| General - risks, definition | Which OHT? | Deciding on it | Getting off it | "Natural" hormones | Long term considerations |
| Extract
from http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00863.html
FDA NEWS
FDA Approves New Labels
for Estrogen and Estrogen with Progestin Therapies for Postmenopausal Women
Following Review of Women's Health Initiative Data
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today is advising women and health care professionals about important new safety changes to labeling of all estrogen and estrogen with progestin products for use by postmenopausal women. These changes reflect FDA's analysis of data from the Women's Health Initiative study (WHI), a landmark study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health that raised concern about risks of using these products.For the full article see the URL above |
|
|
NHRT phytoestrogens As a general rule of thumb, estrogen alone is only used by women who have had a hysterectomy, whereas "intact" women who still have a uterus must have a progestin added to combat the greatly increased risk of estrogen-induced endometrial cancer. Where a progestin is not used, any bleeding must be investigated with an endometrial biposy. In her book, Dr Susan Love states that on average each woman following this method must submit to 3 such biopsies. Even without bleeding, prudence dictates an annual routine biopsy. The term HRT or hormone replacement therapy may be used to mean estrogen+progestin or it may mean estrogen only since estrogen is a hormone... Similarly ERT may be used in situations (particularly studies) when progestin is in fact added, but the speaker's interest focusses on the estrogen component. This is particularly unfortunate since the addition of a progestin not only messes up the studies, but often messes up the woman too - a fact which is conveniently omitted more often than not. Note: Since this was originally
written, considerably greater care is being taken to differentiate between
the two terms, and newer studies frequently have two treatment arms - one
with, one without progestin - but caution is still in order when trying
to interpret what exactly is being referred to, especially with earlier
material.
Alt.support.menopause (ASM) at one time (circa 1997) tried to make a comprehensive list of possible OHT and the varieties of situations a woman might find herself in. The by no means exhaustive list follows: Surgical menopause (no ovaries and no uterus)
Since this list was made, other varieties of HRT have sprung up, including those which are a repackaging of synthetic hormonal drugs used as oral contraceptives, typically at a lower dosage level. They tend to be introduced in Europe and only later cross the Atlantic. Other combinations of "HRT" today can also contain testosterone. This is more likely after surgical menopause. So as Joan said at the time:
|
| And then there's "NHRT" ie. Natural Hormone Replacement Therapy. Many of its proponents like to claim it is radically different from "HRT" which they reserve for "traditional" (their term) use of primarily Wyeth/Ayerst products i.e. Premarin, Prempro, etc. While it is true that the majority of research has been done using Premarin and Provera, it is illogical to lay equal claim to all the benefits which have been, rightly or wrongly, ascribed to P. and P. while at the same time DISclaiming all the risks which are increasingly being reported. While they *may* be right, there is certainly no evidence that they are. |
| To further complicate matters, people sometimes use the term "natural hormones" when the more accurate term would be phytoestrogens. For example, while the "natural" estrogen estradiol is synthesised in the lab from soy, soy taken as a food does not supply estradiol but much weaker phytoestrogens. |
| Increasingly, raloxifene
(Evista) is being suggested as a substitute for OHT but the term "designer
estrogen" is a misnomer. It is only approved for use in postmenopausal
women and is totally inappropriate for perimenopausal women. It does not
treat "menopausal" symptoms. Neither does it do many of the things which
are claimed for it - it is very much over-hyped.
(2001 This overstatement is now less prevalent after adverse publicity and an FDA warning) |
| General - risks, definition | Which OHT? | Deciding on it | Getting off it | "Natural" hormones | Long term considerations |