Part One may be viewed
here.
The
FBI’s fortune took a turn for the worse when blame shifted towards
them over the question of who was responsible for allowing terrorism to
occur in New York and elsewhere. Conventional Wisdom points to the FBI
and INS, whose inability to monitor and act swiftly in deterring these
fanatical serial killers lead to the death of thousands of innocent
people on 9/11. How true is
this accusation and what rests behind it?
RadioRote
will go beyond the re-pundit-say one hears parroted on news-shows day
after day, by reviewing and re-assessing earlier RadioRote statements,
observations and RR Updates. The former RadioRote information will be
compared to the newest information available – thus enabling a further
analysis of things to come.
One
Collects, the Other Shreds
One
is being led to believe that the fundamental problem in Intelligence
nowadays is not in America’s inability to gather data, but in their
inability to put its pieces together. We read where any blame prior to
9-11 should not fall upon Dubbya -- anything after 9/11 is his fault.
We are also told that if
the FBI was more vigilant in ‘maverick’ Senator McCain’s state of
Arizona, (as opposed to Jeb’s state of Florida where terrorists also
trained), this incident may have been prevented. In short, the media is
framing the argument similar to the parlor game that follows the
principle of “If”… If ‘ifs’ and ‘wishes’ were candies and
kisses, then everyday would be Christmas.”
This scenario follows: What “if” information could have been
sent to the ‘right people’ that Moslems were entering this country
under dubious circumstances…what if the INS to FBI would have been
more vigilant…what ‘if’ the White House could have been apprised
of the situation in time…what if…what if…what if…
The
parlor game deflects from the real issues at hand. The answer is:
“they did and they were”.
Journalist
Greg Palast of the London Observer (as well as being a reporter for
other British media groups) did much to uncover these sordid details. He
interviewed the former head of the
American visa bureau in Jeddah during the Reagan/Bush years, Michael
Springman. Springman told
Palast, on video, that while:
“In
Saudi Arabia I was repeatedly ordered by high level State Dept officials
to issue visas to unqualified applicants.
These
were, essentially, people who had no ties either to Saudi Arabia or to
their own country. I complained bitterly at the time there. I returned to
the US, I complained to the State Dept here, to the General Accounting
Office, to the Bureau of Diplomatic Security and to the Inspector
General's office. I was met with silence” [i]
When
Bush Sr. became president, Springman realized that his protests were
falling on deaf ears, because:
“What
I was protesting was, in reality, an effort to bring recruits, rounded up
by Osama Bin Laden, to the US for terrorist training by the CIA. They
would then be returned to Afghanistan to fight against the
then-Soviets”. [ii]
“Rounded
up by Osama Bin Laden”? How did Osama Bin Laden become a chief operative
for the CIA, an agency Bush Sr. once headed in 1976?
Much
has since been written about the cozy business relationship between the
Bin Laden and Bush families, from the Right Wing “Judicial Watch”, the
Wall Street Journal, and to the Left Wing magazine, “In These Times.” [iii]
The
Bin Laden family sold its shares of the James Baker/James Carlucci/ Bush
family run Carlyle Group circa 45 days after 9/11:
The
Saudi Arabian family of Osama Bin Laden severed its financial ties to the
Carlyle Group, a prominent Washington investment firm, a source familiar
with the relationship said. The family has sold its $2.02 million
investment back to the firm in light of public controversy surrounding the
family after September's terrorist attacks.[iv]
The
Carlyle firm, (of which “pre- RR” has been reporting on for over 3
years) whose business ventures run the gamut from soda bottling companies
in Texas to armaments, are known to use their political influence in
peddling business deals around the globe.
The Bin Laden’s family connections to Carlyle reaped both groups
millions in profits from the US and Saudi Arabia to the Far East. In fact,
the Bin Laden family is believed to be one of Dubbya’s original
financial backers.
That
Dubbya made his first $20 million off the investment given to him by the
Bin Laden family (Osama’s brother) years ago, or that Dubbya draws money
from the Carlyle Group, may not have been considered a great issue until
9/11.
What
makes the connection more intriguing is that Dubbya, prior to 9/11,
demanded the FBI “back
off” of any further investigation into the Bin Laden family, and their
possible ties to Moslem terrorists in the US and to their funding of WAMY.
The World
Assembly of Muslim Youth claims
to be a Moslem charity group. However, this group lost its funding and
standing in Pakistan after the Pakistani government charged them with
leading terrorist attacks against Indians in Kashmir.
To
this date, WAMY funds have not been frozen in the US.
Even
though the Bush family had financial ties to the Bin Laden family and
Springman complained about the White House and State Departments refusal
to turn off the visa spigot for suspected aliens entering the country
through Saudi Arabia, this does not tie the FBI or the INS into the blame.
The
FBI did, however, know about terrorist groups infiltrating the US, but
perhaps not in the way the media wants its audience to believe.
Whereas the media and White House would draw the INS and FBI as the
main culprits, or slackers, the earlier FBI report paints a different
picture. The FBI not only documented their trials and tribulations in
monitoring some terrorist groups in the US, but noted the agency’s
subsequent obstruction by Dubbya. The file is reported as being cataloged
as: Case ID - 199-Eye WF 213 589. 199.
Here
Palast, who obtained a copy, explains in part:
This
document is marked "Secret". Case ID - 199-Eye WF 213 589. 199
is FBI code for case type. 9 would be murder. 65 would be espionage. 199
means national security. WF indicates Washington field office special
agents were investigating ABL - because of its relationship with the World
Assembly of Muslim Youth, WAMY - a suspected terrorist organisation (sic).
ABL is Abdullah Bin Laden, president and treasurer of WAMY.[v]
The
report “alleged
that the cynicism of the American establishment and "connections
between the CIA and Saudi Arabia and the Bush men and bin Ladens may have
been the real cause of the deaths of thousands in the World Trade Centre
(sic) attacks”.[vi]
This
report, and the history uncovered so far, corroborates with Springman’s
unheeded complaints about spurious young Moslem men legally entering the
US under the blessings of the US State Department, CIA, and Reagan/Bush
White House. Springman
presents several examples of his experience in this matter. One incident
involved two Pakistanis who told Springman they wanted a visa to enter the
US for a trade fair – even though they could not name the trade fair or
the State in which it was being held.
He denied their visas. The Embassy over-rode his ruling.
Another such example was of an Arab who, in the visa office, filled
out the government forms for two Pakistanis seeking entrance into the US.
Over his objections, the State Department allowed them in as well.
Springman also charged that of the ranking officials placed in the
US Consulate in Jeddah, only 3 were not CIA agents.
These
policy violation incidents occurred so often that Springman kept a dossier
on these illegal activities. When
he returned stateside and, as head of the visa department in Jeddah,
lodged a complaint with the State Department -- Springman claimed they
shredded his documents.
Springman
did not realize the enormity of the State Department’s irregular
activities until he discovered that it was the Reagan-Bush White House who
recruited these future Taliban fighters to be trained with US assistance
and funding.[vii]
What
else could one have expected form an Iran-Contra administration but to
have supported a Taliban membership known to have been hostile to US, and
then lie about it to the American people and to themselves?
The
Reagan/Bush White House and NSC were actively involved in forging greater
bonds between themselves and the Afghan warlords and tribes; despite the
fact the Afghan groups hated and distrusted the US.
In
several White House e-mails dated in late October of 1985, Walter Raymond
of the NSC discusses with another NSC high ranking official, Donald
Fortier, alternative ways in trying to convince a visiting Afghan rebel
group to chum around with Reagan in the White House -- since the president
already set a “firm appointment” to visit with this fanatical group
from “11:30 to 11:50 a.m.” on 10/30/85.
The
response from Fortier was that the militant group did not want to go to
the White House even though “(T)hey have been invited to the White House
by the president of the US and for that they were damned lucky.”
Raymond
comments in an e-mail that he realizes Afghan Fighters are “not
Pro-American” and do not want to be seen as a puppet to the US.
Nonetheless,
Raymond adds to another email: “The president, as you know, strongly
supports the brave fight for freedom being waged by the Afghans
peoples…and that Reagan deeply believes the Mujahaddin must be part of
any process leading to peace in Afghanistan”.
This included Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the most radical Islamic
fundamentalist and certainly one of the more fervent anti-American players
in the visiting group.
Raymond
reminds Fortier: “(T)his is a continency (sic) plan. Do not used unless
asked. I have…advised State…to use the same line.“ The meeting never
took place. It was not because the administration came to its senses and
realized they were doing business with an anti-American radical militia.
But the refusal to visit the Reagan/Bush White House was due, instead, to
the Afghan’s and Pakistani refusal to go no further than visiting New
York.[viii]
Apparently,
an air of impropriety meant more to these radical and fundamentalist
warlords than it did to either Reagan or Bush.
So,
here, it is discovered how the Reagan/Bush administration cuddled up and
to worst elements of the anti-American Afghan militias by giving them
weapons and further training in war and terrorism in order for Reagan/Bush
to win points with the so-called “freedom fighters” in Afghanistan --
who would later form a terrorist organization to attack American
interests.
Yet
the Reagan/Bush Administration did not just favor any group, but those
“freedom fighters” particularly favored by Osama Bin-Laden -- who
chose his extremists with the full support of the White House.
Bin-Laden appeared to be a contact man between the US and his
“freedom fighters” of choice. He was, after all, a member of that
Bin-Laden family who were financially tied to the Bush family for tens of
millions of dollars. The
relationship between Osama Bin-Laden, Afghan Fundamentalists, the Pakistan
Government and Taliban movements on the one hand -- and the CIA, the
Reagan/Bush White House and the State Department on the other hand, are
actually the same hand.
As
in the case of Iraq’s Hussein, Panama’s Noreiga and now the Saudi’s
Bin-Laden clan…one must question why we are yet again witnessing another
example of a Bush family member going after another one of their
family’s former business partners.
As
to what role the FBI actually played in all this blowback is unclear. If
anything, it appears the FBI is taking the brunt. As Springman pointed
out:
The
attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 did not shake the State
Department's faith in the Saudis, nor did the attack on American barracks
at Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia three years later, in which 19 Americans
died. FBI agents began to feel their investigation was being obstructed. Would
you be surprised to find out that FBI agents are a bit frustrated that
they can't be looking into some Saudi connections?[ix]
(Italics added).
Springman
is partially right. It would have been more correct for him to have said:
“If they were allowed to follow Saudi investment patterns, the FBI could
have found some answers”.
An
article from the UK is expected out in the next few months on a 1994
financial meeting between the Saudi’s and Moslem terrorists. This might shed further light on this matter.
Next
Installment: Mueller’s
FBI plays cat with your mouse.
Dubbya’s
Hasty 911 Call: Part 3.
[iii]
These are but 3 of a cascading number of reports that tied the Bush
family to the Bin Laden family in business ties that profited them
millions of dollars. The Pre-RadioRote information format was
following the relationship through the Carlyle group for over two
years.
The
citations on the above mentioned Bush-Bin Laden relationship can be
found at:
Judicial
Watch: http://www.judicialwatch.org/1045.shtml
Village
Voice on the Judicial Watch comments: http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0218/gray.php
A
brief over-view of Bin Laden and Bush cooperation by the Cleveland
Plain Dealer may be found at: http://www.webcom.com/hrin/magazine/bedfellows.html
[iv]Business
in Brief Washington
Post pg. EO2 10/27/01
[vi]
Bush took FBI agents off Laden family
trail Times
of India. 11/07/01 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?
art_id=1030259305
[vii]
Palast and Springman Interview. Democracy Now. Pacifica Radio. 6/7/02
Note: The host, Amy Goodman, is known for her pro-terrorist outlook
and distaste for Bush. The interview, however, was harsh on both Bush
and the Saudi terrorist sponsors. The idea to Goodman that Bush and
her pro-terrorist sentiments were labeled as the’ same peas in a
pod’ may have been unamusing to her.
The combination of which appeared to have placed Goodman in a
more ‘subdued’ mood during that part of the broadcast.
[viii]National
Security Archives. Fortier and Raymond E-Mail Transcripts.
White House E-Mail. Blanton, Tim editor
Cited
from E-mail sent between Donald Fortier, Walter Raymond and Jonathan
Miller (date and time) 10/28/85
16:47:49; 10/28/85 17:25:34; 10/29/12:19:33; 10/29/85 18:56:07;
10/30/85 08:20:49
Return
to Contents
RadioRote®
allows distribution of information from its site, as long as RadioRote®
is cited or given credit. You may not use the
RadioRote®
logo, or alter it, unless citing it as a source. ©2001
For problems or questions regarding this website contact radiorote.
|