Dangers of Incineration

  • CANCER AND HEALTH

  • Emissions from "state of the art" incinerators contain dioxins furans (toxic chemicals) and heavy metals, which can cause cancer. Researchers in Britain have found elevated incidents of cancer in the lung, stomach, larynx and bladder within 7.5 km of some incinerator locations. The USA Environmental Protection Agency has confirmed the cancer-causing effect of dioxins.

    Additional health hazards include altered sexual development, male and female reproductive problems, suppression of the immune system, diabetes and a wide range of hormonal effects. The effects of dioxin emissions are however apparent over 30 mile or more.

    It is hypocritical to promote smokeless solid fuel, lead free petrol and no smoking public areas, all in the interests of health, while at the same time promoting incineration

  • TOXIC ASH

  • Some 25% by weight of what goes into the incinerator comes out as hazardous ash. In particular, 5% of what goes in, comes out as highly toxic flue ash. Toxic chemicals in this ash include dioxins, lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury and chromium. Most of this ash will probably be disposed in dumps. In some countries, incinerator ash has been used for road or footpath building.

    In Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK, residents were warned to avoid any vegetables grown in vegetable allotments because ash from a nearby incinerator was used to build pathways through the gardens.

  • LANDFILL

  • The transport of any incinerator ash produced to Dublin Port or, more likely, its long-term storage in the proposed super-dump in Kentstown will pose a huge safety problem. Accidental spills on site or leaks during transport, or the loading/unloading of these vehicles all present the chance of an accidental release of these toxic elements into the environment.

  • TOXIC DUMPS

  • These are the natural consequences of incineration. Much more dioxin will leave the incinerator as ash than through emissions. Toxic lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury will leech out gradually from the dump. To date, there are no facilties for the safe long-term storage of toxic ash from incinerators. Assuming that the EU ban the transport of toxic waste between countries in the near future, and in the absence of hugely expensive safe long term toxic ash storage facilities, it is reasonable to conclude that it will be dumped at landfill sites, such as the proposed site in Kentstown.

    Incineration does not therefore remove the need for landfill - it just makes smaller dumps much more toxic to the community

  • DIOXINS IN OUR FOOD

  • Dioxins accumulate in fats - meats, poultry, milk and even a nursing mother's milk. They tend to work their way up through the food chain into humans. Any milk with dioxins fed to babies will cause hormonal and developmental problems. Dioxins accumulate and are very difficult to break down in the body. New Zealand farmers and their government emphatically rejected incineration for this very reason.

    In Belgium, a recent dioxin scare recently triggered the virtual collapse of the domestic food industry. There are no facilities for dioxin tests in Ireland. The first casualty will be the dairy sector.

    In some places, farmers within a 30 mile radius from the incinerator site have found their milk un-saleable to the larger food conglomerates.

  • OTHER RISKS

  • There is also the risk of catastrophic dioxin releases from accidental fires or explosions. A fire broke out in the incinerator waste reception hall in Dundee, Scotland, which prevented fire-fighters entering the hall for six hours. Am explosion of 30kg of dioxins in Seveso, Italy in 1974 produced hormone changes in people living in the vicinity. People who live near incinerators or dumps containing incinerator ash will be exposed to these hazards.

    More..

    Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

    1 1