=================================================================
A Majority Party for the 21st Century
Why America Needs a New Party
The Democratic Party is dying. It is time to start putting together a new party to replace it.
CAP Home


Why CAP?


CAP Manifesto


CAP's Founder


How to Help


Schedule a CAP Speaker


How CAP would eliminate the Personal Income Tax


Interesting Websites
In 1852 the Whig Party, the party of Daniel Webster and Henry Clay, suffered a devastating defeat in national elections. Weakened by internal divisions over the issue of slavery, it effectively disappeared in 1854 and was replaced by the new Republican Party, which was to become America's dominant party from Lincoln to Franklin Roosevelt.
Here are some of the reasons the Democratic Party is going the way of the Whigs:
The organized labor movement, historically the principal constituent of the Democratic Party, is visibly weaker, partly because many of the things for which it fought are now taken for granted.
The Democratic Party has allowed itself to be captured by minorities (black Americans permanently oriented to Washington, gays demanding legitimacy for their lifestyle, radical feminists disdainful of the family) who would never give the Party a national majority even if they could stop squabbling among themselves.
The Democrats are on the wrong side of the great moral issue of our era: abortion. While the Whigs were generally more correct on the issue of slavery than the Democrats of their day (Lincoln was a Whig congressman), they could not bring themselves to take an unequivocal stand and wound up quibbling themselves to death. The Democrats are rapidly becoming the party of abortion; they could not even tolerate pro-life Governor Casey at their 1992 convention.
McGovern. Carter. Mondale. Dukakis. Clinton. If this is not the political equivalent of Kaposi's Sarcoma, what is?
But why call for a new party to replace the Democrats? Why not just watch them wither into a permanent minority and help the Republican Party become the dominant party again?

Because the Republicans do not see the political merit of being unequivocally on the right side of the great moral issue of our era, either. Incredibly, just as the Democrats totally depart the playing field, the Republicans begin withdrawing to the sideline, too, babbling about the need to have a "big tent." During their 1996 national convention, the Republicans expended more energy avoiding "divisiveness" over abortion than on any other goal.

Makes one wonder if the GOP's critics aren't right when they call the Republicans the "stupid party." (In 1992 the Republicans gave prime time to "divisive" Pat Buchanan and got a big bounce in the polls for Bush against Clinton. In 1996 they muzzled Buchanan, and Dole remained in a double-digit lag against Clinton. Go figure.) In any event, the Republican Party is historically the party of big business. A new party replacing the Democrats will have the potential to form a new electoral majority by appealing to small business, independent professionals and blue collar workers--and by reaffirming its commitment to the most important thing in the world to all these economic groupings: the family.

So, that's the situation. The Democratic Party, given majority status by Franklin Roosevelt, is locked into a quarter- century-old factionalist ideology that is steadily whittling away its base. The Republican Party, given majority status in the middle of the 19th century by the clearsighted moral vision of Abraham Lincoln, is now too nearsighted to see the great moral issue facing politicians at the end of the 20th.

This is not to say that there are not other pressing issues besides abortion facing Americans as we prepare to enter the 21st century. There are many:
The Constitution our founding fathers gave us has been warped beyond recognition by an activist Supreme Court, helped along by gutless presidents and supine Congresses.
Our burgeoning national debt threatens to open permanent enmity between our older and our younger generations (including those not yet born), and we no longer have any choice but to perform radical surgery on how we collect taxes and how we make our national spending decisions.
In international trade, we have locked ourselves into a number of agreements without first assuring ourselves a level playing field, and we face some hard choices between additional folly of the same kind and destructive protectionism.
Crime and education: The more we spend on controlling crime, the more dangerous our streets and cities become. The more we spend on education, the less our kids learn. Hasn't it occurred to any of our politicians that these are not money problems, but problems of philosophy and culture?
Tragically, neither the Democratic Party nor the new Republican majority in Congress has yet developed sensible proposals for dealing with any of these issues. Speaker Newt Gingrich does not yet appear to know that these problems exist, much less intend to grapple with them seriously.

The new Constitution Action Party will grapple seriously with these issues, and it will do so with a passionate commitment to its principles. If you find yourself in sympathy with CAP's Manifesto, then you owe it to yourself, your country and your children to join together with others of a like mind in forming the majority party of the 21st century.

CAP will make every effort to roll back the powers of the federal government, and to reduce its potential for becoming tyrannical. But we will studiously avoid giving any encouragement to the idea that federal tyranny can be prevented by force of arms. It cannot. The founder of CAP is a Vietnam veteran who knows that pitched warfare between the armed forces of the United States and the so-called militias can end only in the swift crushing of the militias. And such conflict would create political forces leading even more rapidly to a federal tyranny. The only sure route to restoration of the freedoms Americans have always treasured is through the ballot box. Americans disgusted with the steady growth of centralized power should repudiate the major parties which seek or tolerate the consolidation of federal power. They should join CAP, identify with its manifesto and vote accordingly. In the meantime, they should join all other decent Americans in condemning the "evil cowards" who murder innocent children with their bombs. That much, at least, the President has gotten right.

At the very top of CAP's list of priorities will be the restoration of the constitutional order bequeathed to us by our forefathers. This priority is reflected in the new party's name: the Constitution Action Party.

Why the Constitution Action Party? Because the traditionalist camp has heretofore been marked, above all, by its inaction. It has analyzed, theorized, deprecated, described, prescribed, proscribed, inscribed, ascribed and circumscribed, but it has failed miserably at the indispensable task of coming up with specific solutions for specific problems, mobilizing popular support for the idea and getting it done.

Longtime readers of the various publications of the Right might not have serious disagreements with their analysis of the country's problems. But we would be hard put to cite practical and particular ideas they have set forth to solve the problems.

CAP set forth a series of such practical solutions in its newsletter, published between August 1995 and August 1996. (See How to Help for information on ordering back issues.)
==================================================================================================
Contact CAP Today!
Contact Webmaster
Last updated on November 8, 2002
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1