THE INSTITUTE
  FOR  THE
  QUATERNARY
  EVOLUTION IN
  SHAKESPEAREAN
  THOUGHT

Play Commentary
             MOTTO: Know you not that I must be about my mother's business
  • HOME PAGE

  • Each commentary applies the Sonnet philosophy
    to the plays and poems of Shakespeare
    to reveal their inherent meaning.

    The Institute for the Quaternary Evolution in Shakespearen Thought
    The Quaternary Institute
        Quaternary Institute & Quaternary Imprint

       A LOVER'S COMPLAINT




    HOME PAGE   +    QUATERNARY INSTITUTE    +   CONDITIONS OF ENGAGEMENT   +   QUATERNARY PROGRAM
    THE SONNET PHILOSOPHY   +   SONNET COMMENTARIES    +   PLAY COMMENTARIES   +   GLOSSARY
    DARWIN, WITTGENSTEIN & DUCHAMP   +   INQUEST 2009    +   JAQUES 2009    +   QUIETUS    +   CONTACT


    The four volume set William Shakespeare's Sonnet Philosophy is now available.

    With the poem and play commentaries now published in full in Volume 3 of William Shakespeare's Sonnet Philosophy only the first few pages of each commentary appear online



    A Lover's Complaint


    Roger Peters Copyright © 2002

    The poems and plays considered so far were chosen to demonstrate how deliberately Shakespeare had based his works on the philosophy published in the Sonnets of 1609 or Q. Venus and Adonis, Lucrece, and The Phoenix and the Turtle, only make sense in the light of the Sonnet logic. Love�s Labour�s Lost, as the only play with no known source and with a degree of difficulty that has only recently seen it performed regularly, represents a deliberate attempt to present the philosophy on stage. The plot of Measure for Measure, while sourced from previous versions, is adapted to the Sonnet philosophy and demonstrates its utility for critiquing the inconsistencies in traditional biblical beliefs and Platonic idealism.
          The next work to be considered, A Lover�s Complaint, was specifically included by Shakespeare in Q as an example of the philosophy in practice. It provides a link from the philosophy articulated in the Sonnets to its application in all his other works. While the poem is short by comparison with the plays, it contains the logical pattern on which they are based.
          Volume 1 noted a number of thematic and numerological features of A Lover�s Complaint that relate it to the Sonnets in Q. The features it shares with the Sonnets confirm its role as a vehicle for the philosophy. This commentary will show that the content of A Lover�s Complaint is consistent with the philosophy. It will correct the misinterpretation and denigration the poem has suffered at the hands of those who have wished to convert Shakespeare to illogical biblical or Platonic beliefs.

    Analysis of A Lover's Complaint

    The first three lines of A Lover�s Complaint establish the logical pre-conditions for writing mythic poetry. To appreciate the significance of the opening words it is necessary to remember that in the logic of the Sonnets Nature is the basis from which sexual division leads to increase and thence to the possibility of truth and beauty. And the Poet of the Sonnets is the one who appreciates that poetry is conditional on Nature and increase. So, when the poet of A Lover�s Complaint begins his tale, the first words he hears, echoing from off a hill, acknowledge the priority of Nature over language.

    From off a hill whose concave womb reworded,
    A plaintful story from a sistring vale
    My spirits t�attend this double voice accorded, (1-3)

          In the logic of the Sonnets, the �hill� represents Nature. The poet calls it a �concave womb� identifying it with Nature and the source of the female and male. From the hill or concave womb, with its implied sexual dynamic, is reflected the �reworded� story. Because the dynamic of truth and beauty derives logically from the sexual dynamic in Nature, the poet recognises that his �story�, or any story, is a reflection of the sexual dynamic. The reflection of the reworded story from the concave womb expresses the erotic logic of the poet�s verse.
          Just as Shakespeare establishes the logical relation of increase to truth and beauty and thence to writing in the first 19 sonnets, he begins A Lover�s Complaint by stating the logical conditions for writing poetry. The words that form the poem are logically related back to their basis in Nature and the sexual dynamic, rewording or reflecting the reality of Nature. The sexual dynamic of life gives rise to the erotic expression of the poem. Having articulated the logical conditions for any mythic expression in the Sonnets, Shakespeare begins his sample poem by encapsulating those conditions in the first line.
          If the first line provides the logical foundation for the Lover of the title, the second line addresses the idea of a Complaint. From off the hill/womb comes the �plaintful story�. The complaint of the maid in A Lover�s Complaint is a lament that accompanies her transition from adolescent virgin to mature woman. Shakespeare takes the traditional conceit of a psychological complaint, typical of poetic �Complaints�written by his contemporaries, and gives it a philosophic twist. In his hands it becomes a rite of passage away from the psychology of idealism (whether biblical or Platonic) that notoriously complains about the natural logic of life. The maid�s realisation, at the end of the poem, that her sexual experience was not dire, allows her to anticipate a pleasurable repeat.
          To ensure his logical correction of idealistic fatalism is not missed, Shakespeare has his poet hear the maid�s �plaint� issue from a �sistring� vale. The reference to a �sistring vale�, a page after the erotic evocations of valleys and wells in sonnets 153 and 154, leaves no doubt that the maid�s voice arises from a cloistered or virginal condition. The allusion anticipates lines 232- 8, where the maid�s lover recounts the sexual arousal his idealised beauty induces in a nun. So, consistent with Sonnet logic, the poet first hears the maid as she emerges from the idealised celibacy analogous to that of a religious �sister�.
          The third line bears this out. The poet�s �spirits�, or his imaginative soul, attend to the �double voice� from off the �hill�. The �voice� issues both from the sexual orifice of the sister/maid and, from her mouth. The double nature of the logical relationship gives language its capacity to represent the world.
          So, within the first three lines, Shakespeare presents a scenario that incorporates the basic elements of his philosophy. The poet�s account in the poem begins after the physical act of sex between the maid and the youth. In a poem that expresses a mythic level of understanding, the first three lines acknowledge the transition from Nature and the sexual dynamic to the erotic dynamic of voices and words. The poem opens with a statement of the Sonnet logic that incorporates the function of the 5 poetry and increase sonnets, 15 to 19.
          The poet, having set the scene for the poem by evoking the logical conditions for poetry, lies down to listen to the �sad tun�d tale� of the maid. Because he is aware of the natural logic of life and thought, he anticipates the nature of the maid�s complaint. As he makes himself comfortable, with an air of resignation, he sights her �fickle� form rounding the hill. Her expressions of sorrow are equated to the fickleness of the weather, like �wind and rain�.

    And down I laid to list the sad tun�d tale,
    Ere long espied a fickle maid full pale
    Tearing of papers breaking rings a twain,
    Storming her world with sorrows, wind and rain. (4-7)

          Editors, not understanding the philosophy articulated in the 70 pages of sonnets preceding the Complaint, question the meaning of �fickle� and remove the comma after �sorrows�. They struggle to find another meaning for �fickle� other than its usual meaning of �capricious� (as it is used throughout Shakespeare and OED entries). They are unable to accept the logical inevitability of the maid�s sexual awakening. When they remove the comma from line 7, they kill the irony in the poet�s observation of the maid�s sincerity.
          The poet describes the maid as a young woman who exhibits early signs of aging. She is not adolescent but more like a thirty-something who is aware of the onset of age. If she was still a virgin before encountering the youth then, as the poem reveals, she was not unwilling to sacrifice her chastity. Her �fickle� nature is a consequence of the dogmas imposed on her sexuality by idealistic constraints or fears

    Upon her head a platted hive of straw,
    Which fortified her visage from the Sun.
    Whereon the thought might think sometime it saw
    The carcass of a beauty spent and done,
    Time had not scythed all that youth begun,
    Nor youth all quit, but spite of heaven�s fell rage,
    Some beauty peeped, through lattice of fear�d age. (8-14)

          Consistent with the Sonnet logic, after the allusion to Nature and the sexual dynamic in the first stanza, the second stanza introduces the dynamic of truth and beauty. Truth (logically the dynamic of saying or thinking) is characterised as a process that adds thought to thought consequent on the sensation of seeing or the logic of beauty. The maid�s youthful beauty is subject to time�s decay, making the sensation of beauty a less precise gauge of what is best and worst (sonnet 137). Because her �rage� is generated by the �heavenly� attitude toward virginity, she does not appear as beautiful as she might
          In the first two stanzas, A Lover�s Complaint unmistakably follows the logic of the Sonnets. It has been possible, without invention, to observe the progress from Nature, through the sexual possibility, to the logic of increase and on to the dynamic of truth and beauty. The two stanzas outline the structure of the whole set of Sonnets and the 14 increase sonnets. It introduces the mythic role of the poet and then brings the dynamic of truth and beauty to bear upon the maid. It should not surprise then that the next two stanzas focus on the role of the eyes, which are pivotal to the logic of truth and beauty in sonnet 14.

    ...continued in Volume 3, William Shakespeare's Sonnet Philosophy

    Back to Top

    Roger Peters Copyright © 2002


    Introduction    Venus and Adonis    Lucrece    Love's Labour's Lost
        The Phoenix and the Turtle    Measure for Measure    Macbeth
        A Lover's Complaint    


    HOME PAGE   +    QUATERNARY INSTITUTE    +   CONDITIONS OF ENGAGEMENT   +   QUATERNARY PROGRAM
    THE SONNET PHILOSOPHY   +   SONNET COMMENTARIES    +   PLAY COMMENTARIES   +   GLOSSARY
    DARWIN, WITTGENSTEIN & DUCHAMP   +   INQUEST 2009    +   JAQUES 2009    +   QUIETUS    +   CONTACT

    Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

    1