

| Home | News/Activities | Position Papers/Articles | Statements of Support | Photos | Links | Contact us |
Mt. Kanlaon, Its Myths and Wildlife, Painting by Masaste
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
|
Table of Contents:
|
|
Mt. Kanlaon Natural Park Management Plan June, 2008 (official management board document with information on the profile of the protected area and the management plan of the park)
II. INTRODUCTION III. PROFILE OF THE PROTECTED AREA. A. Historical Context and Rationale for Protected Area Establishment B. Regional and Local Development Context C. Physical Features: Location, Geology, Soils, Topography, Hydrology, Climate, Hazards D. Biological Features: Habitats and ecosystem; E. Social, Economic and Cultural Profile: 1. Population, demographics, and migration patterns; 2. Indigenous groups’ cultural profile; 3. Land use, ownership and tenure; 4. Resource use practices; 5. Poverty levels; 6. Social indicators; G. Current and Proposed Programs and Projects in MKNP H. Current PA Management Structure and Capabilities for Management I. Major Management and Development Issues and Concerns
IV. MANAGEMENT PLAN . . . . A. Vision, Missions, Goals, and Objectives B. Strategies: 1. Management zoning; 2. Integrated protection, rehabilitation and monitoring; 3. Research and documentations; 4. Community-based resource management; 5.Establishment of non-destructive livelihood alternatives; 6.Information, education and communication; 7. Human resource development; 8. Sustainable resource generation & mobilization; 9. Institutionalization of PA administration & networking; 10. Disaster management 1. Biodiversity conservation and environmental restoration, preservation of landscape, unique habitats and species and cultural characteristics; 2. Economic and social programs; 3. Management structures, capacity, and participation; 4. Disaster Management; E. Management Standards and Guidelines
V.PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT VII. BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN VIII. MONITORING PLAN . . . . A. Monitoring System, B. Evaluation System IX. REFERENCES
|
(Note: This Management Plan was approved prior to the passage of RA 9154, declaring Mt. Kanlaon a Natural Park and authorizing PNOC-EDC to enter into 169 hectares of a so called "buffer zone" for the purpose for geothermal exploration and development. In this 2001 Management Plan, there is no room for PNOC-EDC's geothermal development. The plan is included in full in this website because it is closer to an ideal of how the plan should be. )
Mt. Kanlaon Natural Park
Management Plan: June 2001(Con't)
3.5 Social, Economic and Cultural Profile
1. Population demographics and migration patterns
There are now 15 barangays that have territorial jurisdictions over the park with four having permanent barangay centers within the area while the rest are within one kilometer or less from the boundary. Negros Island in 1855 attracted migrants from other Visayan Islands of Iloilo, Capiz, Antique and Cebu who were mostly land less poor seeking jobs in the provinces’ haciendas. These migrants started clearing the forest to acquire land in the island. The additional settlers that occupied the park were sometime in the early 1920s near what is now Canlaon City. Since then, the number of migrants gradually increased through the years with the biggest influx coming during the period between 1980-1990.
Population in the PA is presently estimated at about 3,068 households. Out of these, the PA occupants who may qualify as tenured migrants reached some 2,939 households or about 14,928 individuals (table 7). The households within the MKNP are generally nuclear in character with average household size of 5 members per family. The park has a very young population where the average age of the residents is 23.55 years.
There are more males than females in the population of the park as seen in the table 7. Male population stands at 7,541 while those of females is at 7,387. Male population among the households in the various barangays within the park tends to be higher than the females except in Brgys. Malaiba and Lumapao of Canla-on City where the female population is higher than those of the male.
2. Indigenous People and Cultural Profile
MKNP is host to 2 groups of indigenous people whose population is slightly over 200 households. They are the Atis or Negritos and the Bukidnons. The Negritos are black skinned with kinky hair and flat noses to whom the name Negros comes from. The Atis, are highly nomadic in character and don’t have permanent settlements in the PA.
An ethnographic study in Codcod, San Cárlos City claimed that the Bukidnon is a separate and distinct ethnic group whose resistance to the inroads of colonization and Christianization alienated them from the majority of the local population. The OSCC organized two tribal councils at Barangay Codcod. These are the Cabagtasan Tribal Council and Iliran Tribal Council. However, memberships are mixed with both claiming almost the same members from the IPs community. The Bukidnons’ population is estimated at about 93 households with some 489 individual members. The group in 1997 made up an approximate 5.2% of the population of Brgy. Codcod in San Cárlos City.
The IPs are mostly engaged in agriculture using slash and burn and into production of rice, corn and vegetables. Other sources of income are fishing, hunting and private employment.
Table 7. Population and sex distribution of tenured migrants by barangay in MKN
|
|
|
|||
|
Area |
Total Number of Households enumerated |
Male HH Members |
Female HH Members |
Total HH Members |
|
A.San Cárlos City > Brgy. Codcod |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total |
1,073 |
2,901 |
2,769 |
5,670 |
|
B. Canlaon City >Brgy. Malaiba >Brgy. Lumapao >Brgy. Masulog >Brgy. Pula |
204 171 213 446 |
358 484 491 1,144 |
466 488 467 1,121 |
824 972 958 2,265 |
|
Sub Total |
1,034 |
2,477 |
2,542 |
5,019 |
|
C. La Castellana >Brgy. Mansalanao >Brgy. Sag-ang >Brgy. Biaknabato >Brgy. Cabagna-an >Brgy. Masulog |
3 13 91 239 81 |
9 34 255 576 212 |
8 34 259 540 217 |
17 68 514 1,116 429 |
|
Sub Total |
427 |
1,086 |
1,058 |
2,144 |
|
D. La Carlota City >Brgy. Yubo >Brgy. Araal |
21 77 |
59 204 |
50 197 |
109 401 |
|
Sub Total |
98 |
263 |
247 |
510 |
|
E. Bago City >Brgy. Mailum >Brgy. Ilijan |
3 18 |
7 52 |
5 54 |
12 106 |
|
Sub Total |
21 |
59 |
59 |
118 |
|
F. Murcia >Brgy. Minoyan |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total |
286 |
755 |
712 |
1,467 |
|
Grand Total |
2,939 |
7,541 |
7,387 |
14,928 |
3. Land Use Ownership and Tenure
The presence of settlements inside the MKNP has significantly altered the land use and classification of the parkland. While 55.24% or 11,537.48 hectares still have primary and secondary forest cover, some 29.10% or 7,148.05 hectares are already cultivated with some 291.10 hectares already titled. Tenured migrants in the PA include the IPs and settlers who occupy some 6,680 hectares of parkland covering home and farm lots which amount to 115.89 hectares and 6,564.4 hectares, respectively as indicated in Table 8.
The average land holding owned by an occupant within the MKNP is 2.14 hectares. Biggest average land holding is in the municipality of Murcia at 3.79 hectares while the smallest average land holdings is in Canla-on City at 1.29 hectares. The socio economic survey showed that 48.72% of the park residents own less than 1 hectare of land while 24.79% own between 1 and 2 hectares. In addition, 6.48% have holdings over 5 hectares while 11.72% own land between 2-3 hectares.
4. Resource Use Practices
The main activity of the MKNP communities is “panguma” (farming), which accounts for 95% of the households while the rest are engaged in other types of income generating activities such as seasonal workers for sugar cane plantations and game fowl breeding farms, extractive activities for minor forest products, charcoal making and micro-entrepreneurial activities like ambulant vending or peddling. The high concentration of households engaged in farming is largely due to the low social and technical skills of the occupants to secure employment or work other than farming or land based income source.
Corn is the number one agricultural product from the park as reported by 67.40% of the respondents. This is followed by bananas as reported by 32.3% of those surveyed while rice ranked third at 22.19%. Other popular products are various types of root crops used for food and sold for cash income.
|
Table 8. Distribution of Land Ownership and Occupied Areas in MKNP |
||||
|
Area |
Total Number of Households |
Total Area of Farmlots (Hectares) |
Total Area of Homelots (Hectares) |
Total Area Occupied |
|
A.San Cárlos City Brgy. Codcod |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total |
1,073 |
2,853.81 |
40.42 |
2,894.22 |
|
B. Canlaon City >Brgy. Malaiba >Brgy. Lumapao >Brgy. Masulog Brgy. Pula |
|
216.29 213.43 227.42 364.84 |
5.13 2.14 3.24 7.28 |
221.42 215.27 230.66 372.12 |
|
Sub Total |
1,034 |
1,021.98 |
17.80 |
1,039.77 |
|
C. La Castellana >Brgy. Mansalanao >Brgy. Sag-ang >Brgy. Biaknabato >Brgy. Cabagnaan >Brgy. Masulog |
3 13 91 239 81 |
7 51.80 273.80 675.35 161.80 |
.60 1.11 4.22 11.52 8.56 |
7.60 52.91 278.02 686.87 170.36 |
|
Sub Total |
427 |
1,169.75 |
26.01 |
1,195.76 |
|
D. La Carlota City >Brgy. Yubo >Brgy. Araal |
21 77 |
|
.15 7.06 |
94.15 201.66 |
|
Sub Total |
98 |
288.60
|
7.21 |
295.81 |
|
E. Bago City >Brgy. Mailum >Brgy. Ilijan |
3 18 |
27.00 47.50 |
.05 .08 |
27.05 47.58 |
|
Sub Total |
21 |
74.50 |
.13 |
74.63 |
|
F. Murcia >Brgy. Minoyan |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total |
286 |
1,155.50 |
24.32 |
1,179.82 |
|
Grand Total |
2,939 |
6,564.14 |
115.89 |
6,680.01 |
5. Poverty Level
The poverty incidence of communities inside the MKNP based on their monthly income is relatively high. Compared to the present provincial poverty threshold of P8,000 per month, some 94% or about 2,762 households fall under the poverty group.
The monthly income capacity of the residents of MKNP as shown in Table 9 vary widely from one another with the average set at P3,447 per month. It ranges from a claimed P100 and less by some 5 percent to a high P25,000 by less than 1% of the population. Meanwhile, 40% of the households have monthly income range between P1,000 to P5,000. Roughly 37% of the MKNP based households have members engaged in secondary economic activities. Greater cases of these secondary income activities are micro-enterprise (19.3%), farming (17.5%) and “pamugon” or farm work (16%). Over all income level from secondary sources has a median of P1,000 per month.
| Table 9. Range of Monthly Income Among MKNP Occupants | ||
|
INCOME |
MAJOR Number % |
SECONDARY N % |
|
1000 & below 1001 – 2000 2001 – 3000 3001 – 4000 4001 – 5000 5001 – 6000 6001 – 7000 7001 – 8000 8001 – 9000 9001 – 10000 10001 & Above T O T A L |
163 48.51 70 20.83 37 11.01 20 5.95 9 2.68 6 1.79 3 0.89 5 1.49 4 1.19 4 1.19 15 4.46 336 99.99 |
54 50.46 26 23.30 11 10.28 5 4.67 4 3.74 2 1.87 0 0.00 2 1.87 1 0.93 0 0.00 0 0.00 107 98.12 |
6. Social Indicators
There are government agencies in the different communities in MKNP providing social services. However, some residents reported that some are less responsive than others. About 29.47% of those interviewed shared that no DA representative has visited their community while about 17.3% noted the DA’s visit as infrequent. Meanwhile, 43.89% of the respondents said that representatives from the DOH visit their community once a year. However, some 16.3% say that they have not seen their DOH representative. The same is true with the Municipal Veterinarian. But despite the infrequent visit of DOH personnel to their community, 73.3% had their babies vaccinated for various diseases.
The average highest educational attainment in the MKNP is Grade 4. La Carlota City records the highest attainment at 2nd year high school. There is also a high incidence of out-of-school among the children. The number one reason for their inability to send their children to school is poverty as reported by 41.46%. Moreover, 19.69% reported lack of interest among their children as primary reason while another group of 12.44% cited the age of their children as a key factor. Some 16.59% noted that work prevents their children from going to school.
Power is generally not available to the residents of the MKNP with 91.28% reporting the use of kerosene lamp or “kingki” or “mitsa” as standard lighting facilities. Electricity is used only by about 10% of the respondents shown in Table 10. For water, residents of the MKNP are heavily dependent on springs as reported by 71.86%. Open dug well serve the needs of some 20.49% while about 17.49% use piped in water from spring development projects.
|
Table 10. Lighting Facilities in MKNP. |
||
|
LIGHTING TYPE |
Number |
% |
|
Multiple response n = 367 Kingki/Mitsa Petromax/Flourescent (Battery) Kuryente |
335 14 37 10 |
91.28 3.82 10.00 2.72 |