Brazil hotels ordinances in Rio
Brazil hotel: ordinances in the eye
1- Also they constitute against-ordinances, for beyond the foreseen ones in n.° 1 of the article 61.° of the article 61.° of the Decree n.º 167/97, of July 4 th:
a) The closing of the establishment, in breaking of made use in the article 11.°;
b) The commercialization of particular lodging, in breaking of made use in the article 12.°;
c) The omission of the installment of the service foreseen in the article 13.°;
d) The coarse or repeated lacks in the attendance of the customers or the ‘ presentation of the service staff;
e) The refusal or unjustified delay in the presentation of information or requested documents for the fiscalization;
f) The opposition or lack of contribution in the shares of fiscalization to the tourist enterprises, without damage of eventual criminal liability.
2–The alíneas are not applicable v) and x) of n.° 1 of the article 61.° of the article 61.° of the Decree n.º 167/97, of 4 of July.
3–The against-ordinances foreseen in the a) and the f) of n.° 1 are punishable with fine of 100 000$ 750 000$, in the case of singular people, and 500 000$ 5 000 000$, in the case of collective people; the remaining against-ordinances are punishable with fine of 50 000$ 500 000$, in the case of singular people, and 250 000$ 3 000 000$, in the case of collective people.
4–The recklessness is punishable, as well as the attempt, but this only in the cases of the alíneas), b) and f) of n.° 1.