WHAT WAS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE METALLURGY OF THE STEEL IN THE SINKING OF TITANIC?
By Rachel Bloor
INTRODUCTION
  The titanic set off on its maiden voyage just before noon on April 10th 1912, from Southampton, England.  It was the largest and most luxurious ship ever built, and the media had dubbed it unsinkable.  But on April 14th diaster struck, as the ship hit an iceburg that was three to six times its own mass.  This damaged the double-bottomed hull so that 6 of its 16 watertight forward compartments were ruptured.  Ironically, it was the fact that Titanic could stay afloat with 4 of these compartments flooded that had made it supposedly unsinkable.  With 6 flooded, it was inevitable that Titanic would sink within 2 hours of the collision, which would go on the cause the death of more that 1,500 passengers.
   It has always been said that a metallurgical failure could have been one of the major causes of Titanics dramitic sinking.  Since September 1st 1985, when Robert Ballard found the Titanic wreckage in 3,700m of water on the ocean floor, salvage work has gone on to try and uncover the reasons behind the ships sinking, and whether the quality of the steel really was good enough.  During the 1998 expedition, the recovery of a 20 tonne piece of steel from the ships hull meant that in depth chemical and metallurgical tests could be carried out on Titanic's steel.
   In this report I will be looking at some of the results of these tests, and forming conclusions about whether Titanic could have avoided disaster, had the steel been of better quality.  In my conclusions I will also answer the question of how metallurgists would design a material for the ships hull today.
Clicking on the following links will allow you to explore this website, my report. 
They are, in reading order;
Why did the Titanic Sink?  Two Theories.
Chemical Analysis
Physical Tests
Conclusions
Bibliography
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1