North Wales


HOME
ABOUT
COMPARISON:
...Deaths
...
Addictiveness
...
Health
...
Crime
...
Number of users
BACKGROUND:
...UN
...Misuse Drugs Act:
......'drugs' definition
......'
misuse' definition
......
medicinal use, stress
...ACMD
...
Risky activities
...Police discretion
...
CPS discretion
...
Jury rights & duty
...
Human rights
...
Health policy
...
Education policy
...
Trade policy
...
Modernisation
...
Prohibition
......
Convictions
...
Civil disobedience
...
Concerns
.......
Gateway
.......
Driving
.......
Increased usage
...
Prejudice
...
Political parties
NORTH WALES
ACTION:
...
Leaflets
...
Letters published
...
Letters guide
...
Letters templates
...
Letters to MPs etc
NEWS
LINKS

For advert-free site go to www.palad.org.uk

North Wales newspaper articles - the drugs debate:

The original articles can be viewed at http://icnorthwales.icnetwork.co.uk
Just type 'cannabis' into the search box, top right, then find the relevant date.

What do people in North Wales think about drugs policy? Find out here:

Police 1
Police 2
Police - what to tell children?
MPs
Plaid Cymru
Professionals dealing with substance misuse
The public
Cannabis and pain relief
Drug problems in North Wales
Drug dealers supply 50% of children

Dec 14 2001: 'We need to look at legalising all drugs'
Daily Post

NORTH Wales chief constable Richard Brunstrom will today call for a Royal Commission to investigate the possibility of legalising some, or even all, illicit drugs. Mr Brunstom believes Britain is losing the battle against drugs and he will argue for the setting up of a Commission urgently to consider ways of reversing the trend.
The chief constable will tell members of the police authority that despite the spending of billions of pounds and thousands of officer hours the numbers of addicts and recreational users of illegal drugs in the UK have multiplied at an alarming rate since the 1970s. Mr Brunstrom will argue that following the lead of America, the UK has, since the 1960s, adopted one course, and one course only - banning the sale or possession of illegal drugs. That was despite the catastrophic failure of the USA's 1920s Prohibition Laws against alcohol. Mr Brunstrom believes despite an ever increasing effort to stop the flood of drugs such as cannabis, ecstasy, cocaine and heroin onto our streets they are now more available - and cheaper - than ever before. He will tell members that £6.6bn is spent on drugs annually in the UK and much of that sum is raised from criminal activity.
Mr Brunstrom will also attack the use of legal drugs - alcohol and tobacco - which he describes as the most dangerous. He finds it is baffling and hypocritical that these, albeit lightly controlled by the government which raises substantial taxes from their sale, are treated in a wholly different way from other addictive and dangerous drugs, despite the immense cost to society and industry from the results of their abuse.
Mr Brunstrom dismissed the Home Secretary's backing for the reclassification of cannabis as timid. He believes the move will leave the dealers and smugglers of illicit drugs to continue to amass vast fortunes while they undermine our society.

Sep 18 2002: 'Methadone is bigger killer than heroin' - police chief
By Steve Bagnall Daily Post Staff

"Chief Constable Richard Brunstrom was speaking before today's landmark conference at Clwyd Theatr Cymru, Mold, in which he will again call for a major review of the drugs laws.
He said: "Methadone is as addictive as heroin and is clearly more dangerous. Head for head, more people die from methadone abuse than heroin abuse.
Mr Brunstrom said there will be three points in his conference address - the current drugs laws are not working, agencies have to treat addicts as victims beyond arresting and jailing them, and part of successful treatment is making clinically pure heroin available to addicts on the NHS.
"The two most dangerous substances which are misused are tobacco and alcohol and they are freely available," he said. "They kill many more people than all the other illegal drugs. More than 50pc of all people dying from drugs die from tobacco, just under 50pc die from alcohol. Five or six per cent die form all the other drugs put together. Our drugs laws are illogical, they are unethical, they are counterproductive because they make the situation worse and they are untenable. I am arguing for a complete review of our drugs laws to put them on some rational basis. Why are some drugs legal and other drugs illegal? How on earth did we get into a situation where tobacco is freely available, although lightly controlled, and ecstasy is completely and utterly illegal? If you look at the death rate there is no comparison. It is difficult if not impossible to sustain an argument that heroin is more dangerous than cannabis or that cannabis more dangerous than tobacco. Heroin is not an inherently dangerous substance in its pure form. The real impact heroin has on society - unlike tobacco, which is killing many people, heroin doesn't kill hundreds and thousands of people each year - is it causes you to have to steal to feed your habit and that has an enormous impact on society which is not currently catered for."

Sep 5 2002: 'Police chief in dilemma over drug laws'
Emma Thomas, Crime Reporter, The Western Mail

ONE of Wales's leading police officers says he finds it impossible to explain Britain's drug laws to his children. As details emerge of how the Government's reclassification of cannabis policy will be policed, involving a "three strikes and out" tactic for dealing with users, North Wales Chief Constable Richard Brunstrom says he finds the law as it stands illogical. "It is impossible to explain logically to my children why cannabis is illegal and nicotine and alcohol, which are more addictive and more harmful, are freely available," he said.

Jul 20 2001: 'Cannabis decriminalised within five years, says MP'

Cannabis will be decriminalised by the end of this Parliament, believes a Labour member of the influential House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee.
David Winnick's comments come as a BBC survey showed that at least 81 Labour backbenchers would be prepared to vote for decriminalisation if it was recommended by a Royal Commission.
Thirty one said they would oppose it.
Even some ministers are in favour of relaxation of the law on the drug, claimed backbencher Jon Owen Jones, who yesterday tabled a Private Member's Bill in the Commons calling for legalisation.
Some 95 backbenchers told BBC radio that they would support a Royal Commission inquiry into the decriminalisation of the use and supply of cannabis - more than four-fifths of the 116 Labour MPs who responded to the survey.
And 32 said that they would vote for decriminalisation without an inquiry, with an additional 45 backing it if the inquiry found in favour and four only if supply was restricted to prescriptions by doctors. However, a majority of the 234 MPs approached - 118 - refused to reveal their thoughts on the subject, even anonymously.
Mr Jones, a former Welsh Office minister, welcomed the survey's findings, telling the programme: "I think there are a number of ministers who privately recognise that the policies of the Government are not working and need a radical overhaul."
Dame Ruth Runciman, whose report for the Police Foundation last year called for cannabis to be downgraded to Class C status, said the survey results reflected "considerable unease" about the UK's drug laws.
Decriminalisation would not require complex legislation and could be introduced by the time of the next General Election in 2005 or 2006, she said.

Sep 21 2001: 'Plaid back cannabis cafes plan'
By Clive Betts, Western mail

PLAID Cymru voted yesterday to approve the opening of cannabis cafes, and floated a dream of Wales gaining visits from tourists who use soft drugs.
By a large majority, the party's annual conference in Cardiff changed previous policy and approved the use of cannabis for recreational purposes.
The party also called for use of the drug for medicinal purposes to be decriminalised. ...
Probation officer Leanne Wood, a candidate in Rhondda at the last election, said that individuals did not become violent after using cannabis.
Ms Wood claimed, "It is no more harmful than tobacco or alcohol."
... another party heavyweight, former chairman Marc Phillips, swung the debate. "The arguments for removing cannabis from the atmosphere of illegality are compelling," he said.

Sep 19 2002: 'Politicians `ignoring the facts on drugs' '
By Rhodri Clark, The Western Mail

... at the conference of the North Wales Drugs and Alcohol Forum ... The 500 delegates voted over-whelmingly in favour of scrapping the distinction between hard and soft drugs and creating a scale of risk for all drugs, including alcohol and tobacco.

Oct 27 2001: 'Majority 'in favour of legalising cannabis' '

A majority of Britons believe cannabis should be legalised and sold under licence in a similar way to alcohol, according to a new poll.
Some 65% of those questioned, agreed it should be legalised and 91% said it should be available on prescription for sufferers of diseases like multiple sclerosis.
The poll, carried out by Mori for the News of the World, follows the Government's announcement that the law on the drug has been eased.
While possession of cannabis will still be illegal, police will no longer be able to arrest those carrying it.
It will also be reclassified as a Class C drug, putting it in the same category as anti-depressants or steroids.
The poll says 56% of people aged 18-34 supported the plans. Only among the over-55s was there a majority opposed to them. Alcohol and tobacco were rated as more dangerous by 45% to 24%.
There were worries over users progressing to other more harmful substances such as heroin and cocaine.
Some 47% said cannabis led to harder drugs, 41% said it does not.
A majority of those quizzed (53%) said the proposed change in the law would make no difference to the number of people taking cannabis.
Just 6% admitted having used it themselves, and 97% claimed that they would not use it in the future. Mori interviewed 603 Britons aged 18 or over on October 25 and 26.

Sep 10 2001: 'UK cannabis trials show 'significant' pain relief benefits'

Preliminary results from trials of cannabis-based pain-killers have shown most patients derived a clinically significant benefit. The trials taking place in Oxford, Great Yarmouth and London are testing the pain-relieving effects of active compounds found in cannabis. Early results showed that in 41 cases out of 53 pain relief was significantly greater than when patients were given a non-active "dummy" placebo drug.
GW Pharmaceuticals, which has a Home Office licence to grow cannabis for medicinal use, has presented the data at a meeting in the US. Most patients involved are suffering from multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injuries. Dr Philip Robson, medical director at GW Pharmaceuticals, said: "This is the most comprehensive evaluation of cannabis-based medicines so far undertaken in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury. "We are seeing definite trends indicating the superiority of active treatment over placebo. These encouraging early results fully justify the expansion of the clinical research programme into larger- scale phase three pivotal trials."
Dr Geoffrey Guy, executive chairman of GW Pharmaceuticals, said: "We remain confident of being able to present data on quality, safety and efficacy to the UK regulatory authorities in 2003, and - subject to approval - bring the first cannabis-based prescription medicine to market in early 2004."

Dec 5 2002: '1,000 clients using drink-drug service'
by Emyr Williams, Caernarfon And Denbigh Herald:

"David Roberts, manager of Substance Misuse Services with the North West Wales NHS Trust, said ... "There are very few areas in Ynys MÙn and Gwynedd where you can't get drugs these days, and it is clear that it has spread to all the rural areas, where substances are readily available."...
Giving a break-down of main substances involving referrals in the two counties, he revealed that heroin accounted for 41 per cent, alcohol 38 per cent, cocaine/crack 3 per cent, amphetamine 1 per cent, cannabis 1 per cent, and other opiates 16 per cent."

Dec 4 2002: 'Underage sales shock'
By Elgan Hearn, Bangor And Anglesey Mail

CIGARETTES and alcohol can easily be bought by underage consumers on Anglesey, according to a survey released by Trading Standards Officers. An undercover operation using young people to try to buy drink and cigarettes proved that some island shopkeepers were quite willing to sell goods to those underage.
The survey showed that children as young as 14 had little difficulty in buying alcoholic drink and tobacco products. Anglesey retailers sold alcohol on more than 50 per cent of occasions to children aged 14. The national figures of the survey organised by Wales Trading Standards showed a rate of 30 per cent. Similarly, illegal sales of cigarettes on Anglesey were made on 40 per cent of the occasions that volunteers tried to make test purchases.
Anglesey's chief trading standards officer David Riley expressed his extreme disappointment at the local results of the all-Wales survey into the sale of age-restricted goods to children. He said: "To add to these disturbing results, trading standards wrote to all retailers on Anglesey with detailed guidance some six weeks before the survey was carried out. "We even issued them prior warning that the survey would be taking place.
On Anglesey, test purchases were made at 60 outlets selling age-restricted products, including alcohol, tobacco and fireworks, during late October and early November.

 

Links:

North Wales Drug and Alcohol Forum: www.nwdaaf.org.uk
SubstanceMisuseNet: www.substancemisuse.net/wales.htm
Welsh Assemby's 'Tackling Substance Misuse in Wales': www.wales.gov.uk/subisocialpolicy/content/direct/misuse.htm
Crime v Health: www.wales.gov.uk/subisocialpolicy/content/consultations/daat-e.htm
Assembly's Health website: www.wales.gov.uk/healthplanonline/index.htm
Giving Up Smoking Campaign: www.givingupsmoking.co.uk


 
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1