TO
WELCOME
TO CONTENTS |
|
A subsidiary analysis
of the MORE study on the effects of raloxifene use by osteoporotic postmenopausal
women looked for a possible early increase in cardiovascular events similar
to that noted in studies using estrogen such as HERS,
but found none. It is reported in a free detailed fulltext article at http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v287n7/rfull/joc11015.html
JAMA Vol. 287 No. 7, February 20, 2002 Raloxifene and Cardiovascular
Events in Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women
Extract
from
In summary, there was no evidence that raloxifene caused an early increase in risk of CV events, either overall or among postmenopausal women at high risk for or with CHD. Raloxifene therapy for 4 years did not significantly affect the overall risk of CV events in the total MORE cohort but did significantly reduce the risk of CV events among women at high risk for and among those with established CHD. Before raloxifene is used for prevention of CV events, these findings must be confirmed by an adequately powered, randomized trial with CV events as predefined outcomes.Funding/Support: This study was funded by Eli Lilly & Co [makers of raloxifene] |
July
3, 2001 Extract from
Study
Says Drug Can Stimulate Ovarian Cancer Cells
Evista belongs to a class of drugs known as selective estrogen receptor modulators. It attaches to cells in the same way estrogen does, blocking the hormone's effects on them. |
Extract
from PubMed abstract:
Can Fam Physician 2000 Aug;46:1592-6, 1599-603 Raloxifene not better than estrogen Two trials versus combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) showed HRT had a more favourable effect on surrogate end points reflecting the risk of fracture and cardiovascular risk (changes in bone mineral density and lipid profile). Compared with combined HRT, raloxifene reduced the incidence of menorrhagia and mastodynia, but did not relieve symptoms linked to menopause. Results of animal studies call for close clinical monitoring to detect a possible increase in the incidence of ovarian cancer. |
Two
brief extracts from http://www.ti.ubc.ca/pages/letter34.htm#Raloxifene
Therapeutics Letter, issue 34, March / April 2000 New Drugs V : Raloxifene (Evista®) Evidence of effectiveness: Changes in bone mineral density and serum lipids do not necessarily correlate with desired clinical events, therefore trials and data on surrogate outcomes are purposely not included in this letter. For example in one trial fluoride increased bone mineral density and increased the incidence of non-vertebral fractures, and in another trial estrogen/progestin treatment decreased LDL cholesterol and was not associated with a decrease in coronary events.Conclusion: Raloxifene reduced radiologic vertebral collapse in both the primary (ARR = 2.2%) and secondary prevention (ARR = 6.5%) settings, but had no effect on non-vertebral fractures (including hip fractures). Benefits for reduction in painful vertebral collapse and reduction in early breast cancer were small and of a similar magnitude to the harm of increased thromboembolic events. |
Caution ! The study below
is fraught with the possibility of misinterpretation by the press and others.
http://www.medscape.com/reuters/prof/1999/09/09.27/cl09279t.html PET Scan Demonstrates Raloxifene's Effect on Brain Metabolism WESTPORT, Sep 27 (Reuters Health) - In a very small study comparing the effect of raloxifene and estrogen on brain metabolism, PET scans demonstrated that raloxifene affects brain metabolism but, unlike estrogen, it does not affect the left frontal cortex, the region associated with cognition and memory.<snip purely theoretical remarks as to the possibility of practical implications....."may have an impact", "might be a good thing", "if that theory proves true", "may offer"> Dr. Metz said that whether or not raloxifene or estrogen actually cause behavior and mood changes related to the changes seen on PET is unknown, because none of the women reported any such changes while taking estrogen, raloxifene or placebo. "This remains theoretical," he said. |
Extracts from http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/319/7206/331
BMJ 1999;319:331-332 ( 7 August 1999) Editorials Raloxifene as a multifunctional medicine? Current trials will show whether it is effective in both osteoporosis and breast cancer Recent developments in the new endocrinology of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) seem to have the potential to transform therapeutics. The emerging data on the multiple effects of raloxifene have generated great excitement that this might be the first multifunctional medicine. Raloxifene was developed for preventing osteoporosis and, like oestrogen, may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. In addition, raloxifene may reduce the incidence of breast cancer without increasing that of endometrial cancer. News from business pages (rather than medical ones) often gives insight into less publicised aspects of the drug trade. Below are two 1999 news items following closely on each other which illustrate the slipperiness of claims made. (Tishy) Lilly Barred From Claiming
That Evista Lowers Breast Cancer Risk
A US federal court on Friday temporarily barred drug maker Eli Lilly and Co. from making promotional claims that its osteoporosis drug raloxifene (Evista) has been shown to reduce the risk of breast cancer, rival drug maker AstraZeneca Plc said on Monday................ Friday July 30, 11:12 am Eastern Time (i.e. 9 days later) Alternative Uses of Drugs Noted INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- Eli Lilly & Co. plans to take advantage of a federal ruling that allows drug company representatives to show doctors medical articles describing alternative uses for medications. Wednesday's ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth, of Washington, D.C., could lead to more so-called ``off-label'' use of drugs and expand treatment options for patients. Eli Lilly said yesterday it will start instructing its 2,855-person U.S. sales force to take advantage of the widened marketing opportunities offered by the ruling.<snip Lamberth's ruling applies only to peer-reviewed articles in medical journals and textbooks. Companies still aren't allowed to hand out their own brochures or make verbal sales pitches for off-label drug uses. For a long article which
pulls together "Publications that contained information on the background
of development, structure, mechanism of action, tissue-selective effects,
and adverse effects of raloxifene" and supplies a long list of references,
visit
Extract from J Clin Oncol 17:1-19. http://www.asco.org/prof/pp/html/guide/brisk/f_brisk.htm It is premature to recommend raloxifene use to lower the risk of developing breast cancer outside of a clinical trial setting. On the basis of available information, use of raloxifene should currently be reserved for its approved indication to prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women.American Society of Clinical Oncology special article: Technology Assessment on Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Strategies: Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (May 99) |
http://pharminfo.com/pubs/pnn/pnn19.html#9
December 11, 1997 Raloxifene Approved for Osteoporosis Raloxifene (Evista, Lilly) 60-mg tablets have been approved by FDA for prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. The first selective estrogen receptor modulator, raloxifene should be available by early January. FDA reviewed data from 50 studies conducted in 28 countries to establish the safety and efficacy of raloxifene for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. More than 12,000 women have participated in the clinical program to date. A total of 1,764 postmenopausal women participated in pivotal Phase 3 osteoporosis prevention studies. In two studies, women were randomly assigned to take raloxifene or placebo. In the third study, women took raloxifene, placebo, or estrogen-replacement therapy. All the women took calcium supplements. In each study, raloxifene was superior when compared with placebo in preventing bone loss in the lumbar spine and hip. These pivotal clinical trials also showed that raloxifene builds bone, although to a lesser extent than does estrogen.
A rare but serious side effect associated with raloxifene was an increase
in venous thromboembolic events. Women taking raloxifene reported a higher
rate of hot flashes than did women taking placebo (24.6% versus 18.3%).
Women taking raloxifene also reported a higher rate of leg cramps than
did women taking placebo. Raloxifene did not increase the risk of endometrial
or breast cancer.
How and why was it approved? Here's a personal post from Kathryn: I spent half the evening reading over some of the transcript of the hearing held for the approval of Raloxifene in November 1997. The vote was 8 for and 4 against approval, Those against felt there was not enough information on raloxifene yet and the approval process was going too fast. [ I found the discussion on whether bone density meant anything for the prevention of fractures most fascinating ] I must thank Joan for suggesting the easy way to search for these hearings on the FDA website, limit the search to "Docket" it worked.
The first presentation representing the public by Dr. Trudy Busch of the Women's Health Research Group at the University of Maryland is well worth reading. One of the other presenters suggested all women in the study should be followed after for 10 years, I wonder if that suggestion was taken up?: I don't really think it was. |
http://pharminfo.com/pubs/msb/ralox244.html
extract only: my emphasis What the Patient Should Know:
|
http://www.nejm.org/public/1997/0337/0023/1641/1.htm
abstract only of Delmas PD, Bjarnason NH, Mitlak BH, et al. Effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, serum cholesterol concentrations, and uterine endometrium in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1641-7. |
Jan 29, 98 Kathryn posts:
I really don't want to confuse things here, but I just read a news report today that shows they want to use Raloxifene now also for pre menopausal women. They found that it *increases* estrogen levels in women who are still ovulating. But the news story does say:
"It is important to know that the effects of raloxifene differ depending
on a woman's present ovarian function," Baker said. "One should not generalise
about the use of raloxifene between postmenopausal and premenopausal women."
The study on Raloxifene and
premenopausal women is reported to be published in current issue of the
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
NB One of Lilly's justifications for ignoring cancer in tested rodents is that it will only be used in menopausal women |
Extracted fromhttp://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/health/jan-june98/estrogen_1-12.html
(also available in Real Audio) DR. LAUREN STREICHER: The confusion with Raloxifene, of course, is that everyone thinks this is it, this is an estrogen substitute. It is not meant to be an estrogen substitute, and it’s not being marketed as such. It is being marketed as an alternative to women who cannot take estrogen, who would like to prevent osteoporosis. It’s not going to help hot flashes, in fact, may increase hot flashes, and it may not--no one has really looked to see other tissues, in terms of is this going to benefit the bladder, is this going to help with Alzheimer’s, which we know that estrogen can. (Alzheimers is moot: Tishy) DR. SAMUEL EPSTEIN, University of Illinois, Chicago: The alarming information is that in studies on mice and rats Raloxifene produces a high incidence of ovarian cancers. The end of the section dealing with these studies says the clinical relevance of this is not known. However, when you turn to the warning section on Raloxifene in which women are told about their dangers, there’s not a single mention about ovarian cancer."Reassuring" words re the fact that raloxifene caused ovarian cancer in rodents Also see 2001 news item above |
Extracted from http://www.msnbc.com/news/160110.asp#BODY
(April 21, 98)
AS REPORTED in The Wall Street Journal, scientists will reveal at a cancer meeting next month that the designer estrogen raloxifene can cut breast cancer risk by up to 74 percent. http://www.junkscience.com/news2/ralox.htm Drug May Prevent Breast Cancer By Rick Weiss, Washington Post Staff Writer Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company May 18, 1998 Gives various views of the claim in the headline. |
Week
of May 13, 1998 Science News update, JAMA
http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/sci-news/1998/snr0513.htm#joc72104 Extracts from: DRUG NOT AS EFFECTIVE AS HRT IN IMPROVING HEART DISEASE RISK FACTORS Osteoporosis drug has some beneficial effects CHICAGO— A drug to prevent osteoporosis is also effective in lowering risk factors for cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women, but is not as effective as hormone replacement therapy (HRT), according to an article in the May 13 issue of The Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA).Editorial: Search Continues For A "Magic Bullet" "The uncertainties about the cardioprotective effect of estrogens apply doubly to raloxifene. Even if estrogens were proven to be cardioprotective, a rush to replace estrogen with raloxifene for this indication still may be inappropriate. ... Raloxifene may be viewed as a designer drug, not yet suitable for everyday wear. Or, ultimately, it may prove to be a magic bullet in search of its target." |