Dr. Ferguson's Room�Report of the National Reading Panel

Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction

Invest in life�s greatest treasure, our children.

Although the findings of the National Reading Panel offer detailed information on strategies that have proven to work in reading instruction, the report does NOT meet the needs of our schools. The Partnership for Reading encourages educators and parents to go deeper into the research to discover what really works and to learn how to activate those concepts in the classroom and at home. Here are some of the fundamental findings of the NRP:

  • Certain instructional methods are more effective than others. Many of the more effective methods are ready for implementation in the classroom.
  • To teach reading well, teachers must use a combination of strategies, incorporated in a coherent plan with specific goals. A teacher who addresses only one area of reading or uses one instructional approach will probably not be successful.
  • To become good readers, children must develop phonemic awareness (an understanding of the sounds that make up spoken language), phonics skills (an understanding of the sounds that letters and letter combinations make), the ability to read fluently and accurately, and the ability to comprehend what is read.
  • Systematic and explicit instruction in phonemic awareness directly causes improvement in children's reading and spelling skills.
  • Systematic and explicit phonics instruction produces significant benefits for children from kindergarten through sixth grade and for children having difficulty learning to read. Effective phonics instruction involves teaching a sequence of phonics elements, not just highlighting elements as they appear in a text.
  • Guided repeated oral reading is important to developing reading fluency - the ability to read with efficiency and ease. Guided repeated oral reading helps students recognize new words and understand what they read.
  • While programs such as Accelerated Reader significantly improve comprehension skills, the research is not conclusive on whether reading silently helps to improve reading fluency. It is not yet clear whether independent silent reading by itself improves reading skills or whether good readers simply like to read silently more than poor readers. Therefore, reading silently should be combined with other types of reading instruction. 
  • Vocabulary should be taught both directly (apart from a narrative or text) and indirectly (as words are encountered in a text). Repetition and multiple exposures to words contribute to the understanding of word meaning.
  • Reading comprehension - understanding what is read - is best supported when teachers use a variety of techniques and systematic strategies to assist in recall of information, question generation, and summarizing of information.
  • Teachers must be provided with appropriate and intensive training to ensure that they know when and how to teach specific strategies. Teachers must know how children learn to read, why some children have difficulty reading, and how to identify and implement instructional strategies for different children.
  • Computer technology can contribute to the improvement of reading instruction. Early indications from the research suggest that additional studies and further analysis are necessary to determine the specific, proven contributions computer technology can make in this area.

See chapter 7, Minority View, for information from the only elementary teacher involved in the study.  The research failed to discuss many important questions.  She concludes that the report is narrow and biased.  In the end, the work of the NRP is not of poor quality it is just unbalanced and too some extent irrelevant.  (Joanne Yatvin, Ph.D. has more than 40 years of experience in education and is the only member of the NRP who has lived a career in elementary schools.)  The report does NOT meet the needs of our schools.  The following are a few of the areas not reviewed in the NRP study.

  • Direct instruction
  • Use of decodable texts
  • Imbedded skills instruction
  • Reading aloud to children
  • Invented spelling
  • Use of predictable texts
  • Early language development (vocabulary, grammar, and literary language)
  • Integrated reading and writing
  • Home teaching programs
  • Access to quality literature
  • Whole class instruction
  • Scripted instruction
  • Teacher modeling
  • Children�s understanding of print conventions

Hot Topics not seriously investigated (from International Reading Association as listed in Reading Today, December 1999):

  • Balanced Reading Instruction
  • Decodable texts
  • Direct instruction
  • Early intervention
  • Performance assessment
  • Standards
  • State/national assessments
  • Volunteer tutoring

 Three reading models not considered in research:

  • Word identification model of reading
  • Word identification plus skills
  • Integration of language and thinking

---------------------------------------------------------

For questions about this Website, please e-mail Robert Ferguson.

 
Home     Contact us

Shortcuts to Dr. Ferguson's Website

| Home Page | Assignment Policy | Assignments | Homework Tips | Discipline Policy | Classroom Rules | Math | Compass Math | Reading | Funbrain.com Tests | News | Calendar | Did you know? | Parent Letter | ??? | Why Chess? | Recognition Spotlight | LinksTeachers' Corner | Index by Topic |

Copyright � 2002 by Robert Ferguson. All rights reserved.
Revised: August 16, 2002 .

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1