Home

About this Web Site
Wages
Seating Capacity
Seat Belts
Benefits
Unions
News from here & there!
State Associations
for S.B. Drivers

Winsted School Bus
Drivers Page
Do you drive for a private company or a school district?
Private
District
Not Sure

Do you agree District operated drivers are better off than those driving for a private contractor?
Please check one
Yes
No
Not Sure



NEW FAIRFIELD CONTRACT BREAKDOWN
SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS

************************************
Please take time to answer the poll questions to the right on this page...Thank You

Jan.25-they are back at the table. By law neither side is allowed to speak to the press while negotiations are on going. (UPDATE) LAIDLAW... presents final offer...drivers to vote Friday, Feb. 1st.

scroll down to the story & date you wish to read...
Story #1
Turn down offer 28-1
Jan.17th.
Story #2
Strike Uncertain
Jan.18th
Story #3
Back to table this Friday???
Jan.22nd
Story #4
Contract Ratified
Feb. 5th



Bus company, schools prepare for driver strike By Marietta Homayonpour and Robin DeMerell THE NEWS-TIMES 2002-01-17
January 17th story: By a 28-1 margin
Drivers tell Laidlaw No Thanks!

NEW FAIRFIELD ? Local school bus drivers rejected a Laidlaw Transit contract offer Wednesday night and said they are ready to strike.

A spokesman, however, said contract negotiations could continue today.
i.e. "a Laidlaw spokesperson not a Teamster." George Brier of the Local 677 Teamsters Union said drivers would be on the job today. ?We are united in our resolve for a fair and equitable contract,? he said. ?The company failed to address safety concerns and working conditions that affect each driver on a daily basis. The wages Laidlaw put on the table are significantly lower than what they pay other area drivers, both union and nonunion. ?The ball is in their (Laidlaw?s) court,? Brier said. ?A strike is imminent.?

Laidlaw provides school bus service for a number of area towns, including Danbury, Brookfield and New Milford, but the strike will affect only New Fairfield, where Local 677 organized the bus drivers several months ago. Drivers in the other three towns are not unionized.

NOTE: Brookfield drivers have voted to go with the Teamsters and contract talks begin this week

Schools here will remain open, said New Fairfield Superintendent Kathleen Matusiak, who sent a notice home with students Wednesday alerting them to a possible strike. Matusiak said in the notice that she was notified late last week there might be a strike, ?But as yet, I have no further information.? Replacement drivers would be used on the routes, according to Matusiak and Laidlaw?s general manager, Cliff Gibson. ?We?re hoping this doesn?t happen,? Gibson said. But if it does, bus drivers certified by the state will be used to drive the buses.? Those replacement drivers are Laidlaw supervisors, managers and certified instructors who were brought to New Fairfield this past weekend to go over the bus routes, Gibson said. The company also met with local police to discuss traffic plans and security if strikers form picket lines. The company employs about 25 drivers in New Fairfield. Negotiations between the bus company and the Teamsters have been going on for several months, Gibson said.



return to top of page
January 18th story:
School bus driver strike still uncertain

By Marietta Homayonpour THE NEWS-TIMES 2002-01-18 [Although bus drivers rejected a recent contract offer in New Fairfield, students were delivered to and from school Thursday.] The News-Times/Wendy Carlson

Although bus drivers rejected a recent contract offer in New Fairfield, students were delivered to and from school Thursday. NEW FAIRFIELD ? Students have no school today and Monday, but whether schools will be dealing with a bus strike against Laidlaw Transit when they reopen Tuesday is still uncertain. Members of Teamsters Local 677 voted 28 to 1 Wednesday night to reject Laidlaw?s contract offer. They are ready to strike, but no date was set. A business agent and organizer for the union, George Brier, said school bus drivers did not strike Thursday because they knew the weather would be bad and did not want to jeopardize the safety of the children. ?It was out of the question,? said Brier about a Thursday strike. ?They would never want to strike when the roads are bad.? Meanwhile, Laidlaw Transit is keeping preparations in place in case there is a strike.

Laidlaw general manager Cliff Gibson said supervisors, managers and certified instructors were prepared to drive the buses Thursday and will be ready to do so next week if necessary. All replacement drivers are certified Connecticut school bus drivers who came to New Fairfield over the weekend to learn the routes, Gibson said. A strike in New Fairfield would not affect other local towns where Laidlaw also provides school bus service, such as Brookfield, Danbury, New Milford and Bethel. Gibson said Laidlaw provides school bus service in 75 Connecticut public school districts. About 40 percent are unionized.

Brier said Brookfield drivers also recently joined the union. Their first contract negotiation meeting is set for next week. Contract negotiations in New Fairfield, where the Teamsters organized the school bus drivers last year, have been going on for several months. A federal mediator was brought in recently to help.

?We?ve been working with the mediator and bargaining in good faith,? said Gibson.

But the Teamsters? Brier said, ?you can see by the number of people against (Laidlaw?s offer) that they were wrong in their assumptions.? Safety concerns and wages were the main points negotiated between the company and the union, Brier said.

Gibson said the company is offering a 6 to 8 percent increase in wages during the first year of the contract and an 18 to 21 percent increase over the life of the three-year contract. The differences are due to seniority, he said.

In talks with New Fairfield school bus drivers Thursday, several expressed a particular concern. ?We?re looking for safer parking for the buses,? said 23-year veteran Jeanne Sacrider. For many years, buses have been parked overnight in the back parking lot at Meeting House Hill School. Drivers said there is not enough space. Passenger cars sometimes park in the bus area, and when big events are held at the school, another place has to be found for the buses.



return to top of page
January 22nd story:
School bus drivers back to bargaining table???
By Brian Saxton THE NEWS-TIMES 2002-01-22 NEW FAIRFIELD ? After a weekend anticipating a strike today by its 26 local school bus drivers, Laidlaw Transit learned Monday that a new negotiating session had been set up for Friday. ?We had not heard from the union this weekend, so we were anticipating a strike,?? said Laidlaw General Manager Cliff Gibson. But Monday night, Gibson got the information he had been waiting for. ?The union has contacted the mediator and asked for another negotiating session,? he said. ?We received word through the mediator that the union wants to talk about non-economic issues.? The bargaining session has been set up for this coming Friday. ?Both parties will be back at the table on Friday, and until then we?ve been reassured that the drivers will be coming to work,? Gibson said. Union officials in Waterbury could not be reached Monday. Gibson said if the union drivers had failed to turn up this morning, replacement drivers would have covered the 24 routes. The replacements, including company supervisors, managers and certified instructors, are all certified Connecticut state school bus drivers who have familiarized themselves with the routes, Gibson said. A strike in New Fairfield would not affect other districts in the area, such as Brookfield, Danbury, New Milford and Bethel, where Laidlaw also provides school bus service. Only 40 percent of Laidlaw?s bus services in 75 Connecticut public school districts are unionized. Brookfield was unionized only recently, and the first contract talks have yet to be held. The threat of a work stoppage in New Fairfield, which would affect four schools, came last week after the drivers, members of Teamsters Local 677, voted 28-1 to reject Laidlaw?s contract offer. Although both sides spent several months negotiating the contract, a federal mediator was brought in recently to help. The mediator, John Carpino of Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services, declined Monday to comment about the negotiations. George Brier, a business agent and organizer for Local 677, said recently that safety concerns and wages were the main issues negotiated between the two sides. Gibson said the company is offering a 6 percent to 8 percent wage increase during the first year of the three-year contract and an 18 percent to 21 percent increase over the life of the contract. ?We?re going to go back to the table and listen to what the union has to offer us,? Gibson said.
Contact Brian Saxton at [email protected]


#4: Drivers accept company offer and have since ratified the contract
return to Home Page     return to top of page
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1