Index
TOC
Yet Another Modest Proposal
or
The Universe+ Hypothesis v1.020
rewritten on June 14, 2005
Abstract:
This paper sets forth a hypothesis that postulates a model
of the initial conditions of the universe that contained and
contains as its common citizen, billions and billions (my
gratitude to Dr. Sagen) of hypermassive and supermassive
black holes that exist distantly, at the edge of our visible
cosmos while the big bang (distribution) event occured.
These as yet unnumbered and for the most part, currently
unlocated hypermassive black holes constitute the major
population of the "Universe+" then and now, and probably, it
was from this population of invisible hypergravity giants
that was responsible for, and the source of, our visible
universe's "big bang birth".
What can we see?
Most of these other invisible hypermassive black holes are
too distant to be ever detected currently by any known
means, and so far, exist only in the inferential deductions
of this hypothesis.
The green gas on the other side of the fence
Much of the original unimaginable distribution of the big
bang was on the other side of the "explosion" and is now
going the other way, away from us, presumably slowly
accelerating in velocity, at the same rate as the
distributed matter on our side of the big bang.
To See or not two c
This part of our "local" big bang that is going the other
way at a certain accelerating velocity, may, when added to
the velocities of the exploding matter from our side which
is going the opposite way, might add up to more than c and
therefore be completely invisible to us.
Say what?
Restating: The absolute value of the vector sigma of the
(tangential) velocities may, in many cases, approach or even
exceed c which might disallow forever, any visibility and
therefore might preclude any meaningful investigation.
The Lilliputians
So among the visible portion of the cosmos, the little
common visible spiral galaxy of only 100,000 or so light
years in diameter and the specks of stars that inhabit them,
would therefore make up a tiniest mass portion of the
cosmos, along with unradiating matter such as: planets,
earth, Jupiter and et al., as well as comets, asteroids and
particulate belts of dirt clods, sod, frozen water, old
space stations, bots, and lost and left behind wrenches,
cameras and flashlights, and too much dust to mention.
achoo! :-) i hate when i sneeze in my spacesuit...
The Origins of the Spiral Galaxy
If two black holes close on one another, there is a good
chance that the resultant orbit velocities will generate so
much centrifugal force that parts of their mass may actually
detach and start streaming off with an ever lessening x,y
velocity vectors, generating a "spiral arms effect"
appearance. This in spite of the magnitude of the black
hole gravitation. It is a push, but it is worth considering
if mass isn't held to the velocity limits of c.
Centrifugally the stuff may be able to break loose. In
fact, this may be the best evidence that mass can travel
faster than c.
hypothesis:
ALL spiral galaxies and probably even lesser similiar
distributions as well, started as closing binary black hole
orbits resulting in a "clumpy" redistribution of lesser
mass, some radiation emitting, some not.
The unfortunate corollary of this hypothesis is that there
are a LOT of black hole objects moving around out in deep
space bonking into one another and generating galaxies or
partials or just accreting into one another.
Our own local group and our own galaxy and the tiny black
holes within our own galaxy and the local but comparatively
"tiny" great attractor are the closest examples.
In fact, looking at it, even the "big bang" distribution
might have been a "spiral arms" distribution of two
hypermassive objects.
Who is calling the shots?
These innumerable hypermassive and lesser black holes
(radiation retaining objects) are probably, this Universe+
theory presents, the most responsible, directly or
indirectly, for most, if not all, of the the currently, by
inference, visible and invisible phenomenon in the cosmos.
The "Big Bang" theory of galactic origin
The "big bang" theory which gives us an everything from
nothing reality from a hot singularity, and leans pretty
heavy against common sense and is in contention here. This
"one shot then a fade away universe" scenario of the "Big
Bang" may have been in fact just a:
1) Supermassive black hole collision or
2) Possible binary orbit of hypermassive objects, causing a
massive centrifugal distribution, or (even if yet another
third theory proves correct)
3) A Repulsive force event upon gravitational collapse
That is, a hot particle repulsive force redistribution of
the entire hypermassive source (well, most of it...) due to
a total collapse of the weak field (gravitational field)
caused by unimaginable heat and pressure which interrupts
the additive quantum gravitational interlinking mechanism.
see the Snot Standard Model
Will this thing ever go away?
But does this last theory bring with it another theory that
may assume a massless linking or "ratcheting underlayer
ether" that "carries" or propagates the quantum radiation?
This theory explains (well, acknowledges) that all radiation
has the same propagation velocity in space no matter what
its energy is because of the massless resonant linking
underlayer, aka: (ether) can only propagate so fast.
The same layer impliedly propagates neutrinos too by the
way. OR neutrinos may be part of the linking "ether"? and
be part of the gravitational process.
This area of suggestion is not very popular right now for
sure, but i am going to throw it out to you anyhow and let
the wolves snap over it.
What goes around, comes around.
or should this be
What goes out, goes back in?
To be sure, according to the universe+ hypothesis, the
centrifugal distribution or the distribution caused by
collision, or the gravitational collapse resulting in
supermassive particle distributions are all followed by
eventual supermassive black hole accretions by other
resident "Ladies in waiting" black holes.
Due to the unimaginable gravitational attraction of other
supermassive black holes, they reabsorb the visibly
radiating galactic flotsam and jetsam from the "primary
nova" (little bang) or distribution. i.e.: Galaxies and
stars.
An Example:
Look at it this way: heat up a batch of glue gravy on the
stove, (lots of flour or starch) and when done, throw ladles
of it, like a baseball, against the kitchen wall. Where it
sticks is like another black hole that was just there to
catch the fly. that is what is going to happen to our own
galaxy. All the milk from the milky way is going back into
somebody else's black bucket on the wall. simple. end of
story.
Splashback
With accretion of galaxies, a certain amount of "splashback"
occurs. This is observed as possibly, gamma ray bursts. But
bursts can probably occur on a lot smaller scale too. You
don't need a galacy and you don't need a supermassive black
hole.
Come to think of it, if a galaxy is 100,000 light years in
diameter and is being accreted (absorbed) by a black hole,
you would expect gamma splashback to last some major portion
of that time interval.
SO... substantially noncontinuous splashback signals might
come from the same area of space where that is happening.
And if we can detect no noncontinuous signals from anywhere
in space then what does that indicate...? Gamma ray bursts,
though infrequent, might have the property of coming from
the exact (or slightly moving) location in space.
So What?
Tenative Conclusion:
And that is how the visible cosmos begins, (but not
the entire cosmos) and that is how it will end, (but not the
entire cosmos) generated from black holes and then
reabsorbed into yet another supermassive black hole.
Eternal Quantum Quark soup.
Quarks you are, and to quarks you will return.
More Big Banging going on
There probably are other inevitable collisions by other
hypermassive black holes sitting at cosmotic (new word!)
distances away of the now violently redistributed mass
during time, but the distances in lightyears are too great
for their light putt-putting at velocity c to reach us
during our time in the cosmos or for the present.
But you can never tell what or when or where even more light
breaks forth yone and will arrive on track one.. but at
least we have a tentative handle on the why.
Fitting Reality into God or fitting God into reality
Taking a different direction for a second, and
metaphysically speaking, (Don't infer that God is
metaphysical) using this Universe+ hypothesis, it appears
evident as a theological guess, that God can create His
Light as many times as he wants, and He is not limited to a
single "Big Bang" and "Big Fadeout" event implied from
current physics.
Moreover since HE is eternal, it may follow that HIS home is
eternal as well. And i hope that our home and future home
is somewhere within some small corner of His home as he
reportedly watches over us and even looks in on us from time
to time.
Our favorite readsay source says that He created the heaven
or heavens (depending on the book) and light.
I don't remember reading that an eternal universe was
created. This concept to a human mind appears to be a tad
on the oxymoronic side. I'll have to leave this one to the
temple theologians who allegedly have a deeper understanding
of God stuff.
In any event, to a joe sixpack, it seems self evident that
He can create any damn thing He wants, when He wants, how He
wants, and that includes a very stupid lifeform on the
planet earth called Homo unsapiens.
(or whatever the proper Latin or Greek word is for someone
who is chewing up their one and only home at a prodigious
rate.)
And don't think for a second that you are going to move out
to another home.
This is it: dirt, water, mud, snow, rain, volcanoes,
sandstorms, wind, tornadoes, hurricanes, and all...
Unless you are a space traveler, which is a very unenvious
and hazardous activity given the velocity of hardballs and
spitballs out there that can whack you at 40,000 mph without
notice...
So take care of your home for you and your children or else
join the dinosaurs in a museum attended in the distant
future by the children of a hopefully more thoughtful
(carapaced or winged?) lifeform...
however, i am beginning to wonder just how bright universal
lifeforms can ever get... can you ever expect that much
really from a bunch of protoplasm with a gullet? sigh...
Thirty beer bottles on the wall
Take for example, our own local group of 30 or so galaxies
that are currently traveling at a reported 1,000,000 miles
per hour and are accelerating slowly towards an object known
as the "Great Attractor" which appears to be a black area in
space.
The eternal garbage disposal units
This great attractor is still a little guy compared to the
big boys and the possible millions and billions of others
like it, are the standard citizen of the cosmos into which
our galaxy will be reabsorbed in a blink of galactic time,
100,000 earth years plus or minus a few, as it is
reabsorbed, hopefully edgewise as it takes longer, and pours
itself, ever more elongated, into the radiation retaining,
gravitationally overwhelming black hole mass.
Oh happy day...
Cheer up, we get to travel around our sun an average (best
guess) in the high fifties or low sixties of earth years if
we take into consideration all the starving babies who don't
make it to five years of age.
Another monumental achievement for mankind...
The Wrong Escalator
Our increasing velocity towards the great attractor,
currently quite possibly confused with an "acceleration" in
the expansion and fadeout of the universe, appears to have
only about three billion years left before the entire local
group of galaxies are reabsorbed or accreted into our
relatively smallish local supermassive or hypermassive black
hole known as the great attractor.
Splat!
The accretion process will be carried out at near c velocity
with a strong probability of splashbacks of high gamma ray
bursts (nasty if you are close by) after the 100,000 light
year diameter galaxies zoom through the great attractor's
event horizon and finally hit the actual solid mass of the
great attractor.
It needs a name
The new hypothetical model of the universe is nicknamed,
"The Universe Plus" or spelled "Universe+" to differentiate
it from the existing universe models of the universe that we
use today.
Tricky Dark
The density and diameter of hypermassive, supermassive, and
smaller black holes when measured from their current
apparent 'event horizon' may be a little deceptive however,
due to the radiation retaining boundary (event horizon)
layer's minimal escape velocity of just 'c'.
Please see Bubbles text.
First, a tentative picture of the Universe+ concept:
This is a picture?
Hypothesis:
The UNIVERSE+ is composed of at least 99.9 % Radiation
Retaining HyperMass/Energy Objects (RRHMEO) This is as good
a guess as any, leaving 1/10 of 1% as visible. (Let's
pronounced this acronym, "romeo" to make it easy.)
How big is big?
Hypothesis:
The Mass of Each Radiation Retaining HyperMass Energy Object
responsible for the distribution in the local detectable
cosmos may/could have as much as approximately 1/2 the
mass/energy of our known visible (and perhaps larger
invisible) universe for its Mass/Energy, although, there
probably is a great variation in size and distribution of
the RRHMEOs overall in the universe+.
The pattern repeats
Hypothesis:
At best guess, the distribution in eternal space of these
hypermassive, supermassive, and massive radiation retaining
objects is probably a fractal one, that is to say,
continually completely random in both size and distribution.
Fractal only in the sense that the distribution pattern
probably are similar to smaller distribution patterns which
are similar to smaller distribution patterns & etc.
Time for a picture
Let's give an example of distribution probabilities. View
the Hubble deep field and replace each galaxy with a
hypermassive black hole at similarly scaled distances, then
stick the deep field pictures of galaxies between each
hypermassive black hole system or systems.
Math? Bye me, I pass...
How to quantify these events and structures? The real math
work and sciencing, I have to leave to the astrophysicists
(who think reality and the cosmos can be explained with
numbers), as they are the people who have the brains,
training, the helpful colleagues, other resources, and who
have as well, access to the collective millions of dollars
of government and private equipment that will help prove or
disprove this hypothesis.
Solitary confinement
There is a real limit to what a solitary citizen can do
working in a solitary fashion daydreaming up stuff. But as
far as I am concerned, all the science work has been
completed by Dr. Hubble and his namesakes, and there
remained only the simplest of deductions, ala Sherlock
Holmes & Dr. Watson style, to reach and create this rather
wild hypothesis.
Note:
If the hypothesis proves true, it was no great intellectual
feat. Probably every astrophysicist and astronomer already
came to the same conclusion anyway, but was too wussey to
announce it, or worse, it was tactfully unmentioned because
of reasons of "Metaphysical baggage" and/or "Wisdom".
Tut-tut
As if God gave a shit about what we thought or ate
(Metaphysical food here...) just before He judges us and
puts us where we, according to our conduct, belong....
To steal a phrase from politics, "it's the conduct from our
heart, dummy"...
Does this EVER end?
Hypothesis:
The number of RRHMEO's in the Universe+ is guesstimately
approximately: 1.0 x 10^ (to the unimaginable power number).
But let's just guess for starters that there are 1024 of
them +/-a few orders of magnitude, and they guesstimately
may be distributed spatially in a pattern analogous to the
fractal geometry of nature concepts, that is, strewn out all
over the place in an apparent random fashion, although, it
may not be so.
How's that for double-talk? But more on this later.
Scenario #1:
Collision
Hypothesis:
Now the Universe+ hypothesis carries with it, certain
assumptions. That is, that these RRHMEO's occasionally
collide at enormous closing velocity, probably approaching
"c" due to their gravitational force, creating a flurry of
pieces, many of which are small enough to not retain visible
radiation. That is, many of the smaller pieces "light up"
due to their lesser gravitational status and we have the
resulting "visible" particulate i.e. galaxies, suns, and
what not.
Note:
This does not rule out dust and all the possible hydrogen
ions and even molecues that self accretes from self igniting
when the mass is finally great enough.
But much of the larger ejectiva from a distribution do not
"light up", as they still retain a mass large enough to
retain light emissions despite being centrifugally broken
off and slung out into space or orbit.
Thus are created from the "chards" of the colliding RRHMEO's
many (millions, billions?) of smaller radiation retaining
massive objects (RRMO's) (or black holes) as well as many
millions (billions?) of small fusion objects.
These RRMO's pieces may additionally go into a binary orbit
or collision? and further distribute matter. (Let's
pronounce RRMO as row-mo). Of course the only difference
between a RRHMEO and a RRMO is size.
Hot or Cold?
Problem:
If I remember correctly, a suggested fly in the ointment is
that some physicist's maintain that the internal temperature
of any radiation retaining object (black hole) is near
absolute zero and the fusion processes seem intuitively
unlikely to occur if the temperatures of the black hole is
so low. Where they got that idea is beyond me. Let's see,
did i just dream that one up myself...?
hmmm... well, anyway...
So how can the fragments (ejectiva) light up if they are
cold?
But other physicists maintain that the temperature is 10 to
the 9th degrees Kelvin which will warm your tortillas. We
may be able to formulate by deduction, a tentative answer to
this issue.
Are some hot and some cold?
Restate Hot or Cold
Question:
Can a collision at or near c binary orbit "heat up" the
RRHMEO's? If the black holes are at near absolute zero, how
can they, or why do they light up?
How much energy is absorbed/released by a collision? The
main theory, my best uneducated guess, is to avoid the
question altogether and say,
"If it's Big, It's Hot."
Hypothesis:
The RRHMEO's may have been always "lit up" or at fusion and
higher temperatures and pressures and capable of undergoing
visible "fusion" but for their immense radiation retaining
gravity.
Their massive gravity retains heat radiation as well, and
results in "unseen or unmeasurable" heat radiation inside
and close to the hard surface, and even at the event horizon
of the supermassive black hole, even though we assume that
the retained radiation is at or near the hard surface, it
being gravitationally retained and attracted.
The event horizon of any hypermassive object is a long,
long, distance away out from the hard surface and where the
escape velocity is down to a mere 'c'.
duh...
In any event, by simple observation, we can conclude that
the current visible universe, come to think of it timewise,
is there anything but a current universe?
But the current universe we cannot see, all we see is the
past universe... oh well..
Anyway the universe is full of photon activity (or
underlayer resonance), awash in a sea of neutrinos and
possibly other non-mass fields and items from galaxies, suns
and other whatnot.
By the way, the neutrinos get sucked into the black holes
too if they are subject to any gravitational attraction from
their "mass".
That is they are more densely packed as the spacetime
warpage increases. Neutrinos may even have some effect on
altering the TIME within the spacetime warpage.
By the way, what is time that it can be altered?
Fireworks of various sizes
So IF the big bang was sourced in two RRHMEOs to begin with,
you have to assume that after the collision distribution,
some of the pieces lit up because the core mass/energy and
therefore gravity, of some of the pieces were insufficient
to maintain the radiation retaining capability which would
have kept the larger pieces dark.
In addition, while I think of it, and though unrelated to
current discussion, the original collision/orbit "big bang"
event may have been between 2 or more RRHMEOs and that there
may even have been some ongoing fusion activity by very
small pieces of extraneous remnant matter existing from
before the big bang..
end of scenario #1
Scenario #2:
A closing binary orbit with/while closing velocities
approaching c?
Hypothesis:
These RRHMEO's may occasionally go into a closing binary,
trinary, quatenary orbits of enormous closing velocities and
centrifugally sling great volumes of Mass/Energy from its
perimeter, creating a flurry of pieces, many of which,
though not all, are small enough to not retain radiation.
That is, they "light up" and we have the resulting "visible"
particulate i.e. galaxies, suns and what not. (same as
above) commencing the fusion process.
Moby Conservation of Momentum
As the x-y vectors of the centrifugally ejected mass
decreases with continuing lower solar mass and the orbit
velocities decrease as well reducing the x-y velocities.
The result is that the arms of the ejectiva all have the
same orbit period. And that is why the spiral arms, usually
two, all move around at the same orbit period.
Let's try that again
Hypothesis:
As the main central Mass/Energy of the binary system
gradually (well, rapidly, relatively) decreases and each
body of mass/energy ejectiva has less outward and forward
velocity vectors due to lessened escape velocities than its
predecessor it results in the appearance of the classic
spiral nebula.
The binary system eventually comes to a relatively stable
configuration of just two (or more) merging and/or orbiting
black holes without substantial ejectiva.
As the binary system merges, both having exhausted all the
surplus ejectiva, the conservation of angular momentum
accelerates the remaining merged black hole's spin. And
there may even be a bit more ejectiva as this occurs
depending upon size factors, but again, that process is
unique to each system.
Hmmm...
Question:
The question occurred to me as to what effect on the
outlying ejectiva would the central binary black hole's, now
IF now no longer a black binary system, dramatic increase in
rotational velocity have on the ejectiva? We are dealing
with a Quasar, pulsar, or millipulsar now...
Question:
Would there be an increase in the gravitational fields with
the resultant increase in polar orbiting mass? Hmmm, well,
don't see how, but, Well, anyhow, questions like that are
best left to the experts.
-------------------------------
What the hell is this all about?
Hypothesis:
Smaller spiral nebula are also created by smaller binary
(RRHMO) & etc. systems.
This event would cause the "arms of the spiral" to retain
their "shape" as the x,y,z,t vectors of the ejectiva would
continually lessen as they would be mass (gravitationally)
dependent as to the (x,y,z,t) components of escape
velocity..
Whether the "ejectiva condition" is due to the peripheral
Mass/Energy approaching the velocity of c which thereby may
somehow lower the escape velocity of the peripheral
Mass/Energy or whether it is just the classic outward
centrifugal force of the orbit operating upon the peripheral
Mass/Energy, or whether it is simply the orbiting mass is
orbiting faster than the subject masses escape velocity, is
an issue as yet, unresolved.
on rereading this somewhat incomprehensible paragraph, it
appears sometimes my brain hits a bump... a prime candidate
for a rewrite here.
-------------------------------
Anti-magnetic
Hypothesis:
These RRHMEO's probably would have the corresponding
enormous magnetic fields which would predispose a lot of
charged matter to orient itself in perpendicular "polar"
orbits. (binary, trinary, quatenary and above would have
very interesting resultant magnetic fields as well as
smaller orbiting mass/energy systems.)
Indeed, you could probably deduce from the orbiting
mass/energy what the original configuration of the core
system is or was. (okay, Sherlock, just try it...)
Bump and Grind, a Brownian Cosmos?
Hypothesis:
The RRHMEO movement or activity cosmoswise overall might be
somewhat or slightly analogous to the "Brownian movement"
(there's that Mandelbrot again...) since inductively, we can
deduce that there might/must be a heat constant in the
universe world of RRHMEO's. Since a RRHMEO collision would
imply movement, and movement implies energy, and energy,
heat.
Prospective light bulbs
Random collisions and/or accelerating binary orbits would
probably be expected to occur over time and space. Except in
this case of RRHMEO's, there would be no bounce, and would
instead create an occasional "big bang" effect with the
corresponding "light show", that is, small elements of
displayable fusion systems made up of unretainable radiation
gravity/mass systems, and all contained within certain
retained volumes of space boundaried by other distant
RRHMEO's..
To Accret, or not to Accret?
Hypothesis: Ejectiva resulting from the RRHMEO's collision
or "c" binary condition would probably be finally reabsorbed
by other RRHMEO's over time unlike the current model as
accretion of the current 'expanding' physical universe is
currently understood to be physically impossible.
The resulting changing mass/energy of the absorbed universe
mass could introduce altered orbits and/or events causing
another romeo event (sort of a big bang) within a system of
RRHMEO�s over time.
But don't wait for the next 'bang'
Hypothesis:
The Universe+ system would probably be an unclosed
Energy/Mass continuum and other collision or orbiting
events, as yet unobserved by us, (another bang) may occur
over any time period of say, 10 to the 9th or so earthly
years plus or minus lots of exponents.
The events themselves would probably have a "statistical"
time period of recurrence, perhaps related to and dependent
upon the universe's heat constant, er... motion of thingys
in space.
If, If, If...
Hypothesis:
If
our own observed "big bang" event, in fact occurred,
and
if
the the scientific basis for its expansion consideration,
a "red-shift", is not the result of some ionized element
like sodium's (Na)
or
perhaps, some other element's ionization in space, (Ca,
Si, H, He, or what have you,) effect or effect's on photon
activity over distance that led to the big bang hypo-
thesis,
then
we can expect that throughout or over time, that is, through
the eternity of time, millions upon millions of other "big
and little bangs" can be expected to occur, separated of
course, by appropriate scaled space and time distances and
periods. Don't hold your breath waiting for the next one.
Say What?
Question: With respect to our local celestial bodies, can we
determine distance and velocity parameters that they are
traveling from each other by radiation studies as well as
from visible light studies.
But visible light seems to be the "junk" indicator of the
universe.
Visible light is subject to bending, gravitational lensing?,
gravitational oscillation due to passing over any high-
gravity binary system, and for all we know, it might even be
able to be altered by high-energy radiation systems.
Is it possible to "reprism" higher frequencies of energy
other than visible light?
Can we somehow establish that high energy radiation effects
a similar "spectrum effect" through certain materials and
can further buttress the "expanding universe theory"?.
Or eliminate it?
Well, that is a question, the validity of, and answer to,
will have to be left to the experts.
Flunking Optics
Question:
Indeed shouldn't the "rainbow" of visible light through
glass (silicon solution) tip us off to the possible effects
of other elements upon light as it travels through space and
possibly creating some spectral manipulations?
In short, is the "red shift" caused by something other than
the "expansion of the universe"?
One little, two little, three little bangs
Of course , with no "expansion of the universe" there is no
Universe+ concept and we revert to square one on the nature
of the universe about us.
Especially if we conveniently ignore the "great attractor".
But a static "one bang" universe still may not adequately
explain a lot of other phenomenon to anybody's satisfaction
and least of all to the high priests by limiting God's
muscle power to just one bang.
For sure, there is a truth out there somewhere, it is just a
matter of finding out what it is....
Expanding universe, or not an expanding universe, that is
the question....
Source of Gamma Ray Bursts
Hypothesis:
The Universe+ concept, with its introduction of RRHMEO's
might aid in the understanding of the periodic high energies
that occasionally strike earth.
For example, from time to time high energy radiation strikes
the earth from various locations in the sky (day or night)
baffling scientists.
The source of the energy of course would be smaller victim
masses being accelerated to very high collision velocities
as they hit the RRHMEO's collector's solid surface and not
event horizon.
Like a drop of water hitting a pond, a bullet composed of a
portion of the very high energy released would projectile
outward.
There might be, over the eons, a myriad of these events of
varying magnitude, depending upon the size of the victim.
Collectively, they would randomly map as a random series of
random duration, random strength, high energy pulses if
monitored from a x,y,z,t location.
Back home
Analogy:
Viewed another way, liken the boundary RRHMEO's to a bunch
of electronic bug zappers put out around the porch of your
summer home.
You are sitting out on the porch one hot summer night with a
bunch of bug zappers plugged in. As you rock in your
favorite porch chair, sipping on a beer, you occasionally
hear a "zzzzzap! pop! bzzzzt!".
It's the sound of victim bugs being drawn in toward the
light and having its form "altered". Or in the other sense,
being drawn into the "nolight".
What big teeth you have grandmother!
Hypothesis:
So, likewise may be many of the sounds of BGR (background
radiation).
The BGR signal coming from the "big bang" particulate being
reabsorbed by various positioned RRHMEOs.
A small galaxy, say our own Milky way, would generate a
maximal splash back signals for as approximately as long as
the galaxy is wide and a minimally splash back signal in the
thickness of the width in light years because the closing
velocity of the victim galaxy would accelerate and approach
the velocity of c the closer it got to the RRHMEO.
A 1000 light year diameter victim galaxy would take about
1000 years to be reabsorbed as it was accelerated and
reabsorbed into its local RRHMEO.
Most of the splashback radiation would probably get
reabsorbed by the galaxy undergoing accretion, so a hundred
thousand year signal may be a bit much to expect.
Listening to the bug zappers
Note:
At least, that is my best first intuitive guess. A train
that is one light year long, and traveling at the speed of
light, would take one year to pass by, according to my very
imperfect understanding of general or special relativity, so
i can only GUESS that a galaxy would be reabsorbed at about
the same rate. A small single fusion particle (say our own
sun) would be just sort of a tiny ultra short "zap" or
'blip' event.
The very tiny tag along planet earth, probably wouldn't even
register on the instruments of the lifeforms on the other
distant galaxies who were measuring BGR as the entire milky
way galaxy was being reabsorbed.
the fates
Hypothesis:
So, if the RRHMEO Universe+ hypothesis is correct, we can
deduce the fate of our own galaxy and all the other remnant
radiating and non-radiating particulate of the "big bang".
It is all simply reabsorbed by various RRHMEO's thru time
sitting out there.
Hypothesis:
Of course, not all BGR would comes from the tentatively
proposed recollection (accretion) process.
Probably a lot might be (yet another tentatively proposed
hypothesis) caused by the standard tiny RRHMEO's activity in
a decaying binary orbit or perhaps even a wobbling galactic
jet system from merging black hole thru the zero gravity
port.
The reason for Galactic Jets
Hypothesis:
If the closing binary "black holes" have the same mass, a
"zero gravity escape tube" exists for the energy of their
superhot "evaporating" masses to find a way out, (don't
stand in front of this) like escaping air from a tire,
contrariwise, if the masses are unequal.
Nothing escapes the spinning wok
If the masses were too unequal, the zero gravity area would
be a 'wok' shaped disk and not allow any radiation to escape
since the escape port would be sealed off.
Nothing escapes the spinning wok.
Old faithful
Hypothesis:
It probably wouldn't be too unusual if the signals were
turned on and off for various periods, as one or the other
of the binaries collected more mass to effect the "spinning
wok" effect. Each GRB (gamma ray burst) tweeter has its own
unique physical beaming process depending on its probably
constantly ever changing environment.
The Great Attractor
Hypothesis:
The "Great Attractor" of course would be just a standard
smallish RRHMO in that part of space.
Say cheese?
Question:
Would it be feasible to camera (visible and invisible
radiation) a portion of the night sky to see if there are
any very short bursts of visible light (radiation) along
with the radiation coming from the victim Mass/Energy and
collector RRHMEOs.
answer:
probably not, too few photons...
Question:
The Great Attractor might be a good starting candidate for
such an investigation. A collateral issue would be of
course, do these radiated energy forms really travel through
space at the same velocity?
answer:
proably...
Permutating the issue, if we take receipt of a burst of
visible light, when can we expect the high energy radiation
burst to appear?
Simultaneously as commonly thought?
What conclusion can be reached if it doesn't?
What if there is no high energy burst accompanying the
visible burst?
Did it arrive a long time before? and so on...
What can we conclude about radiation velocity if the burst
arrives before the visible light?
Why the heavens are black at night
Hypothesis:
RRHMEO's would explain why the sky is dark...
The infinitely vast continuum of existing RRHMEO's would
explain as well:
"Which came first, the chicken or the egg? :-)
Well, it would seem to be the chicken unless there was a LOT
bigger egg.
Don't open that door!
Consider:
Now we have a satisfactory universe+ of RRHMEO's.
They explain a lot, but the next question is:
Where did all these supermass dots come from?
Obviously, following the same logic, they are there from an
earlier collision between an even larger dimensioned SUPER-
RRHMEO's!
Now things are getting really unimaginable and I am afraid
that this is the pathway that leads away from sanity.
Exploding imagination
Just how small can we be?
Just how large can large get?
Seems like i read something about like this in a 35 cent
1950's pulp science fiction book once or twice when i was a
kid in high school.
hmmm.... dimensions of reality...
parallel worlds and all that.
Theology meets science fiction.
Ooooh well...
What is truth? asks Pontius Pilate...
What is reality? asks the astrophysicist...
where is my blankie? asks joseph_sixpack.
Where did this come from?
Hypothesis:
Finally, the problem of the calculated insufficient mass to
contain the orbits of the spiral arms of a galaxy might be
overcome with the working universe+ hypothesis in that there
are one, two or more lesser scale RRMO's (remnants from our
own local big bang) in binary orbit at the center of almost
EVERY SINGLE spiral galaxy in existence except clusters.
The one, two (or more) smaller residual RRMO's still
generate enough radiation to light up the center of their
galaxy, either from emitted radiation from the remnant
binary black hole system, now a spiral galaxy, or from the
strong magnetic fields, or from just dishing out wacko
speeding dust, even though, they have thrown most of their
mass outward and reached equilibrium, and yet contain enough
mass to prevent dissipation of the Energy/Mass in orbit.
Ejection velocity minus escape velocity = 30 mph?
Hypothesis:
Another thought occurs, the ejecting velocity minus the
escape velocity may be so low as to make it seem like the
ejectiva is being held by the galaxy when in fact it is
traveling outward at too slow a velocity to be accurately
measured by current scientific technology, that is, it is
just very slowly (relatively speaking) moving outward.
The Conscious Cosmos
Philosophical aside:
Summing up, like Alice in Wonderland, we can't stay out of
the bottle drinking the stuff that makes us smaller and
smaller and smaller, in our own eyes, spiritually, as well
as physically.
Our almost infinite tininess, is a mind and soul-boggling
humiliation to our vanity.
Yet we, and no doubt other life forms, do still collectively
exist in scale somewhat like mold upon a piece of bread, yes
we exist almost as a mold or slime on the universe's planets
as the consciousness of the universe.
Still, it does not seem to be a small honor to be part of
the consciousness of the universe. (much is omitted here...)
fly in the ointment
Problems:
A fly in the ointment of the above suggested model of the
dynamics of galactic matter is the cluster galaxy.
What dynamics have created these?
They don't seem to be the result of either a spiral event or
a collision event.
Presently, i haven't a clue. hmmm.... but i will keep
thinking about it.
hmmmm...
(later addition:)
Aah!
Hypothesis:
clusters are simply galaxies that are being held and
undergoing the process of gravitational accretion.
Hypothesis:
Based on the same basic principles discussed above, we can
do a stretch and create a multiple orbiting system with
strong magnetic fields. (But here, i have to leave you. i
hate flies.) How about an easy way out?
Hypothesis:
Many Cluster Galaxies are simply the edge view of star
strings and not oriented at all around a common center of
gravity/mass/energy but are simply an optical effect due to
the orientation of the composite stars that make up the
cluster.
It would be slightly analogous to looking at the headlamps
of the automobiles on the freeway behind you.
This is a bad idea, just stay with the accretion status
theory for now.
Didn't i say this before?
Philosophical:
Stepping back, and looking at our own tiny galaxy, we are an
element of consciousness in the universe.
This mold, this life, has the property of being able to
contemplate it own existence!
We are that component of the universe contemplating itself.
There is no need for space travel.
We are already on our own extremely tiny spaceship called
earth.
Setti
Hypothesis:
The distribution of aware life is probably distributed
pretty evenly across the vastness of our visible universe,
and will probably be present among the other "big bang"
events across the huge universe+ past, present and future.
The thin layer of lifeslime upon the planets exists
everywhere it can. Like fusion, it is a natural process, a
natural event. er... created by God.
Hypothesis/Meditation:
The consciousness of the universe, this ultra thin layer of
lifeslime is distributed uniformly upon receptive planets
across the starry night for all eternity. Each packet of
dust, correctly assembled, takes it's turn meditating.
Collectively we are each a cell in the organ of the universe
that contemplates itself and its own existence.
We are the universe contemplating itself.
Children's stories
Our activities are the collective activities of lifeslime.
Does that make the two legged god, the just one, the process
who drives a Buick, who is not, but deigns to call herself
the reflected light, just a piece of moldy blue cheese?
Is the metaphysical moon in fact just made of this green
cheese?
Never sell children's stories short...
or their ability to produce questions.
why consciousness?
Questions:
But why?
What for?
To what end?
For what purpose, if any, does this cosmic consciousness
exist?
Why life?
What can consciousness change?
What can we do except understand what can only be.
Are things as they only can be?
Things are as they only can be...
Does the consciousness of the Universe+ have a function?
But what?
Why am I?
What for, am I? asks the universe+.
Of course, the null hypothesis is that life is a reasonless
process by the universe. That is interesting too...
Hypothesis:
A layman's argument against the Hot Singularity hypothesis.
The reversion of matter/energy to a less compact state, that
is, a post 'big bang' is an event that is postulated to
occur almost simultaneously, literally in a matter of
seconds or even less!
That is, the total "Thru the Barrel Exploding Time" (TBET)
for the 'big bang' is say, for argument, 1 second at an
unknown velocity of V.
Actually, a reading of some opinions indicate a much, much,
less period of time.
So the projectile length or bubble wall thickness (BWT) of
mass/energy or gravitational pulse fired off in any given
vector direction would be the result of at most one half of
the diameter (the radius) of the RRHMEO times the "Thru the
Barrel Exploding Time" or just 1 second of 'down to the core
time' fired off in each direction at velocity V.
The resultant geometric picture of ejectiva (mass/energy or
gravitational pulse or whatever you wanted to call it)
distribution would be very much like a rapidly expanding
thick walled bubble of some mass/energy with a limit
thickness of BWT expressed as a function of the front wall
to back wall of the bubble traveling at velocity T.
Of course, this assumes for simplicity's sake that V is a
uniform value throughout the thickness of the gravitational
pulse which it probably isn't. But the variation in V
probably still wouldn't be so large as to distribute
mass/energy over such a distance of many millions
(billions?) of light years which now exists according to
pictures from the HST (hubble).
Of course, we could just be looking at just a small section
of the bubble wall with us being within the wall and calling
it the universe.
Restated as an analogy, imagine a balloon floating high in
the sky, and dangling from it are a large number of loaded
fireworks all wired together at the base of the tubes so
that the barrel tubes are all pointed outward in the rough
shape of a sphere. Now discharge the tubes all at once. The
fireworks shot all goes out at once and forms a huge bubble.
If you connect the dots of all the shot what you end up with
is a dynamic expanding model which is an approximation of
the distribution of matter/energy involved in a "big bang".
The expanding shot forms an ever less dense growing sphere.
(Gee! that would really be pretty and educational if someone
actually did that...)
So big, so thin
The exploding time of the 'big bang' may be even much less,
thereby giving us an even thinner web thickness for the
mass/energy film that makes up the outside of our 'big bang
of mass/energy bubble'.
The above core distribution time frame would appear to give
us a universe, the mass of which, would be arranged in a
bubble like distribution.
To say the lease, such does not seem to be the case at first
look.
Deep field implies that something else went down...
Minor Glitch.
Hypothesis:
If the velocity of the mass/energy being 'big
banged' out would, by guess, be approaching c minus the
effects of gravity of the behind mass.
Assuming the two vectors of the opposite ejectiva's velocity
added up to more than the speed of light (c) then that
portion of masses whose absolute values of opposite
velocities exceeded the velocity of light would not be
visible to its opposite or angular vector due to the
propagation velocity of c. But adding transporting limits,
i.e. 'c' is hazardous because we can get an addition to c+c
to equal 2c even though the light can make its way across at
c, far less than the actual relative moving rates of greater
than c!.
39. Or stating hypothesis #38 another way: Because of the
opposite velocities (any velocities greater than c/2) of the
Matter/Energy contained in the "big bang" material, enormous
amounts of mass/energy would be seemingly 'invisible'
because the "light" from one side would never be able to
"reach" the other side.
end of universe+ hypothesis concept
v1.001 added bug zapper analogy
v1.002 added cluster issue and minor rewording.
v1.003 added item 32 and minor rewording.
v1.004 went to HTML & Front Page Express
v1.005 added fonts, superscript
v1.006 spell checked doc. (lots of mistakes!)
v1.007 rewrite hypo 1 through 7 on 2/17/01
v1.008 corrected errors, changed wording, added a little.
v1.009 same as above, added green cheese
v1.020 redid whole thing. deleted some, added some. :-)
A single person in a small boat on a vast sea
listening to the wind of the Heavens
and the growling down below
Final comments
Yet Another Modest Proposal
or
The Universe+ Hypothesis
v1.011 - a careful rewrite
Summary Abstract: This paper set forth a hypothesis that
postulated a model of the initial conditions of the universe
that contained as its common citizen, billions of
hypermassive and supermassive black holes. These as yet
unnumbered, and for the most part, unlocated hypermassive
black holes, constitute the major population of the universe
and are responsible the universe's events. Most are too
distant to be ever detected.
Detection?
However, some sort of detection may be possible from
backlighting by galaxies showing a small circle, which would
be the event horizon of the hypermassive object. Stars
would appear in front as bent light from star that are
behind the hypermassive object.
These same stars would appear to move to the perimeter of
the event horizon of the backlite hypermassive object as
they approached the hypermassive black hole from behind.
Perimeter stars should be tracked first as those may be the
closest and moving the fastest towards the object.
Blue shifting may be visible and detectable.
I'll leave this to the experts...
i'm outta here...
TOP
TOC
Index