RadioRote

The rest is silence.
(Hamlet V.ii. 367)

 

RadioRote #2

 

News  Flash 

 

Table of Contents

 

 

Contact Us

 

White Rose

(outside Link)

11.08.01

 Bookmark this page.

 

 

Table of Contents

 

When Does Secrecy Become Conspicuous?        Did George W Bush restrict access of presidential papers for security  reasons, or to safeguard the "Cult of the Individual?"

More Bacon, Less Hogwash                                Ethics modified is chicanery exposed. How Sir Francis Bacon and nearly 20 year old troubling documents reveal what the White House believes it has hidden. 

The Bush Family and Collective Amnesia          The "home front" and drug enforcement agencies are not heading  into a new direction, they are merely borrowing  tactics from an earlier administration. The only question is  how arbitrary will the White House be when deciding which drug pushers, fellow travelers and terrorists are "friendly" to the administration, and which neighborhood junkie should be punished for it. 

Reagan Directs "Battalion 316"                                        In this RadioRote series, we will explore the history of the Reagan-Bush administration’s heavy handedness in creating and sustaining the Honduran Intelligence Unit turned Right Wing Death Squad, known as ‘Battalion 316.’ We will also cite examples of their Human Rights abuses and the administrations' lukewarm response to these reports -- as well as present primary documents as to how the Reagan-Bush administration worked hard in distancing themselves from the active roles they undertook in the Honduran scandal they assisted in designing.  Some of the names may be familiar, as they found refuge within the new Bush Administration. 

The Ruckus Over Rucker

 

In a recent Supreme Court (“SC”) decision, the Rehnquisling Quorum voted 8-0  to allow the Oakland Housing Authority to evict four senior citizens due to the drug activities of people the seniors knew, even though some of the drug activity did not take place on the subsidized housing grounds. Chief Justice ’Wilhelm Rehnquisling’ ruled that the tenants cannot use ‘no knowledge’ of such activity as a defense, and that due process is not a factor in such cases.  Thus, if subsidized housing makes the government (“the people”) the landlord, then do these same rules apply to those elected officials whose housing costs are offset by the taxpayer? 

 

The Ruckus Over Rucker Part 2

     

As stated in the first installment of this piece, the Supreme Court ruled 8-0 on 3/26/02 that any resident of a public subsidized housing unit whose family member in that unit, or guest, is involved in drug activity or any other illegal pursuit (either on or off the property), will be evicted from said subsidized housing unit whether or not the resident was aware of the illegal pastime. This case centered on four senior citizens in different units who were evicted based on the activities of others. RadioRote, and now a growing number of others believe that if this ruling holds, than the eviction process should include anyone in a residence that is supported by taxpayers because, as Rehnquist argued "the plain language is unambiguous" when it comes to that kind of eviction. With this in mind, here are examples of another group of people who should be considered for eviction, based on their own philosophies and the court's decision. 

 

Pacifica Radio: It's Race to the Bottom 

 

Their audience is young, hip and tragically uninformed. Is Pacifica Radio a "progressive" outlet,  or merely a group of disaffected posers and rebels without a clue? 

 

PacifiCapo Radio

To Pacifica Radio, does "Free Speech Radio" mean "Jew Free Radio"? 

 

Jeb's Hasty 911 Call 

 

Part 1.

 

In this multi-part article, RadioRote re-assesses the defensive posture the Bush Administration donned well before 9-11. In this first part, we re-examine John Ashcroft. This Senator from Missouri  became the Conservative Standard Bearer for the Bush White House. He carried all the right credentials for the job. Or, perhaps, too "Right." Why else would he bear so much animosity towards the FBI?  

 

Jeb's Hasty 911 Call

 

Part 2.

 

The FBI and INS are taking the brunt for the 9/11 failure in Intelligence . But how much could they do when the White House had an adversarial and counter-productive approach towards these agencies in matters of preventing terrorists from entering the US as far back as the 1980's?

 


RadioRote® allows distribution of information from its site, as long as RadioRote® is cited or given credit.   You may not use the RadioRote® logo, or alter it, unless citing it as a source.  ©2001
For problems or questions regarding this website contact radiorote.
Last updated: June 18, 2002       

                                                                                                                                                                                            

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1