by Nathan Coppedge page
Part I. Effective-Meaning: Objective-Time
�1.a. Additional Development page 1
Our original analogy states that Effective-Meaning : Subjective-Perception :: Objective-Time : Objective-Perception.
We stated that because all perception entails an awareness of perception, any subjective-perceiver is (at least) self-conscious. The Effective-Meaning of something is what it consists of, therefore we may state that insofar as a soul signifies consciousness we may say it is the Effective-Meaning of Subjective-Perception. Consciousness, or the Soul, is how the subjective-perceiver relates to anything.
(It then became clear that insofar as changing-perception requires an awareness of perception, the subject must have an object of awareness, a form of knowledge. It seemed that the only exception was when the subject did not know. But we are qualifying all perceptions as forms of knowledge, since insofar as they define a world, they represent a reality. Before a subject can perceive anything, he must at least have an objective-perception of his own perceptions. This becomes more clear when we define matter as a form of knowledge; something is only real insofar as it is real. Matter that is not perceived is not real matter. We are not concerned with non-realities. So, ideas fit into our definition of objects.)
All worlds are objective in the sense that we must know something about them. If the world is external, we are stating a belief that it has truth besides our own. If the world is internal, we are stating that we know more than the world knows. Any other cases of Subjective-Perception are purely material cases, in which no truth is perceived. So it may be that I am assuming that experience is true. But that is the one quality that applies to anything. Even the concept of nothing is true.
Then we switched the ends of the analogy, so that Subjective-Perception : Objective-Perception :: Effective-Meaning : Objective-Time. Since any perception involves change, it also involves death. So long as all perception involves death, we must say that Time is a quality of the Objective World. If all thought is significant, we can state that something is not Subjective as long as it has a quality of significance. We can say that so long as Subjectivity defines a world, it has a quality of the Meaningless.
Once we have defined the Objective World as the Judgment axis in relation to Subjective-Perception, it became clear that the only solution for the Effective-Meaning of Subjective-Perception involved an alignment of the Judgment axes with the as-yet-unnamed contextual axes of SoulGod-TimeWorld. There are four ways to do this, giving us four possible worlds, or outlooks.
NEXT
Preface
Chart
Summary
Part 1a.
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Iteration 4
Part 1b.
Iteration 5
Iteration 6
PART II.
(incomplete)
PART III.
(outline)
PART IV.
(outline)
NOTES
Philosophy and Writing Main Menu