By
Tani Jantsang
This, what we present in our organization and sell essays on, is an
Adamantine Doctrine said universally to have been The Doctrine of
the
prior world age, the 4th world age, the Satya Yuga.
Some systems
categorize the Yugas in another order. Pesh Hun transmitted it
to the people in
the Kali Yuga. Blavatsky was told some of this by someone in
India,
for sure. But she distorted the darker aspects of it.
What absolutely legitimizes the entire Esoteric Tradition and all
the
related cultures (plural) that had it and still have it, as a whole,
is
their EMANATION doctrine about the Boundless Darkness, No
Name, Aditi,
Ain Soph, Apeiron,etc. and the Flame, Viraj, Vajra, etc. that
is in
that All Pervading Darkness - and the resulting doctrine of Being
and
Becoming. This is not exclusively in the Eastern lands since the
"western
civilization" Hellenic pre-Socratic traditions also have these
doctrines
of the Apeiron (the One) and the emamation, and the Five Daimones -
but
it is universally agreed upon by every scholar to be very Eastern in
tone and intent - and that is where Pythagoreanism comes from.
It is far
more ancient than Babylon, also. It existed in India as the
standard
Shivaite Doctrine at least as far back as 7,000 BC.
But THIS is the unifying concept.
1. Unknown - Boundless Darkness. - That which is Arupa.
2. Non-Being and Being. The intermediate being-state is BECOMING.
It
does this out of Necessity.
3. Emanation of a Light, Flame, Vajra, Viraj, etc. as a 7-fold
Formed
and Ordered substance that BECAME all material (matter/energy)
things.
4. Infusion of the Darkness as a 5-fold formless chaotic "force" of
some kind, into the 7 which, in turn, drives it on to ever greater
change
and diversity, relentlessly driving it on to change, to BECOME.
It is very much unlike a creation doctrine; it is very much unlike
paganism with many gods and goddess and half-godling "children of"
the
gods/goddesses. It is not dualistic at all. It is NOT for everyone!
One is
either Of It, or they are not. Repeat, it is not dualistic - so if
you
find some later dualism mixed into the pure doctrine, it is a later
addition.
In addition, there are elaborations that are identical: how that
darkness is always categorized in 5 distinct ways as it acts on "the
nature"
around us and how the Flame is within us as kundalini, Vajra, etc.
How
the Flame comes into living beings from the All Pervading Darkness,
goes through living things as a Flame or kind of "Light" and then
returns
to that One Darkness. How the All Pervading Darkness itself never
increases or decreases all the time this goes on. There are also
very
similar doctrines about what lacks this Flame within, in all these
traditions. There is no judgement on such people. It is just that
the Tradition
is not told to them - hence it is esoteric. (Times have changed). I
could say it this way: Aditi, Vach, Viraj are the same things,
recognizable
to anyone that knows this, as Kether, Binah, Hochmah. Same
things.
This is one solid tradition amongst MANY whole cultures, parts of
cultures and peoples. It is universally said to have been The
Adamantine
Doctrine by which all society was governened in a "Golden Age"
during the
Satya Yuga which is a prior world age. It is distinct from the
trinity
traditions, distinct from the dualistic traditions which oppose
light
and dark. It is distinct from paganism. It is distinct from the
solar
cults. It is NOT a salvation doctrine nor is there any kind of
notion of
a "personal Being" in the One Darkness.
It has nothing to do with rebelliousness or the mundane world of the
herd and hypocrisy. It has nothing to do with that pro or con
- all that
is irrelevant. If you want rules, make them up. If you follow rules,
then someone else made them up. That's how societies work. How
societies
work has nothing to do with the Doctrine. The need "in itself" for
rules is contrary to the Dharmas. But rules are needed in SOCIETIES
and we
all live in societies, behaviors in these societies are set as a
standard of "acceptability" by the people IN those societies; there
is
nothing divine about such rules or societal laws or morals or
ethics; this
has NOTHING to do with The Doctrine. There is a qualified
difference. A
Ngagspa (Dark Doctrine Adept) can behave one way in some remote area
of
Etsen Gol. That is, you would see the outer behavior of this person,
you'd see him doing things. Let him come to the USA and live in the
city.
The Ngaspa ADAPTS easily enough. You'd see him doing other behaviors
outwardly. Inwardly, he is the same Ngagspa. Outer behavior has
nothing to do with the Inner Being. Following speeding laws on interstates,
which the Ngagspa would do if he came here, has nothing to do with
The
Doctrine.
This is perfectly clear in the Esoteric Tradition whether you get it
from the Dark Tradition section on our website or from a university
or
from an Adapt or whether one might tell you some of this, as someone
told
Blavatsky (and she garbled it all up and tried to change it....) It
does NOT MATTER if confused persons, overly cerebral people or
anyone else
doesn't get it. Glaring and screaming out is the EMANATION doctrine
and the BOUNDLESS DARKNESS concept - the Flame that is in that Darkness
-
from there comes Being and Becoming. Those things are OUTSIDE of
Judeo-Christianity-Islam for the most part. These are the three MAIN
things
that bind these traditions into one Esoteric Tradition: Boundless
Darkness, Flame in Darkness , Being/Becoming. These THREE things
unify it into
one Esoteric Tradition, in addition to the the actual teachings of
the
7 and the 5 and The One, usually with focus on the FIVE and The One
Darkness. They are LHP traditions though they also encompass RHP
since the
two are never opposed: they compliment each other when they are
properly understood and practiced.
At least we have unified what belongs together as a core doctrine. I
don't expect a very cerebral person stuck in the Judeo-Christian
paradigm
to hear a single "note" of what I said. And I'm not into explaining
harmony to tone deaf people. It's a waste of time. The LHP does not
work
that way. You either hear the tune, or you don't. It is not like
conversion doctrines. It is not like what has come to be thought of
as RHP.
Though that in itself is very confused and misnamed.
If you hear it, it definitely CALLS to you, you can't even resist
it.
If you don't hear it, I suggest you don't concern yourself with it
and
continue to PURSUE YOUR OWN things and be happy with what you have.
To
not do that is to participate further in non-being.
Obviously, in history, pieces of this One Doctrine have been
absconded
with, merged with things it was never a part of, such as the Logos
cults - and then the Sun Cults of old. SAT and Sanatana: these
concepts got
confused with Saturn the planet - and then confused with the Sun.
Some
of the Doctrine got merged into the Dark Goddess concept - dualized
-
as what I'd imagine to be a reaction to the Solar Patriarchal
peoples
ruling those areas. In the Kali Yuga, this is bound to happen to
anything
from the Satya Yuga. No matter. None of that is relevant. We
present
tradition of the Boundless Darkness in a very unadorned and pure
form.
That is relevant.
Recently, supermassive black holes have been found - and now the
conception of the all-destructive black hole has changed into one
where these
black holes have a lot to do with CREATION of galaxies, not just
destruction. How would a Dark Adept see these things, since
saying that such
existed has been part of the doctrine anyway? As the fingers
of the
Boundless Darkness, the hand of the Sat Itself doing what it always
does:
folding/unfolding, push/pull. We would say that the "many"
black holes
one sees at the center of galaxies are really One Thing - made to
look
like many things in many places and times by the Illusion of
Space/time. That is what we'd say.
SATANIC REDS ORGANIZATION:
Satanic Reds exists as an alternative to the "Satanism" that is so
tied
up with Judeo-Christianity. It is, in fact, a Left Hand Path
organization as far as occult doctrines go. The doctrines are
wholly outside of
the Christian world view. The concepts of becoming (xeper) and Inner
Will (thelema) are in these Doctrines, and always were from ancient
times. But the wailing angst of people rebelling against their
own
Christian backgrounds is wholly left out - it's not in SR, it
doesn't exist.
The guiding principles of Satanic Reds, aside from the
sociopolitical
guidelines, are shown in "The Nine SaTanic
Postulates," which reflect
the pure Dark Tradition which is wholly independent of modern
neo-Satanism and the sentiments of the proponents of modern
neo-Satanism. Please
read these documents on this website, I will also present them
here:
Satan has always been seen as the Dark Lord, Dark Principle, or Dark
Force. Seeing and above all feeling this
force/principle/etc. as
permeating and motivating all of nature, Satanists have revered this
as
either an Atheistic force, Deistic Principle, or Theistic Deity.
Incorporated into the Dark Traditions are all things that touch on
it or focus on
it: Hermeticism, certain aspects of the Kaballa, Taoism, certain
whole
groups of Tantra, Shivaism and Vedanta wherefrom we get the words
Sat
and Tan. It is interesting that the root word Sat in modern
Sanskrit
means Truth of the inner kind. In the West this got inverted
to mean the
Lie, or Satan as the Father of Lies. This could be one of the
earliest
known examples of cultural inversion.
Advice: AVOID KLIPPOTHS. They are killers of Joy.
While this may sound like Big Bang Theory and evolutionary biology
to
some of our 20th century atheists, consider that these concepts are
ancient. It is one of the fundamental tenets of the Dark
Tradition that
would state that all those modern-day geniuses who "discovered"
these
things, already HAD this knowledge within them. They had to,
to think up
the ideas in the first place before they set out to prove them using
modern technology. Let us say, they were inspired. And
they too had to
battle tooth and nail against the monotheistic religious forces,
such
as Christianity, to even get their ideas out. Consider how
Darwin and
evolution are still being fought against by Christian Creationists.
We
have always had an Emanation Doctrine and primary in this Doctrine
is
that there is/was a Boundless Darkness IN WHICH a Blazing Flame
burned
at a time when the All was One. The Blazing Flame flashed out
and
Became All Things.
