As human experience shows, the 12 periods distinguished in the cycle are sufficient to analyze the majority of important processes and phenomena: 12 months of the year, 12 zodiac signs of the cosmic cycle, 12 tribes of Israel, 12 feats of Hercules, etc.

 

Incidentally, the same 12 periods (four phases with three periods in each) one can observe in a big breathing cycle – for more detail read “Yoga – the art of human harmonious development”.

 

 

 

                                                 7 Structure of New Dialectics

 

So, each process, phenomenon has the following common features:

 

1)      cyclical, repetitive nature by which the end of one cycle implies the beginning of the other;

2)      each cycle of development is based on its intrinsic contradictions/opposites which determine the character and speed of development, contradictions which are solved/lifted only with the end of the cycle;

3)      four common phases in a cycle – they are marked by a square entered in a cycle – the first phase – non-manifest informational phase; the second – transitional energy/materialization phase; the third – manifest material phase; and the fourth – transitional dematerialization/energy phase;

4)      each of these phases have three common periods: the period of tension-acceleration-growth; the period of peak, or resonance, and the period of relaxation-deceleration-decline;

 

(All in all, the cycle has 12 periods common to any process or phenomenon, and they are symbolized by a regular dodecagon entered in a circle - see Fig.5)

 

5)      any big cycle of four phases, or 12 periods, can, in turn, consist of small cycles…

 

One should stress once again that all these divisions are rather conditional and relative, and depend on the “resolution” ability of our mind.

 

For example, with sufficiently high resolution, we can distinguish that each of the 12 periods of the cycle, in turn, can be regarded as a “small” cycle, whose life-period is so small that our consciousness can distinguish in it only two polarities, or phases: a) manifest materialization polarity, which we mark as the “positive” or “right” phase; and b) non-manifest dematerialization polarity, marked as the “negative” or “left” phase.

 

 

In other words, the cycle of 12 periods can be viewed as a large cycle consisting of 12 small cycles, or 24 small periods. That’s how we split the day in 24 hours.

 

There can be other options, of course.

As an example of a big cycle, we could take the annual cycle of the Earth’s interaction with the Sun, consisting of four phases, called seasons, or 12 periods, called months:

 

winter is the first, informational phase, marked by the top of the square – the phase of a sleeping seed, an embryo, when the interaction of earth and the sun is minimal (with the shortest period of daylight);

 

spring is the second, energy phase of materialization, marked as the square’s proper right side, the phase of the sprout – transitional from the informational phase of a “sleeping seed” to the material phase;

 

summer is the third, manifest material phase, marked as the square’s base, the phase of realization, fruition;

and

autumn is the fourth energy-dematerialization phase, marked as the square’s proper left side, the phase of the fruit’s decay, disintegration and emergence of a new seed.

 

The big annual cycle thereby closes.

 

One can also distinguish a small cycle in it, the daily cycle, with its manifest phase of the day, and non-manifest phase of night.

 

8.     Signs of the Times – characteristics of four phases of Time cycle

 

Informational phase.

 

Absence of any perceptible tension is the main feature of informational phase: with its super-high frequencies and super-low amplitudes its tension is not perceived by ordinary mind. For human beings the processes unfolding during this phase are but a dream which they cannot recall.

 

Absence of any perceptible tension in this phase defines a circular structure of the phase contents, information, and its relative stability in time.

 

Relative, because these circular structures have a propensity to periodically self-compress under external impact of environment – in other words, they periodically burst and break their circular structure, burning down and discharging those of their elements which proved incapable of further evolution; after which they converge again, and thereby become more compact, more dense, and more stable.

 

Informational phase starts with a period during which analysis, selection, and struggle of competing, opposite ideas and theories takes place – in other words, it’s a period of “negation of negation” the main feature of which is Chaos.

 

The next, “resonance” period of informational phase, the one which opens a new cycle is a period of synthesis, creation of a new idea; it’s also a period of revolution when old contradictions (goals, values, principles) lying at the foundation of the old cycle are replaced by new ones which are to determine the development of the next cycle.

This is a period of resonance when consciousness starts distinguishing out of the initial informational chaos some constantly repetitive elements which form a certain pattern. Dynamics is the main feature of this period.

 

The last period of informational phase is the period of comprehension and logical framing of those principles which were discovered during previous dynamic period of synthesis. It’s a period of creation of a new picture of the world, new world vision. Statics is its main feature.

 

Using analogy, the informational period is a period when the “sleeping seed” wakes up; when an array of ideas, a theory turns into a project.

 

Creation of a new picture of the world, or a new project, i.e. emergence of information with more compact, more dense circular structures, has its side-effect: a sharp discharge of energy produced during annihilation of useless information.

It’s this energy discharge which opens

 

Energy-materialization phase.

 

Unlike the first, informational phase, the other three phases are marked by the presence of force (i.e. the presence of phase-frequency shift) and its manifestations, like tension, acceleration and vector of movement.

 

As for the second, energy-materialization phase, it’s marked by a sharp drop in frequency and rise in amplitude, which manifests itself in the first period of the phase in the upsurge of tension, explosion of energies creating chaos of internal conflict in which a new locomotive power of the current cycle is to emerge.

The first period of this phase is a period of a sprouting seed.

 

During the second ‘resonance’ period of the phase tension reaches its peak; the triumphant locomotive power becomes visible, purposeful and creative.

It’s a dynamic period of birth of a new construction, when designer determines its inner structures; it’s a period when general direction of future movement becomes visible; a period when the sprouting seed breaks the ground and turns into a new entity, plant.

 

In the third, ‘static’, period the energies which acquired their impulse and vector of movement during the previous period now are losing speed sharply, condensing, compressing and getting ‘frozen’.

The energy flow is becoming polarized: one can distinguish in it informational and carrier frequencies, the ‘upper’ and ‘bottom’ layers – in other words, hierarchic structures emerge.

It’s a period when designer problems are solved, and technology is being created.

 

Material phase

 

The way compression of information in the first phase created new world vision and liberated untamed energies, transformed later, during the second phase, into creative, pioneering energies, these too were similarly compressed, giving birth to matter and releasing new energy, this time not innovative but productive, the one which has already received its vector of movement.

 

This latter feature is most prominent during the first period of material phase, when the seedling is rapidly turning into a fully-grown plant, losing at the same time its suppleness; when a construction after a period of tests and trials loses its uniqueness, and enters a production line period.

 

The first period of the phase is marked by a sharp rise of tension, this time manifest in accelerated, unrestrained growth of material form – which inevitably spills into a conflict, this time not internal, but external because the time cycle is approaching the peak of its manifest, visible development, and the flow of energy-information fueling this cycle reaches the limits of its self-realization, triggering a counter-reaction, a backlash of the outside world.

 

The second period of the phase, ‘resonance’, a peak in the fight with the external foe during which the goal of all entities is realized: self-preservation and proliferation.

While the resonance period of energy phase is marked by entity’s own birth, similar period of material phase is marked by birth of its off-spring.

Continuing the analogy, it’s time when a fully-grown plant enters into fruit-bearing period.

 

After the material phase resonance period in which goals were achieved and contradictions fundamental to the development cycle were solved, thereby the tension which those contradictions created were lifted, after this the ‘negative’ half of the time cycle begins, opposite to the already passed ‘positive’ half; which means that outer visible, quantitative growth begins to decline, being replaced by inner, qualitative growth which takes form of aging and death. The physics origin of this process lies in its growing frequency and falling amplitude.

 

The signs of imminent decline are noticeable in the third period when after the resonance and resultant loss of energy, tension starts falling and processes decelerate, which is marked by a change in the vector of movement, a fallback and subsequent reversing.

 

At the end of the third period when any change, movement becomes barely noticeable (stagnation) assessment of the past stretch (the first positive half of the cycle) is taking place, and the picture-impression of the past experience is formed.

This picture is always positive in general, though attempts are initiated to revise the “technology” created at the end of the energy phase. Those attempts are inevitable reflecting the objective change of course in the time cycle.

For a plant which has reached the peak of its development this period signifies aging.

 

Energy-dematerialization phase

 

The processes of the fourth phase are opposite to those which mark the second phase.

 

Accelerated drop of tension (fall of amplitude and rise of frequency in the energy flow) in the first period provokes another internal conflict in the form of disintegrating hierarchical structures, i.e. chaos.

 

This period solves which of the released energies-powers is to become a locomotive force of further transformations, and consequently, whether the disintegration is to become wild, unrestrained, i.e. whether it’s to become complete, with the loss of material form, or it could be controllable, as a way of reform, reconstruction.

 

Actually, the scenario of the impending disintegration was written at the end of material phase, during stagnation period when the past experience of the first half of the cycle was assessed and the image-picture of it formed.

Its fullness and objectivity determines the nature of further transformations.

 

The second period of the phase is resonance, annihilation and death. It’s the period when the ripened fruit falls to the ground, and outdated construction, having passed a series of modifications, is removed from production.

 

The third period is a ‘parting of soul’, release of energies. The fate of the corpse, fallen fruit or outdated construction may differ: it could be eliminated by ‘scavengers’, it could rot, or it could be mummified with the aim of possible resurrection – this would depend on the fullness and objectivity of the assessment given at the end of the third period to the past second, negative, half of the time cycle.

 

Anyway, no mater how earnest attempts to reach objectivity would be, the picture-image of the past experience of the second, negative, half of the cycle would be also negative.

 

So, by the end of the fourth energy-dematerialization phase, the past time cycle will be marked by two contradictory-opposite assessments, images of past experience.

It’s these polarities, contradictions which are to be solved in the informational phase of a new cycle; they are to trigger the reaction of synthesis in which a qualitatively new picture of reality, new vision of the world is to emerge, and energy for a new cycle of development to be released.

 

Such cycles continue until the information-idea fundamental to them reaches perfection, absolute fullness and wholeness, and becomes a Symbol, entity unaffected by Time.

This is the meaning of evolution.

 

Until this is achieved, all evolutionary entities pass through the same cycles which have the same phases and periods. The human being and his consciousness are no exception.

 

9.     Conclusion.

 

The described model of a cycle with its sequence of invariable time characteristics, the Signs of the Times, is conditional and relative. It results from a comparative agreement, balance of the level (frequency) of consciousness and the perceived layer, fragment of reality, the frequencies of its energy-information flow.

One could call this model ‘standard’ because it’s quite intelligible for the minds of the ‘doubting, thinking idiot’ type, i.e. for all those who can perceive the time cycle fully, albeit in fragments, contradictions.

 

For those who lack the fullness of perception (‘omniscient idiots’) such model will be distorted: one half of the cycle will be overstretched, the other contracted. But such cases won’t be examined for one simple reason: analysis is a benefit of ‘doubting, thinking idiots’, for others it’s a curse.

 

Speaking of this model’s physics aspect, one should stress that it reflects and is applicable only to those processes which develop in frequency-amplitude regime. The processes of zero-amplitude phase-frequency shift are not examined here: they are the next step in the evolution, and normally are not perceived by ordinary minds.

 

Winding up, the author would like to stress that attempts to create a universal methodology of analysis have never ceased in the world. One can cite as example the Alchemy Wheel of Time, or Alexandre Saint Yves d'Alveydre's Archeometre, Hindu and Buddhist mandalas, and even tarot cards used in fortune-telling.

 

But the scope of this work does not stretch as far examination of these models and methodologies.

 

Nor does this work include examples of application of the New Dialectics to give analysis and forecasts of various time cycles. The reader can find them in my play Untrodden paths.

 

 

January 15, 2007. Andrei Shkarubo.