A few extracts
from a detailed article about the danger of assuming that because a correlate
of a disease is "improved" the outcome of the disease itself will be too.
Recommended for people who are alarmed by low bone density results or high
cholesterol. All does not have to be lost..but don't get too complacent
either ;-)
http://www.acponline.org/journals/annals/01oct96/surrogep.htm
Surrogate End Points
in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled?
Annals of Internal Medicine,
1 October 1996. 125:605-613.
Thomas R. Fleming, PhD,
and David L. DeMets, PhD
Phase 3 clinical trials,
which evaluate the effect that new interventions have on the clinical outcomes
of particular relevance to the patient (such as death, loss of vision,
or other major symptomatic event), often require many participants to be
followed for a long time. There has recently been great interest in using
surrogate end points, such as tumor shrinkage or changes in cholesterol
level, blood pressure, CD4 cell count, or other laboratory measures, to
reduce the cost and duration of clinical trials. In theory, for a surrogate
end point to be an effective substitute for the clinical outcome, effects
of the intervention on the surrogate must reliably predict the overall
effect on the clinical outcome. In practice, this requirement frequently
fails. Among several explanations for this failure is the possibility that
the disease process could affect the clinical outcome through several causal
pathways that are not mediated through the surrogate, with the intervention's
effect on these pathways differing from its effect on the surrogate. Even
more likely, the intervention might also affect the clinical outcome by
unintended, unanticipated, and unrecognized mechanisms of action that operate
independently of the disease process.
We use examples from several
disease areas to illustrate how surrogate end points have been misleading
about the actual effects that treatments have on the health of patients.
-
Arrhythmia Suppression:
Use of reduction in ventricular ectopic contractions as a surrogate for
decreased cardiovascular-related mortality.... Ventricular arrhythmia is
associated with an almost fourfold increase in the risk for death related
to cardiac complications particularly sudden death. Three new
drugs (encainide, flecainide, and moricizine) were found to suppress
arrhythmias effectively and were approved by the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) for use in patients with life-threatening or severely symptomatic
arrhythmias. After the data were finalized, the sudden death comparison
was 43 and 16 and the number of deaths was 63 in the encainide and flecainide
group and 26 in the placebo group. Later results from CAST also established
an increased risk for death in patients receiving moricizine .
-
Lipid Lowering: Although
lipid levels, especially those of total cholesterol or its subfractions
and triglycerides, have long been known to be significant predictors of
cardiovascular-related mortality, researchers have debated the relation
between lipid lowering and reduction in overall mortality . As early as
the Coronary Drug Project (CDP) in the 1970s, such drugs as clofibrate
and niacin were known to decrease cholesterol levels. However, neither
agent reduced total mortality in the highly powered 7-year CDP trial. (Similarly
the HERS study for postmenopausal women with heart
disease and HRT -Tishy)
-
Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal
Women: Postmenopausal women have loss of bone mass and develop osteoporosis,
which ultimately leads to an increased risk for fractures of the hip and
other bones....Sodium fluoride, which stimulates bone formation and increases
bone mass, came into widespread use although it was not approved by the
FDA....Riggs and colleagues conducted a placebo-controlled randomized trial
of fluoride in 202 postmenopausal women who had osteoporosis and vertebral
fractures. Patients were followed for 4 years. Treatment increased bone
mineral density in the lumbar spine by 35% (P < 0.001). However,
new vertebral fractures occurred more frequently in patients treated with
fluoride than in those who received placebo (163 compared with 136 fractures),
and nonvertebral fractures also occurred more frequently in patients treated
with fluoride (72 compared with 24 fractures; P = 0.01). Riggs and
colleagues concluded that the form of fluoride treatment used in their
study increased some aspects of bone mineral density but caused bones to
become brittle, thereby increasing skeletal fragility.
|