Literary Journal

Catcher in the Rye

Author: J.D. Salinger
Pages: 234
Obtained: Barnes and Noble
Date Began: August 19, 2016
Date Finish: September 9, 2016

Let this be a reminder that I am as susceptible to prejudice as anyone else. Before I read this classic, I read the reviews. There were some posters who disliked the novel because of of the main protagonist, who they said was just another whiny teenager. I almost went through the book missing everything this precious novel and Holden Caulfield stood for, if it weren’t for SparkNotes

Holden is a 17 year old who is disillusioned with the human condition. He is the age where he discovers that adults aren’t as genuine as they appeared. Adults are “phony”: they wear different masks to please people; They are unjust: they hate others for asinine reasons such as social class (as shown when his headmaster refuses to smile and engage in conversation when parent’s of lower class students come to visit); they are ruled by their superficiality, living for the next hottest car and whatnot; and as Reddit users NihilisticEndeavor and heretodiscussbooks pointed out in a thread about the Catcher, they are apathetic to the injustices of the world: “I mean, if we look around us we can see that the world is basically full of phoniness, this kind of complacent lemming behavior...”

But a subtle theme about Holden, is that he abhors the very idea of casual sex, which seem to epitomize everything wrong with society. It’s superficial and lacks emotional connection. He is furious when Stradlater won’t answer him if he had sex with Jane, a dear friend of Holden whom he has feelings for, and he tries desperately to wipe off a graffiti of “Fuck” in Phoebe’s school, giving up with despair. And so, Holden doesn’t apply himself at school, and he wants to stay a child forever. The novel’s title is Holden’s dream of catching kids when they fall off the cliff in a rye field. I didn’t need to be a SparkNotes scientist to know that he meant he wanted to save kids from adulthood.

Another subtle demon Holden is struggling with is grief. Holden loses his brother, Allie, to cancer at a young age. Afterwards, his older brother runs off to write for Hollywood, and his parents emotionally distance themselves, and send Holden to boarding school after breaking the windows in his grief, separating him from his sister, Phoebe. Holden sees Allie and Phoebe, as sweet and innocent. As SparkNotes duly notes, when Phoebe questions him what is one thing he really likes about the world right now, he says Allie. He has nothing but good things to say about his siblings.

After Holden visits Phoebe, he goes to stay the night at a teacher and adult who he still trusts deeply, Mr. Antolini. In his post-party living room, Mr. Antolini tells Holden that he isn’t the only one who is disgusted at the human condition, that there are many men who came before him having the same existential crisis and “left records of it in history, in poetry.” He goes to bed, but only a little while later, he wakes up feeling a someone petting his hair. It was Mr. Antolini, and Holden, believing he had homosexual tendencies, packs up a few of his things and rushes out of his house. On this chapter, SparkNotes brings up that Mr. Antolini might’ve been showing affection for a cared-for student’s pain, but that its one of the many times throughout the book that Holden over-simplifies reality.

From there, everything culminates into a nervous breakdown for Holden. Every time he left the curb, he thought he wouldn’t make it to the other side, pleading with Allie to not make him disappear. He sits down on a bench to regain his bearings, where he finally decides to travel out West to work odd jobs. He fantasizes about pretending to be mute for the rest of his life to make the world leave him alone. His relatives would come visit him He wouldn’t return home again. He goes to buy a stationary to write a goodbye note to Phoebe at school.

In the climax of the novel, Holden is waiting for Phoebe to meet him at the museum during Phoebe’s lunch period. When Holden finally sees Phoebe, she is pulling a suitcase. Phoebe begs Holden to take her with him, but Holden is unable to respond; he is struck speechless and lightheaded. When Phoebe pleads again, he becomes enraged, and flatly tells her, “No, shut up,” that she isn’t going, and that she would miss the play if she went, which Holden concedes he was partly angry because she wouldn’t be in his beloved play any more.

Here is what I say about this part from my annotations:

“Holden's strong reaction to Phoebe's desire to go with him out west, to quit school, her play, everything, is likely because he knows he's on a self-destructive path. Additionally, the play holds sentimental value to him, as it was the play all of his siblings, including Allie, went to every year.

Not only that, but Phoebe staying in New York City means she's going to grow up. She's going to see the vulgar graffiti that will take away her innocence, in Holden's view. So what this means is, deep down, Holden sees staying stuck in childhood as unhealthy. Going through the pain, confusion, and uncertainty of adulthood is the only step forward. And so when Holden sees the only person he really cares about, about go to on the same path as he, he feels enraged. He probably now understands how others whom care about him feel when he's doing exactly what Phoebe wanted to do.”

Holden checks her bag in the checkroom, and tries to walk her to back to school, but she wouldn’t have it. With Phoebe trailing on the parallel sidewalk, giving Holden the silent treatment, they go to the zoo. Phoebe eventually comes around and talks to Holden again. Phoebe rides the carousel while Holden watches, and the penultimate chapter ends with Holden being so profoundly happy at this moment, about the way his sister looks going around and around on the carousel.

Holden has learned to make compromises with adulthood in its current condition. Like we all have at one point in our lives, we accept that the world isn’t always fair and just. We have to learn to find happiness. And, if we dare, try to make the world a better place by being more careful about what kind of things we support (as consumers, voters, laborers, activists, etc.) about our society. But most of the time, we are beaten to submission into participating in society’s darkest vices. Holden’s growth here isn’t all that “good” in the moral sense because he’s giving in to society. In society’s eyes, however, they would consider Holden growth’s to be “good.” manonthemount on Reddit condenses this expertly:

“...Ironically, while his critics whine, the book chronicles Holden eroding into a shape that fits more readily into societal constructs. Holden's maturing leads to a dark conclusion where the place in society concepts of equity, truth, and hope reside are in an institution.

As you note, readers of varying maturities relate to Holden differently. The novel disillusions the young and validates the old, but the less introspective of the latter witness it with pleasure rather than well-earned regret.”

Staying true to the novel’s message, the final chapter does not give off a optimistic vibe. We learn that Holden is telling his story from a rest home, where is recovering from his breakdown. He talks about how stupid it is when he gets asked if he’s going to apply himself at school next September from a psychoanalyst, which he says to the readers that we don’t know if we are going to do something until we do it. We just think that we’re going to do it.

Holden mentions that his brother, D.B. visits him with his new girlfriend, and that he has asked what Holden thinks about what has happened in the past couple days (the novel takes place in just three days). Holden tells the reader that he “doesn’t know what to think about it,” and that he regrets telling so many people about it.

If I were to reflect on my life, I would say that I agree with Holden in some respects. I don’t always know the “ultimate” meaning if everything that has happened in my life, assuming that there is an “ultimate” meaning. Ultimately though, there is a certain freedom in being able to assign meanings. Sometimes, I’ll assign meaning to an experience in terms of personal growth. However, I can see how for some, typically, horrible experiences, it would be almost an insult to pressure others to extrapolate meaning from it, which insinuates that it “had” to happen for progress or whatever.

He just misses the people that he has interacted with in the novel, even including Stradlater, Ackley, and Maurice. In the final line of the novel, Holden gives us one last piece of advice, in which he tells the reader that we shouldn’t “tell anybody anything. If you do, you start missing everybody.”

Holden is conveying here that you shouldn’t seek out new human connections or experiences, because they’ll eventually pass. This shows that Holden is “museum glass case” mindset, where he wants the special moments from his life, the people and his feelings, to always stay the same, will influence Holden in the future.

Brave New World

Author: Aldous Huxley
Pages: 259
Obtained: Barnes and Noble Online
Date Began: July 12, 2016
Date Finished: July 24, 2016

Summary:

A dystopian novel that chronicles society after the conflict. The World State of Brave New World is populated with groups of identical twins born of the tube in the Central London Hatchery and Conditioning Centre, and conditioned to their caste, shaped and determined by their genetic engineering, and the Society. In the conditioning process, they are conditioned by pain and pleasure, and hypnopedia, the Society’s tour de force. In hypnopedia, children are programmed maxims such as “everyone belongs to everyone else,” prejudices of other castes, and on infinite consumerism.

Hearkening to Fahrenheit 451, the Society shuns negative emotions by suppressing family life through promiscuity, religion through Fordism, and time for contemplation through everlasting whirlwind of work, activities, and consumption. Time is specially alloted to prevent any downtime, G-d-forbid, any contemplation. These aspects of humanity, the Society believe, are the wellspring of misery, and if misery should somehow slip through the cracks, there is always a near-endless supply of the drug known as “soma,” to get them through it. Stability and “happiness” are the values the World State strives for.

The characters are a mix of those who are embrace the Society, having known nothing else, and those who feel that there is something missing from their great Society. Bernard Marx is a lanky, hypnaedia expert with poor self-image, constantly comparing his frame to other Alpha males. He has a crush on Lenina, a vaccination technician, whom he yearns to have a relationship that transcends the carnal. He is the primary protagonist in the first half of the novel before passing the role to John as his status in the World State wanes to obscurity. From Sparknotes, Bernard is secretly desires to be the very thing he criticizes, and when he does temporarily become that (following the discovery of John), his feeling of isolation dissipates.

John is from the New Mexico Savage Reservation, a fenced province wherein resides people unaffected by the World State, that Bernard and Lenina bring back with them to “civilization.” John is white; his mother is a citizen of the World State who had an accident and was unable to return, and his father is the Director of the hatchery and conditioning centre. John was never fully accepted by the Indians in the reservation, and so, he learns about he value of solitude. He is well-versed in Shakespearean literature, from books handed down by his mother, and as Sparknotes says, is the fountain from where he gains and measures his values against the World State and its controller, Mustapha Mond. John was once hopeful about the “brave new world” as his mother and Bernard told him about it, but once he immerses himself in their world, he becomes disgusted and horrified the Society’s absence of humanity.

Lenina embodies the values of the World State, with the initial exception of going out for one man for too long. It is socially taboo to see one person for more than I week, I presume, as part of the effort to prevent romance and family. Throughout the novel, Lenina grows further apart from the only society she ever knew by becoming fiercely in love with John. But as Sparknotes observed, she was unable to expression herself but sexually, and John was scared away by his inability to cope with his “lust and love.” At the end of the novel, Lenina ultimately stays true to the values of the World State, and John succumbs also, to an orgy (Sparknotes Character List, par. 1 & 4). The novel ends with John committing suicide.

The other two characters were Helmholtz Watson and Mustapha Mond. Helmholtz, the physical opposite of Bernard, didn’t fit in to society either due to his remarkable physique (Sparknotes, par. 3). But unlike Bernard, as the lecturer of the College of Emotional Engineering, he was often writing, which led him to yearn to write something more meaningful (Sparknotes, par. 3). As Sparknotes says, Helmholtz discontent with the World State is “more philosophical and intellectual.” And so, Helmholtz quickly bonds with John over Shakespeare, except for poems about romance, marriage, parents, and family, which he finds ludicrous.

Lastly, Mustapha Mond is the Resident Controller of Western Europe. Different from what you might expect, he is well-versed in literature, history, and the sciences, having once worked as a physicist studying illicit topics (illicit as in, any science that enlightens and provokes inquisitiveness, not drugs or anything of the sort) before being presented with an ultimatum: be sent to an island, or receive training to be World Controller. We know the choice he made, and now, he prizes stability and happiness over freedom, human connection, and individuality.

My Feelings:

From the books I’ve read, I am so accustomed to happy endings, that, had I not been lulled, I would’ve seen the unhappy ending a few chapters away. I was half-expecting the characters to inspire some kind of revolution, or start a new society far away.

But a happy ending would’ve made readers less vigilant about subtle tyranny by giving them hope that there was a way out of tyranny should it ever become reality. Brave New World is a warning about tyranny, individual repression, genetic engineering, and propaganda and manipulation. My edition of the novel included a copy of a letter from Huxley to 1984 and Animal Farm author, George Orwell. One topic Huxley discusses is the rapid advancement of propaganda techniques.

It didn’t occur to me much while I read the novel to make connections to modern times until I read the letter and period analyses at the end of the book. My first connection was our modern media. The modern media has become such an instrument of influence in our society, especially with the way it sensationalizes everything. It can make one believe that a threat is greater than it actually is. Once that happens, it can lead the public discourse on focusing/detracting on/from issues, and influence which side(s) of an issue one supports.

I’ve heard the most of our news channels are owned by a few corporations. Thankfully, due to the open web, people can view alternative sources of information, but there are forces who wish to put an end to the free web for that very reason.

Lastly, here is my general view of the World State from my annotations:

“Ironically, the Controller's society has more prohibitions and controls than "pre-modern" society, with what it's social predestination, genetic engineering, conditioning, and rules against monogamy, intimacy/romance, family and other social rules.

The lack of control over one's destiny, privacy, individuality, and independence can also make one miserable. But that never happens because they genetically engineer their citizens to have lower intelligence and awareness. Yes, there's a lot of pain in the world, but at least we have our precious consciousness and awareness through it all. I would rather have a physical disease than a mental one like dementia, where you lose the person you are.

The citizens are slaves and they don't even know it. I mean, what's the purpose of living then? I remember back in 7th grade to a class discussion on The Giver when a student said that the lack of emotion makes it seem like the citizens of the Community never lived at all. Granted, the Society's citizens have their emotions intact, but are heavily conditioned; their decisions and path in life are already set in stone by the rulers. They probably never felt fear or triumph from having to make a meaningful decision on their own. They probably never felt the evaporation of loneliness and all the things that make life beautiful from being deeply close to another human being. Risking and coping with failure and negative emotions to attain and keep triumph and love comes with the territory, so of course they avoid and prevent these natural aspects of life.

A society should do its best to facilitate peaceful coexistence and give people the opportunity through freedom and safeguard the biological faculties (because as I said in the book, it is taken away) to experience life fully.”

Entry Finished: August 6, 2016


Sources:

Sparknotes Character Descriptions

Sparknotes Helmholtz Watson