Compare and Contrast Paper: Books vs. E-books
When I read for pleasure, I prefer the sound, feel, and smell of the crisp pages. Sometimes, on my Dad’s rocker or in my bedroom, the tender warmth of the lamp, and the encircling darkness adds to the intimacy of hard copied reading. I don’t have the same experience with an e-reader. It’s a machine; interactive, but superficial. The backlight and the heat of the hardware barely replaces the tranquility of the lamp. The shape remains the same through the waves of titles. The personality, the same. Nonetheless, there are times when I crave nothing more than to have an e-book. Those times are when I’m hauling several textbooks across campus, and then having to tremulously pull up onto the desk. Books and e-books offer their own amenities that are more convenient for the reader in different situations, such as in cost, durability, convenience, and amenities. These are the principles by which these two mediums will be collated.
Books are costlier to produce, and thus higher priced for consumers than e-books. The reason being that they exigent more resources than their counterpart. They require presses and deft press operators to be created. Afterwards, there are charges for warehousing and shipping. Conversely, e-books are digitized; they only need computers and programmers to be produced.
Since e-book titles are instantaneously sold through the internet, shipping and warehousing fees do not apply. Titles that were originally in printed form are cheaper by choice because the sales of the printed version cover the production costs of digitizing. That can be subject to change once titles are first produced to the e-book. in which digital copies can have the same price as its hard copied cousins. Lastly, both mediums allocate money to pay for the author, editor, and marketing staff.
The portability of the book depends on its size and reader; it can be lighter or heavier than an e-book. With an e-book, the configuration, weight, and texture remains the same through the waves of titles. The weight and/or texture of the e-book can be modified through the use of a case or cover. The e-book can contain an entire library, thanks to its internal memory. A book, only one title.
On durability, they can be damaged in distinctive ways. Unlike an e-book, books do not become disjunct if dropped because it isn’t a device. Instead, books are prone to tears and wears of the pages and the covers, particularly paperbacks. Though, e-books can be made sturdier with a case or cover. One last potential problem exclusive to e-books are bugs and glitches. For example, in the Barnes and Noble Nook Color of one user who redressed his complaints through the company’s online forum, the touchscreen can become unreceptive, and would open books and scroll through pages haphazardly.
Books and e-books have their own conveniences. Batteries and charging, books don’t need to do. This absence exonerates the need for time and battery management. Another convenience is that readers can use a traditional pen and pencil to jot notes and highlight, instead of a stylus or fingers. On the other hand, the consumer doesn’t have to carry around a writing instrument with the use of an e-book, and they also have highlighters. Books and e-books both have the capability of bookmarking more than one spot. In terms of lighting: books have no screen so it’s more visible in the sunlight, but have no backlight like an e-book so a light source is needed in darkness.
E-books have a plethora of amenities that books don’t have such as web browsing, e-mail, games, music players, and the service provider’s market app. To access the world wide web, consumers have the option of buying an e-book that runs on 3G, Wi-Fi, or both. The 3G edition is typically more expensive. One intriguing feature is that e-books have is a search function. For Barnes and Noble Nooks, the search function operates just like an internet search: it identifies key words from the query and lists in bold what page the key word is found. The search is then saved in its own functional history. E-books also give users an option to change the font and font size.
Two final amenities offered are the subscriptions for newspapers and magazines. In Amazon Kindles, they can be bought by the Kindle and then accessed by reading apps. They are also interactive. Another astounding feature is that the Kindle will enable users to link their active hard copied subscriptions and receive digital editions of their product. Lastly, there are two options that authorizes auto-renewals: monthly, or annually.
These conduits for language have defining differences and similarities in their costs, portability, durability, conveniences, and amenities that are capable of suiting each person’s distinct needs. Books are costlier than e-books; have flexible sizes, weights, textures, and configurations; damaged primarily by tears and wears; do not need batteries or to be charged; allow the utilization of traditional writing instruments; and assimilates one title at a time. E-books are less costlier in the long term, but has an expensive capital purchase of the device; have a fixed weight, size, and configuration, but the addendum of covers can alter the texture; damaged primarily by bugs, glitches, and blunt force; do need batteries and to be charged; has digital writing utensils; contains a mobile library; and has a cornucopia of amenities that books don’t have.
Those who value sensory appeal might choose a book. Those who don’t mind a fixed configuration while sailing through the titles might choose an e-book. Those who are able to return to a reading spot with a lamp might choose a book, and those who travel might choose an e-reader for its backlight, fixed weight, and pocket library. For me personally, I predilect towards traditional books for its sensory individuality, but will promptly utilize an e-book for a title that is too heavy to lug around, and to avoid having to use any portable LED lights that illuminate just a part of the page.