Get Paid for Shopping on Internet

CIRCULATING FLUIDISED BED COMBUSTION (CFBC) TECHNOLOGY FOR POWER GENERATION -- Technology Status

1.0 THE FLUIDISED BED COMBUSTION PROCESS

For fuels with high moisture content and low heating value such as biomass, municipal wastes, paper & pulp industry wastes, sludge etc. and small capacities, bubbling fluidised bed technology is recommended. The circulating fluidised bed technology is considered suitable for waste fuels with a high percentage of non-combustibles(heating value 5-35MJ/kg).

The Circulating Fluidised Bed Combustion technology is environmentally benign. The process employs a Circulating fluidised bed combustor that operates at a temperature of around 800-9000C. The fuel(crushed coal) along with the sorbent(limestone) is fed to the lower furnace where it is kept suspended and burnt in an upward flow of combustion air. The sorbent is fed to facilitate capture of sulfur from the coal in the bed itself resulting in consequent low sulfur emission. The combustion air is fed in two stages - Primary air direct through the combustor and Secondary air, way up the combustor above the fuel feed point.

Due to high gas velocities the fuel ash and unburnt fuel are carried out of the combustor with the flue gases. This is then collected by a recycling cyclone separator and returned to lower furnace.

The heat transfer surfaces are usually embedded in the fluidised bed and steam generated is passed through the conventional steam cycle operating on Rankine Cycle. Alternatively, without the Fluid Bed Heat Exchanger, the heat transfer surface may be distributed over the combustor and the convective pass.

 Fluidised Bed Combustion Process Diagram (Lakeland, USA CFBC):

 

2.0 Advantages of Circulating Fluidised Bed Combustion Technology

Foster Wheeler has more than 150 CFB steam generators in operation. The commercial availability of most of these units exceeds 98%.

3.0 CFBC System Components

The CFBC systems comprise of the following major components:

3.1 Fuel Feed System

Fuel feed system is either pneumatic or wet type. Normally coal is fed as coal -water mixture as they have demonstrated to burn more evenly. The optimum system design depends upon ash and sulfur content in coal. For fuels with low ash contents, coal-water mixture has found favours since large quantities of water are needed for coals with high ash, which affects its efficiency. The fuel is fed in the form of coal-water paste with 25% water by weight. The fuel feed size is lower than 0.75 in.

3.2 Sorbent Feed System

Sorbents are not combustibles and are generally fed either continuously or intermittent. In the latter case, lockhoppers are used. The sorbent is crushed to around 3 mm top size, dries and fed in lock hoppers.

4.0 Technological Advancements

In addition to external particle recirculation CFB, internal recirculation CFB has been developed. Internal recirculation CFB uses U-Beam separators installed in the flue gas exit path to collect and recycle the solids directly to the bottom of the furnace. U-beams are a staggered array of stainless steel channels in the furnace exit plane which capture most of the solids suspended in the flue gas. In addition, the multi cyclone dust collector captures finer solids which pass through the U-beam and recycles them to the lower furnace in a controlled manner. The regulation of this secondary recycle system offers furnace temperature control resulting in improved boiler performance. The manufacture claim to achieve >99.8% particle collection efficiency for the two-stage particle separation system. The IR-CFB operates at low flue gas velocities of 8 m/s as compared to 27 m/s with external recirculation CFB. This reduces erosion problems in the furnace which are a major cause for maintenance problems in CFBC. This design uses significantly less amount of refractory due to elimination of hot gas cyclone path. This IR-CFB technology is exclusively patented by Babcock & Wilcox.

The CFBC process has been integrated with Advanced Pressurised Fluidised Bed Combustion system. The fuel & sorbent are fed into a PFB either Circulating or Bubbling. Combustion is aided by compressed air usually under a pressure of 10 to 14 bars at around 8710C. A cyclone separates particulate from pressurised flue gas stream and returns them to the bed. The flue gas undergoes a final clean-up through ceramic candle filters before entering the combustion turbine at around 8160C. The waste heat from the combustion turbine is recovered in a HRSG that generates steam to drive the steam turbine of the combined cycle.

Pressurised Circulating Fluidised Bed (PCFB) process has been preferred by Foster Wheeler over the Bubbling bed. It offers higher combustion efficiency due to more carbon burnout in circulating mode. Low sorbent consumption for the same sulfur removal because of increased efficiency. Better NOx control from ease of staged combustion, since a circulating unit is taller and more slender. A higher velocity in the circulating mode results in units of smaller size for the same capacity.

5.0 Technology Status

CFBC technology has been proven for all type of fuels including high ash coal, lignite, wood wastes, refinery residue etc. There are over 310 operating CFBC boilers worldwide. Foster Wheeler has more than 150 CFB steam generators in operation. The commercial availability of most of these units exceeds 98%. M/s Lurgi Lentjes Babcock Energietechnik Gmbh (LLB), Germany has 42 CFBC steam generators (>8700 MW) in operation worldwide. M/s Babcock & Wilcox have about 40 operating CFB units worldwide.

LIST OF CFBC TECHNOLOGY SUPPLIERS WORLDWIDE

S. No. Name Of Technology Supplier Technical Collaboration No. Of Operating Plants Remarks
1. Foster Wheeler, USA (47%) ------------- 150 Circulating fluid bed technology
2. Lentjes Energietechnik, Germany (7.7%) Lurgi 42 (870 MW) Circulating fluid bed technology
3. Babcock & Wilcox, USA ------------- 40 Internal Circulation & Bubbling fluid bed technology
4. ABB (14.5%)      
5. BHEL Lurgi 19  
6. GEC Alstom Stein Industrie, (8.5%) Lurgi 150  
7. Austrian Energy & Environment -------------   Bubbling, External/Internal Circulating FB
8. Kvaerner Pulping Oy, Finland (8%)     Cymic Advanced CFBC/ Bubbling Bed
9. Deutche Babcock (4.5%)      

The list of some major plants based on this technology worldwide is as below:

LIST OF MAJOR PROJECTS EMPLOYING CFBC TECHNOLOGY

S. No. NAME/COUNTRY SIZE

MWe

FUEL COMM. DATE REMARKS
1. Tri-state Generation & Trans. Co. USA 110 Coal 1987 Foster Wheeler
2. Kainuun Voima Oy Finland 95 Coal, Peat, Sludge 1990 Foster Wheeler
3. Vasikiluodon Voima Oy, Finland 125 Coal, Peat 1990 Foster Wheeler
4. ACE Cogeneration USA 110 Coal 1992 Foster Wheeler
5. Rheinisch-Westfalisches Elect. Works, Germany 100 Brown Coal 1992 Foster Wheeler
6. Nelson Industrial Steam Company, USA 2 x125 Petroleum Coke 1992 Foster Wheeler (largest petcoke CFB)
7. Nova Scotia Power Inc. Canada 180 Coal 1993 Foster Wheeler
8. IVO International Oy Finland 110 Peat 1995 Foster Wheeler
9. Colver Power Project USA 100 Bituminous Waste 1995 Foster Wheeler
10. Northampton Energy, USA 100 Anthracite Waste 1995 Foster Wheeler
11. CMIEC/Neijiang, China 100 Anthracite Coal 1996 Foster Wheeler
12. Turow Power Station Poland 3x 235 Brown Coal 1998 Foster Wheeler Repowering
13. National Power Supply Thailand 2x 150 Coal, Bark 1998 Foster Wheeler
14. Asian Pulp & Paper Co. China 2x 100 Coal 1998 Foster Wheeler
15. EC Katovice S.A. Poland 180 Coal 1999 Foster Wheeler
16. Jacksonville 300   2003  

S. No. NAME/COUNTRY SIZE MWe FUEL COMM. DATE REMARKS
1. Emile Hutchet, Lorraine, France 125 Coal 1990 Alstom Stein Industrie (Lurgi Tech.)
2. Provence/Gardanne power plant, France 250 Coal 1995 Alstom Stein Industrie

SOx-380, NOx-280 & Dust-20 mg/Nm3

3. Red Hills, Mississippi, USA, Choctaw Generation 2 X 250 lignite 2000 Alstom Stein Industrie

S.No NAME/COUNTRY SIZE

MWe

FUEL Comm

Date

REMARKS
1. Ultra Power, West Enfield, Maine, USA 77 Wood wastes 1986 Babcock & Wilcox
2. Ebensburg Power Co. Pennsylvania, USA 172 Waste Coal 1990 Babcock & Wilcox
3. Kanoria Chemicals Ltd. Renukoot, India 81 High Ash Coal 1996 Babcock & Wilcox
4. Montana Dakota Utilities, USA 215 Lignite 1986 Babcock & Wilcox Bubbling Fluidised Bed
5. Bowater Inc, Tennessee, USA 144 Bark, Natural Gas, Paper Mill Sludge 1998 Babcock & Wilcox

BFB retrofit

6. AES Beaver Valley, Pennsylvania, USA 121.5 Bituminous Coal 1999 Babcock & Wilcox
7. Southern Indiana Gas Co Indiana, USA 299 High Sulfur Coal, Waste Coal 2000 Babcock & Wilcox
8. Changguang Coal Mine Co. Zhejiang, China 155 High Sulfur Bituminous Coal 2000 Babcock & Wilcox
9. Rostovenergo-Nesvetay Russia 163 High Ash Anthracite Coal 2000 Babcock & Wilcox


S. No. NAME/COUNTRY SIZE

MWe

FUEL COMM.

DATE

REMARKS
1. Vapo Oy, Lieska, Finland 30 biomass 1994 8 MWe + 14 MW heat + 8 MW steam. 1st Cymic CFBC
2. Elektrocieplownia Tychy S.A. Poland 37 Coal 1999 Kvaerner Pulping’s Cymic CFBC
3. Clonbulloge, Offaly, Ireland, Edendry Power 120 peat 2001 Kvaerner Pulping’s Bubbling CFBC


1. KEPCO, Seoul, Korea 2X 200 anthracite 1999 High ash, highly erosive coal;

6.0 COSTS

The investment costs of projects based on the CFBC technology are much lesser than the conventional PC based plants. ($900-$950/kW)

7.0 Indian Scenario

Fluidised Bed Combustion is a proven & established technology (not new, in contrast to general perception). Pilot and experimental FBC boilers were in operation as early as 1977 in India at BHEL, Trichy ; CFRI, Dhanbad etc. All these plants are still in operation. However FBC plants are economical only for poor quality fuels which can not be fired in conventional boilers. Initially these boilers were used for co-generation and process gas/steam applications at industrial installations. Later small size captive power plants also used FBC boilers. The common Indian fuels used include high ash coals, coal washery rejects, biomass and lignite.

All initial FBC boilers, before 1992, were invariably supplied by BHEL and based on obsolete Lurgi bubbling bed FBC technology licensed to BHEL by Lurgi Lentjes Babcock. Later Foster Wheeler, USA supplied few Circulating FBC boilers in 1992-95 through its Indian licensee, ISGEC John Thompson. Currently Foster Wheeler is directly executing two new orders from Rain Calcining, Vizag(25MW, petroleum coke) and Mysore Paper Mills, Bhadravati(20MW, multi-fuel). Babcock & Wilcox has also supplied few bubbling bed FBC boilers in India since 1992. The most important of these is the Kanoria Chemicals, Renukoot 81MW captive power plant based on the most advanced Internal-particle recirculation FBC. Interestingly, B&W currently does not have any new order on hand in India. Another notable fact is that B&W does not have any experience with petroleum-coke fired FBC within or outside India. Recently, B&W has formed a joint venture with Thermax Ltd. to supply B&W boilers of all types in India as Thermax Babcock & Wicox Ltd. This company has supplied the FBC boilers to Kanoria Chemicals, Renukoot and Central Pulp Mills, Surat.

Currently most Indian oil refineries are planning to set up refinery residue fired captive power plants. Foster Wheeler is the only experienced pet-coke fired CFBC supplier in India, currently. However with pet-coke, IGCC is also techno-economically competitive with FBC. Due to this Essar Oil, had floated an open tender for their proposed power plant with options both for FBC & IGCC. The bidders include IHI, Snamprogetti for IGCC and Foster Wheeler, Lurgi for FBC. Other PSU oil companies are planning on similar lines. HPCL’s proposed refinery at Bhatinda in Punjab plans to go for IGCC.

Get Paid for filling up surveys

BACK TO MY HOME PAGE | IGCC | CFBC | PFBC | SOLAR THERMAL | WIND POWER | GEOTHERMAL | FUEL CELLS | COALBED METHANE