|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluation
Based on
the criteria listed below, this will give an indication as to how well
they know the biome that they chose to research. The students
written report will demonstrate their understanding of the topic.
I feel that the presentation will give me a clearer indication of the
depth of their understanding. Student presentations will be up to
the student group. They may do their presentation as a sales
pitch, commercial, skit, etc.
Part I: Preparation |
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Part
II: Presentation |
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
Delivery and Use of Visual Aids |
Presentation
read with limited use of the visual aids. |
Partial
reading of information with limited use of visual aids. |
Information
was presented with limited reference to notes. Visual aids used
to enhance presentation. |
Information
was presented and not read. Visual aids were use to enhance the
presentation. |
|
Voice projection, posture
and enthusiasm.
|
Voice
projects was unclear at times. Posture as poor. Little
Enthusiasm. |
Projection
was variable. Posture varied. Enthusiastic at times. |
Presentation
was heard for the most part. Posture varied at times.
Enthusiastic. |
Presentation
was clearly heard. Posture demonstrated confidence. Very
enthusiastic. |
|
Attitude, Contribution, and Listening |
Project
was presented with uneven contribution from the group members.
Members
often repeated data or skipped information in the presentation. |
Presented
project. Group members made varying contributions. Members did
not
listen to others overlapping data in their presentations. |
Positive
throughout presentation. Group members made a contribution to the
presentation. Members listened to others to enhance presentation. |
Very
positive throughout presentation. Each group member made a
significant
contribution and displayed good listening skills throughout the
presentation. |
|
| Part
III: Written report |
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
| Final
copy |
Topics
included. Many spelling and grammatical errors. Less than
four pages typed. Not a reflection of the rough draft. |
Topics
included. Three to five spelling errors. Less than four
pages. Reflection of the rough draft. |
Topics
included. One to two grammatical and spelling errors. Four
to five pages typed. Reflection of rough draft. |
Nine
topics included with title page. Free of grammatical and spelling
errors. Four to five pages typed. Clear reflection of rough draft. |
|
| Bibliography |
Not
alphabetized. Bibliographies do not contain all required
information. Punctuated incorrectly. |
Not
alphabetized. Bibliographies do not contain all required
information. Punctuated correctly. |
Not
alphabetized. All required information included. Punctuated
correctly. |
Alphabetized.
All required information included. Punctuated correctly. |
This project could be easily
modified for your student population and time commitments. It
could easily be adapted to just do the presentation part of the
project. I do not suggest that you modify the actual roles that
the students have. I feel that this is the strongest part of the
webquest. It is vital that the students assume the role of the
scientist and think as that scientist otherwise the authentic learning
of the project may be compromised. Please don't hesitate to
contact me if you have questions.
Top
Process Introduction
Standards Learners
Process Evaluation
Resources
Student Pages Credits
Author