JackVanImpe_MISLEADING_no_reply

email_JackVanImpe_MISLEADING_no_reply ;
JackVanImpe_MISLEADING_no_reply;
JackVanImpe_MISLEADING_no_reply_i;
JackVanImpe_MISLEADING_no_reply_ii;
JackVanImpe_MISLEADING_no_reply_iii;
JackVanImpe_MISLEADING_no_reply_iv.;
JackVanImpe_MISLEADING_no_reply_v;
JackVanImpe_MISLEADING_no_reply_vi;

please remain connected to the internet to download & view the images.
place your cursor on any blank image and right click on show picture.

refresh your page

GOLDEN JUBILEE
1957 - 2007

TIME AND KNOWLEDGE
NAZRANA

HONOR AUTHENTIC SYMBOLS
OF PRIDE AND IDENTITY -
and to share
THEIR BEAUTY AND THEIR POWER
with one another

12 July 2007

[emphasis added, ali kenadian]

(Exodus 28:2 KJV) And thou shalt make holy garments for Aaron thy brother for glory and for beauty. [7 x 4 & 5 x 6]

(Hebrews 3:12 KJV) Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God. [5 x 3]

(Hebrews 3:13 KJV) But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. [13]

meaning:

THE SPIRIT OF PLURALISM is not a pallid religious compromise.

it is a sacred religious imperative.

aggregation

Dec. 13, 1936   [and Italy^[1] (Sardinia]

[12 + 13 = 25]

25: ==> 5 x 5]

2+5: ==> 7 x 1

1+9+3+6 ==> 19 X 1]

COMPARE

at Turin^[1] in Italy^[1]

June 13, 1911

Dec. 13, 1936

[and Italy^[2] (Sardinia]

Written to the Hebrews from Italy^[2]

Hebrews 13 - Italy^[1]

Hebrews 13 - Italy^[2]

(Hebrews 13:25 KJV) - Italy^[2]

Grace be with you all. Amen.

<Written to the Hebrews from Italy^[2],

by Timothy^[2].>

aggregation

[13:25 ==> 38 ==> 19 x 2]

[13+25 ==> 38

==>        19 x 2
25: ==> 5 x 5]

2+5: ==> 7 x 1

the top half of this article is new

with an evidentiary prologue

added to my original email

May 14, 1999 - John Paul II kisses the Koran (Qu'ran) at the Vatican.

To the objectors who claim that this book was not the Koran, we present an excerpt from an interview with FIDES News Service (June 1, 1999). In it, Chaldean Catholic Patriarch Raphael I affirmed that he was present when John Paul II kissed the Muslim "holy" book:

For the full text of the interview, click here.
POPE KISSES the KORAN @ TraditionInAction.org

BATTLE FOR THE BIBLE

How, in a Europe dominated by the Roman Catholic Church, did the Reformation emerge that would question the very foundations of the Church?

With or without Wycliffe's active involvement, the English Bible became part of an underground movement that became known as Lollardy and continued to spread after Wycliffe's death in 1384. It worried Church authorities enough that by 1407 the English translation was denounced as unauthorized, and translating or using translated Bibles was defined as heresy -- a crime for which the punishment was death by burning. In 1415 Wycliffe himself was denounced, posthumously, as a heretic. His body was exhumed and burned in 1428.

the divine vis-à-vis mystery concept
OF 2--TWO

[1] & [2]

their selfish desires and a lust for life preferred over the profound divine blessings

thou desiredst

(Deuteronomy 5:25 KJVA)^[1] Now therefore why should we die?^[1] for this great fire will consume us: if we hear the voice of YHVH^[1] (יהוה) - LORD our אלהים 'ĕlôhîym el-o-heem' - GOD any more, then we shall die.^[2]

(Deuteronomy 18:16 KJV)^[2] According to all that thou desiredst of the LORD thy God in Horeb in the day of the assembly, saying, Let me not hear again the voice of YHVH^[2] (יהוה) - LORD my אלהים 'ĕlôhîym el-o-heem' - GOD, neither let me see this great fire any more, that I die not.

that I die not

so, whatever of the DIVINE BLESSINGS;

the children of israel desired NOT;

THAT in turn, WAS GIVEN to the children of ISHMAEL FOREVER!

[SEE the irrefutable and irrevocable scriptural evidence and proof cited herein.]

contradiction -- excerpts

Jack Van Impe Ministries

Our Statement of Faith:

We believe in the

V_E_R_B_A_L_[???, ali kenadian ]

inspiration of the Bible;

the Trinity of the Godhead; .....

the Deity, Incarnation

the infallible rule of interpretation of Scripture to be Scripture itself

question

what is the meaning of: 'the VERBAL[???] inspiration of the Bible'??

WHERE in the bible did the lord god of israel say/declare that ?

as far as i know and believe, the bible alludes to no such thing!

therefore, could it be a personal innovation only?

it could well be, unless of course it could be PROVED otherwise.

please quote only the new testament to prove otherwise since, it was written well OVER 3 - 11 decades AFTER the mission and life of jesus himself.

"the V_E_R_B_A_L inspiration of the Bible''

We know of no such phrase anywhere in the Bible

On 3/27/07, JVIM E-Mail Guard System <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

You recently sent an e-mail message to someone at Jack Van Impe Ministries. ,,,,,,

Sincerely,

Jack Van Impe Ministries

Instructions:

Please click on the following link: http://emguard.jvim.com/verify .php?EMGID=2724570:8040768536

"the V_E_R_B_A_L inspiration of the Bible'' Inbox

ali kenadian
" Personal Correspondence Dept." <[email protected]>

NEED YOUR HELP. COULD YOU PLEAS...
Apr 6 (4 days ago)

"Personal Correspondence Dept."

Tomorrow's World

P.O. Box 3810

Charlotte, NC 28227-8010 USA

Phone: (704) 844-1970

Fax: (704) 841-2244

Regional Offices

to me

Dear Friend,

Thank you for your question about where a phrase is located in the Bible.

We know of no such phrase anywhere in the Bible.

If you have further need of information, please let us know.

PERSONAL CORRESPONDENCE DEPARTMENT

From: ali kenadian

Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 11:16 AM
To: Personal Correspondence
Subject: "the V_E_R_B_A_L inspiration of the Bible''

- Hide quoted text -
"Personal Correspondence Dept ."

NEED YOUR HELP. COULD YOU PLEASE CONFIRM THE FOLLOWING?

''WE BELIEVE IN the V_E_R_B_A_L inspiration of the Bible''

Jack Van Impe Ministries
Our Statement of Faith:
We believe in the V_E_R_B_A_L inspiration of the Bible;

question
what is the meaning of: 'the V_E_R_B_A_L inspiration of the Bible'??

WHERE in the bible did the lord god of israel say/declare that ?

your kind reply will be appreciated.

ali kenadian
alberta, canada

Jack Van Impe Ministries
failed to reply despite several reminders sent to
Jack Van Impe Ministries & Dr. Jack Van Impe .

http://www.jvim.com/

http://emguard.jvim.com/verify .php?EMGID=2724570:8040768536

in spite of an auto-response acknowledgment of my email dated march 27, 2007 and several reminders thereof, JACK VAN IMPE - had failed to date to answer my original inquiry re:

Our Statement of Faith :

We believe in the

V_E_R_B_A_L_[???, ali kenadian ]

inspiration of the Bible;

Jack Van Impe Ministries

FOLLOW THE SCRIPTURAL TREND ONLY
AND MAKE THE CONNECTION

'the word' - 'ο λόγος, lógos'^[2]

question

which one was it?

was it the following, as proclaimed by the pauline vis-à-vis trinitarian christians for millenniums?

John 1:1 The Word was God.

and god was the word

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God ... and the Word became flesh and dwelt among us . John 1:1&14

Answering Islam

[was this the latest edition/revision?, ali kenadian]

or, was it?

clarke: ........ Or, God was the Logos:

'and (^?) god was THE WORD'

the infallible rule of interpretation of Scripture to be Scripture itself

an important scriptural
sequence and context;
MOSTLY UNPRESERVED AND
MISREPRESENTED in most of the
known english translations

mystery concept of 2--two

_[1]_{&
[2]}

the god

_1]

and god

_[₂_]

[2]

toward the god

(2 Peter 1:20 KJV) Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

dire warning

(Revelation 22:18 KJV) For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

(Revelation 22:19 KJV) And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

john 1:1

a 3-three part DISJOINTED
statement joined together

vis-à-vis

3-three in 1-one DISJOINTED
statements joined together

mystery concept of 2--two

_[1]_{&
[2]}

toward the god

challenging the very foundation
of the pauline christianity

vis-à-vis

the trinitarian christianity;
their unfathomable doctrines;
cruci_FICTion & christology

the scriptural climax
and a powerful death blow

Art thou he that should come?
or look we for another?

CONTRADICTING the new testament

The Gospel According to John

Return to Index.

Chapter 1

1

1.    In the beginning was the Word-λόγος,[1]

2.    the Word-λόγος[2] was with ELOHIYM, [God אלהים 'ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ -plural]

3.    and the Word-λόγος[3] was EL. [אל 'êl⁴¹⁰ - singular]

[emphasis added, ali kenadian ]

2

The same was in the beginning with ELOHIYM. [God אלהים 'ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ -plural]

compare

Johannes 1:1 (LGB)
1 Im Anfang war das Wort,
und das Wort war bei Gott,
und Gott war das Wort.

unsolvable predicament

even if the above transliteration and its english translation was faithful and accurate to the letter, still the pauline vis-à-vis the trinitarian christians have a bigger and an insurmountable dilemma on their hand.

for all practical purposes, the said jesus christ, the word vis-à-vis 'the word is god/made flesh,' is NOT a UNIQUE divine entity anymore.

BECAUSE by all scriptural accounts only, jesus christ, the word is EL - [אל 'êl⁴¹⁰ - singular] / made flesh; was simply one of the many gods-'ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ in that hierarchy.

compare

Jehovah your God אלהים 'ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ is God אלהים 'ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ of gods,ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰

(Psalms 82:1 KJV+) A Psalm of Asaph.

1.     God^H430 אלהים 'ĕlôhîym el-o-heem'

2.     standeth in the assembly of *God,^H410 אל 'êl ale

he judgeth among

3.     the gods.^H430 אלהים 'ĕlôhîym el-o-heem'

H410 אל 'êl ale

H430 אלהים 'ĕlôhîym el-o-heem'

the God אל 'êl ale.⁴¹⁰,    of gods,אל 'êl⁴¹⁰^-(Daniel 11:36 MKJV)

Deuteronomy 10:17 MKJV)

For Jehovah your God אלהים 'ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ is God אלהים 'ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ of gods,ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ and Lord of lords, a great god-EL. [אל 'êl⁴¹⁰ - singular], the mighty, and a terrible God, who does not respect persons nor take a bribe.

(Joshua 22:22 MKJV)

Jehovah, the God of gods, - The LORD³⁰⁶⁸ God אל 'êl ale.⁴¹⁰ of gods,ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰

Jehovah, the God of gods - the LORD³⁰⁶⁸ God אל 'êl ale.⁴¹⁰ of gods,ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ he¹⁹³¹ .... in transgression against Jehovah (you shall not save us alive today),

(Psalms 136:2 MKJV) Oh give thanks to the God אלהים 'ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ of gods,ĕlôhîym⁴³⁰ ; for His mercy endures forever.

(Daniel 2:47 MKJV) The king answered Daniel and said, It is true that your God אלהּ 'ĕlâhh ^H426 is a God אלהּ 'ĕlâhh ^H426 of gods, אלהּ 'ĕlâhh ^H426and a Lord of kings, and a revealer of secrets, since you could reveal this secret.

your God⁴²⁶ is a God⁴²⁶ of gods,⁴²⁶

H426

H426. אלהּ. אֱלָהּ ‎ ĕlâhh.

el-aw'

(Chaldee); corresponding to H433; God: - God, god.

Polyglot Bible: Revelation: H426
The Polyglot Bible, full text etext at sacred-texts.com ... H426. אלהּ. אֱלָהּ ‎ ĕlâhh. el-aw (Chaldee); corresponding to 433 God: - God, god.

the God אל 'êl ale.⁴¹⁰, of gods,אל 'êl⁴¹⁰

(Daniel 11:36 MKJV) And the king shall do according to his will. And he shall exalt and magnify himself above every god אל 'êl ale.⁴¹⁰ and shall speak marvelous things against the God אל 'êl ale.⁴¹⁰, of gods אל 'êl ale.⁴¹⁰, and shall prosper until the fury is fulfilled. For that which is decreed shall be done.

H410

אל

'êl

ale

Shortened from H352; strength; as adjective mighty; especially the Almighty (but used also of any deity): - God (god), X goodly, X great, idol, might (-y one), power, strong. Compare names in “-el.”

Scrivener Textus Receptus
(Joh 1:1 GNT-TR)

εν αρχη ην ο λογος ^[1]
και ο λογος^[2] ην προς τον θεον
και θεος ην ο λογος^[3]

(Joh 1:2 GNT -TR) ουτος ην εν αρχη προς τον θεον
HebGrk Eng (John 1)
John 1:1

en arch hn o logo^[1]V
kai o logo^[2]V hn proV ton qeon
kai qeoV hn o logo^[3]V

Joh 1:2

outoV hn en arch proV ton qeon
German Luther (John 1)
John 1:1
Im Anfang war das Wort^[1],
und das Wort^[1] war bei Gott,

und Gott war das Wort^[3].

Joh 1:2

Dasselbe war im Anfang bei Gott.

blatant violation of the scriptures

(Deuteronomy 4:2 KJV)^[1]

(Revelation 22:18 KJV)^[1]

(Deuteronomy 12:32 KJV)^[2] What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

(Revelation 22:19 KJV)^[2] And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

FALSE and misleading translation

DISPLACEMENT of scriptural words,

contexts and connotations

(John 1:1 GNT-TR)

1.     εν αρχη ην ο λογος^[1]

2.     και ο λογος^[2] ην

προς τον θεον^[^a*^] _[1]

3.     και θεος^[^b*^] ην ο λογος^[3 ]

Johannes 1:1 (LGB)
1 Im Anfang war das Wort,
und das Wort war bei Gott,
und Gott war das Wort.

(John 1:2 GNT-TR)

ουτος ην εν αρχη

προς τον θεον^[^a*^] _[1]

G4314 -- πρός     pros    pros
      motion towards, accession to, or nearness at.

A strengthened form of G4253; a preposition of direction; forward to, that is, toward (with the genitive case the side of, that is, pertaining to; with the dative case by the side of, that is, near to; usually with the accusative case the place, time, occasion, or respect, which is the destination of the relation, that is, whither or for which it is predicated): - about, according to, against, among, at, because of, before, between, ([where-]) by, for, X at thy house, in, for intent, nigh unto, of, which pertain to, that, to (the end that), + together, to ([you]) -ward, unto, with (-in). In compounds it denotes essentially the same applications, namely, motion towards, accession to, or nearness at.

the scriptural climax
and a powerful death blow

an official word for word transliteration and translation, linked to the original christian web site, for your perusal and verification.

please always remember the last line of john 1:1 quoted here above.

whimsical and misleading rendition into english, propagated in the christendom for millenniums

rest assured, although the pauline christianity is fraught with paul's explicit and implicit lies and deceptions;
as admitted in his own words and quoted herein;
we cannot find a bigger lie, distortion;
and a deliberate misrepresentation
of the christian scripture and faith;
than the following:

COLLABORATION AND EVIDENCE

John 1:1 The WORD^[^i] was GOD^[ii].

AND GOD^[ii] WAS THE WORD^[^i]

unfortunately, most of all pauline vis-à-vis trinitarian christians do not understand the inner meaning and significance of the above because of the wrong, false and misleading greek and english translations per se.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the WORD was GOD ... and the Word became flesh and dwelt among us . John 1:1&14

[was this the latest edition/revision?, ali kenadian ]

compare

(John 1:1 GNT-TR)

  εν αρχη ην ο λογος

και ο λογος ην προς τον θεον

και θεος ην ο λογος

AND GOD WAS THE WORD.
Johannes 1:1 (LGB)

Im Anfang war das Wort,
und das Wort war bei Gott,
und Gott war das Wort.

collaboration and evidence

John 1:14

(John 1:14 KJV) And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

(John 1:14 CEV) The Word became a human being and lived here with us. We saw his true glory, the glory of the only Son of the Father. From him all the kindness and all the truth of God have come down to us.

  (John 1:14 HNV) The Word became flesh, and lived among us. We saw his glory, such glory as of the one and only Son of the Father, full of grace and truth.

(John 1:14 LITV) And the Word became flesh and tabernacled among us. And we beheld His glory, glory as of an only begotten from the Father, full of grace and of truth.

(John 1:14 RV) And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us (and we beheld his glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father), full of grace and truth.

(John 1:14 WNT) And the Word came in the flesh, and lived for a time in our midst, so that we saw His glory--the glory as of the Father's only Son, sent from His presence. He was full of grace and truth.

and so on! their fervent enthusiasm and faith simply swells with each new edition. and the end is not in sight as yet.

a judicious analysis of the text vis-à-vis scripture under review

John 1:1 The Word^[³^] was God.

(John 1:1 KJV)

1.    In the beginning was the Word^[1],

2.    AND the Word^[²^]

was with (^?) God^[¹^],

ELOHIYM, [God אלהים 'ĕlôhîym^{430
-}plural]

3.   John 1:1 The Word^[³^] was God. ^[²^].

[אל 'êl⁴¹⁰^-singular]

[emphasis added, ali kenadian ]

προς τον θεον^[^a*^]

( τον --the ^?) excluded in the english translations; words displaced and meanings changed to suit their own purpose.

Word, The
(Gr. Logos), one of the titles of our Lord, found only in the writings of John (Joh_1:1-14; 1Jo_1:1; Rev_19:13).

clarke: And the Word was God - Or, God was the Logos:

specifically (with the article in John) the Divine Expression (that is, Christ):

(John 1:2 KJV) The same was in the beginning

with (^? ) God^[¹^],

ELOHIYM, [God אלהים 'ĕlôhîym^{430
-}plural]

προς τον θεον^[^a*^]

( τον --the ^?) excluded in the english translations & the meaning changed to suit their own purpose.

excerpts

Jack Van Impe Ministries

Our Statement of Faith:

We believe in the

V_E_R_B_A_L_[???, ali kenadian ]

inspiration of the Bible;

the Trinity of the Godhead; .....

the Deity, Incarnation

the infallible rule of interpretation of Scripture to be Scripture itself

stupendous question

did the said 'Divine Expression' / Or, God was the Logos vis-à-vis 'the Trinity of the Godhead', etc., apply to jesus christ in any sense of the word at all?

the imprudent trinitarians vis-à-vis the pauline christians DEFEAT their own purpose

BECAUSE, for what it's worth, NO such thought, text, context or connotation EVER EXISTED in the ORIGINAL Textus Receptus of the Greek per se.

(2 Peter 1:20 KJV)
Knowing this first,
that no prophecy of the scripture
is of any private interpretation.

an official word for word transliteration and translation, linked to the original christian web site, for your perusal and verification.

compare

an incomplete translation vis-à-vis distortion of the original

further collaboration and evidence

compare

toward the god

hath more abounded through my lie (Romans 3:7 KJV)

(John 1:1 KJV) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

(John 1:2 KJV) The same was in the beginning with God.

toward the god

A SHOCKING TRANSITION OF

'THE GOD'

INTO SIMPLY

'and (^?) god was THE WORD'

clarke: ........ Or, God was the Logos:

the infallible rule of interpretation of Scripture to be Scripture itself
>>

WRESTLING
with the reconstructed & mind boggling
sentence

The Jehovah's Witnesses and John 1:1

In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God,
and the Word was a god." The New World Translation

c. and the Word^[1] was A god^[2].
This one was in [the] beginning with God. [new world translation of the holy scriptures, 1984, pp. 1281]

1808    'and the word was _ A_ god'

1864   'and _ A_ god was the WORD'

1935    'and the word was DIVINE'

1950    'and the word was _ A_ god'

1975    'and _ A_ god [or, of _ A_ divine kind] was the WORD'

1978    'and GODLIKE SORT was the LOGOS'

1979    'and _ A_ god was the LOGOS. LOGOS. LOGOS. LOGOS.

therefore, john's statement that the word or logos was A god or divine or godlike DOES NOT mean that he was the god with whom he was, it merely expresses a certain quality about the word or logos BUT IT DOES NOT IDENTIFY HIM AS ONE AND THE SAME AS GOD HIMSELF [new world translation of the holy scriptures, 1984, pp. 1579]

>>

N S B Notes: Non-Trinitarian Bible Translations

COMPARE John 1:1: Approximately four hundred and fifty English translations of the Christian Greek Holy Scriptures have been written over the past five hundred years. Of this total, about forty have rendered John 1:1 with wording that is different then the usual Trinitarian statement: “the Word was God”.

The following Bible translations of John 1:1 would indicate that perhaps these were Non-Trinitarian Bible Translations. Other important Scripture verses would also need to be examined to determine how non-Trinitarian they really were. Some of these translations read very much like the Trinitarian Biased Translations in other verses.

Reijnier Rooleeuw, 1694, "and the Word was a god"

Harwood, 1768, "and was himself a divine person"

Newcome, 1808, "and the word was a god"

Abner Kneeland, 1822, "The Word was a God"

Thompson, 1829, "the Logos was a god

Leicester Ambrose, 1879, "And the logos was a god"

Stage, 1907, "Das Wort war selbst gttlichen Wesens" [The Word/word was itself a divine Being/being].

Charles A.L. Totten, 1900, "the Word was Deistic [=The Word was Godly]

J.N. Jannaris, 1901, [A]nd was a god"

George William Horner, 1911, [A]nd (a) God was the word"

Holzmann, 1926, "ein Gott war der Gedanke" [a God/god was the Thought/thought]

Robert Harvey, D.D., 1931 "and the Logos was divine (a divine being)"

Ernest Findlay Scott, 1932, "[A]nd the Word was of divine nature"

William Temple, Archbishop of York, 1933, "And the Word was divine."

Rittenlmeyer, 1938, "selbst ein Gott war das Wort" [itself a God/god was the Word/word]

Goodspeed, 1939, "the Word was divine

Lyder Brun (Norw. professor of NT theology), 1945, "Ordet var av guddomsart" [the Word was of divine kind]

Ervin Edward Stringfellow (Prof. of NT Language and Literature/Drake
University, 1943, "And the Word was Divine"

Torrey, 1947, "the Word was god

Pfaefflin, 1949, "war von gttlicher Wucht [was of divine Kind/kind]

James L. Tomanec, 1958, [T]he Word was a God"

New English, 1961, "what God was,the Word was"

Cotton Parch Version, 1970, and the Idea and God were One

Moffatt, 1972, "the Logos was divine

Translator's NT, 1973, "The Word was with God and shared his nature

Philip Harner, 1974, "The Word had the same nature as God"

Maximilian Zerwich S.J./Mary Grosvenor, 1974, "The Word was divine"

Siegfried Schulz, 1975, "And a god (or, of a divine kind) was the Word"

Barclay, 1976, "the nature of the Word was the same as the nature of God"

Schneider, 1978, "and godlike sort was the Logos”

Schonfield, 1985, "the Word was divine”

Revised English, 1989, "what God was, the Word was”

TRANSLATIONS THAT CAN BE READ ONLINE:

2001 TRANSLATION, "In an ancient time, there was the Word. The word was with God and the Word was powerful."

NEW WORLD TRANSLATION, 1950/1963/1984, “In the beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.”

NEW SIMPLIFIED BIBLE, 2003, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was like God.

The New Simplified Bible is Not Trinitarian Biased! John 1:1, 18; 8:58; 10:34-36; 14:10, 11, 17; 16:13-15; Exodus 3:14, 15 and many other references give evidence of this.

COMPARE John 14:10: Now let’s compare how John 14:10 is translated in several modern translations. The phrase in question is “I am in the Father” and “the Father is in me.” One would think that Jesus and the Father were one and the same being from this wording. However, the Greek word “en” they translated “in.” It can also be translated “with.” Notice the comparison:

1769 Authorized Version of KJV: “I am in the Father.”
1902 Rotherham Bible: “I am in the Father.”
1933 George M Lamsa Translation: “I am with the Father.”
1961 New World Translation: “I am in union with the Father.”
1989 New Revised Standard Version: “I am in the Father.”
1995 New American Standard Bible: “I am in the Father.”
2000 New International Version: “I am in the Father.”
2001 2001 Translation: I’m in unity with the Father.”
2003 New Simplified Bible: “I am with the Father.”

Nearly all English Bible translations use the phrase “I am in the Father” at John 14:10. This time we find four translations that do not emphasize the false and mysterious Trinity. They are the New World Translation, George M Lamsa Translation, the 2001 Translation, and the New Simplified Bible.

COMPARE John 8:58: Take a closer look at John 8:58. Most Bible translations use the deliberate Trinitarian phrase, “Before Abraham was, I am.” This is Jesus Christ the Son of God speaking. They want you to think that phrase “I am” means God. But does it? Or does it simply mean “I exist (existed).” The word they translated “am” is from the Greek “eimi.” It has several meanings including: am, exist, and was. Notice how the the translations compare:

1611 King James Version: “I am”
1901 American Standard Version: “I am”
1933 George M Lamsa Translation: “I was”
1961 New World Translation: “I have been”
1989 New Revised Standard Version: “I am”
1995 New American Standard Bible: “I am”
2ooo New International Version: “I am”
2001 2001 Translation: “I existed before Abraham was born.”
2003 New Simplified Bible: “I existed before Abraham was born”

Again we find the same four translations that champion the true God of the Bible, a Monotheistic Deity. They are the New World Translation, George M Lamsa Translation, the 2001 Translation, and the New Simplified Bible.

COMPARE Exodus 3:14: This is where the devious conspiracy begins! The Trinitarian translators mislead the unsuspecting Bible student at the very begininng of the the Holy Scriptures. The Hebrew word that they translate “I AM WHO I AM” is “hayah.” It can be translated “am”, “have been”, “will become”, “exist”, remain”, “will be”. Look at these translation comparisons:

1611 King James Version: “I AM THAT I AM”
1901 American Standard Version: “I AM THAT I AM”
1933 George M Lamsa Translation: “I am AHIAH ASHAR HIGH, (that is, THE LIVING GOD)
1961 New World Translation: “I SHALL PROVE TO BE WHAT I SHALL PROVE TO BE”
1989 New Revised Standard Version: “I AM WHO I AM”
1995 New American Standard Bible: “I AM WHO I AM”
2ooo New International Version: “I AM WHO I AM”
2001 2001 Translation: “I am the One Who [Proves] to Be!”
2003 New Simplified Bible: “[I exist and] I will be who I will be”

Again we find only four English translations that recognize the true God of the Holy Scriptures. These translations are the New World Translation, George M Lamsa Translation, the 2001 Translation, and the New Simplified Bible.

Do you see the difference? The Trinitarian translators want you to believe that God is called “I AM” in the “Old Testament” and Jesus is called “I AM” in the “New Testament” and, therefore, they must be the same…and part of a mysterious, inscrutable, combination of three-Gods-in-one or God in three persons. This mystifying belief is even beyond the average human imagination. Only Satan the devil could have thought up such deceit and confusion!
regardless, jesus then, was the WORD, which not only preceded THE GOD, the father in the beginning, BUT ALSO successfully converted him.

and/or 'THE GOD' JOURNEYED TOWARDS THE WORD;
and the TWO then COLLIDED;

result

tragically, the god lost his divinity, godhood, supremacy
and primacy all at once

2.     και ο λογος^[2] ην

and the WORD was

προς τον θεον^[^a*^]

TOWARD THE GOD

'and (^?) god was THE WORD'

interesting facts

τον³⁵⁸⁸ θεον²³¹⁶

και²⁵³² θεος²³¹⁶

ην²²⁵⁸ ο³⁵⁸⁸ λογος³⁰⁵⁶



τον³⁵⁸⁸ and ο³⁵⁸⁸

1. although, the meanings of the 2 scriptural words namely: τον³⁵⁸⁸ and ο³⁵⁸⁸ ;

2. were the same or similar;

3. and also the same set of rules applied in both cases;

4. the rules were arbitrarily changed;

5. because of own baseless traditions and beliefs thereof.

G3588

ὁ, ἡ, τό

ho hē to

ho, hay, to

The masculine, feminine (second) and neuter (third) forms, in all their inflections; the definite article; the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom): - the, this, that, one, he, she, it, etc.

result:

the god--τον³⁵⁸⁸ θεον²³¹⁶ then became ===> 'god- θεος²³¹⁶' - vis-à-vis an inferior entity;
destined for conversion;
the definite article WAS DROPPED.

whereas, the word--ο³⁵⁸⁸ λογος³⁰⁵⁶' remained ===> 'the word -- ο³⁵⁸⁸ λογος³⁰⁵⁶'  ;
and also became all the more powerful in that new hierarchy;

the definite article WAS RETAINED TO GIVE HIM THAT SUPREMACY AND PRIMACY over 'god- θεος²³¹⁶'.

'and (^?) god was THE WORD'

1864   'and _ A_ god was the WORD'
1979    'and _ A_ god was the LOGOS.
BUT IT DOES NOT IDENTIFY HIM AS ONE AND THE SAME AS GOD HIMSELF
[new world translation of the holy scriptures,
1984, pp. 1579].

question

WHICH one of these 2 'words - λόγος, lógos ' THEN, journeyed towards an unknown god, TO REGAIN HIS ORIGINAL GODHOOD?

further collaboration and evidence

compare

toward the god

WHEN did that journey end, if ever?

WHICH one of these 2 'words - λόγος, lógos ' became flesh AFTERWARDS, at john 1:14?

please prove it only from verses john 1:1-2,14 under discussion.

mystery concept of 2--two

_[1]_{&
[2]}

toward the god

total DISINTEGRATION of
the so-called 'trinity'

(John 1:1 GNT-TR)

1.     εν αρχη ην ο λογος^[1]

2.     και ο λογος^[2] ην

προς τον θεον^[^a*^] _[1]

3.     και θεος^[^b*^] ην ο λογος^[3 ]

(John 1:2 GNT-TR)

ουτος ην εν αρχη

προς τον θεον^[^a*^] _[2]

_summar_y

i.    θεος^[^b*^]             ==GOD WAS THE==>     ο λογος^[3 ]

ii.    ο λογος^[3 ] ==THE WORD ==> SAME / HE==>     ουτος

iii.    ουτος                 ==WAS towards the god==>    προς τον θεον_[2]

_iv.an unending, endless AND jumbled journey continues EVEN NOW:

   ====>     προς τον θεον_[2]

G4314 -- πρός     pros    pros
      motion towards, accession to, or nearness at.

A strengthened form of G4253; a preposition of direction; forward to, that is, toward (with the genitive case the side of, that is, pertaining to; with the dative case by the side of, that is, near to; usually with the accusative case the place, time, occasion, or respect, which is the destination of the relation, that is, whither or for which it is predicated): - about, according to, against, among, at, because of, before, between, ([where-]) by, for, X at thy house, in, for intent, nigh unto, of, which pertain to, that, to (the end that), + together, to ([you]) -ward, unto, with (-in). In compounds it denotes essentially the same applications, namely, motion towards, accession to, or nearness at.

the NON-CATHOLIC christians have continually
challenged the vatican's NON-SCRIPTURAL authority AND CELIBACY

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger

Watch Sex crimes and the Vatican

Catholic Church Settles Los Angeles Sex Abuse Cases for $660 Million

Sunday, July 15, 2007

LOS ANGELES — The nation's largest Catholic archdiocese has settled its abuse cases for $660 million, by far the largest payout in the church's sexual abuse scandal, The Associated Press has learned.

The settlements push the total amount paid out by the U.S. church since 1950 to more than $2 billion, with about a quarter of that coming from the Los Angeles archdiocese.

Marriage is honorable in all

(Hebrews 13:4 KJV)

Marriage is honourable in all,
and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers
and adulterers
God will judge.

PETER, the so-called first pope;

PETER was a married disciple and an apostle of jesus;

PETER was a CIRCUMCISED jew;

PETER was an apostle to the CIRCUMCISED jews;

PETER preached the gospel of the circumcision;

(Matthew 8:14 KJV) And when Jesus was come into Peter's house, he saw his wife's mother laid, and sick of a fever.

(Galatians 2:7 KJV) But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;

(Galatians 2:8 KJV) (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)

please note that jesus himself chose a 'MARRIED' disciple and an apostle TO GUIDE HIS FLOCK with the other 11-eleven apostles.

(Hebrews 13:4 KJV) Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge

(Matthew 19:4 KJV) And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

(Matthew 19:5 KJV) And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

(Matthew 19:6 KJV) Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

another gospel

cherry picking

however, not only did the vatican IGNORE JESUS' own teachings ;

and FAILED to follow his above cited example;

the vatican IGNORE paul's teaching as well;

(Hebrews 13:4 KJV) Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge

the vatican followed paul of tarsus instead;

and his [pauline] teachings;

paul had clearly ABROGATED most, if not all of jesus' teachings.

(Galatians 1:6 KJV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:

(Galatians 1:7 KJV) Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

(Galatians 1:8 KJV) But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

(Galatians 1:9 KJV) As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

(Galatians 2:9 KJV) And when James, Cephas^G2786, and John, who seemed to be pillars,^G4769, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.

Cephas^G2786
Κηφᾶς

Kēphas

kay-fas'

Of Chaldee origin (compare [H3710]); the Rock; Cephas (that is, Kepha), surname of Peter: - Cephas.

Cephas^G2786was ====> pillars,^G4769

στύλος

stulos

stoo'-los

From στύω stuō (to stiffen; properly akin to the base of G2476); a post (“style”), that is, (figuratively) support: - pillar.

(1 Timothy 3:15 KJV) But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself

·        in the house of God,

·        which is the church of

the living God,

·        the pillar⁴⁷⁶⁹

·   and ground of the truth.
^{G4769

στύλος
stulos
Total KJV
Occurrences: 4

pillar, 2

1Ti_3:15,
Rev_3:12

pillars,
2

Gal_2:9,
Rev_10:1}

be ye followers of me [paul]

(1 Corinthians 4:16 KJV) Wherefore I beseech you, be ye followers of me.

(1 Corinthians 11:1 KJV) be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.

in spite of what jesus declared about 'simon peter', paul did not give any kind of priority or primacy to peter himself.

moreover, there is no provision for the roman catholic papacy even in paul's teachings.

The Petrine Deception Volume 8, Issue 5 By Douglas S. Winnail

Tomorrow’s World Facts of History

BUT WAS PETER THE FIRST POPE TO PRESIDE IN ROME? EVEN CATHOLIC SOURCES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE TERM "POPE" WAS NOT USED IN THE WEST "UNTIL THE FIRST HALF OF THE 5TH CENTURY" (Short Biographies of All the Popes, Lozzi Roma, p. 2).

As scholar Hans Küng states: "Catholic theologians concede that there is no reliable evidence THAT PETER WAS EVER IN CHARGE OF THE CHURCH IN ROME AS SUPREME HEAD OR BISHOP" (The Catholic Church, Küng, p. 20). Professor Küng also mentions that "there could be no question of a legal primacy—or even of a pre-eminence based on the Bible—of the Roman community or even of the Bishop of Rome in the first centuries" (ibid., p. 49). The New Testament does not link Peter with Rome, and it mentions no successor to Peter.

the vatican version http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Pope

Early history

Catholics say that the primacy of the papacy derives from Jesus Christ himself, while non-Catholic historians see the primacy of the pope as arising out of hundreds of years of church tradition. All agree that the Pope's role developed through history.

Early history It is generally accepted amongst most Catholic and non-Catholic historians that the institution of the papacy as it exists today developed through the centuries, after the traditional ARRIVAL OF PETER IN ROME C. 50.

During the first century of the Christian Church, the Roman capital became recognized as a Christian center of exceptional note since it WAS FOUNDED BY ST. PETER, THE "PRINCE OF THE APOSTLES"; but there are only a few 1st century references to the r! ecogniti on of the authoritative primacy of the Roman See outside of Rome.

MHCC;   Christ added that he had named him Peter, in allusion to his stability or firmness in professing the truth. The word translated “rock,” is not the same word as Peter, but is of a similar meaning. Nothing can be more wrong than to suppose that Christ meant the person of Peter was the rock. Without doubt Christ himself is the Rock, the tried foundation of the church; and woe to him that attempts to lay any other! Peter's confession is this rock as to doctrine.

But what does the Bible say?

No one can deny or find fault with FACTS. They are actualities! Plain facts concerning the Bible itself, its characters, statements, etc., educates and edifies. This includes Peter, for example, who is introduced in John 1:40-42. "When Jesus saw him He said, thou art Simon [one who hears], the son of Jona; thou shalt be Cephas, which is by interpretation, a stone." "Cephas" is Syriac; "Peter" is Greek. It was Peter who first preached the gospel of Christ to the Jewish nation and to the Gentiles. The fact remains however, that Peter (with the eleven) was an apostle only "to the circumcision," Israel. Galatians 2:7,9 reads: "When they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision [Gentiles] was committed unto me [Paul] as the gospel of [or 'to'] the circumcision was unto Peter; and when James, Cephas [Peter], and John who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me they gave to me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship that we should go to the heathen (Gentiles) and they unto the circumcision" (Israel).

Who Heads the True Church?

The Jews knew from the old scriptures that the "Son of God" denoted Deity and that the Lord is called "a Rock": "He is THE ROCK... the Rock that begat thee... our Rock. Deut.32:4,18,31. "Who is a rock save our GOD?" Psalms 18:31. Thus the apostles had no misunderstanding of Christ's words after Peter's confession, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God," that not on a mere man, not on Peter ("Petros," a stone), but on this Rock ("Petra," a great rock, Christ) "I will build my church." Matt. 16:16,18.

Evidently, Christ's church is not built upon a mere man, but upon the foundation laid down by the apostles and prophets, "Jesus Christ Himself being the chief cornerstone." Eph. 2:20. To this Peter adds his testimony in 1 Peter 2:6-8, that Christ the chief cornerstone was the "stone which the builders (Jewish leaders) disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, a stone of stumbling and a ROCK of offence." All believers, including Peter, "as living stones are built up a spiritual house," v.5. As "one who hears" Simon Peter included himself among the "living stones" who have heard and believed the gospel, who in Christ "are builded together for the habitation of God through the Spirit." Eph. 2:21,22. "Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ." 1 Cor. 3:11.

Truly, it is the Lord Jesus Christ, the FOUNDER of His church (Whom "God hath highly exalted and given a name which is above every name" Phil. 2:9), Who heads His church, NOT a succession of Adamic sinful human beings, elected by men of like Adamic nature, to become "Popes."

(Malachi 2:10 KJV) Have we not all one father? hath not one God אל 'êl ale.⁴¹⁰ created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

(John 17:11 KJV) And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.

in the roman catholic christian world, the pope is the 'holy father,' see: the vatican web site.

and that being an irrefutable and irrevocable claim, is the pope then also claiming to be the god on earth as well, the 'holy father' of jesus christ himself?

consequences

ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves

(Matthew 23:8 KJV) But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.

(Matthew 23:9 KJV) And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.

(Matthew 23:10 KJV) Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.

(Matthew 23:15 KJV) Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

(2 Thessalonians 2:4 KJV) Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

(2 Thessalonians 2:3 KJV) Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

(2 Thessalonians 2:4 KJV) Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

(2 Thessalonians 2:8 KJV) And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

(2 Thessalonians 2:9 KJV) Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

(2 Thessalonians 2:10 KJV) And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

(2 Thessalonians 2:11 KJV) And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

(2 Thessalonians 2:12 KJV) That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

the trinitarian christianity;
their unfathomable doctrines ;
cruci_FICTion & christology

exposing the millenniums-old lie
GUIDING THE HOLY BIBLE

WHICH IS THE TRUE - UNCORRUPTED 'HOLY BIBLE' AFTER ALL?
faith power works wonders

Jack Van Impe Ministries
[email protected]

the new testament

AND there is no consistency within the new testament pre se

1Jo 5:7
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

Available Translations and Versions for 1Jo 5:7

KJV
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

King James Version 1611, 1769

NKJV

The New King James Bible: Counterfeit.

For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one.

Footnotes:

5:4

M-Text reads your.

5:8

NU-Text and M-Text omit the words from in heaven (verse 7) through on earth (verse 8). Only four or five very late manuscripts contain these words in Greek.

5:9

NU-Text reads God, that.

5:13

NU-Text omits the rest of this verse.

5:18

NU-Text reads him.

New King James Version © 1982 Thomas Nelson

NLT
So we have these three witnesses-

Footnote:
Some very late manuscripts add in heaven—the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. And we have three witnesses on earth.

New Living Translation © 1996 Tyndale Charitable Trust

NIV

For there are three that testify:

Footnote:
Late manuscripts of the Vulgate testify in heaven: the Father, the Word and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. ⁸ And there are three that testify on earth: the (not found in any Greek manuscript before the sixteenth century)
New International Version © 1973, 1978, 1984 International Bible Society

ESV

For there are three that testify:

The Holy Bible, English Standard Version © 2001 Crossway Bibles

NASB
For there are three that testify:

New American Standard Bible © 1995 Lockman Foundation

RSV
And the Spirit is the witness, because the Spirit is the truth.

Revised Standard Version © 1947, 1952.

ASV
And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth.

American Standard Version 1901 Info

Young
because three are who are testifying [in the heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these -- the three -- are one;

Robert Young Literal Translation 1862, 1887, 1898 Info

Darby
For they that bear witness are three:

J.N.Darby Translation 1890 Info

Webster
For there are three that bear testimony in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one.

Noah Webster Version 1833 Info

HNV
For there are three who testify:

Hebrew Names Version 2000 Info

1John 5:7
(MKJV) For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word - λόγος, lógos, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one.

(KJV) For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word- λόγος, lógos, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

(KJVA) For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word- λόγος, lógos, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

(KJVR) For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word- λόγος, lógos, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

(DRB) And there are Three who give testimony in heaven, the Father, the Word- λόγος, lógos,, and the Holy Ghost. And these three are one.
1 John 5:7 (WEB) For there are three who testify {Only a few recent manuscripts add "in heaven: the Father, the Word-λόγος, lógos',, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. And there are three that testify on earth"}:

1John 5:7

(MKJV) For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word - λόγος, lógos, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one.

(CEV) In fact, there are three who tell about it.

  (ISV) For there are three witnesses-

(LITV) For there are three bearing witness in Heaven: the Father, the Word-λόγος, lógos', and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one.

(RV) And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth.

(Webster) For there are three that bear testimony in heaven, the Father, the Word-λόγος, lógos', and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one.

(WNT) For there are three that give testimony-- the Spirit, the water, and the blood;

1 John 5:7 NKJV [The New King James Bible: Counterfeit.]
For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one.

New King James Version © 1982 Thomas Nelson

1Jn 5:7 -

1Jo 5:7
There are three that bear record in heaven. This verse is not found in the Revision or in any ancient MS. It is no doubt an interpolation.

For there are three that bear record in heaven ... - There are three that “witness,” or that “bear witness” - the same Greek word which, in 1Jo_5:8, is rendered “bear witness” - μαρτυροῦντες marturountes.

It is not consistent with the design of these notes to go into a full investigation of a question of this sort.

I. It is missing in all the earlier Greek manuscripts, for it is found in no Greek manuscript written before the 16th century. .... But it is incredible that a genuine passage of the New Testament should be missing in all the early Greek manuscripts.

II. It is missing in the earliest versions, and, indeed, in a large part of the versions of the New Testament which have been made in all former times. It is wanting in both the Syriac versions - one of which was made probably in THE FIRST CENTURY; in the Coptic, Armenian, Slavonic, Ethiopic, and Arabic.

III. It is never quoted by the Greek fathers in their controversies on the doctrine of the Trinity - a passage which would be so much in point, and which could not have failed to be quoted if it were genuine; and it is not referred to by the Latin fathers until the time of Vigilius, at the end of the 5th century.

(b) The “language” is not such as John would use. He does, indeed, elsewhere use the term “Logos,” or “Word” - ὁ Λόγος ho Logos, Joh_1:1, Joh_1:14; 1Jo_1:1, but it is never in this form, “The Father, and the Word;” that is, the terms “Father” and “Word” are never used by him, or by any of the other sacred writers, as correlative.

SO NOW, we know WHY & WHAT paul exactly meant when he proclaimed:

(Romans 3:7 KJV)

For if the truth of God

hath more abounded through my lie

unto his glory;

why yet am I

also judged as a sinner?

Pope^[1] John Paul II kissing the Islamic Koran

    FAILED

Pope^[2] Benedict XVI

Sunday , April 8, 2007

among the pontiff's daily concerns ...

AND RISE OF ISLAM - in Europe

EROSION OF THE Catholic faith.

Pope Benedict XVI
^^^^^^^^^^
E-mail:
[email protected] ;
[email protected] ;
[email protected];

[email protected]

[email protected];

[email protected];

John Ankerberg - [email protected];
Dr. Emir Caner   - [email protected]m;
Dr. Ergun Mehmet Caner   -- [email protected];
[Ann Coulter    - [email protected]]
self appointed jack_ass of the christian world; -
[email protected];

POPE JOHN PAUL II RECEIVES A MARK IN HIS FOREHEAD BY A PAGAN SHIVA PRIESTESS - [full picture]

that I might gain the more
I am made all things to all men

[full picture]

a must read

recently updated

my original article vis-à-vis reply which remained unanswered for all these years was posted @ sold_his_soul .

against_biblical_jihad; against_biblical_jihad; where did jesus die? jesus_birth_quran_bible;

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws