Accidental Ecumenism of Haiwan Dias?
Recently, while checking the very interesting and informative
NovusOrdoWatch.org website I happened to notice that it (NovusOrdoWatch) had listed a
Tradition-in-Action (TIA) page which picked up a picture from my website and adopted it for itself without so much as mentioning where or from which website or webpage they got the picture.
I wrote to TIA with endorsements to the Webmaster of NOW and to Mr. John Menezes who had originally provided me with the cutting of the picture which I had scanned, requesting that TIA attribute the picture to my website, but have had no answer since so many days (today being May 15). My letter is reproduced below.
I think that TIA is behaving in a churlish and deplorable manner. The reason for this is not too far to find. And that is that TIA disagrees with me on the fundamental attitude towards the sect that was founded by Roncalli ("John XXIII-II") and the Robber-Council "Vatican II" during 1958-1969, which TIA affirms is identical with the Catholic Church, and which I affirm is the Roman branch of Modernism, a branch itself of the Liberal branch of Protestantism (the other two main branches being "Evangelicalism" and "Fundamentalism").
I also take this opportunity to comment on the statements made by the persons who brought this picture to the notice of TIA, an "N.R.", probably being the Feeneyite-cum-Old Catholic heretic Dr. Neil Rangel from Sao Estevao de Corjuem in the Ilhas de Goa district of Goa, and the other being a "B.M", probably my former Lefebvrist acquaintance Bonifacio Meneses, a resident of my native district of Bardez.
"N.R." wrote:
"I found the picture posted below on the net."
I make a shrewd guess that N.R. did not "find" this picture; it was forwarded to him by someone in a chain from me, most probably through Mr. John Menezes himself, who has an extensive chain of correspondents the worldwide.
N.R. also wrote:
"The Bishop in the picture is now Ivan Cardinal Dias in Bombay."
As a matter of fact, N.R. is too evidently wrong. I do not know whether this is deliberate or due to a confusion. The original caption of the picture clearly identifies the person in the picture as the "Archbishop of Bombay, Monsignor Ivan Dias". Evidently, therefore, he did not "become" bishop of Bombay subsequent to the taking of this picture, but was so already at that time.
N.R. also wrote:
"I don't know if he has abjured his action in this event."
This statement is even more pathetic and ridiculous. Why on earth should anyone labor under the misconception that
Haiwan (
"Monster") Dias would have "abjured his action in this event"? I, for one, am utterly unable to compass any good reason.
One can labor under this misconception only if one is isolated and out of touch with the reality of the sect to which
Haiwan Dias belongs. The reality is that this type of action is fundamental to the very existence of this sect, just as the Mass is at the heart of the Catholic Church. That is, this sect puts Ecumenism and Inter-Religious Dialog, Worship and Communion in so central a position, that it is impossible to imagine this sect without such acts.
Such acts are not abherancies. On the contrary, they lie at the very heart of this sect, and are strictly mandated by its leadership, so that any bishop who failed to fulfill his monthly quota of this spiritual fornications would quickly find himself being hauled up for disciplinary action.
Nor was this action a one-off. To prove that this is so, I provide links to the following pages:
- haiwan-dias-false-peace.html
- somaiya-satanism-in-action.html
- spiritual-fornciation-somaiya.html
- spiritual-fornication-mangalore.html
- spiritual-fornication-pimenta.html
- spiritual-fornication-quintana.html
- thomas-dabre-coprophagy.html
From: Lucio Mascarenhas
To: Tradition In Action, Mario Derksen (Editor, Novus Ordo Watch), John Meneses
Cc: "H.H. Pope Michael"
Date: Apr 19, 2006 10:30 AM
Subject: Article & Picture credit
Today, while checking the Novus Ordo Watch website, which I do regularly, I found that a new link:
Apostasy in Action:
Novus Ordo Cardinal Worships Hindu "Deity" (http://www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/B054_DiasHinduDeity.shtml)
He probably only wanted to imitate his master, John Paul II, who worshiped a snake in Togo in 1985. Reality Check: "And we know that the Son of God is come. And he hath given us understanding that we may know the true God and may be in his true Son. This is the true God and life eternal. Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen." (1 John 5:20-21)
This link took me to the "Tradition In Action" site, where I found a picture picked up from my webpages without attribution, showing Ivan Dias worshipping the demon Ganapati.
The picture is picked up from my Aarti Controversy page http://www.geocities.com/prakashjm45/aarticontroversy.html. The address of the picture on my site is http://www.geocities.com/prakashjm45/g/diasdemon.jpg.
This picture had been provided to me by Mr. John Meneses, a Goan living in Bombay, and a sedevacantist, although he attends regularly the SSPX's services.
The cutting is from the Indian Express, Bangalore edition. The picture as hosted on my website, and picked up without any alteration by TIA was edited by me with three changes that I have made to the picture:
- I cut out and brought the "Indian Express, Bangalore" title closer to the picture;
- I cut and brought the date line closer to the picture;
- I overwrote, in M.S. Paint, the blasphemous attributation of the title "Lord" (which belongs only to my God, Jehovah-Elohim, the God of Israel, incarnate as Christ Jesus) before the name of the demon "Ganesha".
The picture as re-produced by TIA shows exactly the same attributes as my alterations.
Moreover, I have captioned the picture as "Diasdemon", which is also the name of the picture as hosted by TIA. The address of the TIA version of the picture is http://www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/Images/B_054_diasdemon.jpg.
I have no objection to TIA or anybody using the picture, but with proper attributation. I have myself kept the attributation of the Indian Express intact. When I have borrowed pictures from TIA, I have attributed them to TIA.
I therefore wish to know why TIA has not attributed the present picture to me. It is obvious that TIA has acted in this manner with deliberate intention. I am very deeply disappointed with TIA. TIA must either attribute the picture to me or withdraw it. This is as required by the laws of honesty and of the Church.
I expect TIA to address my concerns.
Kind regards,
Lucio
|
TIA has not even bothered to reply. This is typical of the blasely hypocritical, arrogant and self-conceited attitude of most self-styled "Catholic Traditionalists", who, far from being rooted in the norms of Catholic courtesy, are not even cognisant of the norms of worldly courtesy!
Haiwan Dias' Mission
Haiwan Dias has been systematically fornicating and teaching Christians to join him in his spiritual fornications. This constitutes the sum of
Haiwan Dias' False, Satanic Gospel. It is what is called "Ecumenism", "Inter-Religious Dialogue", "Inter-Faith Dialogue", etc. It is from Satan, for Satan and directed to the worship of Satan. No one conversant with the True Gospel of Christ Jesus can pretend otherwise.
As demonstrated by the pages on Spiritual Fornication that I link to above,
Haiwan Dias piteously teaches...
"The problem is that we restrict this message to such meetings of intellectuals instead of taking it to our people... All we need to do now is spread the message to the world."
It is for this end that
Haiwan Dias has cast all his resources in seducing the three reprobate seminarians back to their vomit; it is the victory of this False, Satanic Gospel that he and Castrillon-Hoyos, his fellow-prostitute, celebrated the triumph of. Finally, it is to reward his steadfastness, courage and devotion to the spread of this False, Satanic Gospel of Spiritual Prostitution, devotion to the certain taking of millions and millions of Christians to eternal damnation, that the Arch-Apostle of Satan, Maledictus V Ratbag has "promoted"
Haiwan Dias as the Chief Prostitute over the "Congregation" founded on the remains of the Catholic Congregation
"Propaganda Fide" to promote this Gospel of Spiritual Prostitution on the global scale.
| |
PUBLISHED on the Internet: May 28, 2006.
|
|
P U R P O S E
Written with the purpose of educating people in matters concerning the Catholic Resistance to the Modernist Apostasy, and based on the principles elucidated by the Church, that the truth is never afraid, and that the Church is never afraid of the Truth, and on the principles elucidated by Frs. Rumble & Carty and by Fulton Sheen in his essay, "The Art of Controversy". — Benedicamus Deus, Lúcio.
|
Fair Use Notice
This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human, religious, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Lúcio Mascarenhas
|