Chemical terrorism

While the bioweapons treaty has been relatively successful in converting large-scale biological agent production facilities, such as the facility at Stepnogorsk, to civilian purposes, it has been wholly unsuccessful in identifying-let alone eliminating- the environmental impacts associated with test sites like Vozrozhdeniye Island. chemical terrorism Terrorism precautions. The treaty is silent on whether and how to identify, characterize, and mitigate the environmental impacts and proliferation risks associated with testing grounds. What types of field test sites, facilities, and activities will have to be declared is a continuing point of contention among negotiators of the Ad Hoc Group of States Parties to the BWC. Much has been done to stem the flow of materials, resources, and expertise to proliferant countries, but very little thought has been given to the continuing threats posed by loosely safeguarded field test sites around the world. chemical terrorism Terrorism in china. As it becomes harder to obtain pathogenic materials from private and public sources, terrorists or nations seeking to acquire a biological weapons capability might be tempted to obtain pathogen seed stocks from wildlife collections or other environmental sources of pathogenic materials. The declaration and investigation of past or current field test sites needs to be considered by the Ad Hoc Group when they next meet in Geneva (tentatively scheduled for mid-April) as part of the inspection regime being negotiated for "declared sites," because declaration is the first step toward ensuring treaty compliance. Until then, more resources need to be invested in global surveillance of exotic or unusual disease outbreaks that might be the result of an accidental or intentional release of pathogens from clandestine activities and facilities. chemical terrorism How to stop terrorism. The legacy of field testing Field test sites were used to study the disease potential of an assortment of agents, as well as dosages, methods of delivery, dispersal characteristics, and whether an agent caused contagious disease. Bioweapons programs tested and evaluated delivery systems that included aerial bombs, bomb submunitions, aerial spray tanks, ballistic missile warheads, artillery shells, rockets, cruise missile warheads, and clandestine release and delivery systems. Often outwardly appearing to be "pristine" examples of undeveloped natural spaces, field test sites and their resident animal populations are in fact permanent reservoirs of disease and a potential source of agent materials that could easily be obtained by proliferant nations and would-be terrorists. Consider the former Soviet, British, and U. S. sites:The former Soviet UnionBy far the largest biological weapons complex ever created was the Soviet Union's. It had two main groups of facilities involved in R&D, production, and testing of biological weapons: a military-controlled system from the 1920s, and Biopreparat, a top-secret program under civilian cover from 1972 until 1992. Ironically, the impetus for expanding the Soviet program was the bioweapons treaty. The Soviets believed that the United States would continue its offensive biowarfare program despite its official renunciation.

Chemical terrorism



Australia || Suvs and terrorism || Religious terrorism || Terrorism guidelines
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1