Home | First Law of Research | Zeroth Law of ReSearch | Generalised Problem-Solving | Second Law of ReSearch | Last Law of ReSearch |


Second Law of ReSearch


Domain

Explanation

Motivation

  • As stipulated in the niche realisation theory,
  • An individual's state of being is formed by the basic configuration of transition-niche-transition through the chained processes of niche and transitions: turbulent, laminar & wake
  • This, however, is subjected to the overall environmental conditions that the individual is facing
  • To have favourable conditions for ReSearch would require three critical aspects:
  1. 天時 Heavenly conditions: state of affairs & events evolutionally favourable 成事在天
  2. 地利 Earthly conditions: resource abundance, favourable policies & technologies know-how, know-why & the need & urge for these 肥沃之地
  3. 人和 Humanly conditions: socially favourable 謀事在人
  • Yet,
  • These 3 critical aspects, although always true, are too vaguely formulated to be useful
  • Hence, a rigorous formulation is required

Deficiencies of the First & Zeroth Laws of ReSearch

  • Upon further deliberation of the intrinsic properties of the First & Zeroth Laws of ReSearch,
  • With the presence of:
  • First Law of ReSearch: feedforward open-loop generic technique … inherent in all operations
  • Zeroth Law of ReSearch: feedback closed-loop fundamental technique … inherent in all self-rectifications, awareness & understanding
  • We can discover that w.r.t. to limited time, resources & motivation, in order to be useful, both laws are limited to the particular system-of-interest
  • This does not mean that both laws are invalid or violated
  • Both laws remain true for the constrained domain of interest
  • However, when the domain becomes unconstrained due to the increasing shifts in foci or drilling of researchers, both laws would not produce their full potential
  • Thus,
  • On the micro-level of ReSearch, both laws are indispensable
  • On the macro-level of ReSearch, they are insufficient to be useful for the shifting of research focus
  • Why the need to shift research focus, when shifting itself would blur the research picture?
  • One must be aware of the omni-presence of the chain of research, the web of knowledge that back-propagates into past knowledge & forward-propagates into future knowledge
  • With the present research focus, the system-of-interest is the niche in focus
  • Yet,
  • When research progresses along the chain of research, the system-of-interest would inevitably shift into another
  • Currently, no such law of research exists to fully account for the smooth, substantiated & reasonable transition from the current system-of-interest into the next

Conception vs. Concretion

  • All research tasks & events do not only involve the doing (operations, implementations) … & the corrections (realisations, fundamentals)
  • The events would ultimately involve concepts …
  • Yet no one can clearly define concept … as it is a virtual idea with actual realisation or implementation
  • The concept influences the operations & understanding
  • The operations & understanding shapes the concept
  • Hence,
  • There is always a closed-loop relationship between conception (virtual form) & concretion (actual form)
  • This is analogous to dreams & reality
  • How many realise our dreams, yet who can live without dreams?
  • To concrete is to cut off aspects of concept
  • To concept is to modify concrete
  • Is there a dilemma or in engineering, a compromise/tradeoff between conception & concretion?
  • The solution or resolution is in the interface, interaction, architecture or organisation of both elements of concept & concrete
  • Yet interaction is still as undefinable as itself
  • To inter-act is to act in related fashion … with influences both within & without … both internally & externally … in other words, in dual mutually-exclusive extremes … the extremes in turn have their own respective extremes … forming infinitely-chained processes
  • Hence,
  • With this understanding (from Zeroth Law of ReSearch) of the influence of interaction on the balance between conception & concretion … the following 2nd Law of ReSearch is derived

2nd Law of ReSearch

  • Second Law of ReSearch states that with regards to the shifting of research focus under environmental conditions, all processes involve arbitrary chaining of the basic configuration of subsystem-system-suprasystem, with the system as the event-of-interest, where for any system, there would always exist a more fundamental, smaller, simpler, more rigid, less flexible, less powerful, more stable & less interactive system – subsystem; and there would always exist a more complex, larger, less rigid, more flexible, more powerful, less stable but more interactive system – suprasystem.
  • Hence,
  • Along the chain of research always lies various forms of the basic subsystem-system-suprasystem configuration, similar to cable-strut structures which are composed of only a handful of basic forms
  • This basic form directly addresses the transition of research focus, accounts for environmental influence & illustrates the conception-concretion interactions
  • Thus … with the subsystem-system-suprasystem basic form … any process can be potentially understood

System

  • System-of-interest is the niche to focus on
  • If the trial system is complicated, transit into the subsystem
  • If the trial system is insufficient, transit into the suprasystem
  • To transit into or out of the system-of-interest,
  • One needs to be aware of & understand the concept of system degrees of freedom (DOF)
  • System DOFs are the allowable, variable, changeable, maneuverable, dynamic, flexible & non-rigid, non-static aspects of the system concept
  • DOFs allow the system to be modified to study its effects
  • In mechanics, DOFs are the materials [brittle/ductile, elastic/plastic/catenary]; kinematics [translations (horizontal, vertical) and rotations that can be generalised into 6 basic DOFs]; kinetics [displacement-loading interactions]; conditions [boundary, internal, initial & end conditions]
  • In networking, DOFs are the entry points, exit points, the links and the nodes or intersections or interchanges
  • In thermodynamics, DOFs are the processes (radiation, convection, conduction), the media (gas, liquid, solid, fluid, plasma) and the interactions (pressure, temperature, volume)
  • In genetics, DOFs are the chemistry, biological processes & environment factors
  • DOFs are the aspects or degrees that the system is free or partially free, but not totally restrained or constrained from change, hence freedom
  • Thus,
  1. Zero DOF: theoretical lowest limit of system, absolutely stable, equivalent to zero Kelvin in thermodynamics
  2. Infinite DOFs: theoretical highest limit of system, absolutely variable, equivalent to the universe
  • Between the absolute extremes of zero DOF & infinite DOFs,
  • The Second Law of ReSearch implies that:
  1. Any system can be transformed into a subsystem by reducing the allowable DOFs already present in the trial system - by restraining, constraining or holding certain non-critical DOFs rigid or given or assumed or known
  2. Any system can be transformed into a suprasystem by increasing the allowable DOFs already present in the trial system - by releasing, relaxing or freeing certain critical DOFs that have been rigid or given or assumed or known, into free or partially free DOFs

Transformation theory

  • To derive & arrive at the most appropriate or optimal system-of-interest for ReSearch,
  • Using Theory of Generalised Problem-Solving:
  • Criteria: min. free or partially DOFs within system to describe all effects-of-interest to reach objectives & scope
  • Problem understanding: pick out all system DOFs
  • Selected solution: tests to qualitatively evaluate the remedy effects & constraints of each DOF à separate into critical & non-critical DOFs à apply Second Law of ReSearch

Subsystem

  • If system is too complicated or illusionary,
  • There can always be a simpler way to perceive, model & understand it
  • Hence, when the problem is just overwhelming
  • The researcher does not dive into the concretion
  • The researcher falls back onto conception
  • With conception, the researcher interacts the relationship at levels that the engineer is fundamentally sound
  • Because, by the Second Law of ReSearch, there is always such a subsystem
  • The researcher can be assured of preventing progressive conceptual collapse, hence preventing actual concrete engineering disasters
  • Potentially this means that all disasters can be avoided
  • If the 2nd Law of ReSearch can be internalised within the researcher & if only lay people can take their own respective tasks & duties at their strides & capacities (know yourself 知己)

Suprasystem

  • Yet,
  • there can be the opposite,
  • Now that the system is firmly supporting the researcher
  • The researcher engages in internalising the system to become routine
  • But, the act of routine is an act of future complacency
  • Hence, the researcher moves into the suprasystem - to understand things that baffles one, that one has assumed, ignored, neglected, modified or given in the past
  • One needs new & extended insights into the process
  • Hence, suprasystem is derived from Zeroth-Law of ReSearch
  • This can be from linear à nonlinear, from statics à dynamics, from elastic à inelastic etc.
  • Because, by the Second Law of ReSearch, a suprasystem always exists
  • Potentially this means that all & everything can be known & engineered
  • That there is always hope & inert confidence for research events
  • If the 2nd Law of ReSearch can be internalised within the engineer & if only lay people can internalise open-hearted spirit towards the surroundings (know adversary 知比)

Summary

  • Second Law of ReSearch is formed by the basic configuration of subsystem-system-suprasystem
  • Where focusing on the system is the niche
  • Focusing on the subsystem is the careful, pre-emptive protective stabilising approach
  • Focusing on the suprasystem is the hopeful energising exciting interactive approach
  • Hence, a rule-of-thumb is:
  1. If it is too difficult, go easy
  2. If it is too easy, go difficult
  • Eventually, provided inherent damping exists, the mutually cyclic shifting between the extremes would settle at hopefully a stable equilibrium position, but life (not to say research) is an unstable phenomenon,
  • Hence the following trends:
  1. Simple things would always complicate over time & circumstances
  2. Complicated things would always simplify over time & circumstances
  3. Oscillations always exist between the shifting extremes of simplicity & complexity
  • One is not sure where this would lead to, but neither does the researcher
  • Hence, the researcher does not argument or debate or probe into issues of such nature
  • As the researcher knows that one should only focus & focus only on his niche 定位 & little else

May the ReSearcher be with You

窮則變 變則通

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1