Global Web Pages Rubric p7

[ Home ] [ Introduction ] [ Task ] [ Process ] [ Evaluation ] [ Conclusion ] [ Teacher Page ]

Web Pages Rubric Name:

Topic: Date: Score: /35

Beginning

2

Developing

3

Accomplished

4

Exemplary

5

Score

CONTENT

Much information is missing, incorrect, or not relevant to topic.

Some information is missing, incorrect, or not relevant to topic.

Contains correct and relevant information.

Contains correct, relevant and in-depth information.

TECHNICAL QUALITY

(Text)

Most of the text is not clear and understandable. Font/size is not appropriate.

Some text is not clear and understandable. Font/size is not appropriate.

Text is clear and understandable. Font and size are appropriate.

Text is extremely clear and understandable. Font and size are appropriate.

TECHNICAL QUALITY

(Graphics)

Many graphics are not in focus, inappropriate, and/or not relevant to topic.

Some graphics are not in focus, inappropriate, and/or not relevant to topic.

Graphics are clear, appropriate, thematic, and enhance understanding.

Outstanding, creative graphics: greatly enhances understanding.

TECHNICAL QUALITY

(Layout)

Not much thought or effort has been put towards color scheme/layout. Both are dull &/or unorganized.

Color scheme/layout (background, title/text boxes) is disturbing and inconsistent.

Color scheme/layout (background, title/text boxes) is pleasing and consistent.

Color scheme/layout (background, title/text boxes) is thematic, creative and consistent.

ORGANIZATION

Pages/text/graphics are missing and/or not in order. Navigation is not seamless.

Pages/text/graphics are not in order. Navigation is not as seamless as it should be.

Pages/text/graphics are in the correct order. Navigation is seamless.

Pages/text/graphics are in the correct order. Navigation is seamless (includes hyperlinks).

REFERENCES

There are too few references used to successfully complete this project.

There is not a variety of meaningful references.

There is a variety of meaningful references.

There is a great variety of meaningful references.

EDITING

(Text)

Grammatical and/or mechanical errors are too abundant.

There are noticeable grammatical or mechanical errors.

There are very few grammatical or mechanical errors on any slide.

There are no grammatical or mechanical errors on any slide.

Comments:

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

[ Home ] [ Introduction ] [ Task ] [ Process ] [ Evaluation ] [ Conclusion ] [ Teacher Page ]
Web Pages Rubric			Name:
Topic:			Date:		Score: /35

	Beginning 2	Developing 3	Accomplished 4	Exemplary 5		Score
CONTENT	Much information is missing, incorrect, or not relevant to topic.	Some information is missing, incorrect, or not relevant to topic.	Contains correct and relevant information.	Contains correct, relevant and in-depth information.
TECHNICAL QUALITY (Text)	Most of the text is not clear and understandable. Font/size is not appropriate.	Some text is not clear and understandable. Font/size is not appropriate.	Text is clear and understandable. Font and size are appropriate.	Text is extremely clear and understandable. Font and size are appropriate.
TECHNICAL QUALITY (Graphics)	Many graphics are not in focus, inappropriate, and/or not relevant to topic.	Some graphics are not in focus, inappropriate, and/or not relevant to topic.	Graphics are clear, appropriate, thematic, and enhance understanding.	Outstanding, creative graphics: greatly enhances understanding.
TECHNICAL QUALITY (Layout)	Not much thought or effort has been put towards color scheme/layout. Both are dull &/or unorganized.	Color scheme/layout (background, title/text boxes) is disturbing and inconsistent.	Color scheme/layout (background, title/text boxes) is pleasing and consistent.	Color scheme/layout (background, title/text boxes) is thematic, creative and consistent.
ORGANIZATION	Pages/text/graphics are missing and/or not in order. Navigation is not seamless.	Pages/text/graphics are not in order. Navigation is not as seamless as it should be.	Pages/text/graphics are in the correct order. Navigation is seamless.	Pages/text/graphics are in the correct order. Navigation is seamless (includes hyperlinks).
REFERENCES	There are too few references used to successfully complete this project.	There is not a variety of meaningful references.	There is a variety of meaningful references.	There is a great variety of meaningful references.
EDITING (Text)	Grammatical and/or mechanical errors are too abundant.	There are noticeable grammatical or mechanical errors.	There are very few grammatical or mechanical errors on any slide.	There are no grammatical or mechanical errors on any slide.
Comments: