Prejudice


HOME
ABOUT
COMPARISON:
...Deaths
...
Addictiveness
...
Health
...
Crime
...
Number of users
BACKGROUND:
...UN
...Misuse Drugs Act:
......'drugs' definition
......'
misuse' definition
......
medicinal use, stress
...ACMD
...
Risky activities
...Police discretion
...
CPS discretion
...
Jury rights & duty
...
Human rights
...
Health policy
...
Education policy
...
Trade policy
...
Modernisation
...
Prohibition
......
Convictions
...
Civil disobedience
...
Concerns
.......
Gateway
.......
Driving
.......
Increased usage
...
Prejudice
...
Political parties
NORTH WALES
ACTION:
...
Leaflets
...
Letters published
...
Letters guide
...
Letters templates
...
Letters to MPs etc

Origins:
Cannabis prohibition began alongside alcohol prohibition in puritanical 1920s America. Propaganda against cannabis falsely claimed it was a lethal addictive drug.

Opening of the film 'Reefer Madness' (1936) Directed by Louis Gasnier:
"The Motion Picture you are about to witness may startle you. It would not have been possible, otherwise, to sufficiently emphasise the frightful toll of the new drug menace which is destroying the youth of America in alarmingly increasing numbers. Marihuana is that drug. A violent narcotic -- an unspeakable scourge -- The Real Public Enemy Number One!
Its first effect is sudden, violent, uncontrollable laughter; then come dangerous hallucinations -- space expands -- time slows down, almost stands still… fixed ideas come next, conjuring up monstrous extravagances, the total inability to direct thoughts, the loss of all power to resist physical emotions… leading finally to acts of shocking violence… ending in often incurable insanity.
In picturing its soul-destroying effects, no attempt was made to equivocate. The scenes and incidents, which are fictionalised, are based upon actual research into the results of Marihuana addiction.
If their stark reality will make you think, will make you aware that something must be done to wipe out this ghastly menace, then this picture will not have failed in its purpose. Because the dread Marihuana may be reaching forth for your son or daughter… or yours…OR YOURS!"
www.dead-projectionist.com/reviewDetail.asp?ID=199

A poster from that era's propaganda is here


"Reefer makes darkies think they're as good as white men."

Federal Bureau of Narcotics Chief Harry J. Anslinger, 1929

“Users of marijuana become stimulated as they inhale the drug and are likely to do anything. Most crimes of violence in this section, especially in country districts, are laid to users of the drug.”
New York Times - Sep.16, 1934

“Marihuana is “a more dangerous drug than heroin or cocaine.” Authority for this statement is United States Commissioner of Narcotics H. J. Anslinger. . . . the drug is adhering to its Old World traditions of murder, assault, rape, physical demoralization, and mental breakdown.”
Scientific American - May 1938

"Marihuana influences Negroes to look at white people in the eye, step on white men's shadows and look at a white woman twice."
Hearst newspapers nationwide, 1935

"Permanent brain damage is one of the inevitable results of the use of marijuana."
Ronald Reagan 1974

"Marijuana leads to homosexuality ... and therefore to AIDS."
White House Drug Czar Carlton Turner 1986

 

Current prejudice:

A UK registered charity, The National Drug Prevention Alliance says on their website:
"It [cannabis] causes permanent brain damage, even from 1 joint every other day".
"What about the use of cannabis as a medicine ? This is a 'scam' by the legalisers 'to give pot a good name' (their words, not ours!). Every relevant American health authority has rejected it, for example in relation to MS, cancer, glaucoma, AIDS etc".
www.drugprevent.demon.co.uk/mainpage.html

Susan Greenfield, a leading neuroscientist, 2002:
"Another notion is that cannabis is less harmful than cigarettes. I'm not sure how this idea came about, certainly not as the results of any scientific papers."
"Moreover, there appears to be a severe impairment in attention span and cognitive performance in regular cannabis users, even after the habit has been relinquished. All these observations testify to a strong, long-lasting action on the brain. Some attempts have been made in laboratories to work out what cannabis could actually be doing to brain cells. So far, some data have suggested that there can be damage to neurons, and at doses comparable to those taken on the street.

Comment: The World Health Organisation's report 'Cannabis: a health perspective and research agenda' states: "The weight of the available evidence suggests that even the long term heavy use of cannabis does not produce any severe or grossly debilitating impairment of cognitive function. If it did research to date should have detected it".

www.observer.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,776394,00.html

The World Health Organisation's report 'Cannabis: a health perspective and research agenda':
"A suspicion that chronic heavy cannabis use may cause gross structural brain damage was provoked by a single poorly controlled study using an outmoded method of investigation which reported that cannabis users had enlarged cerebral ventricles (Campbell et al, 1971). This finding was widely and uncritically publicised. Since then a number of better controlled studies using more sophisticated methods of investigation have consistently failed to demonstrate evidence of structural change in the brains of heavy, long term cannabis users (e.g. Co et al, 1977; Kuehnle et al, 1977)."
www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/general/who-probable.htm

Action on Smoking and Health (ASH):
"A study often quoted as evidence of the harmfulness of cannabis (Wu et al - http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/318/6/347) compared toxin exposure from cigarettes and cannabis – however, the subjects had on average a history of smoking 29.9 tobacco cigarettes per day and 16.5 cannabis cigarettes per week (13 times difference)."
www.ash.org.uk/html/regulation/html/cannabis.html

Government reply to Police Foundation's 'Runciman Report' on The Misuse of Drugs Act:
"11. The Government agrees with the Police Foundation's conclusion that the main classification criteria [within The Misuse of Drugs Act] should continue to be that of dangerousness..."
www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200001/cmselect/cmhaff/226/22604.htm


 
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1