Madeline Felkins Hotsheets Rocketdyne/Boeing Contamination News
Felkins *
ANTHOLOGY and *HOTSHEETS / *FIDDLEFEST / *HOT Times
*Copyright Madeline Felkins 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 All Rights
*
Madelinefelkins.com *Hotsheets.org

Judge Assails Rocketdyne Cleanup

Environmentalists hail a federal jurist's ruling that a Department of Energy effort to rid the Santa Susana field lab of pollutants is inadequate.

By Gregory W. Griggs
Times Staff Writer
May 3, 2007


Environmental activists won a major victory Wednesday when a judge declared that the U.S. Department of Energy continues to violate federal law in its cleanup of nuclear and chemical contamination at Boeing's Rocketdyne field laboratory near Simi Valley.

U.S. District Judge Samuel Conti also barred the DOE from transferring ownership of its Santa Susana property until it conducts a more thorough environmental review of its cleanup operations at the former nuclear and rocket engine testing facility.

"The Bush administration was trying to cut corners at the expense of public health, and the judge wasn't having any of it," said James Birkelund, a Los Angeles-based attorney for the lead plaintiff, the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Boeing Corp. spokeswoman Blythe Jameson said the company, which sold the remainder of the Rocketdyne assets in 2005 to United Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney unit for about $700 million, would withhold comment on the court ruling. Boeing still owns the 2,800-acre hilltop property that contains the lab.

"It's just been issued and we're reviewing the court's decision," Jameson said.

But Daniel Hirsch, president of the anti-nuclear group Committee to Bridge the Gap, a co-plaintiff in the lawsuit, said that nowhere in the 47-page ruling did the judge side with the DOE, and by extension the property owner, Boeing, which purchased the field lab 11 years ago.

"What the judge is essentially saying to the DOE is: 'You guys have really fouled up this cleanup; you've broken the law repeatedly. And I'm going to retain jurisdiction until I'm satisfied that you've met your obligations to clean up the mess you've made.'"

The two nonprofit environmental groups sued the Energy Department alleging that the cleanup plan for the property � where U.S. agencies conducted nuclear research over four decades before ceasing operations in the late 1980s � would leave dangerous levels of radioactive material and other toxic chemicals in the soil.

Energy Department officials have said that the site, where a nuclear reactor meltdown occurred in 1959, would pose no significant threat to human health or the environment after it is cleaned up. But critics and watchdog groups have demanded that a full environmental impact statement be prepared and that the site be cleaned up to tougher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency standards, which would require removal of tens of thousands of cubic yards of contaminated soil.

Conti's ruling requires DOE to prepare a more stringent review of the lab, which is on the border of Los Angeles County. Conti wrote that the department's decision to prepare a less-stringent environmental document prior to cleanup is in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act and noted that the lab "is located only miles away from one of the largest population centers in the world."

U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and her colleague Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works who has been pushing for more stringent cleanup of the site, praised the judge's decision.

"On behalf of the people who live near Rocketdyne, I am so gratified that the court has found in their favor," Boxer said. "It is our solemn duty in government to protect the health and safety of the people we represent."

Hirsch and others said the DOE and Boeing appear to have accelerated the cleanup in recent months.

Critics suggest the rush was to get the Rocketdyne site declared officially "clean" before the Bush administration leaves office, fearing the next president may be tougher on environmental polluters.

Last month, the EPA announced that it would reconsider its decision not to add the Santa Susana Field Laboratory to its federal Superfund cleanup list.

The designation would provide more federal funding.

State Sen. Sheila Kuehl (D-Santa Monica) said she welcomed the consideration.

"Overall, the attention focused on this site by the EPA is very important. It rattles a few cages."


Grand Jury Probing Field Lab

By Kerry Cavanaugh, Staff Writer
LA Daily News
12/05/2005 08:37 PM Release


Boeing Co. officials revealed Monday that a federal grand jury is investigating the Santa Susana Field Lab and has subpoenaed records monitoring storm-water pollution leaving the site.

Company officials did not provide details, but said a grand jury had demanded documents relating to the locations where storm water and wastewater are discharged from the former nuclear and rocket-testing laboratory, owned by Boeing.

The company monitors the creeks and waterways that drain water from the property in order to detect contamination and prevent it from flowing into the Los Angeles River and Arroyo Simi.

Boeing is cooperating with authorities, spokeswoman Inger Hodgson said.

"In 55 years of operation at the Santa Susana Field Lab, the company has made every effort to comply with existing regulations and has made every effort to cooperate with regulators."

Officials with the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation would not confirm or deny whether they are the source of the federal inquiry.

The field laboratory has been operating since the 1950s, when it contracted with the U.S. Department of Defense to conduct nuclear research. The company also contracted with NASA and the Department of Defense for research and rocket-engine testing.

The site is now under a federally ordered environmental cleanup, with the U.S. Department of Energy overseeing the nuclear decontamination and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control supervising the chemical cleanup.

Contaminants found in the lab soil and in wastewater ponds on the property include highly toxic dioxins, heavy metals and mercury.

In the past seven years, Boeing has racked up nearly 100 regulation violations for tainted water leaving the site, and the company paid a $39,000 fine in 2002.

Earlier this year, Boeing settled a lawsuit filed by residents of the San Fernando and Simi valleys who say they were sickened by toxics released at Santa Susana - though Boeing denied any harm.

News of the grand jury investigation came as California water regulators crack down on the lab for some 40 violations of its storm-water permit since July 2004.

Last week, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board ordered Boeing to prevent pollutants from getting into the waterways, and the board is preparing another order this week.

Executive Director Jonathan Bishop said the water-quality board gave Boeing two notices of violations this year detailing toxins and heavy metals flowing from the property, but that the company hasn't done enough to fix the problems.

"They are not a normal, run-of-the-mill site, and they are expected to have a very stringent monitoring program," Bishop said.

Boeing received a new water permit in 2004, and company officials have complained that limits are extremely strict and sometimes penalize the lab for chemicals found at levels below background concentrations in the area. They also have said wildfires in 2003 dropped ash on the property, and that caused some violations. In addition, Hodgson said, this past winter brought record rainfall and more erosion.

"Generally, our permit exceedances since 2004 have been below drinking-water standards and do not pose a risk to surrounding communities," Hodgson said.

Environmental watchdogs said they were glad that water regulators were finally enforcing state law, but were frustrated that Boeing has not been fined or penalized for violating laws meant to protect fish and wildlife along the region's waterways.

"I keep waiting for teeth," said Dan Hirsch of the Committee to Bridge the Gap.

"This is a multibillion-dollar company for whom it is much cheaper to violate pollution laws than comply. I'm waiting for regulators to make this significantly more costly so that Boeing will stop polluting its neighbors."


Ex-Boeing Exec Gets Jail Term in Procurement Scandal
By Peter Pae
Times Staff Writer

10:06 AM PST, February 18, 2005
-- Boeing's former chief financial officer was sentenced today to four months in prison and fined $250,000 for illegally offering a job to a former Air Force official while she was negotiating a multibillion-dollar contract with the aerospace giant.

Michael M. Sears, 57, will also face two years of probation under the sentence handed down by a U.S. District Court judge in Virginia. Sears, who pleaded guilty in November to one count of aiding and abetting illicit employment negotiations, faced up to six months in prison and a $250,000 fine under federal sentencing guidelines.

The former aerospace executive has admitted improperly offering Air Force procurement official Darleen Druyun a position at Boeing while she was concluding negotiations on a $23-billion Air Force deal to acquire 100 aerial refueling tankers from the company.

Druyun and Sears are key figures in the biggest Pentagon procurement scandal in decades. Boeing, based in Chicago, is the largest private employer in Southern California, with about 36,000 workers, many of whom work in the company's defense operations.

Last fall, Druyun conceded that she helped Boeing gain favorable terms on at least four major Pentagon contracts. Beyond offering her work, the company had given jobs to her daughter and future son-in-law. She was sentenced to a nine-month prison term in October.

Druyun eventually left the Air Force and took a $250,000-a-year post as vice president of Boeing's missile defense business. In November, 2003, the company fired her and Sears.

The scandal has prompted the Pentagon and other government agencies to review a host of contracts that Druyun handled during her nine years as the second-highest-ranking acquisition official in the Air Force.

The Pentagon probe found that only eight of the more than 400 contracts overseen by Druyun were questionable, including four awarded to Boeing Co.

Boeing executives have long maintained that Sears acted alone in recruiting Druyun.

Times staff writer Jesus Sanchez contributed to this report.


Ex-Executive of Boeing Pleads Guilty

Michael Sears admits to recruiting a Pentagon official as she negotiated a deal with the company.

By Peter Pae and Jube Shiver Jr.
Times Staff Writers
November 16, 2004

ALEXANDRIA, Va.
� Former Boeing Co. Chief Financial Officer Michael M. Sears pleaded guilty Monday to illegally offering a job to a former top Air Force acquisition official while she was negotiating a military contract with the aerospace giant.

Sears, 57, said little during the 15-minute hearing before a federal judge here. But in a statement, he admitted improperly offering Darleen Druyun a position at Boeing while she was concluding negotiations on a $23-billion Air Force deal to acquire 100 aerial refueling tankers from the company.

Sears, who is scheduled to be sentenced Jan. 21, faces a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Druyun and Sears are key figures in the biggest Pentagon procurement scandal in decades. Boeing, based in Chicago, is the largest private employer in Southern California, with about 36,000 workers, many of whom work in the company's defense operations.

Last month, Druyun made a surprise admission that she helped Boeing obtain favorable terms on at least four major Pentagon contracts because, beyond offering her work, the company had given jobs to her daughter and future son-in-law.

As a result, investigators from the Pentagon and other government agencies have been reviewing a host of contracts that Druyun handled during her nine years as the second-highest-ranking acquisition official in the Department of the Air Force.

Sears pleaded guilty to one count of aiding and abetting illicit employment negotiations in a violation of conflict-of-interest laws.

Under his plea agreement, Sears pledged to cooperate with investigators as they continue their investigation. According to federal sentencing guidelines, he faces little � up to six months � or no time in jail.

Yet prosecutors want more out of Sears. They have been trying to persuade him to agree to a broader plea that the talks he had with Druyun tainted Boeing's defense contracts and hurt taxpayers. That, in turn, could lead to the cancellation of a number of Boeing projects.

But Sears has balked at making that admission, according to sources familiar with the case, making it likely that prosecutors will continue to press him before his sentencing. As part of his plea agreement, Sears said he would submit to a polygraph test, a step that in Druyun's case led to her bombshell admission about her bias toward Boeing.

"Michael Sears' secret employment negotiations with a senior Air Force official struck at the heart of the integrity of the multibillion-dollar defense acquisition process," U.S. Atty. Paul J. McNulty said. "Our investigation is ongoing. We're going to take it one step at a time."

At least for now, though, Sears' plea may represent a minor victory for Boeing because of "what it doesn't say," noted James McAleese, a lawyer who specializes in defense contracts.

"There is no admission by a Boeing officer that the previous contracts were tainted by wrongdoing," McAleese said. "It has been limited to wrongful hiring as opposed to any long-term conspiracy impacting multiple Boeing contracts."

Meanwhile, court filings released Monday provided further details of Druyun's job negotiations as she pitted archrivals Lockheed Martin Corp. and Boeing against each other as they bid for her services. Several times Druyun told Boeing executives, including defense chief James Albaugh, that she'd accepted a job at Lockheed. But Druyun's daughter continued to e-mail Sears that her mother wanted to work for Boeing.

Druyun finally took a $250,000-a-year post as vice president of Boeing's missile defense business. Last November, the company fired her and Sears.

Boeing executives have long maintained that Sears acted alone in improperly recruiting Druyun. "Today's action brings this matter one step closer to closure," said Doug Bain, Boeing's general counsel. Sears' admission shows "that no Boeing executive other than Mr. Sears engaged in any wrongdoing in connection with Ms. Druyun's hiring."

*Pae reported from Los Angeles and Shiver from Alexandria.


Former Air Force Buyer Jailed Over Boeing Deals

Saturday, 02 October 2004

ALEXANDRIA, Virginia (Reuters) -- The U.S. Air Force's former No. 2 weapons buyer was sentenced to nine months in prison on Friday after telling the court she had given Boeing Co. a rival's secret data and inflated weapons deals to ingratiate herself with the company, her future employer.

The disclosure of Darleen Druyun's efforts on behalf of Boeing could spark a new round of ethical, legal and business headaches for the Chicago-based aerospace giant, the Pentagon's No. 2 supplier after Lockheed Martin Corp.

Druyun, 56, tearfully acknowledged before Federal District Judge T.S. Ellis she had agreed to a higher price than she thought was appropriate for what became a $23.5 billion plan to acquire modified Boeing 767 aircraft as refueling tankers.

"The defendant did so, in her view, as a 'parting gift to Boeing' and because of her desire to ingratiate herself with Boeing, her future employer," according to a statement of facts she signed.

Druyun was also sentenced to seven months of post-prison confinement in a halfway house or home detention, a fine of $5,000 and 150 hours of community service. She was the top official at the Pentagon convicted for corruption since the so-called Ill Wind fraud cases in the late 1980s.

Druyun pleaded guilty in April to a conspiracy charge for illegally negotiating a $250,000-a-year Boeing job while overseeing billions of dollars of the company's contracts.

She was hired by Boeing in January 2003, two months after leaving the Air Force, where she had held the No. 2 acquisition job since 1993. In November, she was fired along with Boeing's chief financial officer, Michael Sears, who recruited her. Boeing's chief executive, Phil Condit, resigned a week later.

Related probes

Since then, Boeing has been dogged by related probes by Congress, the Defense Department and federal prosecutors.

"The statements Ms. Druyun made in her sentencing papers came as a total surprise to The Boeing Company," Boeing said in a statement.

In her sentencing papers, Druyun admitted giving Boeing pricing data from Airbus, a European rival 80 percent owned by EADS, during the tanker discussions.

Airbus, also owned by BAE Systems Plc, saw its bid to provide the tankers rejected on the grounds that its offering did not fit Air Force requirements.

Druyun's statements may further delay acquisition of new tankers, a process Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld put on hold in December pending a review of the Air Force's needs.

"I'm afraid there is still more misconduct on the part of the Air Force that has to be looked at," said Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican who has complained of "incestuous" ties between Boeing and the Air Force.

Keith Ashdown of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a budget watchdog group, said he expected the tanker competition to be reopened from scratch, with Airbus invited to bid.

In entering her plea in April, Druyun had agreed to cooperate fully in the government's investigation -- a promise, it emerged Friday, she had not initially kept.

After failing a lie detector test over the summer, she dropped her long-standing claim she had always acted in U.S. taxpayers' best interests while at the Air Force, Robert Wiechering, an assistant U.S. attorney, told the court.

In court, she admitted that, as board chairman of a NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control program, she negotiated what she deemed an overly generous $100 million payment to Boeing as part of a 2002 restructuring of the AWACS program.

Druyun also admitted she picked Boeing over four competitors for a $4 billion upgrade to C-130 transport planes -- "and now acknowledges that she was influenced by her perceived indebtedness to Boeing for employing her future son-in-law and daughter," the statement of facts said.

The Air Force said it would renegotiate any Druyun-negotiated contracts, if warranted, and said it had already begun adjusting NATO's AWACS deal.

In a new line of inquiry, the Bush administration is refusing to allow Senate investigators to review more than 100 e-mails connected to Air Force acquisitions chief Marvin Sambur, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The Senate Armed Services Committee was told the e-mails, some involving communication with Druyun, were "law enforcement sensitive," the sources said.

Last month, White House officials asked the Justice Department to investigate a possible conflict of interest involving Air Force Secretary James Roche and Robin Cleveland, an associate director at the White House's Office of Management and Budget, which reviewed the tanker plan.


Another Boeing Employee Charged with Conspiracy

By Peter Pae Times Staff Writer
May 12, 2004


Federal prosecutors filed criminal charges against a third former Boeing Co. employee Tuesday, broadening an investigation into allegations that the company stole trade secrets from rival Lockheed Martin Corp. to win a multibillion-dollar rocket contract.

Larry Satchell, 65, a former rocket manager at Boeing's Huntington Beach facility, was charged with obstruction of justice, conspiracy and theft of trade secrets. The charges stemmed from the federal probe into Boeing's use of Lockheed materials to win a $5-billion contract in the late '90s to build a new generation of rockets known as Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles, or EELV.

Last year, prosecutors filed criminal charges against former Boeing employees Kenneth Branch and William Erskine, both of whom worked with Satchell.

"He is innocent of these charges," Satchell's attorney, Michael W. Fitzgerald, said Tuesday. "Mr. Satchell enjoyed a distinguished career in aerospace for 40 years, and throughout his career he has contributed to our national defense."

Imposing one of the stiffest penalties ever levied against a defense contractor, the Air Force last summer stripped Boeing of about $1 billion of rocket contracts and indefinitely suspended the company from seeking future rocket work.

The rocket investigation is being led by the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles.

Prosecutors claim that Branch, who previously worked for Lockheed, illegally possessed proprietary Lockheed documents and that Erskine hired Branch because he had the documents.

Branch and Erskine have pleaded not guilty.

According to the charges filed Tuesday, Satchell led Boeing's "capture team," a group directed to "acquire intelligence, technical and cost data" on Lockheed Martin's proposal for the EELV rocket contract.

The charges against Satchell appear to rely significantly on the testimony of another former Boeing employee, Matthew Jew, who was given immunity from prosecution in April.

Jew worked at Boeing as a cost estimator. In an affidavit, he told investigators that Satchell had given him documents that "appeared to be cost-data-associated with Lockheed Martin lift vehicles" that Boeing used to calculate an estimate of its rival's rocket costs.

Then, in the summer of 1999, as Boeing lawyers were concluding an internal investigation into the alleged theft, Satchell told Jew to destroy the documents he had been given, which Jew did, according to court papers. In March, Jew was able to recover some electronic data he had stored in his laptop computer.

Satchell told Jew that they could "lose their jobs and that 'if this were to come out � Boeing could lose the entire EELV program,' " according to the affidavit.

The charges against Satchell came nearly five years after Boeing fired Branch and Erskine and reprimanded Satchell for possessing the proprietary documents and then destroying them. Satchell retired from Boeing in 1999.

Shortly after they were fired, Branch and Erskine filed a wrongful-termination lawsuit that Boeing eventually won. But during the discovery stage of the lawsuit, information surfaced that led the Air Force and Justice Department to investigate the Lockheed case.

Boeing has maintained that the document pilfering involved only a handful of employees and that they acted on their own. No other Boeing senior officials or the company itself have been named in the criminal charges.

The Lockheed case is one of two major ethics scandals that have rocked the aerospace giant in the last year.

Boeing also is facing the loss of a $23-billion Air Force deal for 100 aerial tankers. The tanker deal is under review by the Pentagon partly because of allegations that Boeing was talking to a Pentagon acquisition official about a job at the company while the official was negotiating the tanker deal.


Former Boeing Manager Faces Charges

Larry Satchell Charged with Conspiracy Over Theft of Documents in Defense Contract Bid.


By Jesus Sanchez Times Staff Writer
4:33 PM PDT, May 11, 2004

A former Boeing Co. manager in Orange County was charged today by federal prosecutors for his alleged role in a corporate espionage scandal that forced military officials to strip the aerospace giant of a billion-dollar rocket contract.

The criminal complaint filed in federal court in Los Angeles charged Larry Satchell, who headed a Boeing planning and marketing analysis group known as the "Capture Team," with conspiracy and obstruction of justice, among other things.

Authorities have issued an arrest warrant for Satchell, who is scheduled to turn himself in Wednesday, officials said. Satchell is the third company employee to be charged with allegedly using illegally obtained documents from rival Lockheed Martin to help his company win a lucrative contract to develop a new generation of rockets to launch military satellites. Boeing was awarded the contract in 1998.

Satchell, who worked in Boeing's Huntington Beach office, was the manager for engineers Kenneth Branch and William Erskine. The so-called "Capture Team" was directed to collect and analyze information about Lockheed Martin's bid for the rocket launch system.

Both Branch and Erksine, who were fired by Boeing, pleaded not guilty last year to government charges for allegedly stealing the Lockheed Martin documents. Satchell retired after he was reprimanded by the company.

In 1998, Boeing landed a contract to build 21 of the 28 satellite launch vehicles for the Air Force. Lockheed, which had been a prime military launch vehicle contractor for years, received a contract for just seven of the rockets.

However, last year, the Air Force found that Boeing violated federal law by having thousands of Lockheed documents in its possession. The Air Force took away at least $1 billion in rocket contracts from Boeing and gave them to Lockheed in one of the harshest penalties ever against a defense contractor.

Times staff writers Peter Pae and John O'Dell contributed to this report.

Boeing Finds More Possible Misdeeds
Boeing Obtained a Rival's, (Lockheed Martin's), Data in Bidding for a Third Rocket Deal. But a Five-Year Statute of Limitations has Expired.
By Peter Pae Times Staff Writer
May 7, 2004

Boeing Co., already under investigation for possible corporate espionage, has informed the Air Force of another case in which one of its employees may have improperly possessed a rival company's proprietary documents.

But because of a five-year statute of limitations, federal investigators are unlikely to focus on those documents, which date from the early 1990s, as they continue their probe, legal experts said.

The latest disclosure comes as investigators examine two separate instances of Boeing employees accused of illicitly obtaining trade secrets from rival Lockheed Martin Corp. and then using them to win multibillion-dollar contracts for rockets.

Two former employees who worked at Boeing's Huntington Beach facility have been criminally charged and the Pentagon last summer stripped Boeing of about $1 billion in rocket contracts and suspended it from bidding on future military rocket launch contracts.

Boeing acknowledged last week that federal investigators also were looking into the possibility that the company used "nonpublic" Lockheed information to win a separate NASA rocket contract.

But the company did not disclose at that time that its own internal investigators had found a third case of potential document pilfering.

In an April letter to the Air Force, Boeing said it recently discovered that a mid-level manager who prepared cost estimates of competitors' bids possessed proprietary documents from Martin Marietta, a Lockheed Martin predecessor.

The employee, Matthew Jew, resigned last month and has since been cooperating with investigators. Jew, who couldn't be reach for comment, prepared cost estimates on all three rocket contracts.

Boeing executives said Thursday that the documents did not factor into the company's own pricing as it competed against Martin Marietta for the $1-billion rocket contract in the early 1990s.

The contract was awarded to Boeing.

The Air Force and the Justice Department, citing the ongoing nature of the investigation, declined to comment on the latest disclosure.


Boeing's Misconduct Is Detailed in Memo

By Peter Pae
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
April 23, 2004


An internal Air Force memo suggests a broad pattern of improprieties by Boeing Co. when it bid on Pentagon contracts, apparently contradicting the aerospace giant's assertions that such problems were isolated and that it corrected them quickly.

According to the memo, Boeing misled federal investigators and lied about the number of documents that Boeing employees stole from rival Lockheed Martin Corp. to win a lucrative rocket contract.

The Air Force hit Boeing last summer with one of the harshest penalties ever imposed on a defense contractor when it took away about $1 billion in rocket contracts and indefinitely suspended the company from bidding on future rocket deals.

The 10-page memo offers details on the rocket contract scandal, saying that thousands of pages of Lockheed Martin documents gave Boeing an unfair advantage to develop a new generation of rockets known as Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles, or EELV. The memo says that "an independent team of pricing experts determined" that the documents helped Boeing calculate Lockheed's bid within 2.4% of the offer.

The memo also reveals for the first time how the Air Force in 1999 considered suspending Boeing for having in its possession proprietary papers from Raytheon Corp. when the two rivals were competing for a missile defense program contract.

"Boeing's misuse of a competitor's proprietary documents � is not unique to the EELV program," Steven A. Shaw, the Pentagon's deputy general counsel, says in the memo.

It is included in a recent court filing in a civil lawsuit filed by Lockheed against Boeing in federal court in Orlando.

As Boeing was on the verge of winning the rocket contract, the memo says another Boeing "capture team" was busy reviewing, analyzing and copying the proprietary documents laying out Raytheon's proposal for a missile defense system.

They were inadvertently left at Boeing's Downey facility by an Army official in 1998. A Boeing software engineer discovered the file, but instead of destroying it "or returning it to Raytheon or the Army," it was copied and analyzed, according to the memo.

At least one Boeing employee was involved in both the Lockheed and Raytheon incidents, according to the memo. It doesn't identify the employee.

Boeing's apparent failure to abide by its assurances to report and deal with improper activities angered Air Force officials and compounded the penalty in the Lockheed EELV case, said a source familiar with the Air Force discussions.

A Boeing spokesman declined to comment Thursday on the Air Force memo because he had not seen it. Boeing stands by its position that the theft of Lockheed documents involved only "a handful of its employees" and that Boeing has aggressively implemented an overhaul of its ethics policies, said the spokesman, Dan Beck.

"We took the suspension very seriously, and since then Boeing has continued to cooperate fully with the Air Force," Beck said.

Lockheed spokesman Jeff Adams said that "the documents related to this case � speak for themselves."

The rocket scandal was the first of two that rocked Boeing last year, leading to the resignation of longtime Chief Executive Phil Condit.

Last fall, the Pentagon and Congress began investigating whether Boeing Chief Financial Officer Mike Sears improperly offered a job to a Pentagon official as she was negotiating a $24-billion deal to lease and buy 100 aerial refueling tankers from Boeing. The company hired the official, Darleen Druyun, after she left the Department of the Air Force.

Sears and Druyun were fired in November. This week, Druyun pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy.

Boeing CEO Harry Stonecipher said this month that a tentative agreement had been reached with the Air Force to restore Boeing's status as a rocket contractor and that he expected the Air Force to make a formal announcement within a "few weeks."

An Air Force official said Thursday that she was unaware of an agreement or any possible announcement in the foreseeable future related to the rocket program.

The Lockheed case has long plagued Boeing, which has consistently blamed a few rogue employees for wrongly obtaining Lockheed documents.

The Air Force memo says that at least one Boeing senior executive possessed a Lockheed document and that another executive may have encouraged their pilfering. In addition, the memo says, Boeing's management continually misled the Air Force and provided "false statements."

Early on, the Air Force said Boeing led it to believe the company had only two sets of Lockheed documents. Later, Boeing acknowledged having two boxes. But Boeing actually had eight boxes, according to the memo.

In his July 24, 2003, memo, Shaw concludes that Boeing had 24,500 pages of Lockheed documents. In a court filing last month, Lockheed said it had received an additional 18,000 pages of documents from Boeing.

"To date, Boeing has returned to Lockheed Martin over 42,000 pages of material," a Lockheed lawyer wrote. "These documents have been in Boeing's possession for years, even as Boeing represented to Lockheed Martin that it had disclosed all of the Lockheed Martin documents it had in its possession, even though it was clearly not the case."


Former Boeing Executive Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy
From Reuters
21 April,2004


A tearful former top Air Force official Tuesday pleaded guilty to conspiracy for discussing a job with Boeing Co. while overseeing the Air Force's business dealings with the company.

Darleen Druyun, 56, who retired as the No. 2 Air Force acquisition official in November 2002 and took a job with Boeing two months later, agreed to cooperate with prosecutors who are investigating Michael Sears, the former Boeing chief financial officer who hired her.

"I deeply regret my actions," an emotional Druyun told Judge T.S. Ellis III in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Druyun has been under investigation for possible conflicts of interest in a $23.5-billion Air Force plan to lease and buy 100 Boeing 767s as refueling planes. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Tuesday that the deal remained on hold pending several additional reviews.

Boeing fired Druyun and Sears on Nov. 24, saying the two violated company ethics rules by discussing a Boeing job for Druyun while she was working on Boeing-related Air Force programs and then trying to cover it up. Boeing Chief Executive Phil Condit resigned a week later.

Druyun on Tuesday admitted negotiating the Boeing job with Sears while at the Air Force and then conspiring with him to conceal the talks. She also admitted to asking a senior Boeing executive to secure jobs for her daughter, Heather McKee, and her then-boyfriend, now husband.

Druyun faces a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Her sentencing is scheduled for Aug. 6.

Under the terms of the plea agreement, Druyun will provide any information and documents she has about any criminal behavior and submit to a lie-detector test.

The government agreed not to prosecute Druyun's daughter � who is still employed by Boeing � for her role in facilitating communications between Druyun and Sears.

U.S. Atty. Paul McNulty told reporters the government's investigation would continue.




Boeing Fires Chief Financial Officer and Former Air Force Official
Mike Sears is accused of negotiating the hiring of a U.S. government employee who was in a position to influence Boeing contracts. The former Air Force official, Darleen Druyun, also was fired.
By Mary MacVean
Times Staff Writer
11:02 AM PST, November 24, 2003


Boeing Co. fired its chief financial officer and another executive because of allegedly unethical communications they had while the executive still worked for the government, the company said today.
Mike Sears, the CFO, and Darleen Druyun, who has been vice president and deputy general manager of Missile Defense Systems, tried to conceal their misconduct, Boeing said in a statement from its Chicago headquarters.
The aerospace giant said it has informed the Air Force of its actions and is cooperating with the government in its investigation of the matter.
Los Angeles native James Bell was named acting chief financial officer, replacing Sears. He had been senior vice president of finance and corporate controller.
Boeing said in a statement that Sears was dismissed for violating company policies by communicating with Druyun about future employment when she had not disqualified herself from acting in her official government capacity on matters involving Boeing.
"Compelling evidence of this misconduct by Mr. Sears and Ms. Druyun came to light over the last two weeks," Boeing Chairman Phil Condit said in a statement.
Controversy has surrounded a plan for the Air Force to acquire 100 Boeing 767 planes to use as refueling tankers.
President Bush today signed the defense authorization bill that included approval of a compromise tanker deal, lowering the initial $21 billion price by $3 billion to $5 billion. Under the deal, the Air Force will lease 20 Boeing planes immediately and buy 80 more planes.
The Pentagon launched an investigation this fall into allegations that Druyun acted improperly in giving Boeing financial information about a competing bid on the lease deal.
Boeing has denied wrongdoing in the competition for the tanker contract. The company said the dismissals resulted from an internal investigation.
In July, the Air Force hit Boeing with some of the harshest penalties ever imposed on a defense contractor, taking away at least $1 billion worth of rocket contracts. The Air Force said it was punishing Boeing for "serious violations of federal law" when it illicitly obtained thousands of pages of trade secrets from rival Lockheed Martin Corp.
At that time, Boeing had hired consultants to review its ethics programs.
Condit said today that he has asked the consultants to review Boeing's procedures on hiring government employees "to ensure this type of incident never happens again."
Bell, who earned a degree in accounting at Cal State L.A., joined Rockwell in 1972 as an accountant. Boeing acquired the space and defense businesses of Rockwell in 1996.
Boeing's stock fell 57 cents to $38.29 this morning on the New York Stock Exchange.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Industrial Espionage
Air Force Announces Boeing Inquiry Results
Boeing Penalized $1 Billion and Lockheed-Martin Reallocated Contract Award

25 July 2003 - WASHINGTON ( Air Force PN) -- Air Force officials announced July 24 that the Boeing Company has committed serious violations of federal law. This determination is based on the service�s review into allegations of wrongdoing by Boeing during the 1998 evolved expendable launch vehicle source selection.
As a result, the Air Force will suspend three Boeing Integrated Defense System business units and three former Boeing employees from eligibility for new government contracts. The suspensions are issued against the Boeing Company's Launch Systems, Boeing Launch Services and Delta Program business units as they existed in the Boeing organizational structure as of July 21. This suspension will apply to these business units regardless of where they fall in any Boeing reorganization.
"Our inquiry into Boeing found that they were in possession of thousands of pages of Lockheed Martin proprietary EELV documents during the 1998 source selection," said Peter B. Teets, undersecretary of the Air Force. "As a matter of policy we do not tolerate breaches of procurement integrity and we hold industry accountable for the actions of their employees. We believe the suspension is necessary and we hope all contractors will take note and strive to enforce the highest integrity standards in their organizations."
The individuals suspended are William David Erskine, former ground operations lead on Boeing's EELV program; Kenneth V. Branch, former senior engineer and scientist on Boeing's EELV program; and Larry Dean Satchell, a former member of Boeing's EELV proposal team.
In addition, the Air Force will notify Boeing of its intent to reallocate launches under its existing EELV contract, which was awarded in October 1998, and is known as Buy I. Under this reallocation, the Air Force will reduce the total number of Boeing Buy I Delta IV launches from 19 to 12. The Air Force will increase the total number of Lockheed Martin Buy I Atlas V launches from seven to 14.
Further, the Air Force will permit Lockheed Martin to develop a West Coast launch capability at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., by upgrading an existing launch facility.
The Air Force also announced the results of its EELV Buy II decision. The Air Force disqualified Boeing from the award of three Buy II launches, and plans to award Lockheed Martin three Buy II launches from Vandenberg.
The Boeing Delta IV and Lockheed Martin's Atlas V are the two families of EELVs. They were developed with the Air Force to modernize and reduce the cost of the nation's spacelift operation while providing the United States with assured access to space.


Investigation Leads to Indictments Against Two Former Boeing Managers

18 July, 2003 - WASHINGTON ( AFPN) -- The Defense Department�s inspector general announced July 18 criminal indictments against two former Boeing Co. managers.
Joseph E. Schmitz said that a joint investigation by officials from the Defense Criminal Investigative Service and the Air Force Office of Special Investigations resulted in the indictments.
The managers were in the evolved expendable launch vehicle program. A federal grand jury in Los Angeles charged them with conspiracy to conceal and possess trade secrets.
Kenneth Branch, 64, and William Erskine, 43, are charged with misusing proprietary Lockheed Martin Co. documents during bidding for Air Force launch contracts. If convicted, each faces a maximum of 10 years confinement, a fine of $250,000 or both.
"The potential theft of proprietary data is a specter that can strike at the very foundation of any competitive system designed to ensure quality while containing costs," said Schmitz. "Competitions to design and build the most advanced military systems in the world for the Department of Defense have a potential value of billions of dollars per year. Part of the mission of the DCIS special agents is to investigate allegations to ensure that the integrity of commercial competitions (is) strictly maintained and that a fair playing field is maintained among defense contractors."
In 1997, the Air Force officials announced contracts for launch vehicles services to both Boeing and Lockheed Martin. Air Force officials agreed to provide each company with $500 million for development costs associated with their respective programs, with both companies agreeing to pay any additional developmental costs.
In 1998, of the 28 initial launches, Boeing won 19 of the launches while Lockheed won nine. The program uses the Lockheed Atlas or the Boeing Delta rocket systems to launch government satellites into space for national security interests and for the transportation of commercial satellites.
In 2002, upon learning about the loss of proprietary documents, Lockheed Martin officials alerted the Air Force, which, in turn, informed the DCIS. DCIS and OSI officials then launched an investigation into the theft and referred the case to the U.S. attorney for the central district of California.

Boeing Barred From Future Rocket Work
Company Penalized $1 Billion by United States Air Force While Department of Justice Investigates

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS 25 July 2003
WASHINGTON (AP) --
The Air Force ruled that Boeing Co. broke the law by stealing a competitor's trade secrets and, as a penalty, took away seven military satellite launches that were to use Boeing rockets.
The Air Force also indefinitely banned Boeing from bidding on future satellite-launching contracts.
The shift of seven satellite launches from Boeing to rival Lockheed Martin Co. is worth about $1 billion, Air Force Undersecretary Peter Teets said Thursday.
``Boeing is responsible and must be held accountable for the actions of its employees,'' Teets said at a Pentagon news conference. ``We cannot tolerate anything but complete honesty in our contracting process.''
The suspension will remain in place until the Air Force is satisfied that Boeing has changed its ways and atoned for its misdeeds, Teets said. He said he spoke with Boeing chief executive Phil Condit and was optimistic the company could have the suspension lifted in as little as a few months.
Condit said all of the 78,000 workers in Boeing's Integrated Defense Systems unit would have a ``stand-down'' on Wednesday to discuss the problem and have more ethics training.
``We are extremely disappointed by the circumstances that prompted our customer's action, but we understand the U.S. Air Force's position that unethical behavior will not be tolerated,'' Condit said in a statement. ``We apologize for our actions. We will continue to work with the Air Force to address the issues that caused this suspension.''
Teets said an Air Force investigation concluded that Boeing committed ``serious and substantial violations of federal law'' by stealing extensive information from Lockheed Martin during competition for a $1.88 billion satellite launching contract in 1998. Worse, Boeing did not reveal the extent of the problem until years later and only gave the Air Force copies of all the Lockheed Martin documents this April, Teets said.
Teets announced the penalties after stock markets closed Thursday. Boeing stock closed down 49 cents Thursday at $32.20. Lockheed Martin shares were down $1.83 to $51.55.
Lockheed Martin is suing Boeing over the document theft.
The Justice Department is investigating the matter and has charged two former Boeing managers with conspiring to steal trade secrets from Lockheed Martin. Boeing took out full-page ads in several newspapers last month to acknowledge the lapse and apologize.
Teets said the Air Force investigation found that former Boeing executives Kenneth Branch, William Erskine and Larry Satchell broke the law and would be barred from participating in any future rocket contracts.
Branch, 64, and Erskine, 43, were charged with conspiracy, theft of trade secrets and violating federal procurement laws in federal court in Los Angeles. Branch, a former Lockheed Martin employee, gave Boeing the thousands of pages of documents that included financial and technical details of Lockheed Martin's planned bid for the satellite launch contract. Boeing fired both men in 1999 after an internal investigation.
Satchell, the Boeing official in charge of making sure its bid came in lower than Lockheed Martin's, was suspended by the company and later retired. He has not been criminally charged.
The Air Force had awarded Boeing 21 launches and Lockheed Martin seven. With Thursday's action, Lockheed Martin doubles its launches to 14. Lockheed Martin also will get three more launches scheduled to be awarded later this year, Teets said.
Although most of the launches are from Cape Canaveral, Fla., Boeing also has a launch pad at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. Thursday's punishment includes allowing Lockheed Martin to build a $200 million launch pad at Vandenberg to compete with Boeing for West Coast launches.
Teets, a former executive with Lockheed Martin who retired from the company in late 1999, said he was concerned Boeing might decide to get out of the business of launching military satellites. But the company's wrongdoing was so serious it deserved a strong punishment, Teets said.
``While it's fine to compete, it's not fine to compete at any cost, and it's not fine to violate federal laws,'' Teets said.

On the Net:
Boeing
Lockheed Martin

Classified Data Missing From Los Alamos
Associated Press
Saturday 10 July, 2004 11:50 AM ET


LOS ALAMOS, NEW MEXICO
- Two data storage devices containing classified information are missing from Los Alamos National Laboratory, officials said.

Lab spokesman Kevin Roark refused to say Friday if the information could jeopardize national security.

He said the "Classified Removable Electronic Media" were discovered missing from the Weapons Physics Directorate during an inventory check Wednesday. He refused to specify exactly what was missing, but said the items could be products such as CDs or floppy disks.

A search was under way, and lab Director Peter Nanos said he would order a full inquiry into what happened.

"In order to operate effectively, this apparent lack of attention to CREM issues must be dealt with swiftly and decisively," Nanos said.

This is the second such incident in recent months. Classified electronic media was also reported missing in May. That data had been set to be destroyed before it went missing, Roark said at the time.

Roark acknowledged Friday that this situation is different because the items were to be used for an upcoming experiment. He added that Nanos' tone is also different this time.

"What's different in this case is the director is saying this won't stand," Roark said. "If you can't keep track of classified material, then you can't work at Los Alamos anymore."

U.S. Rep. Tom Udall said he was incensed by the latest security failure at the northern New Mexico lab.

"That this is occurring in the current atmosphere of heightened security awareness is intolerable," Udall said.

The University of California has run Los Alamos since the lab was created as the headquarters of the Manhattan Project � the secret effort to create the first atomic bomb � in 1943.

The contract is up for bids after management failures in recent years, including the firing of two investigators who raised allegations of mismanagement, abuse of lab purchasing and financial malfeasance.

Official Website:
Los Alamos National Laboratory


Copyright 2003 The Associated Press


*Please Scroll for Story: Bids Expected for Los Alamos Contract*
Nuclear Weapons Lab Security to Be Probed
Loss of security badge at Lawrence Livermore wasn't reported for six weeks, report says. From Associated Press
May 31, 2003

LIVERMORE �
Federal investigators will send a team to evaluate security at a nuclear weapons lab and consider whether the federal government should take over, after a report that it took six weeks before top managers were told about the loss of an access badge.

National Nuclear Security Administrator Linton Brooks said Friday that he would send a team of senior managers to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory next week.

The investigation was more bad news for the University of California, which has managed Lawrence Livermore since 1952. The university has already come under withering criticism for problems at the other nuclear weapons facility it manages, the Los Alamos lab in New Mexico.

After security lapses and allegations of financial fraud by some employees, the government decided to put the Los Alamos management contract out for bid when it expires in 2005, breaking a 60-year tradition.

The security team, which will start work at Livermore on Monday, is charged with investigating the loss of a security officer's access badge. The badge was lost weeks ago, but the loss was not reported to senior management until Thursday, and then it was described as the loss of a set of security keys.

The administrator is asking the team to decide if the agency should take over direct responsibility for lab security.

Lab officials acknowledged in mid-May that keys were missing, although they said security had not been compromised. However, Brooks disclosed Friday that the missing item had been lost for three weeks before top managers found out.

Brooks has also asked the team to look into reported claims by a member of the lab security force that the special response team is not prepared to defend against a terrorist attack.

Last month, Brooks appeared before the UC Board of Regents, urging it to compete for the Los Alamos contract. Brooks said then that he did not think problems at Livermore were as serious as those at Los Alamos.

However, in a statement Friday, Brooks indicated he was concerned that the lapses were not being reported up the management chain quickly enough.

"Senior management at Lawrence Livermore and the University of California have responded aggressively to revelations about security problems, but I am disturbed by evidence that other managers in the chain of command have been lax in identifying and reporting potentially serious security problems," Brooks said.


Bids Expected for Los Alamos Contract
The decision follows a string of management breakdowns under the current contractor, the University of California. From Associated Press
8:37 AM PDT, April 30, 2003

WASHINGTON --
The Energy Department will take competitive bids for the contract to run Los Alamos National Laboratory for the first time in the nuclear weapons lab's history, after high-profile management breakdowns shook confidence in current management.
The announcement, expected from Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham today, would force the University of California to compete with other universities and private companies for the lab contract when it lapses in 2005. The university has run the lab since the atom bomb was developed there six decades ago.
"The secretary has agreed that UC should continue to manage the laboratory through September 2005, when the current contract ends. Over the coming year we will begin the process of competition for the management of Los Alamos following September 2005, urging the university to take part," Linton Brooks, director of the National Nuclear Security Administration, wrote in an e-mail that was to be sent to Los Alamos employees today. The administration oversees the nation's nuclear labs for the department.
Abraham ordered a review of the lab contract after two fired lab investigators went public with concerns about the misuse of money and lax fraud controls, but it also follows other embarrassing episodes.
"There has just been a pattern of classified areas that are not properly secured, employees misappropriating equipment and funds, and on and on," said Steven Aftergood, who tracks the lab for the Federation of American Scientists. "It all adds up to a pretty unflattering picture for the university."
A report by Deputy Energy Secretary Kyle McSlarrow praised the University of California's response to the latest problems. "It is difficult to see how any organization could have done more to deal with the problem than the University of California has since December 2002," he wrote.
But Brooks said there is value to be gained from competition and the National Academy of Sciences would be assigned to develop a bidding criteria. He said current Los Alamos employees would be retained and he would visit the lab on May 6 to answer their questions.
Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., who had defended lab management and warned against a rush to judgment, said in the past week that serious mistakes were made and he would support competition for the contract when it lapses.
University of California President Richard C. Atkinson has said that if Abraham opts for competition, "our instinct is to compete and to compete hard," but it would be up to the school's Board of Regents to decide.
Other possible bidders include the University of Texas and private contractors such as Lockheed Martin Corp., which manages Sandia National Laboratories for the Energy Department.
The lab, which occupies a sprawling 43-square mile campus in northern New Mexico, has an annual budget of $1.6 billion and employs about 7,600 people.
Last Halloween, the FBI executed three search warrants against two Los Alamos employees suspected of using lab funds to buy sunglasses, television sets, CB radios, picnic tables, gas barbecues and other merchandise for their own use.
Reports later surfaced that another employee had tried to purchase a customized Ford Mustang with her lab charge card, one had used her lab charge card for cash advances at casinos, and another submitted a bogus travel voucher.
Two Los Alamos investigators -- Glenn Walp and Steve Doran -- who had raised concerns about the fraud and porous management at the lab were fired, prompting investigations by Congress and the Energy Department inspector general, who called the firings "incomprehensible."
The University of California made sweeping changes at the lab, firing or reassigning several top managers and instituting a series of reforms.
On Monday, the Energy Department's inspector general reported that the lab had inadequate measures to keep track of its computers, including those with classified information.
"We do not believe that Los Alamos can provide adequate assurance that classified, sensitive, or proprietary information is appropriately protected," he wrote.
The latest problems come in the wake of the 1999 investigation into Taiwanese-born scientist Wen Ho Lee, who was imprisoned for nine months while under investigation for mishandling nuclear weapons codes and later freed in a plea deal. He was never charged with spying.
The next year, two computer hard drives with secret nuclear-related material disappeared, only to turn up later behind a copy machine.


Fraud Confirmed at Los Alamos Laboratory

Workers Were Warned not to 'Spill Your Guts' About Wrongdoing, a Federal Report Finds.

By Ralph Vartabedian and Rebecca Trounson
Times Staff Writers

January 31 2003


Employees stole or lost at least $1.5 million in government property at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and lab supervisors later warned their staff to resist the temptation to "spill your guts" about the wrongdoing, according to an Energy Department investigation released Thursday .

The probe by the Energy Department's Office of Inspector General represents the first official confirmation of widespread financial fraud at the New Mexico nuclear weapons research lab and management's failure to address it. The facility is operated by the University of California under contract with the Energy Department.

The report corroborates the concerns about weak internal controls and property management issues first raised by two whistle-blowing investigators, Glenn Walp and Steven Doran, who were fired by the lab in November after reporting the thefts. The report terms their dismissals "incomprehensible".


Steven Doran and Glenn Walp, right, former Los Alamos National Laboratory investigators
take time out from an interview in Santa Fe, N.M. on Thursday, Jan. 23, 2003, to pose
for a photograph. Walp and Doran were fired by the lab last November but have since been
rehired as advisers by the University of California , which has managed the lab from its inception
60 years ago. Now university officials are hearing for the first time tales of internal business
turmoil and allegations of management cover-up at the lab. (AP Photo/Jake Schoellkopf)

The two men were reinstated by UC this month after their allegations of a cover-up were made public.

The report comes as the Energy Department is reviewing whether it should break UC's contract to manage Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the nation's two nuclear weapons labs with combined annual budgets of more than $3 billion.

In addition, the FBI is conducting a criminal investigation at the lab and in November executed a search warrant to look for missing property. Two congressional committees and the General Accounting Office also are looking into the business operations of both Los Alamos and Livermore.

The report heightened concern about the lab's management among lawmakers and lab critics in Washington.

"It confirms that the culture at the lab is one that fostered a sense of entitlement by certain employees that they could get away with stealing from the taxpayer", said Rep. James Greenwood (R-Pa.), who heads an report published the lab's official inventory of missing and stolen property, though it did not corroborate the accuracy of the list. In the last three years, the property included 204 desktop computers, 42 laptops, 12 cameras, 80 telephones and 127 printers, among other equipment, the Inspector General said.

The listed value of those items is about $1.5 million, though the Inspector General did not independently verify that tally.

Not addressed in the report were other theft allegations, including reports by Walp and Doran that a lab employee used a credit card issued by the lab to buy a $30,000 Ford Mustang and another employee used her lab credit card to obtain $2,500 in cash at a casino.

Counterintelligence officials have raised concerns that the missing computers may contain sensitive or classified information, a risk that was not addressed by lab officials before the problem became public, the Inspector General said.

Not until December, after Walp and Doran's firings, did the laboratory issue a memo that concluded that no classified information was contained on the lost or stolen computers.

That finding was not addressed by the Inspector General.


Systemic Weaknesses

The report detailed systemic weaknesses at the lab in accounting for property and properly controlling government funds. For instance, Los Alamos permits outside deliveries to numerous "drop points" around the massive campus, including "open spaces with little or no security" that do not allow equipment to be properly inventoried.

Investigators also found the lab had created a culture that failed to hold employees accountable. Indeed, just before an annual Energy Department inspection lab officials issued a so-called survival guide to employees that warned " handwritten notes can be especially damaging ... they are not easily disavowed." It also contained the warning to employees not to "spill your guts."

Another document told the lab's internal auditors "to not use information in a manner that could be perceived as detrimental to the University of California," the lab or the audit office.

The whistle-blowers fired in November viewed the investigation's findings as a vindication.

"We've been saying the lab is riddled with theft and mismanagement and that certain mid- and high-level managers had taken a very cavalier and nonchalant approach to this crime and mismanagement ," Walp said.

"The report overwhelmingly confirms everything we've been saying. We also felt there were blatant efforts to cover up some of this activity, including intimidation of employees, and all for the protection of this contract, the golden calf."

Walp, former head of the Pennsylvania State Police, and Doran, former Idaho City police chief, were rehired by UC this month to assist with its continuing investigation into the theft and financial fraud. Separately, the Energy Department has suspended Christopher Steele, a senior government safety official at the lab, after he pushed an investigation into improper storage of plutonium and what he considered other unsafe handling of radioactive material.

Steele's suspension was disclosed this week and was not addressed in the new report.

The Inspector General said it did not offer evidence that top management at the lab deliberately hid criminal activity, which interim director Nanos said was an important finding. But the report did find they took a number of actions that "obscured serious property management and security problems."

"It is devastating," said Peter Stockton, an investigator with the watchdog group Project on Government Oversight, which has made many of the disclosures about the lab's problems
. "It is a nail in the coffin of the contract."

If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.com/archives. For information about reprinting this article, go to www.lats.com/rights.



Back to Hotsheets

 

More Lapses Found at Los Alamos

Newly listed safety violations uncovered by the government at the nuclear laboratory include exposures to plutonium.

By Rebecca Trounson
Times Staff Writer
Copyright 2003 Los Angeles Times
April 19, 2003


The U.S. Department of Energy announced Friday that it had found a series of new safety violations at Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratory, including a 2002 incident in which seven lab workers were exposed to "significant plutonium contamination."

The announcement, which adds to brewing concerns among federal officials about safety and management at the lab, was made days before the department is due to decide whether to renew the University of California's contract to run the facility.

The department's National Nuclear Security Administration said the lab had violated nuclear safety rules in at least half a dozen incidents from 2000 to 2002.

During one of those, in March 2002, seven workers "received uptakes" of small amounts of radioactive plutonium after a worker cut through a plutonium-contaminated copper pipe without appropriate safety analysis, planning or controls, according to an April 16 letter from Linton F. Brooks, the department's acting chief for nuclear weapons, to lab officials.

Brooks wrote that "significant plutonium contamination was spread throughout the room." The incident took place in the Los Alamos facility known as TA-55, the only facility in the nation authorized to handle all phases of plutonium work.

Although no one suffered serious harm, that was the result of "fortuitous circumstances," not of effective controls or procedures, Brooks wrote.

Another violation, in September 2002, involved two workers who climbed to the roof of a lab building without authorization while X-rays were being taken inside of weapons components, potentially exposing the workers to hazardous levels of radiation. They were not harmed.

Brooks also cited "multiple" safety violations at several lab buildings containing experimental nuclear reactors.

None of the incidents caused "significant consequences" for lab workers, the public or the environment, energy officials found.

"We are taking this action because of the long-standing problem of Los Alamos management to recognize and address nuclear safety deficiencies at an institutional level," said Bryan Wilkes, spokesman for the National Nuclear Security Administration, which oversees the nation's nuclear weapons complex.

UC and Los Alamos officials said Friday the Energy Department's criticisms were a matter of great concern, although not a surprise.

"These incidents have been known to us for some time and the problems are being resolved," said UC spokesman Michael Reese. "We take these and all safety violations extremely seriously and we have been and will continue to work with the Energy Department to make the necessary improvements."

Lab spokesman Jim Danneskiold said the announcement Friday followed a series of contacts between the lab's leadership and Energy Department officials. The laboratory "is taking aggressive steps to address these issues," he said. "We are fully committed to trying to prevent any recurrence of these problems."

Citing the significance of the violations, Energy Department officials said they were assessing a $385,000 fine, although Los Alamos, as a nonprofit institution, is exempt from paying it. This was the second time in five months the lab has been cited for safety violations: A $220,000 fine was assessed in December for unsafe storage of plutonium-contaminated waste.

As a result of the most recent violations, Los Alamos managers will be required to give monthly briefings to Energy Department officials on steps being taken to resolve the problems. The first such briefing is set for next week.

The University of California is scrambling to hang onto the contract it has held for 60 years to run Los Alamos for the Department of Energy.

In recent months, the university's management of Los Alamos has come under intense federal scrutiny because of allegations of widespread theft and financial fraud at the New Mexico facility.

In response to those problems, many of which were made public by two whistle-blowing investigators in November, the university instituted a series of reforms and replaced or reassigned all top managers at the lab, including its director.

Brooks, in fact, praised the lab's new management in his April 16 letter, saying his latest dealings with lab officials represent "a significant ... improvement over prior interactions" with Los Alamos managers.

Energy Department officials have said they will make a decision by April 30 whether to break UC's contract to run Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, its sister nuclear weapons facility.


Lab Scandal Hurts University of California Contract
57 minutes ago 31 January 2003 11:00 a.m.
By MICHELLE LOCKE, Associated Press Writer


BERKELEY, Calif. - A fraud scandal at the Los Alamos laboratory is threatening the storied, 60-year partnership between the government and the University of California that produced both the atomic bomb and the hydrogen bomb.

The university, on the strength of such faculty stars as J. Robert Oppenheimer and Ernest O. Lawrence, has run the Los Alamos, N.M., lab for the government since it was created during World War II as the headquarters of the secret Manhattan Project to build the bomb.

But the scandal has raised questions about UC's management ability and led some members of Congress and other critics to suggest that it may be time to put the contract up for bid. UC's contract expires in 2005, but either side can terminate it at any time.

"I made clear to them that, No. 1, their contract is in jeopardy and, No. 2, one way or another things have to dramatically change with regards to procurement and management of material at the site," said Rep. Jim Greenwood, R-Pa., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee's oversight and investigations panel, which is investigating the lab.

Los Alamos has been rocked by allegations of $2.7 million in missing computers and other property and widespread misuse of lab-issued credit cards, including an attempt by a lab employee to buy a souped-up Ford Mustang for $20,000.

The allegations were compounded by charges of a management cover-up after two internal investigators who reported the thefts were fired in November. In recent weeks, the lab director has stepped down, and other top officials have been reassigned.

Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham has given his staff until April 30 to evaluate UC's performance.

UC said in a statement that it has taken aggressive action to address the shortcomings, including instituting a management shake-up. University officials spent the week in Washington, trying to restore confidence in their management.

In addition to running Los Alamos, UC has managed the Lawrence Livermore weapons laboratory in Northern California since its creation in 1952, largely on the initiative of Los Alamos scientist Edward Teller. But the Livermore contract does not appear to be as seriously jeopardized.
The relationship between UC and the government has had lots of ups and downs over the years, and the labs have been rocked by scandal before — the botched espionage case against Los Alamos scientist Wen Ho Lee (news - web sites), the $1 billion overrun in Livermore's effort to build a superlaser, the 1950s unmasking of Los Alamos scientist Klaus Fuchs as a Soviet spy.

But the latest furor "may be the biggest challenge yet," said Herb York, a veteran of the labs who headed Lawrence Livermore in the 1950s.
Los Alamos has a budget of $1.7 billion and about 7,500 UC employees. Under its laboratory-management contracts with the Energy Department, UC gets $17 million in reimbursement for costs and up to about $18 million in performance-based fees.

The question of whether UC should remain as lab manager has been coming up for years.

After World War II ended with Hiroshima and Nagasaki laid waste by Los Alamos scientists' handiwork, UC was reluctant to continue the partnership. The university has said it manages the labs because the government wants it to, not because UC wants to.

Despite the occasional clash, the contract has never been put out for bid. UC has long maintained that it would not compete if that happened.
With the latest scandal, "clearly there is a growing sentiment among many of our members to put the contract out for open bidding," said Ken Johnson, spokesman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

Among potential suitors is the University of Texas, which in December made an unsuccessful bid to run Sandia National Laboratories, and has Bush administration connections.

Removing UC — at a time when the country is contemplating war with Iraq — would be a substantial task. The 15,500 UC employees at Los Alamos and Livermore work on everything from ascertaining if aging nuclear warheads still work to defending against biological or chemical attack.

"You have to think about the good of the program and the benefit to the nation of that program and whether you can move all of the expertise, which you can't," said UC defender Sen. Dianne Feinstein , D-Calif.


On the Net: http://www.ucop.edu/news/archives/2003/jan16art3.htm


setstats 1

setstats 1

9:11 PM 10/01/2004


Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1