Rockox, mayor of Antwerp,
called one of his important rooms the "Groot Saleth".
In fact it was a private museum, where his rich collections of paintings,
sculptures, coins,
books... were kept and could be admired by visitors.
In 1609 Rubens was asked, by his friend and protector Rockox, to make a
painting to be
placed above this very chimney-piece in this room.
It was the "Samson and Delilah", the painting
that now is cause to continuous discussion.
On a painting by the ANTWERP BAROQUE master Frans II Francken, specialised
in representing such rich interiors, visitors of the Alte Pinakothek
in Munich get an idea
of how that "Groot Saleth" of the Rockox' House looked like;
a chimney and the SAMSON AND DELILAH scene above it are an
eye-catcher in the
middle of the wall in front:
Wow! ... before we go on, I have to draw your attention to a remarkable 'detail':
- Fragment of the so-called original Rubens, property of the National
Gallery, London.
- Detail of the 'whitness'-painting by Frans II Francken, to be seen in
the Alte Pinakothek,
Munich.
I enlarged the Frans Francken painting and connected both women's
right eye with a line,
in order to mark their position one to the other.
See the BIG DIFFERENCE in angle? He was not what may be called
such a good
painter, this Francken ... or was he ???
'A' Samson and Delilah 'soon' (i.e. about 1700) embellished
the rich collection of the
Princes of Liechtenstein in their Vienna palace. But this painting
was always, by this family,
considered
to be a 'Jan van Haecke' (one of Rubens' many pupils at his Antwerp
workshop).
... Well, this is strange: why would this royal family believe
they had a Jan van Haecke,
when
they could have believed they were in the possession of a 'real' Rubens???
It may mean
that the
painting was sold to them as a Rubens' copy, made by Jan van Haecke
... or were
people at
the time totally unaware of the existence of the Rubens' version?
Fairly unlikely.
... there's another argument for this conception ...
Have a look at this engraving: It was made in 1613 by a certain Jacob
Matham,
after - either the original Rubens painting
- or after a study Rubens made before painting (though it's very detailed)
Besides,
it is mirrored to the Rubens' painting ... this can be explained:
as it's an
engraving,
Jacob Matham did not take trouble to mirror Rubens' work, as normally
engravers
would do.
Well,
let's mirror it ourselves and have a look at an interestingly different
detail (different
to
the so called Rubens' painting):
In 1929, the painting (the same?) re-appears on the art market of Paris,
where it is claimed
to be made by Rubens' hand, and sold to a German tobacco-dealer. It remained
in private
possession until...
Being real, it would be worth about 85 million dollars
now (1997);
(not being so, perhaps one tenth of this value...)
After they bought the 'SAMSON AND DELILAH' at the time, the National Gallery
sent
specialists to Antwerp in order to make an exact copy of the still existing
chimney in
Rockox' House. It's above that copy that the painting can be admired in
the Gallery.
If it's really a (excellent) copy, then
WHAT HAPPENED to the ORIGINAL, once owned by ROCKOX ???
Probably discussions and investigations on that serious matter will go
on for a while.
Click this link for a German article
about the matter.
Planning a VISIT
to Antwerp ?
Do you want to be guided and get a lot of explanation ?
Then contact this email-address.
Return to the Quick Links Page here.