next up previous
Next: RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORK Up: Adaptive Equalization of Non-linear Previous: ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

Intersymbol interference (ISI) of the communication channel becomes a main drawback in efficient transmission of the signals, thus affecting frequency bandwidth efficiency and performance improvement. Thus it is necessary to use adaptive equalizers [1] to restore the digital signals distorted by ISI and the noise on the channel. For the pupose many powerful equalization algorithms do exist like the least mean square (LMS), the recursive least squares (RLS) algorithm and so on. But the use of linear equalizers are often not suitable in non-linear environments, because of the assumption that the output is linear function of inputs. On account of this, non-linear adaptive equalization techniques have been developed. For a summary of various adaptive equalization techniques refer [2]. Among these nonlinear adaptive equalization techniques, the radial basis function (RBF) has found an important place because of the ease of implementation and the nontrivial mapping capabilities [3,7].

Non-linear channels are encountered in a variety of places like the telephone channel [17] which may arise because of non-linearities in the amplifiers, or the mobile communication where the signal may become non-linear because of atmospheric non-linearities. But the main effect of non-linear distortion is visible in satellite communications, where the atmospheric non-linearities are at their best. The problem of equalization can be divided into sequence estimation and symbol decesion equalization. The optimal solution for the sequence estimation equalizer is the maximum likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE) [1]. The problem with this approach is that it is computationally very expensive and it also requires the knowledge of channel at the receiving end. The symbol decesion equalizers are relatively simple to implement and they are computationaly less complex than the MLSE. The two common types of are the linear transversal equalizer (LTE) and the decesion feedback equalizer (DFE). They are both simple to implement and can be made adaptive by updating their weights with the help of simple adaptive algorithms like least mean square (LMS) algorithm. The adaptive filter here finds the channel inverse in the presence of noise providing linear decesion boundary. The decesion function of the optimal equalizer is basically non-linear in nature. The problem of equalization can also be considered as a classification problem wherethe equalizer classifies the recieved signal vector to one of the signal constellations. Thus we can treat equalization as a non-linear classification problems, and so the performance of linear equalizers are far from optimal. Thus the only option remains is to go for non-linear equalizers. Non-linear equalizers using artificial neural networks (ANN) [15] and radial basis functions [3][4][6] have been sucessfully developed. The ANN equalizer provides a non-linear decesion function but the convergence rate is slow. Also it suffers problem of not attaining optimal solution because on multimodal local minima. If they are overtrained then they may also diverge to give a very high value. The RBF equalizers on the other hand provides localized functional behaviour demanded by the optimal equalizer decesion function but training of the centres is difficult. However orthogonal least square algorithm (OLS) [5] or the k means clustering [6] can be used to train the centres. Clustering in mutidimensional space is computationally complex and requires long training sequances. Also these techniques work well with the binary signals, but in case of complex signals, this does not work well. In this paper we are going to use the combination of the k-means algorithm and the stochastic gradient (SG) algorithm, since we are using complex signals, namely 64-QAM.

In next section we will look at the basic radial basis function (RBF) network. In section 3 we will see how the simple RBF can be modified into complex RBF (CRBF). Section 5 gives the simulation we have performed on different type of signals, and its comparison with the LMS equalizer. Finally in section 6 we will conclude.


next up previous
Next: RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORK Up: Adaptive Equalization of Non-linear Previous: ABSTRACT
Temp DNS admin
1999-02-03
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1